tight black leggings and big foofy boots

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (746 of them)

i tried wearing a button down shirt a few weeks ago and spent like 40 minutes trying to roll up the sleeves properly.

example (crüt), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:24 (eleven years ago)

i'd still wear it again though given the proper occasion

example (crüt), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:25 (eleven years ago)

there's no wrong way, especially if it has the little loop that you button to hold yr sleeves up

mh, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)

i just don't have much experience with it! i had to do some experimenting to figure out how to get the sleeve length + fold looking ok and also avoid cutting off circulation to my forearms

(sorry this has nothing to do with leggingfoof)

example (crüt), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)

takes good sizing imo, this is mah 'look' (hi matt p) and i always used to have more trouble getting the sleeves right when my shirts were too baggy.

but any belief that this is like the porky pig style that is leggings-only is i am sorry to say based on a misunderstanding

j., Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)

FOOOFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

surm, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:21 (eleven years ago)

my wife dresses like this. when she walks up the stairs it's like an inuit doing "the twerk". i tell her honey, if i wanted to see your a*** id install a "go pro" in the toilet bowl!

just my $0.02

fuhgeddaboudit! (missingNO), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)

you don't want to see your wifes ass : ( ?

j., Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)

when did missingNO become Bill Magill

mh, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)

pretty obvious joek post

brimstead, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)

don't recall bill magill being a half-hearted d-bag and if it's a joke it's pretty obviously risibly stupid

mattresslessness, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:05 (eleven years ago)

glad you have a look j. don't be too fussy about the roll ime

mattresslessness, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:06 (eleven years ago)

mine was a joek post too :(

mh, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)

two months pass...

sinful!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:29 (eleven years ago)

it's been a good three years, rip christian tight black leggings

mh, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:32 (eleven years ago)

there is an 11-image slideshow accompanying that article

rob, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:34 (eleven years ago)

omg lol good trolling sfgate

mh, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:43 (eleven years ago)

"She said she asked her husband, Dale, about his perspective on leggings, and he admitted that when he sees women wearing the clothing, it’s hard not to look at their body."

Way to go Dale. Snitches get stitches.

Brio2, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:51 (eleven years ago)

interesting that he does not refer to his wife there

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:52 (eleven years ago)

good to know the industry to mitigate the stares of christian males is still in business

mh, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:52 (eleven years ago)

“I want her to know, her value is not in the way her body looks or how she dresses. This is why Jesus wants her to hide her body from the sight of lustful men until her God-given husband takes possession of it along with her virginity and all the development rights to her uterus. Who cares what she wants, she'll want what God SAYS she wants."

Orson Wellies (in orbit), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:59 (eleven years ago)

what if God wants tightblack leggings and big foofy boots

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:00 (eleven years ago)

I think it's in Corinthians somewhere

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:01 (eleven years ago)

i regret this thread, and all that i said on it

the captain beefheart of personal hygiene (soda), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:02 (eleven years ago)

Nah it's not your fault it went from fashion critique to dudes perving.

Orson Wellies (in orbit), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:05 (eleven years ago)

like there's a difference

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:07 (eleven years ago)

it's Dale's fault.

Brio2, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:08 (eleven years ago)

fwiw I'm doing zero perving in this thread, this is all strictly impartial analysis of a social phenomenon

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:10 (eleven years ago)

ok so i bought some of those $5 leggings they sell at walgreen's that have sweatpants on the inside and they are
they are heavenly in their comfort

― cross over the mushroom circle (La Lechera), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 1:14 AM (2 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

FYI these come in plus size now and LL is totally OTM about them.

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:21 (eleven years ago)

oh yeah god wants me to wear those more often, not less
i wore them for two days straight last week
also? they don't fade -- they're made of some weird polymer or something

i think i'm going to buy a lifetime supply while they're around because i never want to be without

groundless round (La Lechera), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:37 (eleven years ago)

Haha the plus size ones are $6 or 2/$10 so I own four pairs.

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:48 (eleven years ago)

It is seriously like the best leggings bargain ever. There's a plus size hip indie clothing retailer who sells a similar product for $35 each! And they aren't as stretchy or as soft and the rise is low so they roll down under my stomach and the crotch sags. Like I want to send them a pair of the Walgreens leggings with an angry note. And they are so cheap I could afford to do it!

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:50 (eleven years ago)

Those sound like my kinda leggings. I've been wearing a pair of bright print leggings all the time (they were only $12) and wanting a plain black pair. I guess leggings are my postpartum skinny jeans. Soon, skinny jeans, soon we will be together again. But not too soon...

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 23:02 (eleven years ago)

xp ha you should

groundless round (La Lechera), Tuesday, 27 January 2015 23:15 (eleven years ago)

what brand are they?

difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 02:43 (eleven years ago)

Waleggings

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 03:35 (eleven years ago)

jk I don't know the brand

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 03:41 (eleven years ago)

Leggreens lol

difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 28 January 2015 03:56 (eleven years ago)

i bought some of those on ll's suggestion and they are THE most comfortable thing i have ever put on my body

i have them now in black, grey, red and green

jello my future biafriend (roxymuzak), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:41 (eleven years ago)

ok so i bought some of those $5 leggings they sell at walgreen's that have sweatpants on the inside and they are
they are heavenly in their comfort

― cross over the mushroom circle (La Lechera), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 1:14 AM (2 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

FYI these come in plus size now and LL is totally OTM about them.

― about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:21 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

wait are they fleece lined? cause i've been looking for good fleece lined ones for a while and I could have gotten them at walgreens this whole time? you're shitting me. also, fleece lined tights. I've found an acceptable footless pair but not footed pair.

Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:43 (eleven years ago)

Are these walgreens leggings in with the tights or ?

Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:44 (eleven years ago)

in with tights at my walgreens, and yes fleece lined!!

jello my future biafriend (roxymuzak), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:46 (eleven years ago)

footless tho

jello my future biafriend (roxymuzak), Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:46 (eleven years ago)

they are basically $5 skintight sweatpants
they are THE most comfortable thing i have ever put on my bodyotm
it's like a soft leg hug that also keeps you warm and eliminates the need for ugly housepants

groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:23 (eleven years ago)

Not all Walgreens carry the plus sizes. There are approximately 100,000 Walgreens that I pass on any given day and I've found two that carry the plus size leggings. But yeah, they are either with the hosiery or on an endcap.

Fleece lined tights - http://www.herroom.com/berkshire-4755-cozy-hose-tights.shtml

I'm wearing them right now and they are fucking GREAT. Soft, stretchy, opaque, and lasting through their second winter of service (I have two pairs and one just developed a hole in the toe last week).

about a dozen duck supporters (carl agatha), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:03 (eleven years ago)

Those do not look particularly opaque over her ass but I am convinced on the value of all their other attributes!

Orson Wellies (in orbit), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:07 (eleven years ago)

the walgreens ones are totally opaque over the buns ime

groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:08 (eleven years ago)

now I'm wondering if any of these are the tights Je55e copped to wearing under his dress pants in the cold winter days

mh, Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:11 (eleven years ago)

2 for $32 Canadian >:(

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:21 (eleven years ago)

i found an img of the ones i've got iirc

http://i1200.photobucket.com/albums/bb331/mimsyborogoves2/clothing/IMG_8980_zpsc1b722aa.jpg

groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:26 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.