hey gawker dudes. what the fuck is wrong with you?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6727 of them)

literally no one has defended the horny mom story what is wrong w u guys

deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 16 April 2015 20:57 (eleven years ago)

Do you actually read your own posts

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Thursday, 16 April 2015 20:58 (eleven years ago)

more than you do evidently

deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 16 April 2015 20:58 (eleven years ago)

"after ten years of wondering why everyone was arguing with me despite by my obvious, clear, sound points and logic, i...kept wondering why everyone was arguing with me despite my obvious, clear sound points and logic"

da croupier, Thursday, 16 April 2015 20:59 (eleven years ago)

*gawks*

example (crüt), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:00 (eleven years ago)

d-40 typing "this is not a defense" in the middle of a paragraph of defensiveness doesn't make it something else

da croupier, Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:01 (eleven years ago)

no i'm making a qualitative distinction

deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:02 (eleven years ago)

I don't think that means what u think it means

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:03 (eleven years ago)

i don't care about this stupid post. my point was that i highly doubt it's produced out of institutional malice as much as it is systemic necessity.

i like how i'm being called the gawker chris crocker for suggesting that calling the ppl who run it "sociopaths" might be a little OTT

deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:06 (eleven years ago)

Good work everyone

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:08 (eleven years ago)

yup you said "sociopaths" might be a little OTT and we called you the gawker chris crocker

da croupier, Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:08 (eleven years ago)

yay

mattresslessness, Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:10 (eleven years ago)

yup you said "sociopaths" might be a little OTT and we called you the gawker chris crocker

― da croupier, Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:08 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this no less misrepresents this argument than basically any post you've made on this thread in ten years of ilx

deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:11 (eleven years ago)

omg...you learned it by watching me

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IlpjRSf4d_k/hqdefault.jpg

da croupier, Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:15 (eleven years ago)

I agree with croup on this one, but it is also true that I will die clutching a crucifix, whispering croup posts into Jesus' right cubital fossa.

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:18 (eleven years ago)

the only acceptable outcome is max resigning after the embarrassment of the horny mom debacle

deej loaf (D-40), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:19 (eleven years ago)

the hivemind would also accept the posting of an embarrassing photo, preferably involving shorts and some kind of exotic fruit

da croupier, Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:23 (eleven years ago)

someone's gotta pay man its time for some new media frontier justice for the poor beleaguered scapegoat of clickbait culture

slothroprhymes, Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:25 (eleven years ago)

a messageboard rallied to the defense of standards in tabloid journalism and you won't believe what happened next

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Thursday, 16 April 2015 21:34 (eleven years ago)

His name is probably jace lol. That's a white person name (those are the bad funny names)

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 16 April 2015 23:06 (eleven years ago)

the weird thing about that joke is the only Jace I've ever heard of is Jace Clayton, but that probably just means I'm old

rob, Thursday, 16 April 2015 23:42 (eleven years ago)

kind of annoying that this thread exists and will join the ranks of "pitchfork is dumb" being bumped in perpetuity every time treeships reads someone not being nice on a blog

i would defend gawker itt but max called me unsophisticated the other day http://gagadaily.com/uploads/default_crossed.gif

flopson, Friday, 17 April 2015 00:12 (eleven years ago)

Drake said "sing this verse for me Coachella" and I wasn't about to disappoint drizzy

some dude, Friday, 17 April 2015 00:19 (eleven years ago)

http://www.theunderdogcardcollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/IMG_20140426_0007-215x300.jpg

mookieproof, Friday, 17 April 2015 00:20 (eleven years ago)

I mean it's a reasonable conundrum who wants to disappoint drizzy

slothroprhymes, Friday, 17 April 2015 00:22 (eleven years ago)

If you're reading this, Jace, drizzy is already disappointed

Is It Any Wonder I'm Not the (President Keyes), Friday, 17 April 2015 00:28 (eleven years ago)

kind of annoying that this thread exists and will join the ranks of "pitchfork is dumb" being bumped in perpetuity every time treeships reads someone not being nice on a blog

― flopson, Thursday, April 16, 2015 8:12 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark

Lmao

, Friday, 17 April 2015 00:33 (eleven years ago)

Reddit thread there a lot more interesting than anything I've ever seen on Gawker

sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 17 April 2015 00:45 (eleven years ago)

reading that reddit thread was interesting to you?

flopson, Friday, 17 April 2015 00:47 (eleven years ago)

More interesting than Gawker, sure

sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 17 April 2015 00:52 (eleven years ago)

feel like gawker's raison d'etre was to make tabloid/trashy style journalism go down smooth with a hint of overeducated "can you believe how im wasting my master's degree?" kind of irony, but they've been aggressively unfunny lately. turn it around, gawker dudes.

ryan, Friday, 17 April 2015 01:19 (eleven years ago)

that's a good description of gawker

Treeship, Friday, 17 April 2015 01:21 (eleven years ago)

glad the kid is laughing this off and that he isn't the wilting flower i thought he might be. but still, it was always conceivable he could have been this anxious person who would freak out

Treeship, Friday, 17 April 2015 01:26 (eleven years ago)

crap i guess we need to shame harder

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Friday, 17 April 2015 02:30 (eleven years ago)

man you guys transplanted all of that hate from Dave Grohl to Gawker this week

the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 April 2015 02:34 (eleven years ago)

this post isn't offensive or anything but it does make me worry a little for j0rdan's sanity
http://gawker.com/please-stop-showing-your-thumbs-on-social-media-1674295275

some dude, Friday, 17 April 2015 04:37 (eleven years ago)

thumb shaming

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Friday, 17 April 2015 04:39 (eleven years ago)

No, that's p offensive

sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 17 April 2015 04:57 (eleven years ago)

glad the kid is laughing this off and that he isn't the wilting flower i thought he might be. but still, it was always conceivable he could have been this anxious person who would freak out

― Treeship, Thursday, April 16, 2015 8:26 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lmfao

deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 17 April 2015 05:10 (eleven years ago)

this post isn't offensive or anything but it does make me worry a little for j0rdan's sanity
http://gawker.com/please-stop-showing-your-thumbs-on-social-media-1674295275

― some dude, Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:37 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol this did so much traffic O_O

deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 17 April 2015 05:17 (eleven years ago)

i was making a dumb joke known only to myself as such about bolding a post and writing 'jesus' under it.

― mattresslessness, Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:25 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

aces

flappy bird, Friday, 17 April 2015 05:44 (eleven years ago)

The thumb piece is great!

everything, Friday, 17 April 2015 09:04 (eleven years ago)

in a social media world where the #1 most popular style of photograph is people holding their phones up to a mirror, the #2 style being people's hand holding objects doesn't seem that strange or objectionable

some dude, Friday, 17 April 2015 11:40 (eleven years ago)

lol this did so much traffic O_O

― deej loaf (D-40), Friday, April 17, 2015 1:17 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark

not for gawker it didn't!

J0rdan S., Friday, 17 April 2015 14:33 (eleven years ago)

in a social media world where the #1 most popular style of photograph is people holding their phones up to a mirror, the #2 style being people's hand holding objects doesn't seem that strange or objectionable

― some dude, Friday, April 17, 2015 7:40 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

mirror selfies don't feature close up shots of thumbs

J0rdan S., Friday, 17 April 2015 14:34 (eleven years ago)

not for gawker it didn't!

― J0rdan S., Friday, April 17, 2015 9:33 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol relative to the inside joke posts i see it did

fwiw i have always been embarrassed by my thumbs when taking photos of things for instagram and have just automatically put my thumb behind the object as a result, this post resonates for a reason imo

deej loaf (D-40), Friday, 17 April 2015 14:59 (eleven years ago)

my man

J0rdan S., Friday, 17 April 2015 14:59 (eleven years ago)

mirror selfies don't feature close up shots of thumbs

Reading comprehension's for the day job, huh?

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 April 2015 15:00 (eleven years ago)

andrew

J0rdan S., Friday, 17 April 2015 15:05 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.