33: GREAT POP THINGS by Colin B. Morton & Chuck Death (78 points, 3 votes) a 1998 best-of collection printed so badly that it hurts one’s eyes to read
A ratty, funny, wildly-inaccurate parodic history of rock and pop music, appearing in weekly music papers int he late ‘80s to mid-‘90s, pseudonymously drawn by the lead singer of The Mekons. Most strips managed to condense an artist’s entire career into three or four panels, and continuity was rarely maintained from one week to the next.Fricke: Packing each frame with rude caricatures, textual puns and mischievous apocrypha, Death and Morton recount rock's crucial episodes and life stories, skewering superstars and demolishing hagiography along the way. When Dylan goes electric, a heckler doesn't shout, 'Judas!' He yells 'Boo! Do you know any Judas Priest?' U2 make a concert film about 'a hugely famous Irish group going to America and inventing all forms of American music simultaneously.' … Morrissey was outraged by the huge chin that Langford gave him in an early cartoon. (Langford made the chin even larger in later strips.) But when Morton interviewed Polly Jean Harvey for a magazine article, he confessed to his part in "Great Pop Things"' devilish PJ Harvey parody ('She tried to change the world in her fake-leopard-fur fifty-foot invisible-bunny costume'). Her response was a shriek of delight: "Oh! I've got it up on my fridge."
Fricke: Packing each frame with rude caricatures, textual puns and mischievous apocrypha, Death and Morton recount rock's crucial episodes and life stories, skewering superstars and demolishing hagiography along the way. When Dylan goes electric, a heckler doesn't shout, 'Judas!' He yells 'Boo! Do you know any Judas Priest?' U2 make a concert film about 'a hugely famous Irish group going to America and inventing all forms of American music simultaneously.' … Morrissey was outraged by the huge chin that Langford gave him in an early cartoon. (Langford made the chin even larger in later strips.) But when Morton interviewed Polly Jean Harvey for a magazine article, he confessed to his part in "Great Pop Things"' devilish PJ Harvey parody ('She tried to change the world in her fake-leopard-fur fifty-foot invisible-bunny costume'). Her response was a shriek of delight: "Oh! I've got it up on my fridge."
http://sp8.fotolog.com/photo/40/55/57/ashbrg/1126871966_f.jpg
http://www.beefheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/MortonDeath4.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zsSCH4C2dvI/U8ZMqCNcAMI/AAAAAAAABgY/UcyABkUu7ns/s1600/msppop1.jpg
https://33.media.tumblr.com/25ca4e265a219185c5a0e008d39edcde/tumblr_nd6mx6svmp1s180omo1_500.png
http://www.beefheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/MortonDeath3.jpg
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Thursday, 25 June 2015 13:41 (ten years ago)
if Boy Girl Boy Girl has a bunch of Bernard and/or Huey strips, it ought to be great
it does, and it is!
― you throw darts like a lesser man and owe me cash (stevie), Thursday, 25 June 2015 13:45 (ten years ago)
omg I have never heard of Great Pop Things, wow thanks
― sleeve, Thursday, 25 June 2015 13:58 (ten years ago)
Heh I remember Ben Watson once fuming abt Great Pop Things because they took the piss out of Alexander Von Schlippenbach's name
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 25 June 2015 14:09 (ten years ago)
Wish I could find 'Steve Albini feeds his cat' somewhere.
― the bowels are not what they seem (aldo), Thursday, 25 June 2015 14:11 (ten years ago)
Thats like ILM THE COMIC STRIP
― like a giraffe of nah (forksclovetofu), Friday, 26 June 2015 04:31 (ten years ago)
32: JULIUS KNIPL, REAL ESTATE PHOTOGRAPHER by Ben Katchor (81 points, 4 votes) Kniplpage. (Official site, containing a single strip.)
A middle-aged man, seemingly out of time, wanders the city with the aim of capturing still moments of dignified architecture, but frequently gets distracted from his inner ruminations by the intrusion of human flotsam.
http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-620/h--/q-95/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/9/8/1410186754018/22bb248d-4adf-48d5-bb7a-edae6e956639-1020x698.jpeg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3Nr-z3vV_V4/TccGoJuM9EI/AAAAAAAAA2Y/AURWyX_cQZE/s1600/katchor-the-radiator-musician-da-julius-knipl-real-estate-photographer.jpg
http://www.uky.edu/~grissom/knipl.gif
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Friday, 26 June 2015 14:07 (ten years ago)
ben katchor is great
― Mordy, Friday, 26 June 2015 14:08 (ten years ago)
in my top 10
― it's not arugula science (WilliamC), Friday, 26 June 2015 14:46 (ten years ago)
Such an amazing piece of work. Super nice guy, too.
Here's a link to a really big pic of a book he signed to me:
https://highter.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/tumblr_mld7whrbrn1qbknquo1_1280.jpg?w=700
― EZ Snappin, Friday, 26 June 2015 17:07 (ten years ago)
I loved Great Pop Things; had no idea it was written by a Mekon!
I think I need to buy that collection, bad print or no.
― anatol_merklich, Monday, 29 June 2015 06:56 (ten years ago)
drawn by a Mekon!
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Monday, 29 June 2015 07:30 (ten years ago)
31: BARNABY by Crockett Johnson (93 points, 5 votes) Volume 1 – decades of trying to get a reprint licence finally pays off
A boy named Barnaby wishes for a fairy godmother. Instead, he gets a fairy godfather who uses a cigar for a magic wand. Bumbling but endearing, Mr. O’Malley rarely gets his magic to work — even when he consults his Fairy Godfather’s Handy Pocket Guide. The true magic of Barnaby resides in its canny mix of fantasy and satire, amplified by the understated elegance of Crockett Johnson’s clean, spare art. ...In its combination of Johnson’s sly wit and O’Malley’s amiable windbaggery, a child’s feeling of wonder and an adult’s wariness, highly literate jokes and a keen eye for the ridiculous, Barnaby expanded our sense of what comics can do....As Coulton Waugh noted in his landmark The Comics (1947), Barnaby’s audience may not “compare, numerically, with that of the top, mass-appeal strips. But it is a very discriminating audience, which includes a number of strip artists themselves, and so this strip stands a good chance of remaining to influence the course of American humor for many years to come.” He was right.Barnaby’s fans have included Peanuts creator Charles Schulz, Family Circus creator Bil Keane, and graphic novelists Daniel Clowes, Art Spiegelman, and Chris Ware. It had many fans beyond the world of comics, too. Dorothy Parker compared Barnaby to Huckleberry Finn, and said: “I think, and I am trying to talk calmly, that Barnaby and his friends and oppressors are the most important additions to American arts and letters in Lord knows how many years. I know that they are the most important additions to my heart.”
http://www.cbgxtra.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Barnaby%20intro.jpg
http://westfieldcomics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/BARNABY-420814.jpg
https://locustmoon.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/barnaby-magic.jpg
http://www.philnel.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Barnaby1947-7-13.jpg
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Monday, 29 June 2015 13:36 (ten years ago)
I love the strips in the Smithsonian collection but have never seen any others, unfortunately. Great stuff.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 29 June 2015 16:07 (ten years ago)
ah he did Harold & The Purple Crayon, knew that style looked familiar
― sleeve, Monday, 29 June 2015 16:10 (ten years ago)
yeah I was surprised to learn he'd had a daily strip
― Οὖτις, Monday, 29 June 2015 16:19 (ten years ago)
http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/wp-content/b/barn1.jpg
― JoeStork, Tuesday, 30 June 2015 04:51 (ten years ago)
barnaby is incredible. if i'd owned the fantagraphics reprint way back when i sent in my ballot for this poll it might've been my no. 1.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 30 June 2015 16:40 (ten years ago)
30: ERNIE POOK'S COMEEK by Lynda Barry (95 points, 7 votes) The first volume of a stalled? abortive? complete collection
One of the highest achievements of the America alt-weekly era, Barry’s strip mines the endless depths of young children’s interiority. Playfulness, terror, loneliness while never being alone, internecine power plays invisible to adults, the opacity of the future, laughter and the value of shared memory, regardless of the experience – all the classics. Barry abandoned the strip after three decades only because the entire market died from underneath her.
http://www.isthmus.com/media/2012/01/19/lyndabarry-comeek011912g.jpghttp://www.straight.com/files/styles/article_main/public/files/images/wide/CAR_Pook_2090.jpghttps://misterjep.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/weirdo.jpg
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Wednesday, 1 July 2015 15:52 (ten years ago)
I've re-read some 1980s Barry collections in the last month and am pretty sure I ranked her far too low on my own ballot, wherever I put her
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Wednesday, 1 July 2015 15:55 (ten years ago)
her ear for the language of children is uncanny
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 July 2015 16:11 (ten years ago)
29: DICK TRACY by Chester Gould (100 points, 6 votes) IDW launched their classic strips series by straight-up Xeroxing Seth’s design for the Peanuts hardcovers
There was something that Chester Gould understood about the comics medium that I don't think anyone else has really clued into to the same extent that he did. The whole thing is forward momentum. It is technically considered to be "bad comics" to take up half a panel with a caption that stiltedly describes everything that is going on. Chester Gould didn't think that was "bad comics". Just the opposite. If the gangster threatens to throw the bomb in one panel and you explain what Pat Patton is about to do and how Dick Tracy signals him in the caption in the next panel and then show Pat shooting the bomb out of the guy's hand and into the pickle brine in the following panel…Chester Gould is saying, that's GOOD comics. Set up, explanation, gunshot "OW!". The reader wants to see the bad guy get shot in the hand so the sooner you can get him shot in the hand, the better your comics are. If you can get from point A to point C with one long-winded caption, that's better than using two or three panels to get there.About two seconds before I was going to say something, as if Chester read my mind he mentioned the weird way that he drew Jean Penfield, the writer. She first appears in the 1/24/34 Sunday strip as a typical 30's brunette fashion plate. Then starting Monday and Tuesday her head just keeps getting bigger and bigger along with her eyes – bigger and bigger and further and further apart. It's beyond even the outer boundaries of Chester Gould caricature. She's like an alien life-form or something. Each eyelash is about the length of Dick Tracy's nose. It's all you can do to read what's going on in the strip for trying to figure out what it is with this hydrocephalic 30's brunette fashion plate.[…]But, obviously, Gould didn't once look at her and think – maybe that's a little distracting. Obviously, he always stuck with what was working for him: hell bent for leather forward momentum in the storyline. It soon becomes obvious that the point of Jean Penfield is to get her into her negligee so she can talk to people on the phone and then get attacked in her mansion, and then shoot someone in her mansion and then almost get blown up in her roadster and then get abducted in her roadster and then to drive her roadster off of the road, then wrestle for the steering wheel with her "kidnaper" and then crash through a shack, then brush a haystack and then dash STRAIGHT FOR THE HUGE STORAGE TANK OF OIL. Eyes? No, I can't say that I was too worried that the size or her eyes or the size of her head was a little distracting, Chester Gould appears to say from across the intervening seventy-three years (thinking to himself all the while: It's comics. What don't you understand about that?) One of the Pop Artists in the 60s did a Dick Tracy strip that was all gibberish. He basically traced all of the faces and figures but then rearranged all of the words in the captions and word balloons so that they made absolutely no sense. The intent, I'm sure, was High Irony, Camp, to try and show exactly how devoid of content DICK TRACY and all other pop culture was. The thing was, it still had that incredible forward momentum. Even though you knew that each panel contained nothing but gibberish, you still read every word and looked at all the pictures. Pavlov was right, especially when it came to Chester Gould's storytelling. MUST READ! MUST LOOK AT! MUST READ! MUST LOOK AT! With the circulation and readership that DICK TRACY had, it must've perplexed Chester Gould on an on-going basis. "They can see how I'm doing it, they can see how successful the strip is – why do they insist, instead, on doing strips that move so SLOWLY?" To Gould, it must've seemed as if everyone else's stories were as slow as molasses in January. Because they were, by comparison. Gould, by contrast, was always trying to figure out how to make things go faster. There's a great moment in the 3/4/34 strip where he letters the word balloon directly INTO Tracy's hat. He's got a certain amount of information to impart in Tracy's word balloon, there isn't room for all of it OVER Tracy's hat, so he just letters straight into the hat and then inks the hat around the words. Why not? Why stop and think or even slow down and think? There's a whole rest of a Sunday page that needs writing and drawing. It's COMICS!!
About two seconds before I was going to say something, as if Chester read my mind he mentioned the weird way that he drew Jean Penfield, the writer. She first appears in the 1/24/34 Sunday strip as a typical 30's brunette fashion plate. Then starting Monday and Tuesday her head just keeps getting bigger and bigger along with her eyes – bigger and bigger and further and further apart. It's beyond even the outer boundaries of Chester Gould caricature. She's like an alien life-form or something. Each eyelash is about the length of Dick Tracy's nose. It's all you can do to read what's going on in the strip for trying to figure out what it is with this hydrocephalic 30's brunette fashion plate.
[…]
But, obviously, Gould didn't once look at her and think – maybe that's a little distracting. Obviously, he always stuck with what was working for him: hell bent for leather forward momentum in the storyline. It soon becomes obvious that the point of Jean Penfield is to get her into her negligee so she can talk to people on the phone and then get attacked in her mansion, and then shoot someone in her mansion and then almost get blown up in her roadster and then get abducted in her roadster and then to drive her roadster off of the road, then wrestle for the steering wheel with her "kidnaper" and then crash through a shack, then brush a haystack and then dash STRAIGHT FOR THE HUGE STORAGE TANK OF OIL.
Eyes? No, I can't say that I was too worried that the size or her eyes or the size of her head was a little distracting, Chester Gould appears to say from across the intervening seventy-three years (thinking to himself all the while: It's comics. What don't you understand about that?)
One of the Pop Artists in the 60s did a Dick Tracy strip that was all gibberish. He basically traced all of the faces and figures but then rearranged all of the words in the captions and word balloons so that they made absolutely no sense. The intent, I'm sure, was High Irony, Camp, to try and show exactly how devoid of content DICK TRACY and all other pop culture was. The thing was, it still had that incredible forward momentum. Even though you knew that each panel contained nothing but gibberish, you still read every word and looked at all the pictures. Pavlov was right, especially when it came to Chester Gould's storytelling. MUST READ! MUST LOOK AT! MUST READ! MUST LOOK AT!
With the circulation and readership that DICK TRACY had, it must've perplexed Chester Gould on an on-going basis. "They can see how I'm doing it, they can see how successful the strip is – why do they insist, instead, on doing strips that move so SLOWLY?" To Gould, it must've seemed as if everyone else's stories were as slow as molasses in January. Because they were, by comparison. Gould, by contrast, was always trying to figure out how to make things go faster. There's a great moment in the 3/4/34 strip where he letters the word balloon directly INTO Tracy's hat. He's got a certain amount of information to impart in Tracy's word balloon, there isn't room for all of it OVER Tracy's hat, so he just letters straight into the hat and then inks the hat around the words. Why not? Why stop and think or even slow down and think? There's a whole rest of a Sunday page that needs writing and drawing. It's COMICS!!
http://www.umich.edu/~csie/comicart/StripArt/Gould090147.jpg
http://cdn.coollinesartwork.com/Images/Category_2/subcat_29429/TracyDaily03151948.JPG
http://cdn.comixology.com/previews/sep120385/sep120385-07.jpg
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Thursday, 2 July 2015 01:52 (ten years ago)
I'll admit it, I have LOVED the Dick Tracy reprints after only having been vaguely curious. As Sim points out, there are spelling errors galore and wild plot inconsistencies and maguffins, and Gould REALLY isn't very good at comedy when he turns his hand to it; but the stories are remarkably engaging and you never want to stop reading until the conclusion - by which point he's started to weave the next plot into the strip. The brutality shines through also: when people are beaten half to death they look beaten half to death and might have been being beaten for two or three weeks in publication duration, when people drown you see them drown slowly over three or four strips. The threat is always very real and villains don't come back (90% of the time) because they are dead (90% of the time).
Having said all that, I think we are only a couple of volumes from Moon-era, which might be where I've had enough.
― arbiter of sorrow (aldo), Thursday, 2 July 2015 07:23 (ten years ago)
One of the Pop Artists in the 60s did a Dick Tracy strip that was all gibberish. He basically traced all of the faces and figures but then rearranged all of the words in the captions and word balloons so that they made absolutely no sense. The intent, I'm sure, was High Irony, Camp, to try and show exactly how devoid of content DICK TRACY and all other pop culture was.
Sim is wrong about Jess Collins' intent here, right? This account says that he regarded Gould as a hero:
http://poemsandpoetics.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/jess-collins-images-from-tricky-cad.html
― soref, Thursday, 2 July 2015 08:43 (ten years ago)
this comics journal article kind of makes a similar argument to Sim, but is less polite to Gould:
Gould’s Dick Tracy was profoundly influenced by the pictographic possibilities of Modernist formalism – geometric reduction, simplified color, aggressively linear compositions that eschewed photorealist nuance for an almost industrial graphic design immediacy – Gould had a primitivist magpie eye for purified ways of picture-making.By breaking the linear narrative agenda of the original strips, but keeping the graphic vocabulary intact, Jess identifies and brings to the forefront Gould’s inherent avant-gardism. This undoubtedly would send Chester spinning in his grave — if he hadn’t been very much alive and kicking at the time the collages were made, in the middle of a long slide to the same cultural phantom zone occupied by Al Capp.
By breaking the linear narrative agenda of the original strips, but keeping the graphic vocabulary intact, Jess identifies and brings to the forefront Gould’s inherent avant-gardism. This undoubtedly would send Chester spinning in his grave — if he hadn’t been very much alive and kicking at the time the collages were made, in the middle of a long slide to the same cultural phantom zone occupied by Al Capp.
http://www.tcj.com/reviews/o-tricky-cad-other-jessoterica/http://www.tcj.com/reviews/o-tricky-cad-other-jessoterica/
― soref, Thursday, 2 July 2015 08:45 (ten years ago)
28: LEVIATHAN by Peter Blegvad (103 points, 4 votes) website from 1999
Former Slapp Happy musician takes a break from collaborating with John Zorn and Andy Partridge to draw a dreamlike, existential weekly for a British newspaper, through most of the ‘90s. The baby Leviathan, or Levi for short, is a descendant of Henry, Barnaby, and Nemo, but also related to the protagonists of Chester Brown’s abandoned Underwater; Levi’s dreamscapes and encounters are oft beyond literal comprehension, frequently functioning as metaphors for the workings of adult life, but here with an awareness of how opaque they are to grown-ups, too."Peter Blegvad's comic strip is one of the greatest, weirdest things I've ever stared at. Give me Leviathan or give me death!" --Matt Groening"Whenever I'm asked for proof that literature, art and poetry can exist in comic-strip form, I point to Peter Blegvad." --Ben Katchor
"Peter Blegvad's comic strip is one of the greatest, weirdest things I've ever stared at. Give me Leviathan or give me death!" --Matt Groening
"Whenever I'm asked for proof that literature, art and poetry can exist in comic-strip form, I point to Peter Blegvad." --Ben Katchor
http://oletheros.com/wp-content/gallery/reviews/levi_parentage.jpg
http://www.moorsmagazine.com/images22/leviathan3.jpg
http://www.believermag.com/issues/200911/img/blegvad_leviathan.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_2WwQ6zNxXY0/TG45DQG7XZI/AAAAAAAAAZI/KlgUfnWl-kc/s1600/Leviathan-3.jpg
en Francais
http://www.bedetheque.com/media/Planches/PlancheA_201631.jpg
http://www.du9.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Leviathan-p05.jpg
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Thursday, 2 July 2015 13:12 (ten years ago)
If he's taking a break from working with Andy Partridge, he'd have to go back in time to draw these strips.
― Mark G, Thursday, 2 July 2015 13:47 (ten years ago)
my dad used to but the Independent on Sunday when I was a kid and the occasional glimpses I caught of Leviathan used to fascinate/unsettle me in equal measure, also realising years later that the guy from Slapp Happy drew it was a real 'I can't believe this person who did x is the same person who did y' moment
― soref, Thursday, 2 July 2015 14:02 (ten years ago)
Kinda wish I'd placed Leviathan higher on my ballot, but glad to have known about it/voted for it.
― dart scar rashes (WilliamC), Thursday, 2 July 2015 14:36 (ten years ago)
never heard of it, and I'm a big Blegvad fan, psyched to explore that website
no print collections of this, I assume?
― sleeve, Thursday, 2 July 2015 14:48 (ten years ago)
There was a hardcover published in both the US and UK.
he'd have to go back in time to draw these strips.
he would if he hadn't drawn them in the past
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Thursday, 2 July 2015 14:54 (ten years ago)
called The Book Of Leviathan, sorry
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Thursday, 2 July 2015 14:55 (ten years ago)
ooh it's in paperback as well:
http://www.amazon.com/Book-Leviathan-Peter-Blegvad/dp/1590200527
― sleeve, Thursday, 2 July 2015 14:56 (ten years ago)
xposts yeah it was a reference to this writeup:
Former Slapp Happy musician takes a break from collaborating with John Zorn and Andy Partridge to draw a dreamlike, existential weekly for a British newspaper, through most of the ‘90s.
nm.
― Mark G, Thursday, 2 July 2015 15:21 (ten years ago)
I'm interested in other comics work by Blegvad. he used to draw a strip for terrible UK right-wing magazine Standpoint:
http://standpointmag.co.uk/taxonomy/term/501?page=5
I think he used to do a cartoon in David Hepworth + Mark Ellen's Word magazine as well. does anyone know of more recent material?
― soref, Thursday, 2 July 2015 15:29 (ten years ago)
some more cartoons here
http://radiofreesongclub.com/artists/peter-blegvad
― soref, Thursday, 2 July 2015 15:33 (ten years ago)
The '90s started two and a half decades ago, which is in the past iirc
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Thursday, 2 July 2015 21:34 (ten years ago)
27: GARFIELD MINUS GARFIELD by Dan Walsh (106 points, 4 votes) garfieldminusgarfield.net/
A meme almost twice as good as the strip it undetournes, according to science.
― back once again with the panel behaviour (sic), Friday, 3 July 2015 01:12 (ten years ago)
Yeah, but his collaboration with Andy Partridge was in 2003, but now I see they have done work since the eighties, so OK I'm out.
― Mark G, Friday, 3 July 2015 06:26 (ten years ago)
some more cartoons herehttp://radiofreesongclub.com/artists/peter-blegvad
^ nice
― let no-one live rent free in your butt (sic), Sunday, 5 July 2015 15:06 (ten years ago)
26: ZIPPY the PINHEAD by Bill Griffith (107 points, 6 votes) Understanding Zippy The Pinhead
The second work in the poll that converted from page-based comics to a strip, but this change was lasting. Mostly a vehicle for absurdity in original mode, that aspect was retained in the shift to weekly and then daily mode, but more significantly, Griffith incorporated the approach of his other underground series, Griffith Observatory. More often than not, Zippy’s encountering of the oddities of American life are less a prompt for his non-sequitur reactions – whether positive or negative – and more an opening for “Griffy” to express an actual opinion on what these things say about US culture, politics, and character.Probably the longest-running work in the poll still by its original author? Remind me to check that when we’re done.
Probably the longest-running work in the poll still by its original author? Remind me to check that when we’re done.
http://www.zippythepinhead.com/media/one.jpg
http://zippythepinhead.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/2011/images/052311.gif
http://static.flickr.com/72/197175760_044b725c2a_o.gif
http://www.lostwackys.com/Wacky-Packages/Lost-Wackys/1970s/Bill-Griffith/zippy3.jpg
http://mrc-static.s3.amazonaws.com/Newsbusters/static/2009/12/zippypinhead.gif
http://38.media.tumblr.com/28da8809a2017432986718b46c87de5a/tumblr_mm7b1dRkVu1qzvn61o1_500.gif
http://images.tcj.com/2011/11/121494.gif
http://zippythepinhead.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/other/images/yow2.jpg
due respect
― let no-one live rent free in your butt (sic), Monday, 6 July 2015 16:15 (ten years ago)
haha weird I have been re-reading my copy of "Pinhead's Progress" lately
was disturbed by the Zippy erotica book I saw in the shop a few weeks back, was that really necessary
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 July 2015 16:19 (ten years ago)
Misread that as Ziggy erotica and gah.
― EZ Snappin, Monday, 6 July 2015 18:22 (ten years ago)
what is the Zippy erotica book?
― let no-one live rent free in your butt (sic), Monday, 6 July 2015 23:03 (ten years ago)
fear of flying iirc
― like a giraffe of nah (forksclovetofu), Monday, 6 July 2015 23:04 (ten years ago)
made me sad
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 July 2015 23:11 (ten years ago)
looks like it was something that included a reprint of Young Lust #8...?
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 July 2015 23:12 (ten years ago)
This is Young Lust #8. It has a Dan Clowes cover. It came out in 1993, and it must have gone instantly in the shredder, because I have literally never gotten one response. I decided to put all of my characters into the most explicitly sexual situations I could possibly imagine, as a tongue-in-cheek critique of pornography. It was called "Fleshed Out," and you could see Zippy and Griffy arriving at a party at the upper left. I mean it's a porno. 1993, I was seven years into my daily comic strip appearing in respected newspapers across the country. I was sweating this out for months after I did it, thinking, "What have I done? Someone's gonna find out. They're going to cancel me in the Washington Post and the San Francisco Examiner, Seattle Post. It's the end of my career. Why did I do something so stupid?" But as I said, no one has ever noticed it. [laughter] I think I did a really good job. I highly recommend it. I reread it last week. This is the last page. Every one of the characters is engaged in a sexual romp. Explicit and pornographic as it could possibly be. In a previous page to this, I have Griffy in a compromising position saying, "Well, what is pornography? Whatever turns you on, right? Human sexuality is a complex phenomenon." And his girlfriend at the moment is saying "Hey, wait a second, I'm not finished with my scathing, uh" and he says "Of course, the male and female versions differ widely, in very distinct ways. The clinical approach puzzles me. These videos with their tight close ups of plunging meat. Only a dirt bald brute could find that arousing, n'est pas?" The punch line of this whole strip is at the end, his occasional wife and Zippy are having explicit sex and she says "Oh, Zippy, I love it when you talk dirty." And Zippy says, "Are we having sex yet?"
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 July 2015 23:14 (ten years ago)
http://zippythepinhead.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=allYLs&Category_Code=ruc&Product_Count=4i own a bunch of the first run Young Lust comix; got em from my dad's high school graduation present of his old underground collection
― like a giraffe of nah (forksclovetofu), Monday, 6 July 2015 23:23 (ten years ago)
traded funny aminals #1 for a full run of Melmoth in Cerebus; always been a regret