hey gawker dudes. what the fuck is wrong with you?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6727 of them)

i think about three years ago i got into this argument with jordan and his suggestion to me was, go read a newspaper
that's worked out pretty well for both of us so I am recommending it as an answer to anyone who takes issue with gawker

Premise ridiculous. Who have two potato? (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:26 (eleven years ago)

bonus: i'm consistently knocking out the friday nyt xword

Premise ridiculous. Who have two potato? (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:27 (eleven years ago)

^BRAGGIN '15^

Premise ridiculous. Who have two potato? (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:27 (eleven years ago)

c'mon. if you deal in the blood of a person's reputation, at least expect repercussions. in fact, own that shit. internet's picking up heat on a call for jordan's head on this post, and can you blame them? it comes with the territory. all the successful tabloid people i've known have had ice in their veins, real motherfuckers. if you can't own that shit, get out of the game.

ozmodiar, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:31 (eleven years ago)

lol if you think i didn't expect the exact response that the post got

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:33 (eleven years ago)

did anyone reach out to get comment from the kid in question?

dan m, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:36 (eleven years ago)

xps to forks that's a pretty good way of looking at it, I mean you engage with the sites that are properties of new media robber barons and you should m/l know what you're getting into- some of it will be entertaining and funny, some will be legitimately valuable, some will be petty trash or worse; you read papers and other straight up news properties and you prob get boring news w/ another set of potential issues

(insert devil's advocate "newspapers are compromised/dying/trash sometimes too" caveat here)

slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:38 (eleven years ago)

I think j0rdan has been pretty forthcoming about what he was doing w/ the post, like what he was trying to convey, obv there's a pure clickbait aspect to it on some level but this is Internet writing so what does anyone expect and on that level dude is just doing his job

slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 02:47 (eleven years ago)

the blood of a person's reputation ... who afaik no one has identified or seems interested in identifying

if he ends up ID'd it's more likely it'll be from someone interested in making a "point" about media shaming ppl than it would be someone actually trying to shame the kid

deej loaf (D-40), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:22 (eleven years ago)

i suspect, anyway. i think you guys think there are a lot of people interested in exposing a kid who sang along with the n-word at a concert and while i'm sure there are a lot of people put off by it or annoyed by it or seeing it as a reminder of an entire society of injustice, i doubt many of them thing it's worth the time to track down this kid to make an example of ... that's like some anti-Political-Correctness paranoia IMO.

Also I think ppl trying to ascertain Jordan's specific underlying motives are doing a disservice to this argument, or are only picking up on it bc he is here to respond (more than he needs to IMO). As it relates to the great argument, um, death of the author & all that

deej loaf (D-40), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:25 (eleven years ago)

to the *greater* argument

deej loaf (D-40), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:25 (eleven years ago)

oh come on

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:32 (eleven years ago)

the kid's friends and acquaintances will see it eventually. he'll most likely be mortified. the post compared what he did to racist southern frat parties which this week carries implications of the vile University of Oklahoma SAE chapter

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:32 (eleven years ago)

maybe it doesn't matter if he gets really upset because of this. or if some people end up seeing him a little differently. nothing more will probably come of it for him than that, but those things aren't nothing.

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:36 (eleven years ago)

it's not inconceivable that his name eventually gets linked to this and it affects his ability to get a job either. probably won't happen, but if so that's a real consequence that matters

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:38 (eleven years ago)

dude, you're talking to people who do this kind-of thing for fun and profit and then contort themselves into evading responsibility. you might as well be making these points to a brick wall.

ozmodiar, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:40 (eleven years ago)

r u the kid who sang along the nword with drake at cochella sry u r fired that was very rude

lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:40 (eleven years ago)

i wonder what must it feel like to fire someone for a social media faux pas

lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:41 (eleven years ago)

oh no a white kid might not get a job

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:42 (eleven years ago)

...

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:49 (eleven years ago)

what an amazing contortion to suggest that public behavior might have consequences

deej loaf (D-40), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:54 (eleven years ago)

it's just kind of a funny moment of our zany constantly "plugged-in" "no privacy" 21st century society

flopson, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:56 (eleven years ago)

no jordan is responsible for ruining this young man's life by pointing out something that he did in public w/ hundreds of other people

deej loaf (D-40), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:00 (eleven years ago)

is the "Jace" thing a MtG dig?

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:01 (eleven years ago)

most famous Jace
http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?multiverseid=195297&type=card

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:01 (eleven years ago)

no jordan is responsible for ruining this young man's life by pointing out something that he did in public w/ hundreds of other people

― deej loaf (D-40), Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:00 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

its true i have already fired him in fact

lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:04 (eleven years ago)

xp lollllllll SG for the win

slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:08 (eleven years ago)

"pointing out"

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:14 (eleven years ago)

what else are you suggesting he did? did he call for the kid to be fired from all future employment opps?

deej loaf (D-40), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:15 (eleven years ago)

those are all some fine contortions, thank you for proving my point. we've gone through victim blaming, minimization, and dehumanization (LOLLL!!!) one right after the other. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling.

ozmodiar, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:15 (eleven years ago)

hey ilx wtf is wrong with u.

more people should be publicly shamed for minor transgressions, harden up.

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:18 (eleven years ago)

waht is this kid a victim of? a website made fun of him?

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:19 (eleven years ago)

pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling. pretty classic stuff on display here, and on a group-wide scale, at that. chilling.

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:20 (eleven years ago)

first they came for the kids singing drake lyrics and i said nothing, because i was not a fan.

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:20 (eleven years ago)

all the tell tale signs of chilling itt

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:21 (eleven years ago)

more people should be publicly shamed for minor transgressions

why?

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:21 (eleven years ago)

pretty sure that "kid" is famous actor Ryan Hansen

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:23 (eleven years ago)

maybe i am missing something. i don't see the political value in that video. the entertainment value is mocking a stranger. the whole thing sucks and is gross. i feel the same way about it that i do about misogynistic tabloids that body shame celebrities.

why is it not ok to just be decent and try not to cause undue harm?

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:25 (eleven years ago)

he needs to be shamed but only a tiny bit

lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:25 (eleven years ago)

Treeship, i don't think you really appreciate where you are right now.

ozmodiar, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:26 (eleven years ago)

except if he is really a famous actor he shd be shamed more in accord with his level of fame

lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:26 (eleven years ago)

I think medium shaming is appropriate if you kinda look like a famous actor

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:28 (eleven years ago)

and there is a spectrum of shame around medium that is a function of how famous the actor you kinda look like is

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:29 (eleven years ago)

My object all in blame
I shall achieve through shame —
To let the punishment fit the fame —
The punishment fit the fame;
And make each prisoner pent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment!
Of innocent merriment!

creaks, whines and trife (s.clover), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:30 (eleven years ago)

the appropriate amount of shame in this case is is a deniable amount like be shaming him def but then be like "what"

lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:31 (eleven years ago)

lol

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:31 (eleven years ago)

xxxxxps to sloth: there's all kinds of reasonable and angry complaints to be made about what modern SERIOUS PRINT MEDIA feeds us of course... the quid/agg nyt thread covers class warfare concerns, all major outlets do backflips to maintain status quo at the expense of what seems to me to be necessary revolutionary change in domestic judiciary / policing / political policy (to say nothing of foreign policy; the economist in particular often feels like it's being written from the mid-seventies), terrible hacks survive on the teat of house style for decades and terrorize whole swaths of artistic or progressive endeavor. i dunno if any individual newspaper/magazine is utterly killing the game right now but the good ones employ good writers and researchers and media makers with clever minds and are informative and often fun to read and introduce new ideas and impact the culture positively enough that the good definitively outweighs the bad. my issue with much short-form internet tabloid journalism (and, to a lesser degree, criticism) is that it doesn't necessarily meet that standard.
But hey, that's obviously not the governing core mission when your business model requires x-to-the-nth-power unique hits to keep the lights on and anyway who am i to shit on what puts food on another man's table? so, as i'm no longer the target demographic anyway, i am more currently of the opinion that it's foolish to ask a cow to oink and that mutual apathy to one another's concerns until they overlap for work or ilx seems fairest game all around. as my grandfather used to say, nobody wanna hear your goddamn point when they got their own point to make.

Premise ridiculous. Who have two potato? (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:35 (eleven years ago)

i had a roommate named Jace who was just as awful as a Jace inevitably must be, so i laughed at that part

Drake has a hit single where he describes one of his white friends saying the N-word, and then shrugs "I hope noone heard that." he has another hit single where he refers to his white producer by the N-word.

some dude, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:38 (eleven years ago)

this is all just stealth marketing for ronson

polyphonic, Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:51 (eleven years ago)

agreed. don't believe me? just watch.

And let’s say a new Hozier comes along, and Spotify outbids you (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 15 April 2015 04:54 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.