"I dont know about whiteness but Carles doesn't use the word 'white' at all in that piece so I don't know why we are even talking about that."
Nobody said HE did; thread topic is about white stuff; at least two diff discussions going on here.
― Vic Perry, Thursday, 23 April 2015 20:04 (eleven years ago)
so is the social capital something you get from reading carles? is he not just transmitting his audience's anxieties about whether their choices are real choices back to them
idk, i mean its not adorno, but it's also accessible
― deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 23 April 2015 20:31 (eleven years ago)
http://www.troll.me/images/ancient-aliens-guy/white-people.jpg
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 23 April 2015 21:28 (eleven years ago)
i love and admire affluent white ppl
― no (Lamp), Thursday, 23 April 2015 21:30 (eleven years ago)
didnt read that carles thing but feel like 'contempo conformo' could be called something better... or just call these ppl yuppies like everyone else already does who h8s these ppl (i.e. me and my friends)
― no (Lamp), Thursday, 23 April 2015 21:31 (eleven years ago)
yuppies are diff tho
u don't have to be a yuppie to live a CC lifestyle
― deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 23 April 2015 21:56 (eleven years ago)
sounds more like young bobos so I guess carles is young david brooks
― anonanon, Thursday, 23 April 2015 22:11 (eleven years ago)
I just went out and tried to describe how people are living, using a method that might best be described as comic sociology. The idea is to get at the essence of cultural patterns, getting the flavor of the times without trying to pin it down with meticulous exactitude. Often I make fun of the social manners of my class (I sometimes think I've made a whole career out of self-loathing)
― anonanon, Thursday, 23 April 2015 22:13 (eleven years ago)
carles is like tao lin for me- I find his appeal incomprehensible and it makes me feel like I belong in a different generation
― Mordy, Thursday, 23 April 2015 23:22 (eleven years ago)
maybe a different message board idk
― thoughts you made second posts about (darraghmac), Thursday, 23 April 2015 23:26 (eleven years ago)
Tao Lin the abusive creep? You shouldn't feel too bad, tbh
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Thursday, 23 April 2015 23:32 (eleven years ago)
lol young david brooks. even though i like carles, i could see there being a weary paternalism behind the facade
― Treeship, Thursday, 23 April 2015 23:59 (eleven years ago)
seems like he's getting at some of the stuff Thomas Frank wrote about in the 90s with The Conquest of Cool except instead of critiquing marketing carles comes at it from the angle of "Look at these lames."
― Is It Any Wonder I'm Not the (President Keyes), Friday, 24 April 2015 00:47 (eleven years ago)
never thought id see the day
ilx turned on carles
― deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 24 April 2015 01:04 (eleven years ago)
sounds like carles is having an existential crisis. getting older happens to all of us, good buddy. we'll always have the justice jackets.
― ozmodiar, Friday, 24 April 2015 01:13 (eleven years ago)
i dunno, I'm totes old and really like Tao Lin but Carles leaves me cold. I think young David Brooks is actually a good comp; you admire the craft but there's something kind of emptily self-regarding about the whole project.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 24 April 2015 01:17 (eleven years ago)
Tao Lin and Carles are just two sides of the same despair. The former retreats into mysticism and the latter launches a guerilla attack on a culture that seems to repulse him (i say seems to bc carles is a persona.) Finding life meaningless is pretty old -- so not generational -- but the information overload element is new kinda. familiar exhaustion with bourgeois affectations/falsity but sped up
― Treeship, Friday, 24 April 2015 01:23 (eleven years ago)
I think they're both remarkably anti-social and anti-political. All choices are false choices/life is vanity are major themes for the two of them
― Treeship, Friday, 24 April 2015 01:28 (eleven years ago)
instead of critiquing marketing carles comes at it from the angle of "Look at these lames."
imo anthropology on homo marketus (which is always gonna be in danger of looking at these lames + which will require true humility & perspective) is gonna be a lot more useful going forward than fuck-the-corporations (though obv fuck the corporations). nb i thought this partic post was pretty boilerplate and the bit goole excerpted raised an eyebrow when i read it too. in general i have always thought carles is not as good as the thing he is trying to be has to be, but god bless.
but
he certainly has a knack for completely obliterating any sense of authorial point of view thru unhinged use of scare quoting
this a guilty pleasure for me; it is the very definition of a gimmick but sometimes i think just signposting cliches--acknowledging that this concept came from outside you and that you're not entirely sure you believe it but that it is now as inside you as any of your own feelings, that your authorial pov is not fully your own and you don't confidently understand the ways in which it's not--dissolves or unravels them faster than trying to purge them from your prose (which is what i do) as if they aren't squatting on your mind at all, as if you're brilliant and free. and since marketing works, mamabirdlike, by regurgitating cliches into you, experimental ways of dealing with them are presently v worthwhile artistic r&d. not that scare quotes are all that experimental in 2015 i guess.
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 24 April 2015 01:33 (eleven years ago)
(and not that writers haven't been Dealing With Marketing since the 1960s at the very least.)
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 24 April 2015 01:35 (eleven years ago)
where's our flaubert
― j., Friday, 24 April 2015 01:38 (eleven years ago)
anxiety of influence: a theory of gimmicky scare quoting
― Mordy, Friday, 24 April 2015 01:48 (eleven years ago)
dlh otm
― Treeship, Friday, 24 April 2015 01:48 (eleven years ago)
treeship otm
― drash, Friday, 24 April 2015 06:38 (eleven years ago)
'anxiety' of influence: a theory of gimmicky scare quotinganxiety of influence: a 'theory' of gimmicky scare quotinganxiety of influence: a theory of 'gimmicky' scare quotinganxiety of 'influence': a theory of gimmicky scare quoting'anxiety' of 'influence': a 'theory' of 'gimmicky' 'scare' quoting
― entry-level umami (mild bleu cheese vibes) (s.clover), Friday, 24 April 2015 07:01 (eleven years ago)
what a shit revive, consider yourselves disparaged
― nakhchivan, Friday, 24 April 2015 11:30 (eleven years ago)
Yep, mordy otm what a clinically insane amount of attention to give to this concept, person and writing
I did appreciate the hasty circumvention of the fact that dude isn't a white ppl nor is he talking about whiteness, that was good
― neetsooh ebebay (wins), Friday, 24 April 2015 12:58 (eleven years ago)
CRLS 4EVA bb
― Treeship, Friday, 24 April 2015 13:11 (eleven years ago)
2k9 for all time
― Treeship, Friday, 24 April 2015 13:15 (eleven years ago)
CC's are causing brunch wait times to skyrocket.
― Jeff, Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:43 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
gets it
― mh, Friday, 24 April 2015 14:02 (eleven years ago)
Yep, mordy otm what a clinically insane amount of attention to give to this concept, person and writining
― neetsooh ebebay (wins), Friday, April 24, 2015 7:58 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
He said on a board with an entire thread devoted to the subject
― deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 24 April 2015 14:02 (eleven years ago)
carles could be dressed like an urban lumberjack like all these other contemporary conformists for all we know, it's just the way things are
― mh, Friday, 24 April 2015 14:03 (eleven years ago)
Deej I did not say "writining" wtf
― neetsooh ebebay (wins), Friday, 24 April 2015 14:39 (eleven years ago)
lol
― Treeship, Friday, 24 April 2015 14:42 (eleven years ago)
innovative use of invented typos as gaslighting technique
― 'come around to your house and fuck your ho' (paraphrase) (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 24 April 2015 14:49 (eleven years ago)
did that c n p on a cell phone my bad
― deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 24 April 2015 14:50 (eleven years ago)
Literally twisting my words smh
― neetsooh ebebay (wins), Friday, 24 April 2015 14:51 (eleven years ago)
― deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:04 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i didn't think he had serious fans here!
― goole, Friday, 24 April 2015 15:44 (eleven years ago)
omg are you guys still talking about this
― Οὖτις, Friday, 24 April 2015 15:46 (eleven years ago)
xp i mean, i know there was thread...
(which is always gonna be in danger of looking at these lames + which will require true humility & perspective)
it's p easy to find images of the "CC" lyfe if you're digging around on the internet; it has its fullest state in a photoshoot, so there's a wealth of evidence for something that has a paper-thin existence. really surprised the perceptive, incisive carles ref'd "normcore" which is one of the great phoney-baloney made-up things that nobody ever did really.
what i'm trying to say is that nobody really lives this way. a style is always aspirational; not just in the nakedly classist sense that but, like, "i aspire to have this look and vibe at all times, but, like, i'm at the end of my laundry cycle right now."
all those women you hate at the brunch spot, what do they do when they go home?
― goole, Friday, 24 April 2015 16:03 (eleven years ago)
ftr it appears i posted on the hipster runoff thread 5 times in '09 and 1ce in '11
― goole, Friday, 24 April 2015 16:07 (eleven years ago)
fullest embodiment is this place imo http://www.sohohousechicago.com
― Florianne Fracke (La Lechera), Friday, 24 April 2015 16:19 (eleven years ago)
― goole, Friday, April 24, 2015 10:44 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
really? when i logged onto Facebook this piece was already shared by like 3 ilxors. i guess big hoos & jho & whoever the 3rd person was...crut? haven't realized this discussion is happening here, but
idk maybe its bc i didn't feel like i was being targeted but i always found him pretty pointedly funny when turning the cameras on his audience.
i was never a regular reader & no it's not an in depth commentary on How We Live but some of his pieces are just good imo, accessible, and more self-aware than they're given credit for as is evidenced by the first couple of jabs at him on this thread
― deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 24 April 2015 16:23 (eleven years ago)
i mean it's done thru the window dressing of caring about 'indie rock on the internet' but this kind of anticipates what most ppl in media have spent the last 2 years arguing about: http://hipsterrunoff.com/2012/10/how-indie-finally-officially-died-broken-indie-machine.html
― deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 24 April 2015 16:25 (eleven years ago)
it all just reads like "growing up is so CONFUSING" whininess to me
― Οὖτις, Friday, 24 April 2015 16:28 (eleven years ago)
if you guys think this lifestyle isn't real I have some photos and profiles to share
― mh, Friday, 24 April 2015 16:30 (eleven years ago)
it's totally real I just don't care about how "authentic" it is relative to other lifestyles
― Οὖτις, Friday, 24 April 2015 16:35 (eleven years ago)
not to minimize that wince-worthy passage about 'Contempoconformist women'—like one could argue he's trying to embody from a distance the dude who thinks like this but he doesn't really pull it off—& likewise he's made similarly eyebrow-raising statements related to race where u don't get the impression he's interrogating assumptions so much as reaffirming them
― deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 24 April 2015 16:35 (eleven years ago)
all lifestyles are authentic! not all make strides toward ""authenticity""
― mh, Friday, 24 April 2015 16:36 (eleven years ago)