i tried wearing a button down shirt a few weeks ago and spent like 40 minutes trying to roll up the sleeves properly.
― example (crüt), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:24 (eleven years ago)
i'd still wear it again though given the proper occasion
― example (crüt), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:25 (eleven years ago)
there's no wrong way, especially if it has the little loop that you button to hold yr sleeves up
― mh, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)
i just don't have much experience with it! i had to do some experimenting to figure out how to get the sleeve length + fold looking ok and also avoid cutting off circulation to my forearms
(sorry this has nothing to do with leggingfoof)
― example (crüt), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
takes good sizing imo, this is mah 'look' (hi matt p) and i always used to have more trouble getting the sleeves right when my shirts were too baggy.
but any belief that this is like the porky pig style that is leggings-only is i am sorry to say based on a misunderstanding
― j., Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)
FOOOFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
― surm, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:21 (eleven years ago)
my wife dresses like this. when she walks up the stairs it's like an inuit doing "the twerk". i tell her honey, if i wanted to see your a*** id install a "go pro" in the toilet bowl!
just my $0.02
― fuhgeddaboudit! (missingNO), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)
you don't want to see your wifes ass : ( ?
― j., Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
when did missingNO become Bill Magill
― mh, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
pretty obvious joek post
― brimstead, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)
don't recall bill magill being a half-hearted d-bag and if it's a joke it's pretty obviously risibly stupid
― mattresslessness, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:05 (eleven years ago)
glad you have a look j. don't be too fussy about the roll ime
― mattresslessness, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:06 (eleven years ago)
mine was a joek post too :(
― mh, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
sinful!
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:29 (eleven years ago)
it's been a good three years, rip christian tight black leggings
― mh, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:32 (eleven years ago)
there is an 11-image slideshow accompanying that article
― rob, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:34 (eleven years ago)
omg lol good trolling sfgate
― mh, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:43 (eleven years ago)
"She said she asked her husband, Dale, about his perspective on leggings, and he admitted that when he sees women wearing the clothing, it’s hard not to look at their body."
Way to go Dale. Snitches get stitches.
― Brio2, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:51 (eleven years ago)
interesting that he does not refer to his wife there
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:52 (eleven years ago)
good to know the industry to mitigate the stares of christian males is still in business
― mh, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:52 (eleven years ago)
“I want her to know, her value is not in the way her body looks or how she dresses. This is why Jesus wants her to hide her body from the sight of lustful men until her God-given husband takes possession of it along with her virginity and all the development rights to her uterus. Who cares what she wants, she'll want what God SAYS she wants."
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:59 (eleven years ago)
what if God wants tightblack leggings and big foofy boots
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:00 (eleven years ago)
I think it's in Corinthians somewhere
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:01 (eleven years ago)
i regret this thread, and all that i said on it
― the captain beefheart of personal hygiene (soda), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:02 (eleven years ago)
Nah it's not your fault it went from fashion critique to dudes perving.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:05 (eleven years ago)
like there's a difference
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:07 (eleven years ago)
it's Dale's fault.
― Brio2, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:08 (eleven years ago)
fwiw I'm doing zero perving in this thread, this is all strictly impartial analysis of a social phenomenon
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:10 (eleven years ago)
ok so i bought some of those $5 leggings they sell at walgreen's that have sweatpants on the inside and they are they are heavenly in their comfort
― cross over the mushroom circle (La Lechera), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 1:14 AM (2 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
FYI these come in plus size now and LL is totally OTM about them.
― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:21 (eleven years ago)
oh yeah god wants me to wear those more often, not lessi wore them for two days straight last weekalso? they don't fade -- they're made of some weird polymer or something
i think i'm going to buy a lifetime supply while they're around because i never want to be without
― groundless round (La Lechera), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:37 (eleven years ago)
Haha the plus size ones are $6 or 2/$10 so I own four pairs.
― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:48 (eleven years ago)
It is seriously like the best leggings bargain ever. There's a plus size hip indie clothing retailer who sells a similar product for $35 each! And they aren't as stretchy or as soft and the rise is low so they roll down under my stomach and the crotch sags. Like I want to send them a pair of the Walgreens leggings with an angry note. And they are so cheap I could afford to do it!
― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:50 (eleven years ago)
Those sound like my kinda leggings. I've been wearing a pair of bright print leggings all the time (they were only $12) and wanting a plain black pair. I guess leggings are my postpartum skinny jeans. Soon, skinny jeans, soon we will be together again. But not too soon...
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 23:02 (eleven years ago)
xp ha you should
― groundless round (La Lechera), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 23:15 (eleven years ago)
what brand are they?
― difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 02:43 (eleven years ago)
Waleggings
― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 03:35 (eleven years ago)
jk I don't know the brand
― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 03:41 (eleven years ago)
Leggreens lol
― difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 03:56 (eleven years ago)
i bought some of those on ll's suggestion and they are THE most comfortable thing i have ever put on my body
i have them now in black, grey, red and green
― jello my future biafriend (roxymuzak), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:41 (eleven years ago)
― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:21 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
wait are they fleece lined? cause i've been looking for good fleece lined ones for a while and I could have gotten them at walgreens this whole time? you're shitting me. also, fleece lined tights. I've found an acceptable footless pair but not footed pair.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:43 (eleven years ago)
Are these walgreens leggings in with the tights or ?
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:44 (eleven years ago)
in with tights at my walgreens, and yes fleece lined!!
― jello my future biafriend (roxymuzak), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:46 (eleven years ago)
footless tho
they are basically $5 skintight sweatpants they are THE most comfortable thing i have ever put on my bodyotmit's like a soft leg hug that also keeps you warm and eliminates the need for ugly housepants
― groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:23 (eleven years ago)
Not all Walgreens carry the plus sizes. There are approximately 100,000 Walgreens that I pass on any given day and I've found two that carry the plus size leggings. But yeah, they are either with the hosiery or on an endcap.
Fleece lined tights - http://www.herroom.com/berkshire-4755-cozy-hose-tights.shtml
I'm wearing them right now and they are fucking GREAT. Soft, stretchy, opaque, and lasting through their second winter of service (I have two pairs and one just developed a hole in the toe last week).
― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:03 (eleven years ago)
Those do not look particularly opaque over her ass but I am convinced on the value of all their other attributes!
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:07 (eleven years ago)
the walgreens ones are totally opaque over the buns ime
― groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:08 (eleven years ago)
now I'm wondering if any of these are the tights Je55e copped to wearing under his dress pants in the cold winter days
― mh, Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:11 (eleven years ago)
2 for $32 Canadian >:(
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:21 (eleven years ago)
i found an img of the ones i've got iirc
http://i1200.photobucket.com/albums/bb331/mimsyborogoves2/clothing/IMG_8980_zpsc1b722aa.jpg
― groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:26 (eleven years ago)