Twin Peaks: Classic or Dud?

this feature is widespread and completely unnecessary. I nearly had a heart attack when I bought a new tv and all my favorite films looked completely horrible and cheap. Any tv owner's manual should have a section called "how to stop making things look terrible". I have to imagine this has been a problem for many, many people, and that there are plenty that never figured out how to fix this.

I don't even know if it is good or bad that there is a motion smoothing feature available on new tvs, but it definitely shouldn't be cranked up by default

I think the first time I consciously saw it was at a different laundromat, where The Dark Knight was showing and I was convinced the TV station was actually showing the film slightly fast in order to squeeze in more commercials.

I once bought a Logik CD player that put pauses between tracks(as far as I knew you couldn't change it), ever since I've been scared I'll buy another music player that does the same. It's a terrible idea so I don't know why somebody would specifically design it that way.

That CD player feature you didn't like is going to come back in style.

embrace the pause. use those 2 seconds to rebalance, center yourself, and listen inward. 2 seconds is an eternity compared to the infinitely small. a series of 2 second pauses leads to a collective pause that is infinitely larger than the collective pause of a series of 1.99 second pauses. the eternal pause, infinities on top of infinities. only now you are ready to listen to the next Wilson Phillips song.

Seriously? This is genuinely upsetting me. I'm gonna need an iPod or mp3 player soon and I'm scared there will be pauses.

Or when my CD player breaks, which will hopefully be at least 10 years from now.

Hope they still make CD players in 10 years

Tune in tomorrow
for
Invitation to Love

hfr smoothing makes cgi movies look rly rly strange: like offhand wedding videos of dragons and talking animals. recommended, and now playing at yr nearest big-box electronics section. as the default setting on every television yeah it is a plague. first encountered it on a new tv of my parents' and it made me feel insane because they couldn't see it.

It's kinda how people think insane EQ and 'stereo surround' makes music sound better. It's just different. Not better.

why does anyone like this and why does it exist?

if you're watching HD sports on a giant LCD screen, it improves the experience a lot.

Just realized that 9 episodes is basically the length of TP Season 1...was thinking it sounded short but it'll be even longer than that with no commercials, and that first season covered a lot of ground and was incredibly engrossing.

why does anyone like this and why does it exist?

if you're watching HD sports on a giant LCD screen, it improves the experience a lot.

Or anything with little things flying across the screen, like "The Hobbit.'

I have to disagree there. The first dvd I played on the new tv was Return of the King, which I chose because I thought that a modern, visually exciting movie would be a good way to test out the HD and get it set up correctly, but it looked every bit as horrible and cheap as anything else. At first, I thought I just didn't remember what the film was like or maybe the tv was broken, until I finally figured out that I needed to turn off the smoothing.

This feature shouldn't be used for any feature films, it only makes them worse. The only thing I'd ever consider using it for is sports, and even there the results aren't great. Yes, in sporting events, without the smoothing, you do tend to see some pixelation with quick camera moves, but I've come around to preferring that over the weird unreality of the smoothing feature.

Movies should be watched as their creators intended!

pumped directly into your visual cortex by implanted electrodes

Yes! Thank you!

Avant-pop abuse of smoothing feature in 10... 9... 8...

Now there's this too

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/twin-peaks-creator-reveal-characters-741319

If Lynch is even half as enthusiastic about all this as Frost seems to be, I'll be happy.

Frost wrote the Dale Cooper book which was pretty good, so looking forward to this.

When Twin Peaks first aired, I thought of Mark Frost as this old TV veteran (Hill Street Blues! That seemed like TV history) but actually HSB only finished three years before Twin Peaks started and Frost is still only 60. I guess I was young then.

Wikipedia says Autobio of Dale Cooper was written by Mark's brother, Scott Frost.

that's obviously wrong since it was written by special agent dale cooper

like Dennis Perrin i am getting a distinct "X-Files movies" vibe

oops

like Dennis Perrin i am getting a distinct "X-Files movies" vibe

1) from what?
2) have you seen the X-Files movies?*
3) have you seen The X-Files?

* there were X-Files movies?

I've been rewatching twin peaks. I never realized bryan cranston was the actor who played hank until just now. I feel so dumb.

I saw about 4 or 5 X-Files eps, which were fine, but i didn't need more.

yeah, i meant movie, i forgot how colossal a flop it was.

and 1) from excessive enthusiasm and the track record of 20-years-later pickups

(or just 2 years later... I'm sorta fine with the plug being pulled on Deadwood now)

Not sure if the Bryan Cranston comment was serious or not. He didn't play Hank.

I've been rewatching twin peaks. I never realized bryan cranston was the actor who played hank until just now. I feel so dumb.

― dynamicinterface, Friday, October 17, 2014 3:59 AM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post

ok wait what

the connections btwn TP and x-files are pretty clear imo (TP as Mulder run amok, XF as TP back at headquarters) and i sympathize with "oh this will be bad" feelings of the XF films but like

as a fan

fuck it--my homies are on the TV. i'l turn on my AV Club later.

Also, David Lynch is pretty definitively not Chris Carter.

i'm not sure what that means

wait, there WERE two x-files movies, no?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X-Files_(film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X-Files:_I_Want_to_Believe

vindicated

I was gonna bring up Psycho II et al but yes Hitchcock was dead

I've always wondered whether it was intentional or a coincidence that both David Duchovny and Don S. Davis ended up playing similar characters (eccentric government agent, protagonist's military dad) in X-Files as they did in Twin Peaks...

By "David Lynch is pretty definitively not Chris Carter" I meant that Lynch has a pedigree of quality projects whereas Carter basically just has the patchy laurels of The X-Files (and maybe Millennium, if you're feeling charitable) to rest on, so more Twin Peaks feels like a way more solid proposition on paper than another X-Files movie.

aha

Michael Horse pops up in The X-Files also. And Richard Beymer. And Michael J Anderson!

And Bryan Cranston (who plays Hank)!

and Michael Cera (who plays Lucy)!

I can't find confirmation anywhere online, but I swear I remember Kyle MacLachlan playing Dana Scully for at least two or three seasons of The X-Files.

i think that was before the internet

this is especially confusing because bryan cranston was actually in an ep of the x files