[Paxman "come on!"]
― Finn McCoolit (wins), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 10:08 (eleven years ago)
the G one is pretty neat I think [SPOILERS] think Hunter S Thompson. The D is very confused I, unhelpfully over-clued.
― Keith Moom (Neil S), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 10:12 (eleven years ago)
so many are tortuously constructed, not elegant at all. The J one makes a mockery of "not further defined"!
― Finn McCoolit (wins), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 10:19 (eleven years ago)
Like don't do double-definition clues for this type of clueset, that's just stupid
― Finn McCoolit (wins), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 10:21 (eleven years ago)
Yeah given up on this bollocks, doing today's Paul instead & will be petitioning for the immediate dismissal of "maskerade"
Mine was "wastemen" btw
― Finn McCoolit (wins), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 12:26 (eleven years ago)
thanks i was too hungover to get that
― week of 'puter action (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 12:28 (eleven years ago)
am too hungover rather
"mays twen"? Am I being thick here or what.
― ledge, Tuesday, 7 April 2015 12:36 (eleven years ago)
Maced when
― Finn McCoolit (wins), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 12:40 (eleven years ago)
yes, iow.
― ledge, Tuesday, 7 April 2015 12:42 (eleven years ago)
I didn't think that was that difficult but I am very smug at how I took advantage of the "as" in "as per" being redundant
― Finn McCoolit (wins), Tuesday, 7 April 2015 12:46 (eleven years ago)
back to my usual level post-bank hol: on the paul crossword full of the mysterious affairs/places i managed to get a meagre seven clues and have literally no ideas about any of the rest :((((
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 8 April 2015 15:22 (eleven years ago)
then again i've ONLY JUST got "maced when" despite having actually read that post yesterday
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 8 April 2015 15:29 (eleven years ago)
Mysterious affair, yeti? Mysterious place (4,5-3)
This is out and out cheating, imo.
― ledge, Wednesday, 8 April 2015 15:49 (eleven years ago)
Rot13 nern svsgl bar if you can't be bothered.
― ledge, Wednesday, 8 April 2015 15:52 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, that's too clever by half.
― The job killing and likely illegal (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 8 April 2015 16:20 (eleven years ago)
yeah that's a foul imo
― division of bowker (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 8 April 2015 17:38 (eleven years ago)
Happy to give a pass sometimes e.g. for the ungrammatical solution to araucaria's "a y is one also" (axis) because lol cuet. But not here.
― ledge, Wednesday, 8 April 2015 17:54 (eleven years ago)
groan
21 US president, a two-dimensional pussy (8)
― Keith Moom (Neil S), Saturday, 11 April 2015 18:13 (eleven years ago)
a couple of nice ones in today's Graun:
Stage a coup? Balls might (9)Tree-hugger repeatedly getting Sturgeon's vote? (3-3)
― Keith Moom (Neil S), Wednesday, 22 April 2015 12:45 (eleven years ago)
more cheating for ledge to enjoy:
December 25th but not April 5th or July 3rd? (4)
― nults of 2 ppl don't amount to a will have beens in this crazy (wins), Sunday, 26 April 2015 06:15 (eleven years ago)
it's taken me two days to think of two four letter words for christmas, one of them is more promising than the other but i can't justify it, cheating or otherwise.
― ledge, Tuesday, 28 April 2015 08:27 (eleven years ago)
Noel. No-el.
Don't fight it.
― koogs, Tuesday, 28 April 2015 08:32 (eleven years ago)
Shoots self
― ledge, Tuesday, 28 April 2015 09:35 (eleven years ago)
Right? That question mark is being made to work overtime. "L" rendered as a word is "ell"! Any dictionary will tell you that.
― nults of 2 ppl don't amount to a will have beens in this crazy (wins), Tuesday, 28 April 2015 16:38 (eleven years ago)
That doesn't bother me next to my inability to think of three four letter words for Christmas.
― ledge, Tuesday, 28 April 2015 21:13 (eleven years ago)
my objection to that is, why is "l" clued twice? why do we need july 3rd there at all? i dislike inefficient cluing almost as much as archaic slang.
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 April 2015 11:35 (eleven years ago)
This one, for being an Everyman, I could not parse for the life of me, even after I figured out the answer:
Doctor with obligations guarding against inducements (7)
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 21:04 (eleven years ago)
inducements are IOUs
docious? doesn't really mean what the clue says tho
― ☂ (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 21:08 (eleven years ago)
If you want hints, it involves a medical abbreviation I've never seen before, and another for "against" that I have seen but it just wasn't registering.
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 21:14 (eleven years ago)
drivers?
― ☂ (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 21:20 (eleven years ago)
MOTIVES
― ☂ (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 21:21 (eleven years ago)
yeah, you see MO for doctor occasionally, short for "medical officer" iirc
― ☂ (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 21:22 (eleven years ago)
MO was new to me, and I just wasn't getting the V either. Totally fair once I saw the solution, though.
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 21:29 (eleven years ago)
Speaking of Everyman, the new one is vexing me greatly. I just can't parse most of these, I only have one answer so far. 13 and 14 letter words, really?
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 14 May 2015 18:20 (eleven years ago)
On 3578 I got one 3-letter word.
Doing slightly better this week, but only slightly.
― koogs, Thursday, 14 May 2015 18:37 (eleven years ago)
I finished 3578, although didn't understand the MOTIVES clue above. 3579 is the one I'm on, and I only have 9 down. I think I read they changed setters?
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 14 May 2015 18:41 (eleven years ago)
idk I just loaded it up on my phone to see what a difficult Everyman looks like & I'm getting thru it at the normal rate, not seen anything that's made me go "oh c'mon!". It helps that I got three of the long clues almost instantly. Having said that I'm sure I'll hit a wall now
― italosVEVO (wins), Thursday, 14 May 2015 19:59 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, this isn't as hard as I first thought, I just think the cluing and my brain are not quite on the same wavelength sometimes. I'm about halfway in.
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Friday, 15 May 2015 16:41 (eleven years ago)
Finally finished, with a bit on online research. These are examples of "harder than past Everyman puzzles" imo:
14 King with work in store around westward citadelACROPOLIS
24 Capital account without pound in it is abandonedTBILISI
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Friday, 22 May 2015 15:05 (eleven years ago)
Although this one I liked a lot!
27 Employ glam rock band with energy coming backEXERT
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Friday, 22 May 2015 15:20 (eleven years ago)
Yeah that was nice.
― time trafel 2015 💨 2012 (wins), Friday, 22 May 2015 15:30 (eleven years ago)
Not really enjoying cryptics all that much at the mo. Probably because since moving jobs I'm doing them on my own, where before I'd do them with a couple of colleagues every lunchtime. Maybe because I'm doing them at my desk, instead of in the pub. Perhaps because I'm no longer having a pint alongside.
― ledge, Saturday, 23 May 2015 11:26 (eleven years ago)
all that stuff takes the shine off, true
― gong mad (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 23 May 2015 13:34 (eleven years ago)
Yeah those are the best contexts
Been doing crosswords at work with the deputy lab manager - not my boss, but my immediate superior. He's a novice so still learning the conventions/frustrations. It's been fun, yesterday we had like half an hour longer for break cause he wanted to finish it!
― So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Saturday, 23 May 2015 13:52 (eleven years ago)
Been meaning to ask: why are setters always using "rejected" to mean backwards/inverted? It's one of those things you just accept but I'm not convinced it actually makes sense.
― So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 13:40 (eleven years ago)
Is the thinking "rejected"="sent back"?
― So You've Been Pubically Shaved (wins), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 13:42 (eleven years ago)
that wd be my guess. it's not the best but so much of cryptics is learning the jargon
― gong mad (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 13:43 (eleven years ago)
Cryptics are a solo experience for me (being American, anyone I've ever showed them to reacts like I'm explaining quantum physics.) No pubs either, puzzles are mainly for my train ride to/from work. Although I've taken long car trips with my parents and had them read the clues out loud, and I solve them in my head as I drive.
Was anyone able to solve this one in the Everyman unaided?
Flower in good composition held by small child (10)
― Competent Cracker Barrel Manager (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 26 May 2015 14:05 (eleven years ago)
my botanical knowledge would have to be a hell of a lot better to get that unaided.
― ledge, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 12:30 (eleven years ago)