Why is NPR so effing bad sometimes?

Popes, Supreme Court Judges & NPR Hosts.

The apparently lifetime appointment of Scott "The Fighting Quaker" Simon is reason enough to despise NPR. Even George Orwell didn't see this sensitive voiced slaughter apologist coming.

"There Are People Under Those Bombs," his Weekend Edition editorial from March 2003 explained - sounds like a sensitive title, right? - why it was more humane for people in Baghdad to die by bombing. Listen if you dare. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1242591

Compared to Fox News outright bloodlust, I find Simon's nuanced explanation far more sinister. As he soothingly says, "Humane and bombing may sound incongruous in the same sentence, but the United States and United Kingdom have said that it is possible to wage war against a bad regime for the sake of innocent people. The bombing we watch is a target of opportunity to demonstrate that they value the lives of innocent civilians as much as those of Iraqi commanders they seek to shock and awe into surrender."

"a target of opportunity." Guy saw the bright side of everything, you know?

But those were idealistic days. What did Scott learn in ten years?

http://www.npr.org/2013/09/07/219702819/when-weighing-intervention-in-syria-consider-the-children

The media push for war in Syria a couple years ago --- it didn't work & so was quickly forgotten --- will likely get somewhat more scrutiny now that an amazing story has hit the mass media:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/columnist/rieder/2015/04/16/nbc-engel-kidnapping/25878771/