Rideshare services - Uber, Lyft, Hailo, etc.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1097 of them)

Really interesting. I wonder how it will go on appeal.

from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Wednesday, 17 June 2015 19:40 (eight years ago) link

starting to wonder if Courtney's ever been to France before:
http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/Courtney-Love-Attacked-in-Paris-by-Mob-of-Taxi-6348842.php

Οὖτις, Thursday, 25 June 2015 20:31 (eight years ago) link

Courtney Love's comments are being widely publicized in France; I gather she doesn't know that negatively comparing places to Baghdad is something racists here do.

gov today says it's going to enforce the law against uberpop; not sure how that's going to work but

droit au butt (Euler), Friday, 26 June 2015 09:35 (eight years ago) link

if you use uber you are an advocate/a lobbyist/collaborator ?

conrad, Friday, 26 June 2015 09:38 (eight years ago) link

lol u mistyped a question mark at the end

2011’s flagrantly ceremonious rock-opera (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 26 June 2015 10:18 (eight years ago) link

controversial opinion: surge pricing is good

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 19:44 (eight years ago) link

in cities and areas where transportation is available and private transportation is purely a luxury, I could see that it would be viable

as it is, uber is displacing transportation with controlled rates in areas that lack good public transportation, meaning people who really need a ride (and are able to wait a little while) will still have to pay much more

that and the fact that uber takes the lion's share of surge pricing dollars

Upright Mammal (mh), Friday, 26 June 2015 19:59 (eight years ago) link

if you cross a picket line you're a scab.

Eric Burdon & War, On Drugs (Cosmic Slop), Friday, 26 June 2015 20:10 (eight years ago) link

can't argue that

Upright Mammal (mh), Friday, 26 June 2015 20:15 (eight years ago) link

people who really need a ride (and are able to wait a little while) will still have to pay much more

vs people who really need a while and can't wait and are willing to pay a lil more for it to come

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 20:16 (eight years ago) link

waiting an hour for a cab on NYE or after big free outdoor concert where even public transit is stuffed is bad, so many ppl would pay more to gtfo & more drivers would show up

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 20:19 (eight years ago) link

that and the fact that uber takes the lion's share of surge pricing dollars

they have to give something to incentivize more drivers to actually show up though

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 20:22 (eight years ago) link

how uber splits up the ca$h is a separate issue though

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 20:24 (eight years ago) link

the surge price downside is if I'm not in that neighborhood and break my arm. now not only do I wait much longer, I pay significantly more to get to the hospital because a bunch of assholes went to a giant concert

Upright Mammal (mh), Friday, 26 June 2015 20:26 (eight years ago) link

the incentive they give is... business
if they have the majority of the taxi-like vehicle traffic in their system, then the times when people use your service instead of uber is limited to surge periods when you would have been busy anyway

Upright Mammal (mh), Friday, 26 June 2015 20:28 (eight years ago) link

the incentive they give is... business

no that's the incentive under fixed rates

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 20:30 (eight years ago) link

i don't see why broken arm dude is better off in a fixed rate system. what if he lives somewhere it wasn't worth it for fixed ride cabs to go?

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 20:31 (eight years ago) link

like let's be real, on-demand automobile transportation in a large urban area is ideally a luxury or used for special cases of need. the reality is that public transportation is not there, and in mid-sized cities (or ones that are large but with shitty public transport) uber is succeeding in expanding the user base but has a number of regressive practices that screw over some drivers and passengers who need basic on-demand transportation

Upright Mammal (mh), Friday, 26 June 2015 20:32 (eight years ago) link

Uber's been a huge story in Toronto the past month or two. I never use cabs, so I haven't been following closely.

clemenza, Friday, 26 June 2015 20:33 (eight years ago) link

xp that's the problem with private taxi systems in general. some places have regulations in place guaranteeing you will get a ride eventually, but uber's trying to work around that, too

Upright Mammal (mh), Friday, 26 June 2015 20:33 (eight years ago) link

I get that more cars showing up when a huge event ends is definitely an opportunity to charge more money for prioritized service, but other than the increased price part, don't taxis tend to swarm around those events anyway, since it's an easy source of guaranteed fares?

Upright Mammal (mh), Friday, 26 June 2015 20:40 (eight years ago) link

most taxis working during a surge would go to the surge, the rest would go scoop up fares elsewhere. the problem isn't cabs being directed to surge areas, the problem is not enough cabs during the surge, which pricing fixes by giving drivers who wouldn't have gone out incentive to do so

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 21:19 (eight years ago) link

people were pissed cause they raised prices during a power outage in affected nabes. I get the knee jerk moral disgust, but the effect is more cabs for ppl who need to gtfo of the power outage

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 21:22 (eight years ago) link

*people in Toronto were pissed

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 21:22 (eight years ago) link

i don't think there's anything austrian about this argument?

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 21:45 (eight years ago) link

nobody seems to mind surge pricing for airlines, hotels, etc etc basically everything. in the long term more cabs and market pricing is gonna make cab rides more affordable and accessible, surge pricing once in a while doesn't change that. it was almost impossible to hail a legal cab and take it to a poor / far out part of the nation's biggest cab city until recently and nobody seemed to care.

uber is a terrible company for totally different reasons.

iatee, Friday, 26 June 2015 21:59 (eight years ago) link

what are they?

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 22:01 (eight years ago) link

it flaunts the law openly which gives it an advantage over anybody playing fair and had the venture money to get away with it, pretty clearly aims to be a monopoly, brags about how well paid its drivers are when they'll pretty obv have their wages driven down to oblivion eventually, gets its way via lobbyists / behind closed doors

iatee, Friday, 26 June 2015 22:11 (eight years ago) link

oh, lyfe

irl lol (darraghmac), Friday, 26 June 2015 23:06 (eight years ago) link

agree wth the breaking the law/lobbyists stuff being shitty. but i'm not so sure about wages & monopoly. i mean, i'm sure they aspire to be a monopoly (don't we all) but will they? are taxis a natural monopoly? there's still competition among taxi companies, right? why would rideshare apps be any different then? i guess downloading two apps onto your phone is a bit more of a pain in the ass than saving 2 separate taxi company numbers

flopson, Friday, 26 June 2015 23:17 (eight years ago) link

it flaunts the law openly which gives it an advantage over anybody playing fair and had the venture money to get away with it, pretty clearly aims to be a monopoly, brags about how well paid its drivers are when they'll pretty obv have their wages driven down to oblivion eventually, gets its way via lobbyists / behind closed doors

this is like, all interweb companies since the 90s

j., Saturday, 27 June 2015 00:00 (eight years ago) link

uber's insane valuation shows that a lot of people think that it's more than just a company that eats the taxi industry - like if that's all that happens in the end then yeah it will have to compete on price. if it ends up serving as the technology for a deeper transportation network then it might actually end up w/ a pretty scary monopoly.

iatee, Saturday, 27 June 2015 00:01 (eight years ago) link

yea but then we can just anti trust it

flopson, Saturday, 27 June 2015 05:35 (eight years ago) link

more like goober

e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Saturday, 27 June 2015 05:42 (eight years ago) link

I stand with iatee

Upright Mammal (mh), Saturday, 27 June 2015 15:11 (eight years ago) link

......

waiting for public transport?

irl lol (darraghmac), Saturday, 27 June 2015 16:03 (eight years ago) link

:)

Upright Mammal (mh), Saturday, 27 June 2015 16:12 (eight years ago) link

lol

some rich ppl put money on it becoming 'technology for a deeper transportation network' isn't justification for doing anything now though

flopson, Saturday, 27 June 2015 16:32 (eight years ago) link

well yeah esp since it isn't a monopoly yet, but I do think not giving your money to a thuggish company when there are other alternatives is probably a good idea

iatee, Saturday, 27 June 2015 16:39 (eight years ago) link

also cars suck? this isn't hard.

e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Sunday, 28 June 2015 06:48 (eight years ago) link

the conviction that it's absolutely necessary to be able to travel anywhere at any time for the right market price is so fucking gross and unhealthy.

e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Sunday, 28 June 2015 07:19 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile fossil fuel extraction is destroying all the poor rural areas that these companies and their users won't give a shit about until coastal flooding gets bad and it's way too late. fuck yeah they should be blocked but more than that literally all their resources should be redirected toward alternative energy development.

e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Sunday, 28 June 2015 07:36 (eight years ago) link

this kind of energy being invested in a "new" form that is really just a more efficiently parasitic version of the old one, while the new forms that earth wants for survival are put on the backburner is so infuriating.

e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Sunday, 28 June 2015 07:51 (eight years ago) link

where are the wind turbine thugs? we need amoral assholes making a shitload of money on solar panels. the possibility is there. if a company can make their dream of strong arming taxis out of existence a reality surely we can dredge up an incentive of billions in an artificial market of solar panel bucks or w/e. we have smart economists, even on this board, maybe they could combine a model for an alt energy market with one for being kewl and kill two birds with one stone.

e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Sunday, 28 June 2015 08:10 (eight years ago) link

mega otm

adam, Sunday, 28 June 2015 14:07 (eight years ago) link

nobody seems to mind surge pricing for airlines, hotels, etc etc basically everything.

People freaking hate airline pricing, are you kidding me? And what they especially hate about it is the unpredictability and time-dependence.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 28 June 2015 14:09 (eight years ago) link

There are def amoral asshole thugs making bank off of solar panels are u kidding

Οὖτις, Sunday, 28 June 2015 14:18 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.