Mad props for tomorrow's actually-sexy-for-once fashion spread, by the way. I told the girls it was your job to touch up the nipples in Photoshop.
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 18 November 2005 18:48 (eighteen years ago) link
Actually, that might improve the pages :)
― stet (stet), Friday, 18 November 2005 18:51 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 18 November 2005 18:54 (eighteen years ago) link
and alba, i've never touched up a nipple in my life :p
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 18 November 2005 18:56 (eighteen years ago) link
*bangs head on brick wall for ever*
oh, and i've given up on the fashion until monday, when i can maybe - just maybe - effect some form of fucking communication between the fashion stylist and the picture editor.
the original poster was right? who would aspire to this? apart from a pedant with a god complex.
oh, hang on.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 18 November 2005 19:05 (eighteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 18 November 2005 19:07 (eighteen years ago) link
1) i hate how brits call copy editors "sub-editors." copy editors do a very different job than story editors, department editors, editors-in-chief. we're not sub-anything. we have our own job to do. (i say "we" because i've paid the bills this way for much of my adult life.)
2) everyone who said "if you don't want your piece butchered, brush up on whatever style or reference guides the publication uses, be aware of how long your piece should be and exceed that so that with the dead wood being cut out your best stuff is likelier to stay in, and no matter how much it pains you, get used to writing the kind of writing that editors like to publish, and if that bothers you go home and start a blog" OTM OTM OTM.
3) i've never butchered a strong piece. i've never had to. yes, you absolutely should take it personally. sorry.
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 18 November 2005 21:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 18 November 2005 21:21 (eighteen years ago) link
― stet (stet), Friday, 18 November 2005 21:25 (eighteen years ago) link
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 18 November 2005 21:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 18 November 2005 21:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 18 November 2005 21:58 (eighteen years ago) link
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 18 November 2005 22:00 (eighteen years ago) link
Also, the most brilliant person I've ever known, the most brilliant person on ILX in my view, and its most dazzlingly good writer (all one person) is a sub-editor.
Ailsa, does anyone generally copy-edit job ads?
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 18 November 2005 22:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 18 November 2005 22:02 (eighteen years ago) link
Ailsa: it has no subs! All those sections make me weep (I'm on the daily, btw)xposts ahoy
― stet (stet), Friday, 18 November 2005 22:05 (eighteen years ago) link
that's the thing! if your writing truly does show originality and flair, that'll shine through no matter what the red pen does to it. trust me, a couple of word substitutions and deleted repetitions are not going to scratch the gleam off the hope diamond.
The job -- and the term -- comes from being literally the substitute for the editor
gotcha. don't understand why an editor would need a substitute, but i'm satisfied with your answer.
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 18 November 2005 22:13 (eighteen years ago) link
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 18 November 2005 22:16 (eighteen years ago) link
OTM re: flair. I find the ones who sound off the most about having it removed had hardly any to begin with, just high-school gimmery.
xpost: yeh? come and compete nationally with six quality papers and five tabloids for a market of five million readers in a landmass smaller than Oregon. You people don't know you're born!
― stet (stet), Friday, 18 November 2005 22:21 (eighteen years ago) link
I have no idea. You'd think, somewhere along the line, someone would, especially if it's in a national publication. The Her4ld is joyous compared to the horror that is the jobc3ntre website. Today I saw an advert for a job that required the applicant to work in a "fast paste environment". OK, "paced" *sounds* like "paste", but still, GET ONE COMMON SENSE!
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 18 November 2005 23:33 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 18 November 2005 23:34 (eighteen years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 19 November 2005 15:09 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 19 November 2005 15:28 (eighteen years ago) link
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:38 (eighteen years ago) link
That was supposed to be Jennifer Aniston in Office Space, wearing "flair" buttons.
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:52 (eighteen years ago) link
"editors as allies" is very true. most editors want to have good working relationships with their writers. they want a stable of talented, reliable, open-minded people to draw from (and then all those fledgling jelus mofos can call it nepotism). you can't do that if you're a bridge-burning asshole.
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 19 November 2005 18:45 (eighteen years ago) link
― mimi in st. louis (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 19 November 2005 18:48 (eighteen years ago) link
The ad I answered to get my current job was riddled with mistakes, quite big ones too - a pretty good indicator of how crap our personnel section is, as it turns out - but I think it worked in my favour because I was one of very few people who went for it after realising that the length of the contract was 18 months and not 18 days as stated.
― Mädchen (Madchen), Saturday, 19 November 2005 20:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:05 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sophisticated Boom Boom (kate), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― k/l (Ken L), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:09 (eighteen years ago) link
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:13 (eighteen years ago) link
wtf does it mean when it says that, please?
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:14 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:15 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sophisticated Boom Boom (kate), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link
http://homepage.mac.com/mattvant/Pix/TravMatt.jpg"Aw thanks, Martin!"
― Stark Minker (Ken L), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link
one starts as a reporter and works their way up :)
what training do you have, emsk? the NUJ runs subbing courses all over the place: they'd be a good place to start.
also: i fear a large part of PA's subbing operation is now in yorkshire somewhere. (or is it lancashire? no, that's northern and shell. ach: subs please check.)
if you want, drop me an e-mail off board (use the webmail link or i'll not see it for years) and i can give you the benefit of my immense wisdom hem-hem-hem.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 25 November 2005 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 25 November 2005 18:25 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 November 2005 18:28 (eighteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 25 November 2005 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 25 November 2005 18:31 (eighteen years ago) link
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 25 November 2005 18:33 (eighteen years ago) link
No wonder RJG is on the run.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 November 2005 18:38 (eighteen years ago) link
oh, wank. wonder why? goddamn ilx. never mind. i found it (in my spam folder) and shall reply when sober, over the weekend.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 25 November 2005 23:12 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 November 2005 23:13 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 25 November 2005 23:17 (eighteen years ago) link
(And here's a peeve: That scene in Shattered Glass where the publisher makes the whole editing staff go through the whole magazine circling every comma to make sure that each one has a complementary comma to go with it. Which only makes sense when you're using commas to set off a clause, not if you're breaking up discrete parts of a sentence. It was like, the movie was trying to show these wonky editors hard at wonky work, but it got the details wrong.
Then of course there's the move where Drew Barrymore is a copyeditor at a Chicago newspaper with her own office and personal assistant. Oh how I laughed. And cried.)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 25 November 2005 23:38 (eighteen years ago) link