a clown car full of millionaires: the 2016 presidential primary thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7793 of them)

the right will never accept that their ideas have been rejected. There will always be a problem with the messenger.

Why because she True and Interesting (President Keyes), Monday, 9 November 2015 14:50 (ten years ago)

You may be right, but yr TruCons always say that nominating a conservative hasn't really even been tried. Not since Ronaldus Magnus, and Goldwater before him (whose role was to announce the coming savior like John the Baptist).

Nominating a loser milquetoast moderate, a McRomney 3.0, DEFINITELY won't quash this narrative. The narrative will continue to be that True Conservatives were Stabbed in the Back by The Establishment(tm). So please let's let them try a conservative-approved nominee this time. A Cruz, a Carson, a Palin or Perry type - please, yes, bring it on.

No, it may not completely kill that talking point, but it may make it look more ridiculous than it already is.

uhaul and oates (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 9 November 2015 15:12 (ten years ago)

Nearly everyone already knows it's ridiculous, and that Cruz etc. are money sponges dipping themselves into a sea of angry old white people--but as long as that money is still out there...

Conservatives have one basic narrative: They lost the '64 election and everyone said they were history, and then they came back and basically took over the country 16 years later by remaining pure

Why because she True and Interesting (President Keyes), Monday, 9 November 2015 15:19 (ten years ago)

the right will never accept that their ideas have been rejected. There will always be a problem with the messenger.

OTM.

Austin, Monday, 9 November 2015 15:20 (ten years ago)

The flipside of this is that I'm increasingly convinced that the "moderate" clown car participants are there hoping to lose to the Twue Conservative, so that after the latter crashes and burns in the general election, the former can basically say "I told you so" and present themselves next time around as the Electable Best Chance To Oust Hillary. I mean otherwise I can't fathom what Christie is still doing in this race.

Frump 'n' Dump (Doctor Casino), Monday, 9 November 2015 15:48 (ten years ago)

That they're looking that far ahead to essentially be able to say "Told ya so!" is so obnoxious. I mean, it's just conjecture that that's what someone like, say, Christie is doing. But I can totally see that being the case.

Austin, Monday, 9 November 2015 16:11 (ten years ago)

Christie is still in the race because most of his potential backers signed on with Jeb and sees blood in that water

Why because she True and Interesting (President Keyes), Monday, 9 November 2015 16:12 (ten years ago)

In my dreams I see a Goldwater-esque 35% popular vote ass kicking in 2016 but far all I know candidate Carson/Trump/Cruz will end up with 45% and me weeping for america

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 9 November 2015 17:27 (ten years ago)

Nah, they don't have that much of a chance.

Do they?

Austin, Monday, 9 November 2015 17:28 (ten years ago)

never underestimate the stupidity of the american voter

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 9 November 2015 17:29 (ten years ago)

Well I live with three Fox News junkies, so I guess I should know better.

Austin, Monday, 9 November 2015 17:33 (ten years ago)

45% would be a pretty disastrous loss (and there's no way they would carry the electoral college with that percentage cuz it wouldn't include certain states they would need to win)

Οὖτις, Monday, 9 November 2015 17:34 (ten years ago)

Whoever gets the republican nomination, including Carson, Trump, or Cruz, would soften their delivery of whatever the heck is considered to be True Conservatism today. The whole "extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" approach was thumped badly in 1964 that no one will venture onto that scorched earth again. This is not to say they would soften their actual positions, but only that the message will be made as innocuous sounding as possible, as with "compassionate conservatism".

After losing again, the fire-breathers will certainly blame the messenger once more.

Aimless, Monday, 9 November 2015 18:19 (ten years ago)

I dont want a disastrous loss I want a public humiliation thats unspinnable

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 9 November 2015 18:26 (ten years ago)

everything is spinnable in a fact-free zone

Οὖτις, Monday, 9 November 2015 18:31 (ten years ago)

I mean, there's no electoral outcome that will eradicate a strain of American politics that's been around forever

Οὖτις, Monday, 9 November 2015 18:31 (ten years ago)

Because no one who gets as close to the presidency as occupying the nomination of a major party is knowingly going to create a humiliating disaster, you'll need the most reckless and willfully blind and stupid nominee among the crowd. Trump is easily the most reckless, but Carson now seems to score highest when you average out all three of these qualities. Cruz is much less likely to fly straight into the mountainside.

Aimless, Monday, 9 November 2015 18:35 (ten years ago)

everything is spinnable in a fact-free zone

― Οὖτις, Monday, November 9, 2015 10:31 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

seriously, these guys will never admit defeat, they'll just keep whining about media bias and shit

brimstead, Monday, 9 November 2015 18:44 (ten years ago)

Pretty sure the new crop of nominees in waiting doesn't give a shot about Goldwater analogies.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 9 November 2015 19:03 (ten years ago)

they'll just keep whining about media bias and shit

millions of "illegals" voting

big fat rascal (will), Monday, 9 November 2015 19:17 (ten years ago)

"It is just the opinion of the 'experts' that I 'lost' the election."

Why because she True and Interesting (President Keyes), Monday, 9 November 2015 19:32 (ten years ago)

if only that obama didn't hand out all those free obamaphones and welfare foods we wouldnt be in this mess

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 9 November 2015 19:37 (ten years ago)

obamaphones are really just cases containing fake voter ID cards and instructions on performing abortions

Why because she True and Interesting (President Keyes), Monday, 9 November 2015 19:51 (ten years ago)

Best headline ever: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/11/ben-carson-may-have-never-stabbed-anyone.html

schwantz, Monday, 9 November 2015 20:18 (ten years ago)

or it was until this

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jeb-bush-baby-hitler?utm_content=buffer594e0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Comme Si, Kamasi (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 9 November 2015 21:07 (ten years ago)

More Carson shenanigans: http://gawker.com/is-ben-carson-lying-about-reading-psychology-today-as-a-1741482781

Austin, Monday, 9 November 2015 21:09 (ten years ago)

That's it, I'm voting Jeb!

Austin, Monday, 9 November 2015 21:10 (ten years ago)

xp it's really great, for a guy who honestly needed no embellishment to fill out his win column, that it's all of these little inconsequential absurdities that he's getting caught up in.

really enjoying this.

INTOXICATING LIQUORS (art), Monday, 9 November 2015 21:11 (ten years ago)

The Bush headline made me think of this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJJYVORSP_w

clemenza, Monday, 9 November 2015 21:13 (ten years ago)

I'm hoping that tomorrow Bush interrupts himself mid-thought somewhere and suddenly screams out "The ice is gonna break!"

Which really wouldn't be a bad description of what's happening on the Republican side of things.

clemenza, Monday, 9 November 2015 21:18 (ten years ago)

I've posted this years back, but I still can't remember where I first heard. The deepest of deep vote for many of these folks is that "Conservatism can never fail; it can only be failed."

Purves Grundy (kingfish), Monday, 9 November 2015 22:59 (ten years ago)

Deep core, rather. Stupid autocorrect.

Purves Grundy (kingfish), Monday, 9 November 2015 23:00 (ten years ago)

"I mean otherwise I can't fathom what Christie is still doing in this race."

He was an early leader, and while Dr Morbius is right about how much that 'objectively' means, it probably felt real good - he may be hoping for the Romney position (though as we were saying yesterday, that analogy is past its snapping point), or he may just be assuming that the indictment is coming down the track or it isn't, either way go big or go home.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 9 November 2015 23:19 (ten years ago)

https://whatimg.com/i/G5roZ3.jpg

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 9 November 2015 23:23 (ten years ago)

for a second i read that as a campaign promise, rather than a response to a hypothetical opportunity

Frump 'n' Dump (Doctor Casino), Monday, 9 November 2015 23:45 (ten years ago)

maybe he knows something we don't know

"if you elect me, time travel will be a reality!"

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:03 (ten years ago)

"If you elect me, I will go through every maternity ward in the country until I find the next Hitler."

nickn, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:04 (ten years ago)

Would vote for a time traveler.

Austin, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:09 (ten years ago)

maybe we already have...

Frump 'n' Dump (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:12 (ten years ago)

LOL at nickn!

schwantz, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:12 (ten years ago)

What kind of time traveler doesn't run on the platform of HEY GUYS I'M A FRIGGIN' TIME TRAVELER?

Austin, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:16 (ten years ago)

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/08/02/Arnie-460x276.jpg

Frump 'n' Dump (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:18 (ten years ago)

hey guys carson cleared up the whole fake test story - https://www.facebook.com/realbencarson/photos/a.143829065783568.1073741825.138691142964027/551604265006044/?type=3&theater

JoeStork, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 00:43 (ten years ago)

thanks for clearing that up Ben!

brownie, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 01:00 (ten years ago)

So a weakened Germany after WWI falls even weaker without any sort of leadership. Joseph Stalin notices this in the Fall of 1938, and invades Poland - his sights set on Western Europe by the end of Winter 1939. Nine million Europeans, including seven-million Jews and...

Nah, that's great that we've got a guy running for president who doesn't give a damn about what repercussions may come from traveling back in time and klling a baby. Maybe, as pro-life as he is, he should kidnap the baby, adopt it, take it back to Florida, and...

No, that one wouldn't work either. Janet Reno would bust into the closet where Bush and Baby Hitler were hiding and...

pplains, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 01:22 (ten years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pX4qZcjiv5U

RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 10 November 2015 02:30 (ten years ago)

Christie is still in the race because most of his potential backers signed on with Jeb and sees blood in that water

this feels right to me and is for me the most interesting/compelling narrative in the race right now. christie was as good as counted out not long ago but I think he's playing a "these guys are knocking themselves down" game

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 10 November 2015 02:59 (ten years ago)

christie's still in it because a) do we seriously believe that carson or trump are going to win the nomination? and if not, then why not him i guess and b) that 538 article pointed out that there are a lot of gop delegates in blue states, some of whom may be looking for a less batshit nominee, so yeah why not him

mookieproof, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 03:17 (ten years ago)

i mean rick santorum runs because he likes to feel important, and he finished second last time. christie surely does too, and he hasn't been out of office for a decade after losing by 18 points in his home state

mookieproof, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 03:20 (ten years ago)

Pretty much any president we vote for is going to kill some babies in the future.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 03:29 (ten years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.