Why was World War I called The Great War?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (283 of them)

View Previous Page...

but if that were so, starry would know the answer to her question.

― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:47 (nineteen years ago)

A says they called it the 'War on something'.

― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:48 (nineteen years ago)

hahahaha

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:48 (nineteen years ago)

Starry does know! I know this because I read it in one of Campbell's old Pears Cyclopedias.

I don't. Someone please tell me.

― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:49 (nineteen years ago)

sorry, I misread stuff.

― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:55 (nineteen years ago)

Anyway, go and read Lixi's book and tell us!

― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 13:04 (nineteen years ago)

some batshit rule about how women always get the seat facing the room, and men sit across from them

that's not batshit, it's an iron law.

― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 13:09 (nineteen years ago)

I had hoped that the batshit rule might explain how they can go upside down without crapping all over themselves.

― NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 13:18 (nineteen years ago)

i think andrew is right. it would be cheating for me to give the answer.

― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 13:19 (nineteen years ago)

the brits called it the PHONEY WAR to start with (bcz nothing was happening yet)

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

OK OK!

It was called: THE WAR OF ATTRITION!

So there you go! Neener neener neeener. And they would have called it SOMETHING before the Brit/Fr empires got involved in 39 as PROVEN by the Pears Cyclopaedic evidence, your Honour!

The defense rests! SUSTAINED!

― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 13:54 (nineteen years ago)

oh i thought it was 'the war against aggression'!

― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

fought mostly in the war room

― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Attrition

― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

Oh well! There you go! You are right Steve!

I guess I was too distracted by the giant sack of DAIM bars whilst I was reading that Pears Cyclopaedia - damn my eyes!

― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)

i am very doubtful about this claim. a 'war of attrition' is a standard bit of language. why on earth would they call the just declared, or soon to be declared, war that?

need more than 1x source to believe it.

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)

we have three sources! starry, stevem and some pears

however my answer is correct but the pears were too PC to admit it

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:13 (nineteen years ago)

more importantly: why are pears cyclopedias called "cyclopedias"?

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

i wonder if they called it 'the phoney war' in germany?

like: let's get it on already.

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:15 (nineteen years ago)

surely they were already gettin busy in like czecho etc?

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)

it was all action the first half of september 1939, but i think they took it down a notch till -- norway? april 1940.

they did czechoslovakia in march '39 i think.

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

that said: i think there was 'war' in colonial africa in 1939.

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

In France it's called "la guerre de quarante"

― Revivalist (Revivalist), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

Wikipedia reckons it was also known as the Bore War till it got started in earnest.

― NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)

it certainly was.

it's an interesting question. i bet 'the falklands war' was always called that. and iirc 'the gulf war'. but what of our present wars. it's probably called 'the iraq war', but what about the war in afghanistan? doesn't have a real name.

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

'war on terror'

― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

Drôle de guerre

I had a history teacher, echoing Churchill, who claimed that the Seven Years War (French & Indian War) was the first world war inasmuch as the hostilities occurred in Europe, the Mediterranean, the Atlantic, North America, the Carribean and India.

― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:18 (nineteen years ago)

I kinda like the "sitzkrieg" nickname for the "Phoney War."

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

that has to be more 'worldy' than ww1 innit.

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:38 (nineteen years ago)

Not really. Almost all the combatants in the Seven Years War were European powers or their colonies, and WWI , while it was mostly fought in Europe and the Middle East nonetheless saw hostilities in Africa and the Pacific and there were numerous non-European allies from around the globe.

― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:45 (nineteen years ago)

was there fighting in the pacific? (this is a big knowledge gap!)

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

yes!

didn't know any of this

― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

nah i mean in ww1. i know even less about the seven years war. (whaddayawantfromme, i only got a ba in history.)

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)

Let's just hope future historians don't refer to "World War III, known at first as War on Terror".

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, New Zealand and Japan (and others?) pilched Germany's Far-East possessions.

xpost

― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

xpost er you were asking about ww1 weren't you

― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

bit of a mouthful.

woof, xpost-a-rama

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

what do ppl think of the "world war four" meme?

― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

You say 'meme', I say 'mime'. Let's call the whole thing off.

― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:58 (nineteen years ago)

it's all abt fourth generation these days mate

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

former "gold blade" man john robb?

― benrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

Let's just hope future historians don't refer to "World War III, known at first as War on Terror".

For a while, when she heard W refer to the 'War on Terror', my gf had a tendency to affect the accent of Scarlet O'Hara and inquire what he had against Tara.

― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

Almost all the combatants in the Seven Years War were European powers or their colonies

eh, the Iroquois Confederacy or those guys from TEH LAST OF TEH MOHICANS are hardly European powers. In India I understand that local forces were major players.

― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

That said, I once saw the Seven Years War referred to as being part of the second Anglo-French hundred years war.

― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, Tuomas. Dare I say it, but you have jumped the shark with this one.

― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:27 (nineteen years ago)

Note the prophylactic use of the word 'almost', DV.

xpost

― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:27 (nineteen years ago)

Hey, at least someone took the bait.

(Sorry, Archel.)

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:59 (nineteen years ago)

But, to be honest, I must've been over 20 when I first realized the Middle Ages weren't called that back then. I guess I'd just gotten so used to the "Middle" part of the name that I'd never even thought what it actually means.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

Let's just hope future historians don't refer to "World War III, known at first as War on Terror".

They'll give it some trendy name like "Wr3.0 (beta)"

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

seven years pass...

Repurposing thread for actual World War One talk as we're in the 100th anniversary year.

Obligatory: https://twitter.com/RealTimeWWI

Highly highly recommend the current "Blueprint for Armageddon" series in the Hardcore History podcast. Part 2 just went up last week.

― Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 01:33 (twelve years ago)

Skipping 183 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.