long articles?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)
Ugh can someone concise mordys post 4me pls
― MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)
or any new yorker article
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)
there's a website that specializes in these: http://longform.org nb they probably should've just called themselves essays.org
― Mordy, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:40 (ten years ago)
yes i understand that the term has some currency
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:41 (ten years ago)
i find it a useful term to lump in all narrative, investigatory, or literary nonfiction articles that are over a certain length - i.e. the kind of stuff lots of people, including myself, want to read.
― Karl Rove Knausgård (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:44 (ten years ago)
admit that there's something aesthetically displeasing about the term
― Karl Rove Knausgård (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:45 (ten years ago)
there's also longreads dot com which popularized the word i thinki use it as a way to get my reading-averse students interested in reading
― La Lechuza (La Lechera), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:57 (ten years ago)
Just got out of a meeting, maybe this belongs on some business jargon thread, but "client-facing." As in, " Please don't include the Search Channel Specialists on client-facing emails." This started popping up frequently in the past few weeks, is it a buzz word now?
― Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:01 (ten years ago)
-facing is a common usage these days (outward-facing = public? vs internal i guess)idk
jargon is disgusting
― La Lechuza (La Lechera), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:08 (ten years ago)
Xxpost 2015 Best American Toolongdidn'treads
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:14 (ten years ago)
When the tedium is intense, business jargon can inject some brief excitement into the day. embracing it with real enthusiasm is a sign of desperation.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:23 (ten years ago)
Otm re 'stop by', also e.g. 'the Forget singer will appear...'― kinder, Monday, December 14, 2015 1:34 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post PermalinkWell isn't "appear" as in an "appearance"? I thought that was more of a professional term.
― kinder, Monday, December 14, 2015 1:34 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Well isn't "appear" as in an "appearance"? I thought that was more of a professional term.
I meant the phrasing 'the X singer' where X is literally any song they have released; I really hate it and it's everywhere
― kinder, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:42 (ten years ago)
Alternative to client-facing?
― MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:48 (ten years ago)
emails that may be seen by clients?
as I sit here at my desk I am (roughly) facing the north pole. while it would be accurate to call me a north-pole-facing ilxor, this seems to say something more than it does.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:54 (ten years ago)
what's a search channel specialist?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:56 (ten years ago)
Client-facing is useful b/c it succinctly describes a lot of different things that are intended for, likely to be used by clients, as well as positions that involve directly interacting with clients.
It's a neologism but that doesn't mean it's bad, and it's not even jargon, IMO.
― Je55e, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:59 (ten years ago)
I guess "client-side" preceded "client-facing," but the latter isn't any worse.
― Je55e, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 20:00 (ten years ago)
"raise awareness", "provide support"
basically all modern uses of "support" as some vast vague sea in which the concept of "help" is drowning
― japanese mage (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:53 (ten years ago)
that's my job man :/
― djfartin (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:55 (ten years ago)
I mean yeah you are right these thoughts have occured
yeah it's not the delivery of it or its existence - more like... why can't we explain it more clearly?
sometimes weak laws or legal blind spots lead to weak language though, so perhaps i'm blaming the victim...
― japanese mage (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:58 (ten years ago)
(sorry if i seemed dismissive - i'm coming at it from the side of helping people also!)
― japanese mage (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:59 (ten years ago)
nah it doesn't seem dismissive I have had literally the same thoughts
also I have to explain to people quite often what "support" isn't i.e. magical bypassing of somebody's actual abilities
― djfartin (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2015 11:00 (ten years ago)
i guess it feels like an inevitable failure when the state tries to find a universal language to talk about helping very individual problems
― japanese mage (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 16 December 2015 11:19 (ten years ago)
Where I work it's support for search engine marketing campaigns.
― Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 16 December 2015 16:23 (ten years ago)
army brat
― conrad, Wednesday, 16 December 2015 21:33 (ten years ago)
I keep seeing internet nerds using "nonsense / nonsense on stilts" -- I'm sure that sounded witty when Jeremy Bentham first said it but now uuuuuuugh.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 17 December 2015 04:10 (ten years ago)
"Convo" for "conversation." Just around the corner: such-and-such a player is "in the convo" for MVP.
― clemenza, Sunday, 20 December 2015 23:20 (ten years ago)
"mic drop"
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 21 December 2015 17:32 (ten years ago)
"no fucks to give" in relation to Obama is waaaay played-out
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Monday, 21 December 2015 17:40 (ten years ago)
visioning
― home organ, Monday, 21 December 2015 19:09 (ten years ago)
pretty much any of those annoying bloggy idioms becomes 10x more noxious when used in political commentary. It always reminds me of the college student govt kiss-asses trying to be cool
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 21 December 2015 20:46 (ten years ago)
the false excitement of "pop-up"
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 23 December 2015 20:17 (ten years ago)
turning nouns into verbs by adding "up."
manning upchanging up
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 December 2015 20:29 (ten years ago)
shut up
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 December 2015 20:31 (ten years ago)
(sorry couldn't resist)
The worst is "cowgirl up"
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 23 December 2015 20:36 (ten years ago)
I'm afraid to ask what that means
― La Lechuza (La Lechera), Wednesday, 23 December 2015 20:51 (ten years ago)
Not really. What does that mean?
variation on "man up"
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 23 December 2015 20:53 (ten years ago)
I got IA at "blew up" used sixteen times in an NPR piece today e.g. "it blew up on social media"
― mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Wednesday, 23 December 2015 21:25 (ten years ago)
"grow a pair"
― mutually aquatinted (doo dah), Wednesday, 23 December 2015 22:08 (ten years ago)
ok what is a "fuckboy" -- it feels like a failed attempt by resentful dorks to slut-shame more attractive men.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 28 January 2016 20:26 (ten years ago)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2015/08/18/what_does_fuckboy_mean.html
― Mordy, Thursday, 28 January 2016 20:29 (ten years ago)
I now don't understand at all.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 28 January 2016 20:41 (ten years ago)
"a worthless human" is the only definition you need to know
― clouds, Thursday, 28 January 2016 20:50 (ten years ago)
insult that sounds like a homophobic slur, but really it totally isn't!
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Friday, 29 January 2016 17:28 (ten years ago)
Rather than resentful (male) dorks, I think it mostly comes from the mouths of resentful girls these days.
― The only stan who actually ruins their faves for others (Hiisi), Sunday, 31 January 2016 07:53 (ten years ago)
I hit the point recently where the word "intersectionality" makes me want to throw a television out a window. I think it's a combination of (1) its frequent use by condescending little shits (2) the sense of wheel-reinvention it has (as though this is the first generation to notice that there is interplay between race, class, gender, etc.) (3) its vaguely pseudoscientific ring, as though it were describing something you could plot out on a graph or chart and (4) the fact that it often seems to be used in place of actual insight into the ways race/class/gender/sexuality, um, intersect, like instead of actually saying anything thoughtful about the topic, you can just say "intersectionality" and be done. I got particularly mad when some young blogger accused Gloria Steinem of not understanding intersectionality, as though the debate about race and class in feminism hasn't been going on for decades, like it has never occurred to Gloria fucking Steinem before that such a thing exists.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Saturday, 13 February 2016 05:01 (ten years ago)