itt: consternation and wailing about Zach Snyder's upcoming SUPERMAN/BATMAN film/sequel to MAN OF STEEL -- official title: BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2642 of them)

The preview seems to be saying "this movie will be kind of funny in Act I, absolutely godawful in Act II, and then Act III will be almost redeemed by the presence of Gal Gadot"

El Tomboto, Saturday, 5 December 2015 00:50 (ten years ago)

So basically if you really just want to see a few minutes of Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman you should buy a ticket, but otherwise you should not

El Tomboto, Saturday, 5 December 2015 00:51 (ten years ago)

BTW Gal Gadot? WS

El Tomboto, Saturday, 5 December 2015 00:54 (ten years ago)

So basically if you really just want to see a few minutes of Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman you should buy a ticket, but otherwise you should not

so torn...

ryan, Saturday, 5 December 2015 00:55 (ten years ago)

this is gonna be a slash flick

Hammer Smashed Bagels, Saturday, 5 December 2015 00:58 (ten years ago)

Consider buying a ticket to another movie that starts 20 minutes before this one ends, then wandering in to the wrong theater by sheer accident.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 5 December 2015 01:27 (ten years ago)

I hope they can scare up a pair of shorts for Doomsday

a silly gif of awkward larping (Sparkle Motion), Saturday, 5 December 2015 08:13 (ten years ago)

Why is Ben Affleck doing Batman with a marble-mouthed Jimmy Stewart/Martin Sheen voice?

Chuck_Tatum, Saturday, 5 December 2015 12:18 (ten years ago)

Terrible as it looks, it's a nice contrast to the increasingly risk averse cookie cutter Marvel shit that people still pretend is supposed to be exciting

tsrobodo, Saturday, 5 December 2015 12:34 (ten years ago)

I love that argument. It's basically - "say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, at least it's an ethos"

Number None, Saturday, 5 December 2015 12:40 (ten years ago)

ah come on, you can't compare the nazis to this film

japanese mage (LocalGarda), Saturday, 5 December 2015 12:55 (ten years ago)

Movie will probably kill 6 million brain cells

Hammer Smashed Bagels, Saturday, 5 December 2015 12:59 (ten years ago)

Making it that much easier to enjoy the third installment

tsrobodo, Saturday, 5 December 2015 13:17 (ten years ago)

one month passes...

https://www.reddit.com/r/DC_Cinematic/comments/3ytdgv/saw_bvs_last_night_in_la/#spoiler

Bullshit? Real? Who cares!

Professor Goodfeels (kingfish), Thursday, 14 January 2016 00:00 (ten years ago)

This Batman will come across as a villain to some viewers; he enjoys inflicting pain on criminals. There was a scene where he was branding a criminal, and he had the biggest smile on his face.

i believe it

Copy rights, pleasing all star wars fans, hiring professionals. (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 14 January 2016 00:46 (ten years ago)

look at this pasty motherfucker

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--qYlORJFZ--/oufv9pl3vesnldnpuc4q.jpg

Butt here is always time for the John Mayer Trio or Sting. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 27 January 2016 14:06 (ten years ago)

Me am Bizarro!

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 27 January 2016 14:08 (ten years ago)

Glad to see Snyder's apparently doubling down on ignoring every previous depiction of Superman as a generally benevolent dude.

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 27 January 2016 14:10 (ten years ago)

edward superhands

Butt here is always time for the John Mayer Trio or Sting. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 27 January 2016 14:14 (ten years ago)

Superman v Batman: Come At Me Bro

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 27 January 2016 14:30 (ten years ago)

face looks like Ted Cruz

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 27 January 2016 17:24 (ten years ago)

The capitalised 'Of' is enough to ensure I will never willingly watch this.

Millsner, Thursday, 28 January 2016 12:56 (ten years ago)

You misunderstand. 'Dawn Of' is the name of

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Thursday, 28 January 2016 13:19 (ten years ago)

two weeks pass...

ONE MORE TRAILER

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cle_rKBpZ28

As Oliver Wang put it, "Some trailer editor got really coked up before sitting down to make this."

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:00 (ten years ago)

The Lego sets are out:

http://brickset.com/sets/theme-DC-Comics-Super-Heroes/subtheme-Batman-v-Superman-Dawn-of-Justice

They are...Enh. The forklift & kryptonite assembly looks neat, and here's your Jesse Eisenberg rendered into Minifig form:

http://images.brickset.com/sets/AdditionalImages/76046-1/76046_alt11.jpg

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:18 (ten years ago)

legos are so angry now

Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:24 (ten years ago)

Possibly, but minifigs had blank smiles for their first 20+ years of existence, so any chance from that would be considered as dramatic.

Plus he's a bad guy, cmon, in a grunt Zac Snyder movie. The odds of him showing those pearlies are not high. Lex Luthor is a character not given to beautific demonstrations, even when successfully stealing 40 cakes.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:28 (ten years ago)

Well, Snyder-related Legos, anyway.

It just occurred to me that pre-propecia Lex is kind of a perfect Lego figure.

maybe my clam is just more toxic (Old Lunch), Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:29 (ten years ago)

How so? I kinda dig that they were able to communicate his rumbled suit coat & shirt, and the wrinkle lines of his body piece match those in his face.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:36 (ten years ago)

Plus he's a bad guy, cmon, in a grunt Zac Snyder movie

yeah it's not out of place for him but it just reminded me of how the majority of lego faces now are angry (or come with two versions - angry AND smirky!)

Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:42 (ten years ago)

xpost Pop off his hair and you instantly have the next movie's iteration of LL (presumably).

maybe my clam is just more toxic (Old Lunch), Thursday, 11 February 2016 17:49 (ten years ago)

He smiles in the previous trailer! A really creepy high-energy one, but Lex has always struck me as pretty cheery when not focussing on Superman (which admittedly is 99% of the time). He's basically Trump's self-image.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 12 February 2016 09:35 (ten years ago)

lol, otm

Butt here is always time for the John Mayer Trio or Sting. (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 12 February 2016 12:19 (ten years ago)

Yeah, the post-Crisis Lex has generally been depicted as someone who enjoys the life, not a frowner.

Tuomas, Friday, 12 February 2016 12:35 (ten years ago)

purple & green power suit Lex also loved flying around and fucking shit up when Superman wasn't around to bring out his baldness resentment

glandular lansbury (sic), Friday, 12 February 2016 13:50 (ten years ago)

The best thing about this film so far is that I still want to see it even after three trailers. I can't remember the last movie where I felt like that.

bored at work (snoball), Friday, 12 February 2016 18:49 (ten years ago)

OTOH, these trailers seem to indicate that Snyder is doubling down on his refusal to acknowledge the way these characters (or Superman, at least) have been historically represented and the reasons why those depictions have appeal, so he can take another long walk off a short pier AFAIC. Sorry for the harsh invective, but that's just how I feel.

maybe my clam is just more toxic (Old Lunch), Friday, 12 February 2016 18:54 (ten years ago)

I hope this bombs so hard

but it probably won't

Οὖτις, Friday, 12 February 2016 18:55 (ten years ago)

It's an fx-heavy action movie with "Batman" in the title. It'll more than make back its budget and advert campaign no matter how terrible it is.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 12 February 2016 18:59 (ten years ago)

Batman and Robin
Production Budget 125M
Domestic 107M
Foreign 131M

probably didn't make a profit. but then again the international market is bigger now.

remove butt (abanana), Friday, 12 February 2016 20:11 (ten years ago)

my understand is that when the film started to run into financial trouble, arnold just went to get some more diamonds, from his hideout.

the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Friday, 12 February 2016 20:13 (ten years ago)

The intl market is what I'm referring to. Flick could make like only("only") $150-200m in America and will still pull in more than $300-400m everywhere else even in it's uncontesably shite.

I'm kinda curious how high the returns have to be and still be considered "underperforming" by idiotic yet terrified studio execs staking their entire "hot-shotting a universe" maneuver on this flick not tanking so hard it kills any DC cinematic outing for 5 years.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 12 February 2016 20:49 (ten years ago)

Hey hey hey the international market is larger but not less discerning - The Dark Knight made most of its money in the US, for example.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 12 February 2016 21:28 (ten years ago)

two weeks pass...

snyder:

Over the last two years he’s basically been Superman as pop culture would know him. He’s been righting wrongs, there have been floods, mines have collapsed, bridges have collapsed, churches have caught on fire. He’s basically been a hero.

When we find him, he’s been dealing with the everyday world of being a superhero, but there’s a paradigm shift happening, in that the unintended consequences of some of those rescues are starting to come into fruition. He’s starting to see that every action has a reaction. Like, if you’re just taking a cat out of a tree, you can’t touch anything or the arborists will say, ‘He damaged the tree branch when he got the cat down.’ Or, ‘The cat wasn’t neutered, so now there’s thousands of cats.’ There’s no winning any more for Superman.

so basically we're going from seeing inexperienced hero who levels a city and kills his opponent to a movie about the public turning against him and skipping over entirely all the fun heroic stuff in the middle? another fantastic creative decision from visionary director zack snyder

I dont want my hamster to eat meat cuz it could think im food (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:36 (ten years ago)

Although I was already planning on skipping it, nothing has made me want to see the movie less than that passage. Not even just for the fact that he seems hellbent to suck allllllll of the fun out of Superman (for which, fuck him) but largely because...does he think that's a compelling framework around which to build a story? Really? That's like a one-off issue of the comic, dealing with the annoyances of unintended consequences, and then you get the fuck on with the good shit next month.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:43 (ten years ago)

Like, if you’re just taking a cat out of a tree, you can’t touch anything or the arborists will say, ‘He damaged the tree branch when he got the cat down.’

oh yeah this is brilliant. i definitely want to give the mind that thought this up my money. /s

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:49 (ten years ago)

xp seems like a hangover from watchmen really - 'c'mon guys real superheroes would be terrifying monsters!' the idea that superheroes can work on any other level seems utterly alien to him. i wonder what he thought of ant-man or gotg?

I dont want my hamster to eat meat cuz it could think im food (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:49 (ten years ago)

Zach Snyder on Ant-Man:

But I feel like Batman and Superman are transcendent of superhero movies in a way, because they’re Batman and Superman. They’re not just, like, the flavour of the week Ant-Man – not to be mean, but whatever it is. What is the next Blank-Man?

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:51 (ten years ago)

arborists

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:53 (ten years ago)

I want a Superman movie that is just rescuing cats from trees. Was that really ever a thing? My cat climbs trees, then climbs down. He should rescue dogs from trees, because what the hell?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:53 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.