grantland gave a pretty positive review, prefaced with some dislike of the first season.
in any case I think I know what to expect, and my tolerance for that sort of thing is really high so I'll probably like it.
― ryan, Thursday, 18 June 2015 22:45 (eleven years ago)
i think i only want to see the scene with the fukunaga doppelganger and no other scene
― 龜, Thursday, 18 June 2015 22:48 (eleven years ago)
this being bad would not make me dislike this
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Thursday, 18 June 2015 22:55 (eleven years ago)
still feel like a lot of critics fundamentally misunderstand what made the first season great (none of the things that would slot it into typical prestige television for one) but I need to shut up about it.
― ryan, Thursday, 18 June 2015 23:02 (eleven years ago)
I am super excited to watch this show crash and burn, don't like that nick pizza fella one bit
― Clay, Thursday, 18 June 2015 23:05 (eleven years ago)
interesting point from a mixed review of the new season
I'm not a person who ever had much of a problem with True Detective's self-seriousness; I'd take it any day over the winking camp of a Ryan Murphy show. There is a sincerity to Pizzolatto's writing that is admirable even when it's kind of dumb. And when the first hint of real Carcosa-esque weirdness does eventually rear its head, I sat up immediately. That wouldn't work on a show that wasn't as committed to its cause, no matter how humorless and nihilistic.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/6/19/8813001/true-detective-season-two-review-nic-pizzolatto-hbo
― definite parallels between Dany and Rachel Dolezal (slothroprhymes), Friday, 19 June 2015 18:04 (eleven years ago)
Sad cops sad copsWhatchagonna do
― Οὖτις, Monday, 22 June 2015 03:56 (eleven years ago)
farrell is on 100 thousand trillion
― definite parallels between Dany and Rachel Dolezal (slothroprhymes), Monday, 22 June 2015 04:07 (eleven years ago)
its totally cop goth
― Hell Books (latebloomer), Monday, 22 June 2015 04:10 (eleven years ago)
which one is the true detective, it is farrell right?
― got bent (mild cheezed off vibes) (s.clover), Monday, 22 June 2015 04:19 (eleven years ago)
don't just go by the mustache sterl you know mustaches are tricky
― j., Monday, 22 June 2015 04:26 (eleven years ago)
is there a mustache ceremony when they pick the true detective
― got bent (mild cheezed off vibes) (s.clover), Monday, 22 June 2015 04:31 (eleven years ago)
No spoilers please sheesh
― Hell Books (latebloomer), Monday, 22 June 2015 04:36 (eleven years ago)
spoiler alert........................mustache
― j., Monday, 22 June 2015 04:37 (eleven years ago)
Got into this, and wasn't a fan of season one. Pretty low on the pretentious scale. Didn't feel like philosophy/artiness/etc pushed into the story; felt organic.
Best line was Vince Vaughn's "You're supposed to savor that stuff" or words to that effect.
― ... (Eazy), Monday, 22 June 2015 05:36 (eleven years ago)
Twitter points out that all of the women are introduced in their underwear. But hey, that's the genre.
― ... (Eazy), Monday, 22 June 2015 05:37 (eleven years ago)
underwear detective
― lag∞n, Monday, 22 June 2015 05:38 (eleven years ago)
bikini inspector
need a ryan co-sign before i commit myself
― 龜, Monday, 22 June 2015 11:10 (eleven years ago)
Twitter points out that all of the women are introduced in their underwear.
Kelly Reilly is first seen wearing a full-length robe. And her character is quite obviously Vince Vaughn's equal partner.
I liked it. It's a cop show - not as good as some, but better than most. I'm in for at least one more episode, maybe two. Then I have to decide whether to renew my HBO Now subscription for another month.
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 22 June 2015 12:16 (eleven years ago)
Yeah--can't you see she's wearing a ROBE?
― max, Monday, 22 June 2015 12:16 (eleven years ago)
this was ok, but im having a little trouble with Vaughn. It's fine for a first episode, but I can see where some of the negative reviews are coming from if the next two are similar. Really liked the last third, where exposition gave way to dread.
Did I mishear or did the Taylor Kitsch character mention he worked for a Blackwater-esque company? And then said "we worked for America" or some such.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 13:04 (eleven years ago)
Army was the ref i thought
― Οὖτις, Monday, 22 June 2015 15:31 (eleven years ago)
thanks ryan i'll watch it then
― 龜, Monday, 22 June 2015 15:38 (eleven years ago)
I need to watch the scene again (not with the girlfriend but when he's getting put on leave) but I googled it and he mentions something called "black mountain." I'm sure that'll come up again.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 15:39 (eleven years ago)
there is kind of a weird tension between the beautiful, bressonian-model quality of vaughan's face in repose - set & observed as an inscrutable, ruined object - & then the vaughan who has to do stuff, who's stiff & doesn't seem to be threshing internally the way it would probably be good if he was. i thought the direction in this was like a noticeable step down - the overhead shots frequent & un-fluid - & it routinely clipped moments that could have been good to sit with for a moment, like vaughan smashing a glass, &c.
i'm p into mcadams & kitsch. last shot was super ridiculous but the first thing that had any kinda dynamic to it. 龜 c'mmon what did you think.xp oo
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 22 June 2015 15:45 (eleven years ago)
yeah that's true about Vaughn! those shots of his face in the bar were beautiful.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 15:47 (eleven years ago)
do you mean the last shot of them looking at each other or the aerial shot of the coastline lit up by the police lights. both were awesome imo.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 15:50 (eleven years ago)
the motorcycle scene was really cool
― nose, Monday, 22 June 2015 15:53 (eleven years ago)
i thought the direction in this was like a noticeable step down - the overhead shots frequent & un-fluid - & it routinely clipped moments that could have been good to sit with for a moment, like vaughan smashing a glass, &c.i'm p into mcadams & kitsch. last shot was super ridiculous but the first thing that had any kinda dynamic to it.
i'm p into mcadams & kitsch. last shot was super ridiculous but the first thing that had any kinda dynamic to it.
otm
― max, Monday, 22 June 2015 15:56 (eleven years ago)
yeah i mean the shot of the eye-contact shoot-out between the four of them. but it's good. if there's just convoluted eye contact subtext from now on i will be pleased
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 22 June 2015 16:00 (eleven years ago)
probably projecting but I read "who's this fucking loser" in each of their faces, which made me laugh.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 16:01 (eleven years ago)
lol @ fear of projection in this scenario but yeah totally. definitely more interested in just aggro shoe-squeezing exchanges between esoteric branches of local law enforcement than general self-destructive moustache-wave behaviour.
there is a kenneth lonergan flick coming out sometime which was originally going to have matt damon in, & then got downgraded to starring casey affleck, & i feel like it's going to be hard to watch knowing this - watching matt damon be vulnerable's always so good, & earned, & credible, like it's buried, elicited unwillingly, but with casey affleck it's kinda just right there, like his voice, &c. & colin farrell as livewire is closer to just masculine movie cliche than mcconaughey livewire, i think. like it'll be better if in a couple episodes he's just tangled up in stuff that isn't all ego.
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 22 June 2015 16:09 (eleven years ago)
Vaughn does manage to put across a kind of exaggerated wounded compassion (esp toward Ray) a few times--though it's hard to tell at this point how were supposed to take it.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 16:14 (eleven years ago)
like, in a lot of ways he seems the most vulnerable of the characters, or at least the least emotionally armored.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 16:15 (eleven years ago)
ha I missed this. yes you have my blessing. (please note I have no confidence in my own taste)
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 16:25 (eleven years ago)
if there's one thing i can't be objective about its self-serious philosophical genre exercises.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 16:26 (eleven years ago)
So am I the only one who was screaming for Farrell to stand up from the booth and smash that girl's guitar against the wall, John Belushi style?
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 22 June 2015 16:55 (eleven years ago)
maybe a reach but sorta twin peaks "it is happening again" vibe to that scene that i really dug.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 16:57 (eleven years ago)
so many close-ups.
based on a single ep, the biggest difference between Season 2 and Season 1 is Season 2 feels like a TV show.
― resulting post (rogermexico.), Monday, 22 June 2015 16:57 (eleven years ago)
i thought the direction in this was like a noticeable step down - the overhead shots frequent & un-fluid
Happen to be writing this from Ventura County, but I like how the overhead shots connect the geography of the area - the overpasses in the Valley vs. the ones further north and so on.
― ... (Eazy), Monday, 22 June 2015 16:58 (eleven years ago)
― resulting post (rogermexico.), Monday, June 22, 2015 12:57 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
what did season 1 feel like
― got bent (mild cheezed off vibes) (s.clover), Monday, 22 June 2015 17:01 (eleven years ago)
pretty disappointed molly lambert isn't doing recaps for Grantland (she was the only one i would read last season) but i enjoyed the new guy's take on Farrell.
Rust Cohle was supposed to be cool — like an amalgamation of John Wayne, Dean Martin, and Ricky Nelson from Rio Bravo — morally certain, drunkenly charming, and very, very pretty. Farrell is none of these things. He is not cool. When he talks, it’s with a pinched, nasal voice that’s uncomfortable with being heard. He repeats lessons on fatherhood that he’s read in a book. As for his look, I can’t claim to be totally up on the fashion trends of industrial Los Angeles law enforcement, but with his bolo tie, Magnum, P.I. mustache, and ’90s Christian Slater hair, he looks like the monster created by someone who has spent too many late nights watching too many cop shows and Westerns.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 17:04 (eleven years ago)
http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/the-homer-inline2.jpg
― j., Monday, 22 June 2015 17:08 (eleven years ago)
GTA V: the TV show
― calstars, Monday, 22 June 2015 17:12 (eleven years ago)
interesting to read this; fwiw i guess i'm thinking more of the architectural shots than the highways, where we'd get this kind of fragmented four-shot interlude just showing Some Industrial Sites/commercial zones as establishment or dressing, but in this kinda arrhythmic way, without a lot of grace. i can't remember thinking this about the highways. i liked the shot of the guy riding the bike, silhouetted against its light.
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 22 June 2015 17:31 (eleven years ago)
>I can’t claim to be totally up on the fashion trends of industrial Los Angeles law enforcement, but with his bolo tie, Magnum, P.I. mustache, and ’90s Christian Slater hair, he looks like the monster created by someone who has spent too many late nights watching too many cop shows and Westerns.
i am certain this is what they were going for. just total, foot to the floor, cliche cop.
― AKA Thermo Thinwall (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 22 June 2015 18:08 (eleven years ago)
one of the interesting things about the first season is how it took that quality of some noir in which it's sometimes hard to tell which plot elements have direct bearing on the mystery in question and which are simply part of, let's say, the atmosphere or environment and made it in many respect the explicit focus of the show, making the (ethical?) question of disentangling the specific perpetrator from the "context" (here quite literally cosmic) of the crime something that Rust, at least, has to grapple with. (not for nothing is he distracted by a literal vision of the cosmos right before getting shivved by the murderer.)
here im curious if a similar gesture of narrowing in after widening out (pretty typical of some noir, i'd say) will take hold, given that NP has already stated he's pared away most of the occult vibes. those shots of winding freeways seem to suggest something different from season 1's ancient and pervasive evil, maybe something more labyrinthine, some way in which things hang together or are connected in their complexity, as if those shots are dramatizing the plot mechanizations that are brining these lost souls into the same time and place. even the other aerial shots of industrial complexes seem to be full of information connecting to itself.
― ryan, Monday, 22 June 2015 18:21 (eleven years ago)
i only skimmed the write-ups but it's kinda nice knowing that this - like how cliched its concerns might be, how superficial its reliance on the glamour of masculine broodiness is - is all subject to just whatever happens in the other episodes, that it can all accumulate weight in retrospect. & i hope the circling overhead stuff turns out to be charged w/ psychogeographic meaning, BUT the justin longness of everything makes me feel like it's kinda just wheel-spinning, like cycling through satisfying dress-up scenery (vince vaughan in a robe hanging outside his modernist house in the hills, mulholland drive cruising, &c). the ominous ambient music overload while the lawyer's prodding colin farrell about his wife's killer* feels kinda just like autopilot, to me, & the obvious worst case scenario is that it's the sorta noir-y dressing of s1 without the attention to emptying out & reusing tropes that s1 had.
* hey so ps i - ugh - read some thing last night that mentioned that colin farrell ('s character no libel) killed the guy who attacked his wife; i know this was set-up & alluded to but did i miss a part where we learned the guy actually died?
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 22 June 2015 20:16 (eleven years ago)
Is the opening credits music leonard cohen
― Οὖτις, Monday, 22 June 2015 20:18 (eleven years ago)