Me too!
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 15:14 (eleven years ago)
Detective wearing singlet on air got rattled (12)
Easy enough clue in today's Everyman, but one element I could see upsetting people (not me tho, I like stuff like that)
― Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Sunday, 31 May 2015 16:21 (eleven years ago)
grauniad going for the web developer audience: <span>Minister from cabinet </span><i>almost</i><span> right about several bits of information </span> (9)
― ledge, Wednesday, 3 June 2015 12:11 (eleven years ago)
^ That confused me a lot because I thought your formatting error was part of the clue!
It's hardly obscure though? I'm far from a web developer and I got it, the computery bit of the clue is a p common word
― Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 13:39 (eleven years ago)
the tags were included in the clue as printed
― Keith Moom (Neil S), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 13:41 (eleven years ago)
Oh haha
(They aren't on the app version)
― Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 13:43 (eleven years ago)
It almost sounds like John Connor and Kyle Reese avoid Sinatra's regrets (3,3,2,7)
― ledge, Thursday, 4 June 2015 08:27 (eleven years ago)
don't get why the setter would want to italicize "almost" anyway
also "press" for cabinet is v obscure
― anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Thursday, 4 June 2015 09:23 (eleven years ago)
xp I could give this a more contemporary spin:
It almost sounds like Mad Max and Immortan Joe avoid Sinatra's regrets (3,3,2,7)
― ledge, Thursday, 4 June 2015 16:23 (eleven years ago)
c.mon, with the letter count it's a gimme
― ledge, Friday, 5 June 2015 11:03 (eleven years ago)
too few to mention
but i don't get why. i recognise the terminator references and the mad max reference but...
i think last week's everyman is languishing in my bag with 0 (zero) clues done. 8(
― koogs, Friday, 5 June 2015 11:12 (eleven years ago)
two future men shun?
would not have got there without letter count (also, while reconstructing the pun got stuck on "Menschen" for a while, and now I'm trying to think of a not completely tortuous context where that could work... afraid I didn't like the "future"/"few to" part so much)
― undergraduate dance (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 5 June 2015 12:10 (eleven years ago)
groans, tortuously constructed ♥️♥️♥️
― Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Friday, 5 June 2015 13:13 (eleven years ago)
afraid I didn't like the "future"/"few to" part so much
i'd certainly have been cursing the compiler if i'd seen in a real crossword. even with the 'almost'.
― ledge, Friday, 5 June 2015 13:14 (eleven years ago)
^this post is a clue btw xp
― sink marker (wins), Saturday, 6 June 2015 12:01 (eleven years ago)
aw
― ledge, Saturday, 6 June 2015 19:19 (eleven years ago)
It was a cult AND a sincere post! thats why it's so clever.
― sink marker (wins), Saturday, 6 June 2015 20:03 (eleven years ago)
*clue ffs
Two points in dog delight (7)
Made me laugh out loud on the train this morning.
― Half as cool as Man Sized Action (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 17 June 2015 14:04 (ten years ago)
still working on it...
grauniand puzzle after lex's heart today, but i struggled.
― ledge, Thursday, 2 July 2015 12:59 (ten years ago)
yeah it's a toughie. Got the long anagram, scratching my head over the rest
― Keith Moom (Neil S), Thursday, 2 July 2015 13:38 (ten years ago)
Tuesday's Guardian had Eric Clapton as an anagram of Narcoleptic, which was pretty good.
― mahb, Thursday, 2 July 2015 15:11 (ten years ago)
So I finished the prize crossword yesterday, but I can't for the life of me parse this clue:
Guardian Prize crossword No 26,615, 18 Down: President might introduce ads to create trends or reach family men? (4)
I have the answer but don't see how "create trends" fits in? The clue would work without it, so it must mean something, but what?
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Sunday, 5 July 2015 14:11 (ten years ago)
I can't solve the clue but I think trends = fads
― anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Sunday, 5 July 2015 18:25 (ten years ago)
ok that makes no sense to me still. The answer is ford (for dads), I think you're right that fads fits in somehow but I can't make it work. Seems an overstuffed clue to me but maybe it all works lovely once you can see it idk
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Monday, 6 July 2015 08:46 (ten years ago)
ah then it's "might introduce ads to create trends" = F + OR + "[might introduce ads to] reach family men" = D
― anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Monday, 6 July 2015 11:47 (ten years ago)
Oh yeah lol
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Monday, 6 July 2015 12:03 (ten years ago)
Having no preference in bedroom, police enter here, finding killer in bed (9)
maybe cheeky, maybe offensive, who can say
― This is for my new ringpiece, so please only serious answers (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 July 2015 15:20 (ten years ago)
Seems like setters are really into clueing "bi" recently
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Friday, 10 July 2015 15:43 (ten years ago)
first time i've noticed it but i've not been doing crosswords very often lately
― This is for my new ringpiece, so please only serious answers (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 July 2015 15:47 (ten years ago)
One was like "fan of guys and dolls" something something
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Friday, 10 July 2015 15:49 (ten years ago)
surely time for setters to start incorporating "cis" into their work
― This is for my new ringpiece, so please only serious answers (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 July 2015 15:51 (ten years ago)
*writes letter to editor*
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Friday, 10 July 2015 15:53 (ten years ago)
just seems a handy 3 letter block
― This is for my new ringpiece, so please only serious answers (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 July 2015 15:54 (ten years ago)
Hard to clue for in a non-obvious but non-offensive way prob
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Friday, 10 July 2015 16:16 (ten years ago)
didn't stop them with "bi"
― This is for my new ringpiece, so please only serious answers (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 July 2015 16:17 (ten years ago)
Ha true, it's just I can't even think of a way to clue that without adding like a sentence to the clue
― the story of ilm: an ottyssey (wins), Friday, 10 July 2015 16:35 (ten years ago)
It's not sufficiently clear or accurate ("having no preference in bedroom" is obv super-accurate) but the first thing that came to mind was e.g.
Pope's father gets first point as assigned (7)
(I'm not verr good at these; mostly do quicks/GKs these days tbh, over booze w/a cryptic-hating companion)
― Abraham raves doubtlessly (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 10 July 2015 18:37 (ten years ago)
that's nice. the SJW crossword movement proceeds apace
― This is for my new ringpiece, so please only serious answers (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 July 2015 20:25 (ten years ago)
Annoying one in front of king and son in capital city (7)
i had I _ K _ O _ _ and really wanted this to be INKTOMI but it wasn't to be
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iktomi
― koogs, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 09:38 (ten years ago)
that must've been irritating ;)
― the lion tweets tonight (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 August 2015 10:05 (ten years ago)
The answer looks really obvious but I can't parse the capital city part?
― anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Wednesday, 5 August 2015 10:19 (ten years ago)
somewhere in Italy
― Neil S, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 10:21 (ten years ago)
yes indeed
― paolo, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 11:44 (ten years ago)
did all but one of that one on the train on sunday with an eyebrow pencil. left with 'Overall employment system', N_T_O_K, I daresay it will come to me five seconds after typing this...
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 12:03 (ten years ago)
nope.
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 12:06 (ten years ago)
cheated. kicking myself. not sure about 'overall' though - seems like exactly the opposite?
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 12:12 (ten years ago)
I think it works
― killfile with that .exe, you goon (wins), Wednesday, 5 August 2015 12:14 (ten years ago)
overalladjectiveˈəʊvərɔːl/1.taking everything into account.
― killfile with that .exe, you goon (wins), Wednesday, 5 August 2015 12:16 (ten years ago)
I agree with ledge, it's hard to see the relationship between 'overall' and the answer
on the earlier one, d'oh. I was thinking of R as 'king' and trying to work around that.
― anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Wednesday, 5 August 2015 12:17 (ten years ago)