THE GAME OF THRONES/ASOIAF SPOILER THREAD (WARNING: SPOILERS)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1425 of them)

well, yeah

resulting post (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 21:22 (eleven years ago)

I still am resenting the fact they cut dumb Dorne boy who gets incinerated by Dany's dragons

Mistah FAAB (sarahell), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 21:30 (eleven years ago)

There are a dozen better ways that lazy and cynical wedding night scene could have played out while retaining its inherent nastiness.

Dorne stuff ridiculous.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 21:33 (eleven years ago)

please do list them

resulting post (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 21:38 (eleven years ago)

Oh, I dunno. Littlefinger better preps her for her fate or at least acknowledges (how can he not know?) she is marrying a psycho, and warns her she is in for hell, but convinces her the reward will be worth the horror. Or rather than showing (as such) the rape, they just have it take place behind closed doors and imply it. Or instead of depicting Sansa's torture at the hands of a known vile reprobate reveal that she is steeled up to submit to his aggression for the sake of a bigger picture (a la Dany did). Or have her tell off his equally psycho underling (Miranda?) with a "you don't know who you're fucking with," have one of the North folk kill her, then later as Ramsay advances cut to a lantern in the high tower. Or strike Ramsay with impotence.. Or just have her kill Ramsay, since Roose is already expecting a new son/heir. And so on. Really, since they're deviating from the book, the sky is the limit, even within the restrictions Martin has implicitly set. Martin pointed out in his own reaction how the show is basically dealing with the repercussions of changes it made several seasons ago, so it's not like there's a "right" way to handle the story, if they're going off-book. The scene, at least with what we know, does nothing to develop the Ramsay character (whose torture of Theon already overdid it), Theon (who has been in a state of fear and disgust since the aforementioned), or Sansa (who has had to deal with tons of shit since the first moments of the show, iirc).

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:01 (eleven years ago)

Expecting Sansa to have taken some measure of vengeance immediately on Ramsay/prevent what happened from happening seems to be as Pollyanna-ish as expecting Arya to save Ned from his execution.

Madison Dumbbarfer (Leee), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:09 (eleven years ago)

Littlefinger is like Walter White in constantly winging it and lucking out so don't think he would trust Sansa to survive the Boltons - he's just gambling on it so he has a chance to take the North himself. It's preposterous but as he said "the climb is all there is".

nashwan, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:09 (eleven years ago)

The scene, at least with what we know, does nothing to develop the Ramsay character (whose torture of Theon already overdid it), Theon (who has been in a state of fear and disgust since the aforementioned), or Sansa (who has had to deal with tons of shit since the first moments of the show, iirc).

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, May 20, 2015

but this is rong tho. being forced to watch this is precisely the turn for theon. and we'll buy it when it comes bc we've been forced to watch too.

resulting post (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:11 (eleven years ago)

Which is a legit criticism I've encountered, that making this about Theon further robs Sansa of strength. Besides, why would this be the turn? He's already killed children and passed them off as her siblings. He's been tortured and emasculated at length by a monster. He's been turned into a slobbering dog. Why would the rape of the pseudo-sibling he totally sold out make sense as the straw that breaks his back?

Certainly Sansa could have killed Ramsay this early, given all the screen time spent showing him to be death-worthy and her tortured. Maybe she won't take vengeance at all, but at this point, there has been an awful lot of waiting for Sansa to fight back in some way. Because the alternative is she dies (which given all she's put up with would be ironically anti-climactic) or do nothing, which makes her a dead end.

My point is the show can do whatever it wants. Someone else pointed out that the new R-rated, non-stop violence Mad Max movie is literally about the liberation of model-hot sex slaves, and yet it avoids depictions of sex and sexual assault, let alone nudity, and leaves the bad stuff to the imagination (without ever lingering on it, or even speaking much about it), trusting the audience to put two and two together. But of course, trusting the audience is generally not one of the strengths of TV (let alone movies) but this far along in the show after so much nastiness it really does strike me as cynical to default to shock tactics. They already had the water cooler crowd cornered.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:15 (eleven years ago)

Which is a legit criticism I've encountered, that making this about Theon further robs Sansa of strength.

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, May 20, 2015

addressed upthread. this is "legit" if and only if you believe we're supposed to be seeing sansa achieve some sort of agency this season. that's a fantasy that littlefinger's offered her (and us), but raising and then dashing our hopes is kinda this show's thing so...

resulting post (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:37 (eleven years ago)

btw all my comments here are prefaced by my previous statements in the non-spoiler thread: wrt sansa, the show so far has been more cruel than the books, and nothing is gained by tossing her from one monster to another, but from a production perspective it beats losing her for a season.

resulting post (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:40 (eleven years ago)

I'm still surprised that Littlefinger left her with Ramsay. As much as he's a ladder-climber, I also thought he was angling for some Tully lovin'...

schwantz, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:41 (eleven years ago)

xps
Pretty sure the Mad Max movie avoided depictions of backstory and was quite deliberately light on context while GOT is 95% exposition and foreshadowing.

Conflicted about the whole thing but I don't find that comparison helpful at all.

Over 5 seasons we've essentially been conditioned by the fact that Sansa has so often been in danger of violence and physical trauma but had been spared the worst of it as others around her succumbed. I think that's why this feels like a grotesque betrayal of something the show never actually promised.

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:42 (eleven years ago)

Yeah of all things here the Littlefinger oversight makes the least amount of sense.

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:43 (eleven years ago)

Yes part of what makes the Sansa situation so troublesome is how many times she's been saved from rape and death before (Arya a few times too). She made it this far only to resign herself to the prospect of both via LF's desperate gamble and the slightest chance of it working.

Suspect Theon will sacrifice himself to save Sansa, killing Ramsay in the process. It leaves a sense of his redemption open to viewers, to balance a heroic deed at the end with his terrible crimes and punishment for them. Sansa's strength will come more thru surviving like Cersei and eventually beating LF at his own game (perhaps even to his own delight) I guess.

nashwan, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:46 (eleven years ago)

I think this is how they bring Brienne back into the game or whoever in the north remembers and answers to small scale LOTR beacons

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:49 (eleven years ago)

if you believe we're supposed to be seeing sansa achieve some sort of agency this season

Sure, but like I said, why bring her back to just punish her more? Why bring her back to do nothing? That doesn't achieve or advance anything. By rewriting the book, which is fair game, they have deliberately opted to bring her back, but to what end? I guess we'll see. Or maybe not. It's just erratic or perhaps simply problematic storytelling, imo, and even if there is an overarching goal, the show does seem to be squandering its runtime by cruising ahead full-throttle but choosing wrong-feeling or seemingly gratuitous beats to stuff in its constrained (by time/number of eps) narrative.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:54 (eleven years ago)

It's just erratic or perhaps simply problematic storytelling, imo...

Now we're getting somewhere.

if there is an overarching goal

It seems to be "don't lose sophie for a season like we did with bran/hodor"

resulting post (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 23:00 (eleven years ago)

I just think a lot of people are really tired of shows/films/art/culture putting female characters in there without a clue as to what they're there for, and then just rapes and punishes them over and over and over. You can say that GoT never promised to let Sansa have agency, but why the fuck show her story? What's the point? Yeah, she's a Stark, but so's Rickon, and people don't care about him. The show took this character from the books, showed all her suffering, and then when her suffering in the books stopped, they created another storyline for her so she could suffer some more. What the fuck?

Frederik B, Thursday, 21 May 2015 00:45 (eleven years ago)

no argument wrt exhaustion or wrt that general feeling of "seriously guys?"

wrt why focus on her story, we honestly don't know yet, right? the assumption is that sansa will end up a paranoid machiavel somewhere between littlefinger and cersei with tragic consequences down the line but who knows?

resulting post (rogermexico.), Thursday, 21 May 2015 01:15 (eleven years ago)

Yeah, we don't know. But I think at this point, people's confidence in the showrunners to turn this story into something good is pretty much nil. Nothing came of Jamie's rape of Cersei, after all. I think more people have hoped that they'd learn from that mistake, and not invent yet another rape of a major character in the very next season. But nope.

Frederik B, Thursday, 21 May 2015 01:20 (eleven years ago)

idk afaict jaime and cersei don't seem to be snuggling much lately

resulting post (rogermexico.), Thursday, 21 May 2015 01:27 (eleven years ago)

I've spoilered the remainder of the books for myself now and we seem to be virtually at the end as far as the TV show goes?

What's the original books Sansa supposed to be doing all this time in the later books? Does she just disappear?

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 May 2015 10:51 (eleven years ago)

kickin' around the Vale in disguise

resulting post (rogermexico.), Thursday, 21 May 2015 13:38 (eleven years ago)

Has this ever happened before in pop culture, where a series or story is adapted into a TV show before the story is done, and the TV show overtakes the narrative of the original material and has to make it up as it goes along? I guess "Walking Dead" is like this, to an extent, but that was never devised with an end in mind, so it doesn't really matter. This is different. Must be frustrating to Martin, unless he is really good at focusing, because the popularity of the show will make many people approach his (in theory) forthcoming novels like *they're* the adaptation, or they're the ones that are different. Not to mention that the show, at least in some places, will start to spoil his narrative (vs. the opposite). I mean, does he watch the show? Wouldn't it be tough to write a book with the show and its changes in mind, knowing (apparently) that both show and novels are ultimately (probably) ending up at more or less the same place?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 May 2015 14:30 (eleven years ago)

he writes for the show, so he probably watches it yeah

and he's already admitted that the TV version of Osha made him change his plans for the character

Number None, Thursday, 21 May 2015 15:59 (eleven years ago)

I have to say I'm pretty impressed that the tv guys have managed to abandon the shitty plotlines of the last two books and come up with something worse though

Number None, Thursday, 21 May 2015 16:00 (eleven years ago)

I wonder how show watchers who aren't readers are gonna respond to cersei's "walk," lena headey has confirmed that that's gonna happen

slothroprhymes, Friday, 22 May 2015 00:32 (eleven years ago)

well, once they brought in the zealots, i figured that was definitely gonna happen

Mistah FAAB (sarahell), Friday, 22 May 2015 05:05 (eleven years ago)

they gave themselves a fig leaf by making the high septon do it first but I assume it will be very hard to watch and people will lose their minds

resulting post (rogermexico.), Friday, 22 May 2015 07:23 (eleven years ago)

first casting leak for season six lists what is clearly euron greyjoy and randyl tarly as the first major parts they're looking for.

Clay, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 21:29 (eleven years ago)

i feel like the show has slowly killed my enthusiasm for the series, i was super excited back during season 1 to see everything translated to the screen so well and now i don't know if i'm even going to bother reading the last couple books when they come out

ciderpress, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 21:42 (eleven years ago)

Really though it's probably more that I've had 10 years to find and read better fantasy series while grrm mostly sat on his thumbs

ciderpress, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 22:08 (eleven years ago)

Would love recommendations!

Madison Dumbbarfer (Leee), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 22:09 (eleven years ago)

Robin hobb imo

demonic mnevice (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 22:47 (eleven years ago)

really surprised that they're bothering to bring in euron (and what the hell even is the point of samwell's dad) but will obv be interested to see who they cast

slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 23:31 (eleven years ago)

super weird to see the guy who plays tormund giantsbane in travel commercials, btw

slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 23:33 (eleven years ago)

Samwell's backstory should translate well imo.

Anything Greyjoy gives me narcolepsy.

tsrobodo, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 23:35 (eleven years ago)

super weird to see the guy who plays tormund giantsbane in travel commercials, btw

if u haven't seen the film force majeure i'd recommend it. a lot of fun watching tormund as a yuppy euro ski tourist. (also it is an incredible film.)

Clay, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 23:40 (eleven years ago)

it's on my netflix list, plan to check it out soon

slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 23:55 (eleven years ago)

man that's an even weirder thought than the commercial almost, does he have the giant beard in majeure as well???

slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 26 May 2015 23:55 (eleven years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-izbWSV-xiIw/VE6x32ZoHqI/AAAAAAAAY4I/zCIVP-qwxdA/s1600/force%2Bmajeure-turist-kristofer%2Bhivju-johannes%2Bkuhnke.jpeg

sorry for the huge image but couldn't find a smaller version

Clay, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 00:01 (eleven years ago)

Robin hobb imo

DO NOT read the second book of the Soldier's Son trilogy

DJP, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 13:26 (eleven years ago)

I woke up and wrote this note yesterday at 3:48 AM. LOL

(Game of Thrones) theory:

- Jon Snow’s a Targaryen
- Jon Snow is murdered
- Melisandre (or Thoros of Myr) resurrects Jon Snow
- King’s blood

Allen (etaeoe), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 13:43 (eleven years ago)

Xpost yeah for hobb I basically meant to recommend the group of trilogies that take place in the same world (farseer, live ship, fool, the other one) but soldier son is outside of that iirc

demonic mnevice (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 14:15 (eleven years ago)

It is. It's also on the very short list of books I found physically repulsive and unpleasant to read (although it's in pretty good company with V and The Jungle, if for a completely different reason)

DJP, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 14:51 (eleven years ago)

jon snow dies

― diamonddave85,

Will he I wonder?

the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:29 (eleven years ago)

i would be really surprised if they didn't go there in some fashion, although perhaps he'll just be attacked/stabbed by ollie (or some alliser thorne goon, or thorne himself) - in this hypothetical the point would be not a "will he or wont he die" cliffhanger as in dance w/ dragons but to show how vulnerable he is

dellevadova depression beard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:45 (eleven years ago)

they could also obvs actually kill him and have melisandre bring him back, which i think is the most likely course

dellevadova depression beard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:46 (eleven years ago)

they are being v heavy handed about setting up that kid to kill him so it would be v cool if that was a bluff to psyche the book readers out and jon stays alive, maybe show the kid changing his mind at the last minute or something. however, most likely the kid is just going to kill him.

but as has been discussed previously, the story at the wall requires him to come back somehow, there is nothing there without him. if he wargs into a perma wolf that would be too weird i think, so presumably the red god brings him back to life, which then makes him a watchman, wildling and zombie, and maybe he can bring everyone together and settle things amicably.

Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:53 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.