hey gawker dudes. what the fuck is wrong with you?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6727 of them)

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1lWJXDG2i0A/hqdefault.jpg

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:19 (ten years ago)

petty foresaw all

Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:20 (ten years ago)

much like employees at every other company in the world gawker employees will have to learn to appeal to a sometimes shifting workplace culture and authority

Mordy, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:20 (ten years ago)

feel like this incident wont be forgotten but will ultimately just be another bump in the road for [TBA] media

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:21 (ten years ago)

businesswise at least cld be it changes the culture of the company permanently

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:21 (ten years ago)

"People often ask us where we met"

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:21 (ten years ago)

tho i guess if the culture of the company changes that necessarily has major business repercussions too

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:22 (ten years ago)

if they wanna get "10% to 15% nicer" they're gonna have to carpetbomb their comments section imho

gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:25 (ten years ago)

not much u cn really do abt comments, except turn them off

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:26 (ten years ago)

http://gawker.com/report-hulk-hogan-refers-to-fucking-niggers-in-leake-1719933145

Denton's running down the halls high fiving everyone, right?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:31 (ten years ago)

Denton's probably the guy behind it! From July 10:

http://nick.kinja.com/hulk-v-gawker-the-story-so-far-1716479711

"suspicious audio track"

Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:35 (ten years ago)

idk as far as lasting impact goes, it feels like when the self-proclaimed "bold / fearless / uncompromising" editorial direction of your main site becomes the greatest liability to your parent company's bottom line, maybe the site might change significantly, maybe become more of a decentralized group of affiliated sites without a "journalistic" flagship

gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:35 (ten years ago)

oh he has to be, tbf in this instance it's somewhat warranted xxp

extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:36 (ten years ago)

evryone's cynicism itt is well-placed but this is pretty dope imo:

"To any that resign over the deep-sixing of [the story in question], and to any that find a gentler editorial mission too limiting: I respect the strength of your convictions. This is a decision you’re taking to preserve principles you believed I still shared. And since you were abiding by a policy we had not formally superseded, we will treat all resignations as being constructive dismissal, subject to severance," Denton wrote in a memo on Monday.

D-30 (gr8080), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:37 (ten years ago)

lol at the TNC idea.

A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:38 (ten years ago)

i'm howling over the idea of TNC proofing updates of dog.gawker.com

gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:41 (ten years ago)

he'd have some valuable input on the 500 days of kristen feature i'm sure

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:41 (ten years ago)

Kinda love that Hulk Hogan's lawyer's name is Chuck Harder.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:45 (ten years ago)

If the shit ain't sticking...

Party Your Body (Old Lunch), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:46 (ten years ago)

lol

D-30 (gr8080), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:47 (ten years ago)

haa

goole, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:54 (ten years ago)

this is all fucking insane

you are extreme, Patti LuPone. (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:02 (ten years ago)

like is the name change a legal prophylactic? And will it help? What a bizarre story.

you are extreme, Patti LuPone. (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:04 (ten years ago)

i doubt it would help them in any legal matters, seems like a rebranding thing to help emphasize the supposed new outlook.

teenage good-ass kinja turtles (some dude), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:09 (ten years ago)

denton/gawker have been hitning for a while at how they'd like to have separate names for the media company and its flagship site

D-30 (gr8080), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:11 (ten years ago)

or at least saying things like "we know its confusing" etc

D-30 (gr8080), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:11 (ten years ago)

Lookin' Ass Site, Inc. will be a wild success

teenage good-ass kinja turtles (some dude), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:14 (ten years ago)

goodasskinja.com

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:16 (ten years ago)

i guess i'm wondering if "new outlook" isn't intended to help let the judge know, when deliberating on what hogan should be awarded, that shutting down the site with a massive judgment is unnecessary? or is Grawker protected as a different entity?

you are extreme, Patti LuPone. (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:17 (ten years ago)

My impression is it has more to do w advertisers who don't want their brand associated w gawker bc of its various controversies.

Mordy, Friday, 24 July 2015 16:26 (ten years ago)

have they considered "video production news: a professional newsgathering service"; i don't think it's taken
http://media.giphy.com/media/uFjQLlzp9ScQU/giphy.gif

extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:33 (ten years ago)

kinja, gentler nation

Credit: howtokeepapositiveattitudedotcom (stevie), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:59 (ten years ago)

milo otm

goole, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:01 (ten years ago)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKsedAsWwAAzhS5.png

mookieproof, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:10 (ten years ago)

denton/gawker have been hitning for a while at how they'd like to have separate names for the media company and its flagship site

― D-30 (gr8080), Friday, July 24, 2015 12:11 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

or at least saying things like "we know its confusing" etc

― D-30 (gr8080), Friday, July 24, 2015 12:11 PM (55 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah i mean this is basically just for advertisers no one outside industry ppl and the occasional civilian (cough) who for whatever sickness likes to follow media media even knows lifehacker and jezebel are the same company

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:10 (ten years ago)

wondering if any of their big in house names will take the deal

flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:16 (ten years ago)

hoping righteous gawkerers angrily reject this severance deal

the god i believe in isn't short of cash, mister

mookieproof, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:18 (ten years ago)

wondering if any of their big in house names will take the deal

― flopson, Friday, July 24, 2015 1:16 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

if someone offers u a job its a great opportunity to double bill!!

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:22 (ten years ago)

Misread "politburo" in that memo as "politburp."

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:24 (ten years ago)

the "true and interesting!" revelation is the dumbest thing

chinavision!, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:26 (ten years ago)

I bet nick was really excited when he thought that up. a bold new vision that will set the course for editorial clarity

chinavision!, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:27 (ten years ago)

wld be curious to read a blog that was 100% true but not interesting, just like posts abt what diff media non celebrities had for lunch or which email client they use

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:28 (ten years ago)

lol i guess there are sites that are already that everyday carry and so forth

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:28 (ten years ago)

sounds interesting

chinavision!, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:29 (ten years ago)

its obvs a silly standard cause the post in question that precipitated it obvs while not being the most compelling thing ive ever read was def interesting

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:30 (ten years ago)

"interesting" so nebulous a standard as to be meaningless, you could easily argue that the geithner piece was "interesting," just in the wrong ways

xps ha

gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Friday, 24 July 2015 17:30 (ten years ago)

wld be curious to read a blog that was 100% true but not interesting, just like posts abt what diff media non celebrities had for lunch or which email client they use

― lag∞n, Friday, July 24, 2015 1:28 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

its called people magazine

where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Friday, 24 July 2015 17:30 (ten years ago)

theyre just like us

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:31 (ten years ago)

boring

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:31 (ten years ago)

hey gawker Qwikster dudes. what the fuck is wrong with you, if it still is wrong?

... (Eazy), Friday, 24 July 2015 17:33 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.