― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)
Also, this made the rounds WAY fast... everyone's seen this today (not on ILX, I mean)
― Jimmy Mod Loves Alan Canseco (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 30 September 2005 05:02 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 01:05 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 3 October 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, but the end results!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 3 October 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 October 2005 03:11 (twenty years ago)
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/30/west_side_story_beco.html
http://www.boardsmag.com/articles/magazine/20050601/aice.html
http://www.aice.org/ ('Trailer Park' section)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)
The Shining Revised....oh my!
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 03:11 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 04:03 (twenty years ago)
someone needs to remix this movie. here's what to do:
- remove 80% of the music. too many times this movie spills into overkill because of the combination of jack nicholson + crazy modern classical music. I think nicholson by himself = already spooky (plus also funny, which is another thing the shining should have exploited more)
- ...which means you need to hire an editor to make this movie happen in under 2 hours, so all dialogue and extended pan shots of (admittedly beautiful) scenery don't go stale
- structure the movie around the bar scenes. these move at a good pace, don't have a bunch of dramatic overkill, are funny, nice to look at, and give a great idea of jack's motivation to kill, are good barometers for his madness.
- hold off on the scariest images until the end. dropping the blood coming out of elevators in the first 20 minutes is bad pacing for a movie that in general takes its time getting to the finish line
― Dominique, Monday, 26 November 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)
You're silly in the head.
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 26 November 2007 12:05 (eighteen years ago)
someone needs to remix this movie.
I mean, did you SEE that awful miniseries?!
― Eric H., Monday, 26 November 2007 12:17 (eighteen years ago)
"remixing"/"re-imagining"/"tweaking" this film would be like taking a runny, pungent dump on "The Mona Lisa." Don't fuck with it.
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 26 November 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe they could CGI Shelly Duvall out of the film and put Winona Ryder in instead, as a way of appealing to the young people. Also, they could get Greedo to shoot first.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Monday, 26 November 2007 13:19 (eighteen years ago)
i agree with this, jack's descent into madness happens too suddenly - you don't get much of a sense of what he's actually like before he goes crazy so there's no counterpoint. then, when he does, it goes on for too long. really great movie but it's totally improvable.
― jed_, Monday, 26 November 2007 13:27 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not so sure about holding it off until the end, though. The first shining that Danny has in the bathroom (about the elevator and the split-second splice of the twins) is very effective for presaging/foreshadowing and captures the viewer's attention quickly.
I do think when Shelly Duvall finally sees the elevator, though, it's been shown too many times by that point and not effective.
― Joe, Monday, 26 November 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
I'm trying to think if any other Great Director's Worst Film has inspired such slavish devotion...
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 26 November 2007 14:01 (eighteen years ago)
I can only assume you've seen Fear and Desire. And A Clockwork Orange.
― Eric H., Monday, 26 November 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
slavish = people like it?
― remy bean, Monday, 26 November 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
Much as I'm totally not in the business of "improving" movies, I sort of agree with this. I never really thought it was right that Duvall literally sees the bloody elevators.
― Eric H., Monday, 26 November 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
I think the bloody elevators work best in that trailer. (Eric, I will give you Fear and Desire, I meant since Kubrick became Kubrick.)
To me to the degree it works at all it's a Grand Guignol Kramer vs Kramer, only there's no genre universe in which those 2 actors would be married to each other. I was a squeamish little teenage pussy when it debuted and it didn't scare me much.
I'll probably see it once more, thanks to the doubtsthis has planted, and be done with it forever.
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 26 November 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
I think the entire movie should've taken place in the pantry.
― Pleasant Plains, Monday, 26 November 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
the shining is the only post-strangelove kubrick i have any great attachment to, though i'd prob like barry lyndon more now.
the whole bit with shelley running around at the end is pretty silly, though.
― J.D., Monday, 26 November 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)
you don't get much of a sense of what he's actually like before he goes crazy so there's no counterpoint
true enough, but if you're looking for observant portrayals of plausible humans that the movie seems to care about, Kubrick might not be your thing.
― kenan, Monday, 26 November 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)
honey, can't you see i'm BUSY?
― whatever, Monday, 26 November 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
also, there's more than a hint that Jack was plenty crazy long before we come in -- he's an abusive alcoholic prone to fits of rage. So when he turns raging and abusive, well... there you go. It's frightening not because "wooo! Ghosts!" but because his wife and son are familiar with this Jack already. But again, Kubrick doesn't much care about the humans in his movies, so it's all pretty fuzzy.
― kenan, Monday, 26 November 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
the shining needs a different second half. the only genuinely scary bits - the subliminal visions - are in the first.
― Just got offed, Monday, 26 November 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
but don't you see he was always the caretaker!
― latebloomer, Monday, 26 November 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
I'd remix this movie by using it as kindling
― El Tomboto, Monday, 26 November 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
I was with Morbz re: this being Kubrick's worst movie but then I remembered Eyes Wide Shut
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 26 November 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)