I'm still happy with Livejournal - but it only works for me because of the network of friends who still use it regularly not just to blog, but to discuss stuff in depth and plan things.
All well out of the way of all the crappy fanfic and goth shit, too.
― one art, please (Trayce), Monday, 23 March 2009 23:55 (seventeen years ago)
Am looking at all the other social networks to see if it's worth jumping ship, but they're mostly honking
Problem with that is that, er, all your friends need to jump ship with you, no?
I have to say I wasn't entirely sure what all the fuss was about with the new model. But the more I use it, the more I dislike it.
― a tiny, faltering megaphone (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 09:51 (seventeen years ago)
^ OTM. You can't even see when someone's posted on your wall now except through the notifications, which I mainly ignore because they're full of rubbish 'compare your friends' and 'join scrabulous' stuff. You have to actually go to your own profile to see it.
Also, yeah, the only option I get is to 'hide X person' - but it doesn't work. So I still get this one person with all their quizzes and stuff filling up my page. It really needs to go back to how it was just before this.
― Not the real Village People, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 10:24 (seventeen years ago)
that's not true - your wall posts appear as messages in your feed like this: sender's name > (your name).
― joe, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 10:27 (seventeen years ago)
The most annoying thing is having to go to your requests page to see if you've got any event invitations. How hard would it be to put a notification of any unread ones at the top of the home page?
― chap, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 11:08 (seventeen years ago)
wait, are we using the same facebook? i have a line at the top of my homepage right now which says "you have 3 event invitations and one other request" until you respond to them.
― joe, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 11:12 (seventeen years ago)
Mine just tells me about friend requests. Maybe I need to adjust the settings.
― chap, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 11:13 (seventeen years ago)
I've just changed it so I get an email notification when I get a new invitation. That should make things easier.
― chap, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 11:15 (seventeen years ago)
Erm.. mine don't. I can see a few other people's though. I think it's not working properly though, as the 'hide' option seems a bit random.
― Not the real Village People, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:11 (seventeen years ago)
the hide seems to take people off entirely, they've lost the "see less about" option, which is annoying, otherwise, functionally, it seems almost the same, the layout is just a bit different.
― akm, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:21 (seventeen years ago)
you don't get as many 'wrote on walls', 'became friends with', etc, and the thing on the right is shitty. it seems to change less, and there's less information, and it's pointlessly cluttered. don't need all those avatars.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:33 (seventeen years ago)
It's shit because they've made it real-time. It used to store up what it thought what the things you'd be most interested in for your feed -- new friends of other friends, tagged friends and so on. Now it just dumps them all in a mess, as they happen. So if you miss stuff, it's gone.
They've changed it a bit this morning, though: birthdays are back up the top right
Problem with that is that, er, all your friends need to jump ship with you, no?Yep, but this isn't nearly as big a problem as FB hopes it is. After FB opened its doors to the public, I remember Myspace emptying out in a matter of months.
― stet, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:38 (seventeen years ago)
there was a live feed option on old fb and that was better than what they have now.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:39 (seventeen years ago)
yeah everytime someone adds photos to an album, you get notified so there's like three or four notifications of the same album on your feed IN ADDITION to the notifications on the right. it's just too much. and too many goddamn quizzes too.
i wasn't going to complain til i got used to the changes and now that i am, i have to say i do not like them, not at all.
― Roz, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:41 (seventeen years ago)
Bring them here !!
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:44 (seventeen years ago)
M3lissa M4rchant was never you.
Confirm.Ignore.
― M.V., Tuesday, 24 March 2009 13:53 (seventeen years ago)
I'm gonna have to de-fan Ashley Tisdale.
― jel --, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 18:04 (seventeen years ago)
So all these people who I went to grammar school/middle school with are now my fb friends. One of them just left a message asking what I've been up to. Oh in the last EIGHTEEN YEARS? I mean really, how do I even answer that?
― ENBB, Thursday, 2 April 2009 02:55 (seventeen years ago)
'stuff'
― iatee, Thursday, 2 April 2009 02:57 (seventeen years ago)
Say you've been obsessing over curly-haired pigs from Hungary.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 April 2009 02:59 (seventeen years ago)
small talk is tough
― lil waynes babymama (musically), Thursday, 2 April 2009 16:14 (seventeen years ago)
um NO
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/4310/waht.jpg
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Saturday, 11 April 2009 14:26 (seventeen years ago)
I just noticed they've added an option in the feed to "hide [insert annoying application name here]" rather than hiding an entire person.
farewell, LivingSocial updates.
― salsa shark, Wednesday, 15 April 2009 14:18 (seventeen years ago)
Oh, THANK FUCK.
― a tiny, faltering megaphone (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
thank u for this info! getting app updates is really the only thing i hate about fb
― where we turn sweet dreams into remarkable realities (just1n3), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:39 (seventeen years ago)
except everyone is using slightly different versions of the same app.
― Jena (who is actually a man) (Jena), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
I don't think that matters for LivingSocial, which is by far the worst offender.
― a tiny, faltering megaphone (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
Is there a way I can hide quiz results and dumb virtual gift giving?
― photoshop your disgusting ass partner into passive-aggressive notes (sarahel), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
Er, that's exactly what Salsa Shark is talking about. Click on Hide next to the shit in your news feed; tell it to hide that application. Repeat for everything that crops up and annoys you.
― a tiny, faltering megaphone (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
unfortunately it seems that each quiz is its own app
xpost
― lil waynes babymama (musically), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 18:47 (seventeen years ago)
Yeh, I'm beginning to notice this. Christ's teeth.
― a tiny, faltering megaphone (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 18:57 (seventeen years ago)
One of the more surreal features social networking has brought to our lives is the articulation of all kinds of social decisions. And by that I mean that before the enlightened age of the internet, when you no longer wanted to be friends with somebody or something like that, there was no conscious decision or effort behind it, necessarily. You just stopped trying to engage them, meet with them, keep up with how they are etc. You both just drifted apart, or something essentially vague and mutual - no responsibility for the friendship ending and thus no one's fault. This also left the door open for potential reconciliation ("I would've called you but I lost your number, let's hang out again soon"). But Facebook has made things weird, where now you formally have to think about whether someone deserves the "friend" label or, more intriguing, if someone deserves to be "de-friended." An articulated judgment takes place now.
It'd odd because if you're the kind of person that likes to keep a lean friends list e.g. you simply don't like the idea of that one eccentric co-worker you knew for about a week in 2006 keeping tabs on your social life via FB - you have to actually take a moment to consider the person in question in all their completeness and gauge the worth of keeping them as e-friends before purging them from your friends roster. It's all so weird!
― Cunga, Sunday, 3 May 2009 08:56 (seventeen years ago)
They scored a combined IQ of 137! Can you beat this? Take the IQ quiz.
― SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Monday, 4 May 2009 12:17 (seventeen years ago)
Combined!
― SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Monday, 4 May 2009 12:18 (seventeen years ago)
↑↑↓↓←→←→ⒷⒶ⏎
then click
― caek, Saturday, 9 May 2009 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
Cunga speaks much truth. On the other hand, Facebook hones one's skill at insincere capitulation.
― M.V., Saturday, 9 May 2009 22:00 (seventeen years ago)
Ok, so how is Facebook recommending friends to me who are people that I know, but that I have no mutual friends with and no Facebook link with whatsoever?
― nate woolls, Monday, 11 May 2009 13:33 (seventeen years ago)
Email contacts?
My mum was on the people you may know thing this morning o_O I can only assume cos she's an email contact. She's not facebook friends with my sister or anything and we don't even have the same surname! Spoooooky.
― I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP TO (Colonel Poo), Monday, 11 May 2009 13:38 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah that must be it. The person is in my gmail contacts list, but I haven't used the friend finder feature on Facebook since I first signed up, well over a year ago. Has it had all my email contact details in its database since then, and been checking them periodically?
― nate woolls, Monday, 11 May 2009 13:43 (seventeen years ago)
That's what I figured, yeah
― I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP TO (Colonel Poo), Monday, 11 May 2009 13:46 (seventeen years ago)
I've always read this thread title as, "I don;t have a girlfriend and I'm a bit embarassed by that, so can I pretend you're my girlfriend when I post to facebook".
Is that just me?
― mei, Monday, 11 May 2009 21:47 (seventeen years ago)
chick was flirtin with me at work this weekend. left me a note w/name & number & instructed me to facebook her. have done so and it appears she is married.
lO_O_O_O_O_O_O_O_Ol
― big hoos presents MIGHTY SBARRO (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 11 May 2009 22:30 (seventeen years ago)
can i say i'm cuckolding your husband on facebook?
― languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Monday, 11 May 2009 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
No, me too.
And now that I think about it I remember getting a "Let's ironically pretend we're in a relationship," offer from a former co-worker, which was awkward because I had to politely say no to that idea.
― Cunga, Monday, 11 May 2009 22:37 (seventeen years ago)
"I don;t have a girlfriend and I'm a bit embarassed by that, so can I pretend you're my girlfriend when I post to facebook".
I thought that was the point?
― I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP TO (Colonel Poo), Monday, 11 May 2009 22:42 (seventeen years ago)
But Facebook has made things weird, where now you formally have to think about whether someone deserves the "friend" label or, more intriguing, if someone deserves to be "de-friended." An articulated judgment takes place now.
Eh I havent let it change things that way for me. I just dont acknowledge people who added me if I dont know them/dont rly want to keep up with them. In fact I've done the "hide" thing on a few people, though thats mainly because they were constantly posting reams of crap. They dont need to know I'm not interested anymore and its not like they're trying to keep in touch. I do wonder why some people add you and then never say a word again. I rly should clear off a bunch of such people I suppose.
But anyone taking it as a personal affront is a bit... silly, aren't they?
― 65daysofsugban (Trayce), Monday, 11 May 2009 23:57 (seventeen years ago)
It is silly, I think, but the system behind social networking is so bureaucratized - and that is what's interesting and weird to me.
For instance, someone whom I thought I was still on really good terms with but hadn't talked to in almost two years wasn't dropping down from my friends list (meaning they either de-friended me or they're no longer on the site - and it was a case of former as it turned out).
What's interesting was that this friend, someone I knew at college that recently graduated, figures they'll probably never see me or contact me again (which was plausible) and so the online friendship was terminated like a business contract. It isn't the notion that the friendship was over that's worthy of discussion here (we probably wouldn't have seen each other again unless it was a school reunion tbh) but that its dissolution was articulated by one party for the other to see.
I'd argue that the single, most bizarre thing to come from social networking sites is the idea of writing down everything that was previously unwritten.
― Cunga, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 00:36 (seventeen years ago)
the list of girls i've banged remains unpublished.
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 01:24 (seventeen years ago)
i started posting way too many youtube videos. my husband actually started doing it (and is waaaay better than me at doing this, better music and better longterm span i think)
― the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 09:27 (seventeen years ago)
also, i was talking with our salesperson about facebook. i explained what it was and stuff. (we have mutual acquaintance who "accidently" changed his status to single) she seemed to not have a clue what facebook is. other day i was talking with her husband. he shows me his iphone (and gazillion apps he downloaded - who the fuck has four pages of apps?). so i notice he's on facebook. oO
― the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 09:29 (seventeen years ago)