Words, usages, and phrases that annoy the shit out of you...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (12604 of them)

That is annoying, in part because the original title relies on the assonance between 'what' and 'love' to give it balance. You can't just stick any word there and get the same effect.

jmm, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 15:34 (ten years ago)

yeah, I feel like I have posted about/we have discussed that somewhere before. I similarly hate "The Unbearable Lightness of ____" "A Farewell to ___" or pretty much any unearned use of a literary title, particularly where the new title has little to do with the referenced work other than sounding catchy.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 15:39 (ten years ago)

When people refer to music —or any art, for that matter— as "smart."

Austin, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 15:40 (ten years ago)

Oddly, no one ever uses "Will You Please ___ Please" or "Where I'm ___ing From"

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 15:44 (ten years ago)

'[cultural product] is a poor man's [more critically acclaimed cultural product]'

Mumford and Sons are a poor man's Fleet Foxes.

'I'll see your [cultural product] and raise you [more obscure cultural product]'

I see your Mumford and Sons, and raise you Trampled By Turtles.

subtext (for both): 'my taste is better than yours, [internet message board poster]!'

scarlett bohansson (unregistered), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:01 (ten years ago)

The "see you __ and raise you __" one doesn't even make sense. If you see someone's bet of 10 and raise them 5, you're not saying 5 is better than 10.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:02 (ten years ago)

OTM

Austin, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:04 (ten years ago)

"Let's chat with [talk to] some of those folks [clients/vendors]. I'll send a note [an email]"

The needlessly precious terminology is getting irritating. I think it's to encourage a rapport with contacts that constantly feels like friends getting tea and "catching up", but it comes off as forced to me.

Evan, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:19 (ten years ago)

i prefer notes being sent over emails being shot

mookieproof, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:21 (ten years ago)

Heh, that's fair.

Evan, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:24 (ten years ago)

Are you in the UK? In America all people doing any kind of business have spoken like they are always leaning back in their office chairs, about to launch a crumpled paper ball across the room into a trash can, for at least the last 25 years.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:43 (ten years ago)

No, I'm in America. But yeah that vibe is starting to grate more for me when forced.

Evan, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:58 (ten years ago)

three weeks pass...

stop using 'goals' as an adjective!

scarlett bohansson (unregistered), Sunday, 6 December 2015 15:06 (ten years ago)

i.e. 'your hair is goals','your relationship is goals'. stop it.

scarlett bohansson (unregistered), Sunday, 6 December 2015 15:07 (ten years ago)

That's a new one for me -- what does that mean? Usage demographic?

La Lechuza (La Lechera), Sunday, 6 December 2015 15:29 (ten years ago)

Your hair looks great?

La Lechuza (La Lechera), Sunday, 6 December 2015 15:30 (ten years ago)

basically 'I aspire to make my hair look as great as yours'. I'm pretty sure it started out as a hashtag but then people started inserting it into sentences because that's what people do on twitter.

scarlett bohansson (unregistered), Sunday, 6 December 2015 15:49 (ten years ago)

Well the good news is that it'll probably pass soon enough.

La Lechuza (La Lechera), Sunday, 6 December 2015 18:18 (ten years ago)

New to me, too. I'm going to test it to see if I can annoy #goals

mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Sunday, 6 December 2015 18:56 (ten years ago)

"it's worth pointing out" please stop

reginald lin (alomar lines), Monday, 7 December 2015 00:05 (ten years ago)

xp idk if it's the oline in particular, although they haven't exactly shone. eagles have blitzed well and pass def should be the thing they do best. but NE also made it too easy for them by dropping back to pass too often.

Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 7 December 2015 00:17 (ten years ago)

rong thread obv

Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 7 December 2015 00:19 (ten years ago)

When an obviously planned performance/interview is described as someone "stopping by" ("Lianne La Havas stopped by the NPR Music offices to play two new songs — "What You Don't Do" and "Unstoppable" — as well as "Forget," from her first album, at the Tiny Desk.") I'm sure that was cutesy the first few times but it's so grating now.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 14 December 2015 02:23 (ten years ago)

on point

Iago Galdston, Monday, 14 December 2015 03:09 (ten years ago)

"sunsetting" - corporate speak for retiring logos, mission statements, etc.

I would like to sunset people every time they uses this phrase.

Darin, Monday, 14 December 2015 07:52 (ten years ago)

Otm re 'stop by', also e.g. 'the Forget singer will appear...'

kinder, Monday, 14 December 2015 13:34 (ten years ago)

Well isn't "appear" as in an "appearance"? I thought that was more of a professional term. "Stopped by" is so forced folksy. "Nobel-prize-winning economist Joseph Stieglitz stopped by the studio, you know, to just shoot the shit about his studies calling into question the efficient market hypothesis. We happened to have our lil old tape machine running, give it a listen."

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 14 December 2015 18:33 (ten years ago)

It is kind of annoying--though sometimes it's preferable to the claim that "(Band) played an in-studio concert for us" when its just the singer and guitarist doing an acoustic set of two songs with the interns hooting in the background.

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Monday, 14 December 2015 18:49 (ten years ago)

If you're being interviewed, you're probably really busy. they are literally "stopping by to chat". Somebody kill me.

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 14 December 2015 23:23 (ten years ago)

"long reads"

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:16 (ten years ago)

aren't these just called articles. or essays

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:16 (ten years ago)

long articles

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:20 (ten years ago)

longticles

Doctor Casino, important war pigeon (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:23 (ten years ago)

it's just a way for people to low-key humblebrag. by posting "great longread in ____ on _____" on twitter you're subtly saying "look at me, i can read more than 1000 words at once"

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:25 (ten years ago)

"this link might not be for everyone. there are a LOT of words in it. but for those of you who are smart like me..."

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:25 (ten years ago)

i saw a "best longreads of 2015" link on twitter today

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:26 (ten years ago)

i can read more than 1000 words at once

huh at most I can read maybe a dozen words at once

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:28 (ten years ago)

imho ymmv there are ppl who like reading longform non-fiction and for them the neologism has some value in terms of locating more things to read (nb i sub to 2 ilx longform threads)

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:36 (ten years ago)

what is long-form

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:38 (ten years ago)

how is it different than an essay or an investigative piece or

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)

long articles?

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)

Ugh can someone concise mordys post 4me pls

MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)

or any new yorker article

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)

there's a website that specializes in these: http://longform.org nb they probably should've just called themselves essays.org

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:40 (ten years ago)

yes i understand that the term has some currency

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:41 (ten years ago)

i find it a useful term to lump in all narrative, investigatory, or literary nonfiction articles that are over a certain length - i.e. the kind of stuff lots of people, including myself, want to read.

Karl Rove Knausgård (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:44 (ten years ago)

admit that there's something aesthetically displeasing about the term

Karl Rove Knausgård (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:45 (ten years ago)

there's also longreads dot com which popularized the word i think
i use it as a way to get my reading-averse students interested in reading

La Lechuza (La Lechera), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:57 (ten years ago)

Just got out of a meeting, maybe this belongs on some business jargon thread, but "client-facing." As in, " Please don't include the Search Channel Specialists on client-facing emails." This started popping up frequently in the past few weeks, is it a buzz word now?

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:01 (ten years ago)

-facing is a common usage these days (outward-facing = public? vs internal i guess)
idk

jargon is disgusting

La Lechuza (La Lechera), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 19:08 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.