jenny mccarthy wants your kid to get measles: autism, vaccines, and stupid idiots

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2156 of them)

What makes you think that's an "accurate assessment"? Most of what I've read indicates it's not, but a hysterical overreaction.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:21 (eleven years ago)

How many kids do you think take a loaded gun to school in a given day, and how small a percentage of kids die in a given day because of a loaded gun that a kid brought to school? Very, very small. So I really don't get why it's such a big deal if I pack a gun in my kid's lunch.

Venom Spritz (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:27 (eleven years ago)

You are an idiot.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:28 (eleven years ago)

But I think formally the issue is that there's a tradeoff of the form "minor inconvenience for many --> reduction/elimination of major harm to a very few." There are lots of tradeoffs like that and I don't think there's much rhyme or reason to which ones we think of as "obviously you accept the inconvenience" and which ones we think of as "it would be absurd to accept the inconvenience."

Like, if we all drove 5% less, or resolved never to drive when we were tired, or whatever, we would be taking on only a minor inconvenience, and fewer people would get killed under the wheels of our cars. But we don't really strive to do that.

I don't actually think vaccines fit that well, because the potential harm from a large unvaccinated segment of the population is a lot bigger than any possible harm from a world without peanut-free zones, unless I have misunderstood the numbers completely.

In the end there's probably no principled way to think about these questions, you just have to have some vague sense about how minor the minor inconvenience is and how major the major harm is and how few the very few are, and do your best.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:28 (eleven years ago)

xpost The thing is, it may be an overreaction in your estimation, but it's hardly hysterical. It's actually been a very gradual, very reasonable ramp-up.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:29 (eleven years ago)

BRB going to eat all the peanuts and peanut butter in the world to spare everyone this debate.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:29 (eleven years ago)

Fortunately for you, peanut butter in much of the world is considered kind of gross and weird.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:30 (eleven years ago)

Skippy for life.

Jeff, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:32 (eleven years ago)

I ate alone every single day of my education, sharing nothing. So, peanut butter.

touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:33 (eleven years ago)

xpost The thing is, it may be an overreaction in your estimation, but it's hardly hysterical. It's actually been a very gradual, very reasonable ramp-up.
--Josh in Chicago

I don't think the question of whether this is "hysterical" or "reasonable" are as cut and dried as your post implies. Also probably depends a lot on where you are.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:33 (eleven years ago)

Reminds me of the story my mom tells about her first few months in the States after emigrating from Cuba in '61. The refugee center gave everyone huge blocks of government cheese and tins of peanut butter. She and the family were like, "uhhh..." Not long after they made all kinds of shit: shakes, yogurt, ice cream. But never to spread on sandwiches.

guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:33 (eleven years ago)

It's also important to teach kids as early as possible to trust no one and nothing.

touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:34 (eleven years ago)

That's why my kid gets the gun in the lunchbox.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:35 (eleven years ago)

Peanut butter and bullets, fuckers.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:35 (eleven years ago)

http://www.womenshealthmag.com/files/images/0903-water-pistol-peanuts-300.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:37 (eleven years ago)

man, this thread got derailed, didn't it?

in other news, i think i'm going to make a banana snake with some peanut butter.

I dunno. (amateurist), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:47 (eleven years ago)

shake, banana SHAKE.

I dunno. (amateurist), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:47 (eleven years ago)

What makes you think that's an "accurate assessment"? Most of what I've read indicates it's not, but a hysterical overreaction.

Links or STFU.

Here's the CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/foodallergies/
Here's a the Canadian society of allergy and immunology (pdf): http://www.anaphylaxis.ca/files/Anaphylaxis%20in%20Schools%203rd%20Edition2015.pdf

None of that reads like a hysterical overreaction to me.

Despite the knee jerk libertarianism itt, there are no laws or even regulations making schools peanut free. It's just much easier to manage the problem at the door, by excluding peanuts altogether, than manage a series of close calls and potentially dangerous situations after the fact.

Plasmon, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:49 (eleven years ago)

Alex, this is a serious and non-confrontational question: is this hypothetical for you or do you have a kid in a peanut-free school?

I have a kid but she's 14 months old so it's not something I have to worry about now (so far she's not allergic to any food, either), so my stance is largely hypothetical for me at this point. Just more of a "If confronted with this situation it's what i would do."

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:52 (eleven years ago)

My kid is in a nut free school. He's also four though.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:54 (eleven years ago)

I think the CDC recommendations are all sensible. I also don't think they are recommending a blanket ban on nuts.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:56 (eleven years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEb5a-I0kyg

dan m, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:58 (eleven years ago)

shake, banana SHAKE.

― I dunno. (amateurist), Tuesday, February 3, 2015 10:47 AM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Man, early Lush song demos were weird.

Οὖτις Δαυ & τηε Κνιγητσ (Phil D.), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:09 (eleven years ago)

Carl, Plasmon, et al OTM. I love peanuts to death and am grateful not to be allergic to them, but there are a couple of foods I am mildly allergic to, and totally see the sense in managing the problem at the door.

it takes 14 to make a baby (WilliamC), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:17 (eleven years ago)

Alex in SF doing the school run:

http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Mr.-Peanut-Goes-to-War-1943.jpg

Minaj moron (Re-Make/Re-Model), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:17 (eleven years ago)

nuts (peanuts are legumes but whatever)

The pedant in me lolled the day I bought 1x packet of peanuts which all have to say "contains nuts" (1. yes it does, that's why I bought it; 2. in fact it doesn't even contain nuts, they are legumes!) and 1x packet of mixed almonds and brazil nuts which instead said "may contain traces of nuts", I guess because it didn't contain peanuts, which are not even nuts, etc

For some reason I find peanut/legume pedantry acceptable but if someone starts on "technically blackberries, raspberries and strawberries are not berries but bananas and oranges are" I will get all "if botanists think the word 'berry' doesn't apply to fruit we have been calling berries since the 1300s but to various completely different fruit then it would seem they are using the word wrong and should find a different one"

sorry, this did not add anything to the raging debate

club mate martyr (a passing spacecadet), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:29 (eleven years ago)

Whoa, didn't know that about bananas.

how's life, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:32 (eleven years ago)

i thought bananas were a herb or some such bollocks

kinder, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:12 (eleven years ago)

I am dying to have one of these rn:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/LD_Nutty_Bars.JPG

kate78, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:14 (eleven years ago)

my... my god

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/thom-tillis-washing-hands-toilet

goole, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:15 (eleven years ago)

Wrapping up the Q&A, the moderator joked to Tillis, "I'm not sure I'm gonna shake your hand."

LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:18 (eleven years ago)

I have wondered if nut allergies were on the rise over the last 20 years or what cuz I don't remember any of this shit when I was a kid, but now that I'm involved in the school system it seems fairly common. My daughter's elementary school is not nut-free, but her preschool was. It wasn't a big deal, we just made her almond butter-and jelly sandwiches instead. More annoyingly, her preschool was also mustard-free - and mustard is in fucking EVERYTHING.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:19 (eleven years ago)

What on EARTH is mustard in?

how's life, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:25 (eleven years ago)

sorry, not trying to be all like that, but I mean, I like to think of myself as the kind of guy who reads his ingredient labels.

how's life, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:27 (eleven years ago)

mayonnaise, lunchmeats of all kinds (salami, etc.), crackers, bread, tomato sauce I could go on and on

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:27 (eleven years ago)

(mustard seed incl in definition of mustard here)

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:28 (eleven years ago)

http://splitsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/vaunnies_mustardayonnaise.jpg

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:31 (eleven years ago)

ok, I don't think I've ever seen mustard in bread or crackers (but wondering now if it's just included under "spices"), but I can understand the other ones you listed.

how's life, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:33 (eleven years ago)

xp lol

how's life, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:33 (eleven years ago)

truly, the kingdom of god

goole, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:33 (eleven years ago)

Things we have had to be wary of (at least), if not had outright forbidden: peanuts, tree nuts, gluten (for celiacs), strawberries, mangos, mushrooms, milk (allergies, not just lactose intolerant). Per the anecdotes, I don't know a single adult with any serious food allergies (save maybe a scattered shellfish allergy here or there, which in a couple of cases have come and gone). Same with bee allergies. But there a bunch of kids I know with at least minor issues with some of the above, sometimes life-threatening issues. Sometimes multiple issues. And yeah we're not talking dozens of kids, just a few here and there. The only time it has been a real bummer is when I want Chinese food and certain friends can't come along. Also, gluten free is a real buzzkill, but the two parents I know with celiacs kid (which has also steadily been on the rise, fyi) never complain and always send along gluten free snacks, pizzas, treats and whatnot to parties or whatever.

I know three kids with type 1 diabetes, too, and that seems like another thing on the rise, mysteriously, especially in kids. And that shit is super serious 24/7. And don't get me started on how the drug companies fuck these poor kids and families over, making them pay more in this country than they do on other countries, and devising these stupid vertically integrated systems where if one component is changed, then everything has to be changed. And so on. I don't have any anti-vax friends, but when your kid is suddenly diagnosed with an incurable chronic illness, the conspiracies start to come out. It's in the food, it's in the environment ...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:07 (eleven years ago)

wasn't there a news story two weeks ago about gluten intolerance having no scientific basis?

touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:13 (eleven years ago)

The human body is becoming increasingly resistant to natural foods. How long until Twinkies and Yoo-Hoo wind up in the food pyramid?

Venom Spritz (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:14 (eleven years ago)

There was one kid in my school that had a nut allergy. We handled by just not giving Paul any nuts.

Jeff, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:16 (eleven years ago)

Yuppie gluten intolerance is different from celiac, which is a real autoimmune thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coeliac_disease

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:16 (eleven years ago)

Parents with or with kids who have celiac hate people who go gluten free from some stupid fad reason.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:17 (eleven years ago)

josh can you look into whether any of those things is "on the rise" before saying so

goole, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:17 (eleven years ago)

like, "i keep hearing about this" isn't that

goole, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:18 (eleven years ago)

yeah celiac /= gluten-free, totally different. We have friends with two daughters who both have celiac and this Parents with or with kids who have celiac hate people who go gluten free from some stupid fad reason. is definitely otm. They always bring gluten-free stuff with them wherever they go

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:21 (eleven years ago)

Mayo clinic says celiac is up 4x since 1950:

http://www.mayo.edu/research/discoverys-edge/celiac-disease-rise

Though this says 1% of the population has it, which seems crazily high; I don't think I know anyone, adult or child, who has it.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 18:26 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.