a clown car full of millionaires: the 2016 presidential primary thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7793 of them)

oh then twitter people should stfu

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 16:41 (ten years ago)

like, ignore them completely, good move Bernie!

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 16:41 (ten years ago)

oh then twitter people should stfu

Generally, yes.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 28 September 2015 17:00 (ten years ago)

If we are going to judge candidates on the horrible things their followers say on twitter then it's gonna get messy pretty quick...

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 28 September 2015 17:04 (ten years ago)

And Sanders would still lose.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 September 2015 17:40 (ten years ago)

I'm game to support Bernie for as long as he can hang in.

a silly gif of awkward larping (Sparkle Motion), Monday, 28 September 2015 17:41 (ten years ago)

at the same time sanders is having far more success than previous candidacies of his kind managed

I don't think this is true at all (surely gabbneb will weigh in with some critical stats next Saturday) but even if it was, there's no way he's winning the nomination, treating him as anything other than the usual noise in the system is a waste of energy imo. I wish the Democrats had better candidates than Hilz and Sanders this time around, but they don't and the likelihood of one appearing at this late juncture is basically zero.

Οὖτις, Monday, 28 September 2015 17:47 (ten years ago)

IF the following two things are true, a) that bernie has alarmingly low name-recognition among black and hispanic democrats (not even approval, just mere recognition), b) that the political mediascape is increasingly social, which has fueled both bernie and the GOP's outsider frontrunners, and c) there is an emerging set of young black leadership that is near-unimaginable w/o social media, centered in #BLM, THEN the antagonism between #feelthebern and #BLM is an enormous political liability for bernie that can't really be laughed off as just some twitter shittalk

maybe it's not "his fault" but so what

he's done a few things to try to address the gap but as an elderly socialist from vermont he should have had that gap in mind from day 0. really demonstrates a bad read on the state of the party he's trying to lead.

goole, Monday, 28 September 2015 17:48 (ten years ago)

the likelihood of one appearing at this late juncture is basically zero

We kind of already know what's out there. Even if a Biden or a Warren were to hop in, they're already known quantities. There's just no one else out there right now.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 28 September 2015 17:51 (ten years ago)

"there is no one else"

^quote by Rob (Meathead) Reiner about Hollywood Democrats and the inevitability of H Rodham from a NY Times story about 18 months ago.

skateboards are the new combover (Dr Morbius), Monday, 28 September 2015 17:55 (ten years ago)

I would vote for Gore, but it's so not gonna happen. Biden = No. Warren more useful in the Senate. The rest = blech

Οὖτις, Monday, 28 September 2015 17:56 (ten years ago)

I am over here at my cubicle applauding goole's post like a crazy person

I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Monday, 28 September 2015 17:58 (ten years ago)

Ditto, except for that he said "two things" and then listed three.

Norse Jung (Eric H.), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:00 (ten years ago)

btw I know exactly one person irl (a gay asian Canadian coworker) who is *super-excited* about Hillary

Οὖτις, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:02 (ten years ago)

really demonstrates a bad read on the state of the party he's trying to lead.

If anything, BS has long positioned himself outside of this particular party. I get the sense he doesn't want to lead the Dems as is so much as stubbornly pull them toward his positions. Which of course is sadly, by and large, as unlikely as him winning the nom. He's got a real third party vibe (alas) to him, even more than someone like Trump. I'm mostly curious about how Clinton and her machine will finally dispatch him down the line (and no, I don't mean that way).

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:02 (ten years ago)

fingers crossed for a sex scandal

Οὖτις, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:04 (ten years ago)

And Sanders would still lose.

I am not voting for who is likely to win if I wanted to do that I would bet corporate every time.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:05 (ten years ago)

It's an election for who would do the best job. Not who is going to score more points. It's not a football game. I'm not gambling on horses here. Though I am smelling a lot of manure.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:06 (ten years ago)

a liberal black friend at lunch a couple days ago: "I want to support Bernie, but he's acting already as if I must support him, the unspoken assumption being that if I don't I support Hillary and the Republicans."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:06 (ten years ago)

"better the condescending Goldman Sachs sack of shit you know..."

skateboards are the new combover (Dr Morbius), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:07 (ten years ago)

sachs of shit, i meant

skateboards are the new combover (Dr Morbius), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:07 (ten years ago)

Basically, anyone who comes at me with "Bernie is your only option, you HAVE to vote for him to be a Good Black Person" is going to make me campaign for Hillary out of sheer spite.

I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:08 (ten years ago)

Adam Bruneau nicely proving the point that Sanders' supporters are kinda assholes.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:09 (ten years ago)

"I want to support Bernie, but he's acting already as if I must support him, the unspoken assumption being that if I don't I support Hillary and the Republicans."

how is bernie acting like this, without using words? has he been playing charades on Ustream?

1997 ball boy (Karl Malone), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:10 (ten years ago)

I think my friend was uncomfortable with the progressive coronation of Bernie without feeling as if he, my friend, were part of it.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:11 (ten years ago)

I'm sure you've all seen this in you fb feed, but it's still pretty damning:
http://images.elephantjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/imgur.jpg

So supporting Sanders makes you a kinda-asshole? WTF?

schwantz, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:12 (ten years ago)

that would be crappy rhetoric, djp, especially when Lupe Fiasco is the ideal (if slightly under the mandated age) first choice

don't all candidates act/speak as if you'd be best off supporting them?

skateboards are the new combover (Dr Morbius), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:13 (ten years ago)

the majority of Sanders' money has come from people that do not have money, yes

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:17 (ten years ago)

LOL unions are poor - what a bunch of losers.

schwantz, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:18 (ten years ago)

like let's be real, half of the Clinton money is coming from interests that donate to any candidate they see as "viable," to the extent that they donate to both sides of the aisle

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:18 (ten years ago)

those same unions will back the democrat regardless!

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:19 (ten years ago)

I haven't gone down the whole list, either -- did any of the unions also donate to Clinton's campaign? they could have donated an equal or even greater amount

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:20 (ten years ago)

Point is Sanders won't take money from GS, etc, not that Hillary won't take money from Unions.

schwantz, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:22 (ten years ago)

The point is that with Super PACs, he never will have to. The advertisements will run regardless.

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:23 (ten years ago)

I mean, it is a noble thing to not take those donations, but that money is going to get spent in his name, regardless.

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:24 (ten years ago)

wait, goldman sachs is bankrolling a pro-sanders super PAC? link? what's their stake there again?

Gorefest Frump (Doctor Casino), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:38 (ten years ago)

In the primaries?

schwantz, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)

No, I meant in the general election, should he get the nomination

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:40 (ten years ago)

lol I figured that was obvious but when I didn't type it I figured I'd be quickly called out

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:41 (ten years ago)

LOL unions are poor - what a bunch of losers.

You speak as if "unions" were a few wealthy individual instead of the aggregate of millions of individually not-wealthy individuals who each give a small amount. Get one brane.

Aimless, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:44 (ten years ago)

(was being sarcastic)

schwantz, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:46 (ten years ago)

always a great idea!

Aimless, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:47 (ten years ago)

lol

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 28 September 2015 18:48 (ten years ago)

I know there's always a race on these threads to see who can be the most cynical, but I'm not getting this one. If Bernie got the nom, he'd (apparently?) get the same Dem super-PAC money, he'd definitely pull in the minority vote (not saying he should just expect it or anything, and he clearly hasn't done that) since the GOP is painting itself into a more and more racist corner, and he'd energize a bunch of people who are sick of corporate politics. In addition, he doesn't have the baggage of the Clintons. I know he has his issues (he's a socialist), but this whole thing where people proclaim him unelectable sounds like 2008 all over again.

schwantz, Monday, 28 September 2015 18:56 (ten years ago)

Democratic Party's had challenger(s) from the left in every presidential primary of my lifetime, it's a time honored tradition. For me it's not a question of whether or not he's electable as much as I just don't think he'll win the nomination - Clinton has a wider, more deeply entrenched swathe of support, she has the money, she has the party leaders, etc. And Sanders won't win any southern primaries against her, after that it'll be over for him. He will probably push Hillary's rhetoric to the left - he already has done so as far as I can tell - which is eh, okay. Coming from her it's safe to assume it's just rhetoric.

Οὖτις, Monday, 28 September 2015 19:04 (ten years ago)

I don't think he's unelectable just because of his political positions, being 'a socialist' doesn't help but it's not nearly as bad as the way he comes across as a candidate. hollywood couldn't cast a better stereotypical cranky jewish college professor. e warren would have been a different story. despite literally being a cranky college professor and having positions essentially as left-wing as sanders, she's just so much more personable on camera.

iatee, Monday, 28 September 2015 19:13 (ten years ago)

he maybe he coulda got an accent coach

iatee, Monday, 28 September 2015 19:15 (ten years ago)

minus first he

iatee, Monday, 28 September 2015 19:15 (ten years ago)

Adam Bruneau nicely proving the point that Sanders' supporters are kinda assholes.

― Frederik B, Monday, September 28, 2015 2:09 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Dude wtf. Since you've decided that is what I am shouldn't it be ME personally attacking you?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 28 September 2015 19:16 (ten years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.