def a call everything neo-liberalism or late-capitalism guy
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 20:27 (eight years ago) link
his big subject seems to be the grating nature of so much "left" discourse on the internet. i think the things he has to say about this are good and i appreciate the term "critique drift."
― Treeship, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 20:57 (eight years ago) link
sometimes i wonder what the stakes are in that stuff though. like, was there a time when most people involved in political discussion didn't wield their ideology as an accessory, making the same banal points over and over and looking for places to grind their axe? twitter might just be like the house/cocktail parties of old, except now we're all locked in there forever.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:01 (eight years ago) link
he is a grating leftist on the internet tho i mean
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:01 (eight years ago) link
hes if anything more grating than most online leftists
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:02 (eight years ago) link
matt bruenig >>> freddie imo
― flopson, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:09 (eight years ago) link
Here's an example of a worthwhile subject that he reduces to banality.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:11 (eight years ago) link
he deserves his own thread or another thread. Let's stop discussing him here.
instead of endlessly & pointlessly dissecting their own culture and occasionally raising some vague strawman of neoliberals to strawman more leftists should just ignore all other leftists & argue with economists and liberals to their right straight up. way more entertaining & elucidating than the nth performance of a white dude in a LA grad program wondering if intersectionality is hindering "worker power" or whatever. also they should stop arguing with libertarians so much imo, that's my 1 prob with matt bruenig. like its ok to poke fun at them sometimes but their presence on twitter is disproportionate
― flopson, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:14 (eight years ago) link
i heard TNC on npr yesterday, i love listening to him speak so much. there was one seemingly awkward moment where terry gross asked him "did you hit your children" but i guess thats in the book and what he had to say about it was super interesting
― flopson, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:17 (eight years ago) link
admittedly I had to look up "intersectionality"
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:17 (eight years ago) link
Neoliberalism is conservatism with a gay pride face.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:18 (eight years ago) link
xp- just now?
― flopson, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:18 (eight years ago) link
Yeah. It's one of those terms whose definition I can guess from how the world looks.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:24 (eight years ago) link
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:11 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i really don't think he does, but yes
― goole, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:26 (eight years ago) link
instead of endlessly & pointlessly dissecting their own culture and occasionally raising some vague strawman of neoliberals to strawman more leftists should just ignore all other leftists & argue with economists and liberals to their right straight up.
― flopson, Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:14 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
having to fight w economists all day is def the appropriate punishment
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 22:33 (eight years ago) link
lol
― flopson, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 22:36 (eight years ago) link
― Treeship, Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:57 PM (1 hour ago)
sometimes i'll read something of his and go "yeah, that's true" but i also kind of feel like he inflates the problem way way beyond its importance. i mean snotty clickbait-y "left" takes on everything are annoying, but the percentage of the u.s. population that actually pays attention to that stuff has to be beyond miniscule. i don't even think most self-described liberals care about the kind of infighting FDB seems to obsess over.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 14 July 2015 22:43 (eight years ago) link
Yeah idk. I hear a lot of liberal discussions on the internet and irl that feel like people are reading off a script and it makes me uncomfortable, even when I largely agree with them. But absent the language of internet social justice culture, these people would probably just adopt other cliches.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 22:49 (eight years ago) link
cliches are... the ultimate truth a glimpse inside my twitter drafts
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 July 2015 22:51 (eight years ago) link
Don't forget he's also a TA and professional grad student, so the joke about academia applies 100% - "the battles are so fierce because the stakes are so low."
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 00:06 (eight years ago) link
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 July 2015 21:17 (Yesterday) Permalink
wow
― supreme problematics (D-40), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 02:12 (eight years ago) link
Gender studies and social theory aren't my specialties, and then there's my well-documented suspicion of jargon.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 02:14 (eight years ago) link
Me, I like writing
yeah, i know, that's why all your posts are 8000 words long
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 02:58 (eight years ago) link
― supreme problematics (D-40), Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:12 PM (47 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
obvs not a big consumer of social justice social networking
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 03:00 (eight years ago) link
or… ilx… somehow
― j., Wednesday, 15 July 2015 03:04 (eight years ago) link
who is social justice -- have I met him
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 11:02 (eight years ago) link
It's hard not to, v outgoing
― not a garbageman, i am garbage, man (m bison), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 12:15 (eight years ago) link
Btw I actually hear "intersectional" is on the way out
― supreme problematics (D-40), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 14:04 (eight years ago) link
what's it being replaced with? the return of baggy pants?
― doing my Objectives, handling some intense stuff (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 14:06 (eight years ago) link
the best way out of an intersection is to exit the vehicle on foot and toss the keys to a beaming child
― Most Scientifically Beautiful Face (President Keyes), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 14:08 (eight years ago) link
people who drive are savages imo
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 14:09 (eight years ago) link
privilege speaking
― Most Scientifically Beautiful Face (President Keyes), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 14:11 (eight years ago) link
more leftists should just ignore all other leftists & argue with economists and liberals to their right straight up
actually talked about this with a socialist poli sci prof over the weekend & he suggested that while arguing with liberals is fun af its "as much a fool's errand as arguing with anyone to the right of clinton"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:22 (eight years ago) link
it cant be more of a fools errand than arguing with leftists
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:25 (eight years ago) link
http://gawker.com/making-peace-with-the-chaos-an-interview-with-ta-nehis-1717839272
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:27 (eight years ago) link
someone talk to me abt why ppl are saying "bodies" as in "black bodies" instead of "people"
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:28 (eight years ago) link
history of objectification
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:31 (eight years ago) link
it seems like just another hopelessly awkward academic construct?
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:32 (eight years ago) link
the the only time its used is in the context of oppression you dont need to shoehorn odd shorthand for the oppression in there when youre already talking about the thing
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:36 (eight years ago) link
also clearly oppressors throughout the ages have been very interested in their targets as psychological beings too as thats one of the many tools of oppression
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:37 (eight years ago) link
^all this, but also, it's a stylistic affectation
resonates w/ abhorrence at control of women's bodies, highlights unsavory implications wrt slavery and male violence, slight creepfactor
― j., Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:42 (eight years ago) link
the mainstreaming of academic language is one of the worst things about online
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:44 (eight years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/P9JnBBP.png
good convo
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:47 (eight years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl1dc2cEJfs
― Trap Queenius (wins), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:55 (eight years ago) link
just bought the book maybe i will read it even
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 15:59 (eight years ago) link
― lag∞n, Wednesday, July 15, 2015 3:28 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
also seen this as "trans bodies," "queer bodies," etc--was explained to me that "bodies" *centers* the dehumanization of the subject
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 16:01 (eight years ago) link
"female bodies"
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 16:02 (eight years ago) link
i think this approach doesnt really "get" how language works but i cld be wrong
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 July 2015 16:03 (eight years ago) link
i know you already saw it since you linked to the article, but
Q:There are two terms invoked constantly throughout the book: “body” and “plunder.” There is a physicality to both, a totality in each when you use them, that is terrifying. I’m interested in this idea of choosing the word “black body” as opposed to saying, “the black mind” or “the black soul.”A: I think the body is the ultimate thing. The soul and mind are part of the body. I don’t think there is anything outside of that. Your physical self is who you are. Some people feel that that is reductionist, but I don’t think it is. It’s just true.Q: It’s your vessel.A: But not even your vessel. It’s the thing. The body is the mind. The mind is housed, as far as we know, within an organ—the brain. The brain is part of the body. And when people speak about the soul, they are speaking about certain sensations that they feel as a result of nerves and other organ systems within the body. For me specifically, not really coming out of a religious tradition, that’s how I understand black people. It very much clarifies for me the idea of physical violence. There is a tradition within black America, that I quarrel with, that says: They can do things to our body, but they can’t really trap our minds. I disagree with that. Every assault upon the body is, in fact, also an assault upon the mind. I don’t think there is any way to get away from that.
A: I think the body is the ultimate thing. The soul and mind are part of the body. I don’t think there is anything outside of that. Your physical self is who you are. Some people feel that that is reductionist, but I don’t think it is. It’s just true.
Q: It’s your vessel.
A: But not even your vessel. It’s the thing. The body is the mind. The mind is housed, as far as we know, within an organ—the brain. The brain is part of the body. And when people speak about the soul, they are speaking about certain sensations that they feel as a result of nerves and other organ systems within the body. For me specifically, not really coming out of a religious tradition, that’s how I understand black people. It very much clarifies for me the idea of physical violence. There is a tradition within black America, that I quarrel with, that says: They can do things to our body, but they can’t really trap our minds. I disagree with that. Every assault upon the body is, in fact, also an assault upon the mind. I don’t think there is any way to get away from that.
― 1992 ball boy (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 15 July 2015 16:05 (eight years ago) link