You're gonna kill me if you say it was Peter Sellers doing the v/o.
― pplains, Monday, 16 June 2014 20:21 (eleven years ago)
Michael Bentine in fully 'Potty Time' mode?
― an office job is as secure as a Weetabix padlock (snoball), Monday, 16 June 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
there is no missing footage, as SK didn't want it in the film. (It's true that the fact that it premiered w/ 20 mins that he cut immediately makes that stuff a bit of a Grail, but I really am not curious to ever see it, and it looks like he definitively disposed of it.)
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 16 June 2014 20:30 (eleven years ago)
Acc to wikipedia:
In December 2010, Douglas Trumbull announced that Warner Brothers had located seventeen minutes of lost footage, "perfectly preserved", in a Kansas salt mine vault. A Warner Brothers press release asserts definitively that this material is from the postpremiere cuts, which Kubrick has stated totaled nineteen minutes. No immediate plans have been announced for the footage.
I wld be very curious to see it, ditto the lost ending of The Shining
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Monday, 16 June 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
i've stumbled across the claim a few places that the beatles used some outtakes from 2001 for a sequence in the film version of magical mystery tour, but it's never really explained how on earth the beatles would have gotten their hands on outtakes from 2001.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 16 June 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
kubrick gave them the footage after he pulled out of filming their version of lord of the rings, having shot prepremiere 'missing footage' of the fabs in full hobbit costume that allegedly now resides in landfill under the M8
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Monday, 16 June 2014 20:50 (eleven years ago)
ditto the lost ending of The Shining
That would be the "lost" penultimate scene. I saw it 34 years ago, you're not missing much.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 16 June 2014 20:54 (eleven years ago)
where would the blue powdered food scene fit in if he's eating full room service fare by the end?
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 16 June 2014 20:55 (eleven years ago)
> the lost ending of The Shining
didn't they tack a bit of this onto the end of bladerunner?
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/ist/?next=/smart-news/ridley-scott-reused-footage-from-the-shining-at-the-end-of-blade-runner-2005687/
oh, that was outtakes of the initial sequence of the shining, not the end.
― koogs, Monday, 16 June 2014 21:11 (eleven years ago)
you can read the script pages of the 'lost' shining scene here. i think SK was right to take it out, doesn't add much at all.
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/lost-ending-to-stanley-kubricks-the-shining-revealed-20130124
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 16 June 2014 21:21 (eleven years ago)
Briefly misinterpreted that "SK" as "Stephen King" and just realized that King and Kubrick have the same initials. Paging the Room 237 guys?
― Funk autocorrect (cryptosicko), Monday, 16 June 2014 21:30 (eleven years ago)
the tommyknockers is all about how sk faked the challenger disaster
― balls, Monday, 16 June 2014 21:55 (eleven years ago)
originally called the sammy knockers
― pplains, Monday, 16 June 2014 21:57 (eleven years ago)
New trailer for BFI festival screenings:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfF0vxKZRhc#t=12
Amazing how many indelible images there are in this movie.
― bizarro gazzara, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 10:33 (eleven years ago)
see at what point you lose hope for this 3001 adap
http://thedissolve.com/news/3822-ridley-scott-to-executive-produce-a-2001-a-space-o/
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 23:00 (eleven years ago)
I'm holding out for 2002.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 23:27 (eleven years ago)
On the big screen.
― imago, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 10:20 (eleven years ago)
yep, i'll be going on sunday. psyched as i only ever saw it once, quite recently on a crap TV.
― Piss-Up Artist (dog latin), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 10:24 (eleven years ago)
was shown not even all of it in music class at school on a tiny telly
front row, big screen
there is nothing to add
― imago, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 10:28 (eleven years ago)
seeing it on 70mm tonight. quite excited.
― StillAdvance, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 11:53 (eleven years ago)
Just saw it on the big screen at last, third time in total, can't recommend the experience enough.
― ewar woowar (or something), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 22:39 (eleven years ago)
dont see it on 70mm. it just looks old. which usually is what i crave, but for this, esp after a lecture at the bfi on its set design/rendering of the future/space travel etc, it felt wrong - this film should look new. (also dont see it after a long day at work).
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 09:06 (eleven years ago)
Was surprised to see this is on at a local cinema next week. Wasn't aware it had been rereleased.Not sure what the deal is since I only looked at timetable for Monday.I don't remember seeing rereleased films listed for normal runs there though they have had things like Twilight marathons so you coukd see all the films in order.This was the same cinema that showed the Nick Cave 20000 Days On Earth link up. I haven't seen if the other multiplex has it.
― Stevolende, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 09:33 (eleven years ago)
This is a new digital print of 2001 produced by the BFI as the lead film in their current SF season. These BFI prints tend to 'tour' cinemas around Britain, primarily arthouses but also certain multiplexes for one-off screenings.
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 09:39 (eleven years ago)
There is an interval of a couple of minutes of darkness and music when HAL turns.
― ewar woowar (or something), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:26 (eleven years ago)
the intermission and music that leads up to the start of the film and at the end was actually one of my favourite parts lol. i wish all cinemas presented films like that, as a real presentation.
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:07 (eleven years ago)
I kind of feel like I need to read something about 2001 before I rewatch it this weekend. Like, I wasn't quite sure what to expect the first time round and afterwards I wasn't sure what I had seen. It feels like the majority of the 'plot' takes place right slap in the middle of the feature, which is bookended with a very long intro and a very long outro. I'd like to know more about what to look out for, what Kubrick is going for, small details, bigger pictures... Is there something I can read that would be a good place to start?
― Piss-Up Artist (dog latin), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:54 (eleven years ago)
http://www.goldenageofscifi.info/pdf/TheSentinel.pdf
In the words of Arthur C Clarke, "I am continually annoyed by careless references to 'The Sentinel' as 'the story on which 2001 is based'; it bears about as much relation to the movie as an acorn to the resultant full-grown oak."
― Kelly Gang Carey and the Mantels (ledge), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:59 (eleven years ago)
This one might be more fitting, I first encountered it as a short story but apparently it's a chapter in the novel developed alongside the film:
http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Cultural/Art/2001.html
― Kelly Gang Carey and the Mantels (ledge), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 12:04 (eleven years ago)
Fair bit of confusion at the musical introduction, some seemed to think the show had started with the curtains still drawn xxp
― ewar woowar (or something), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 12:07 (eleven years ago)
Prob mentioned on this thread before, but the BFI monograph by Peter Kramer on 2001 is excellent:http://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/2001-a-space-odyssey-/?K=9781844572861
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 12:10 (eleven years ago)
Saw this on the last re-release some years back, at the Curzon Mayfair, The pre-credits sequence with the snippet of Ligeti and the Curzon's sixties style interior made me feel like I had jumped back in time, or maybe forward.
― MaresNest, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 12:26 (eleven years ago)
Actually just looked back at the timetable for that cinema locally . & it has had 2 showings a day on for the current week and one showing a day for next week. So somewhat more than a one off.Is that happening elsewhere than the BFI too?
― Stevolende, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:33 (eleven years ago)
Well there's the British Film Institute - a lottery-funded body with an educational and preservationist remit - and the National Film Theatre in London, which is run by the BFI but shows films owned, distributed or revived by many different companies. The BFI mount a number of different seasons at the NFT over the course of a year, and generally most seasons will have a 'lead' film that then tours the whole of the UK. Any cinema can show a BFI-distributed film, for as long as they like; here in Glasgow, 2001 has had a week-long run at the GFT, the city's sole arthouse cinema, and a one day showing at the big Cineworld multiplex. I'm sure the BFI is keen to have films they distribute (and create new prints for) shown as widely as possible, but as they tend to specialise in arthouse fare, showings at more commercial cinemas are generally limited to a single showing, if that; for their Chinese cinema season earlier this year, the BFI created a new print of Spring in a Small Town, which I saw at the GFT, but which never made it to Cineworld.
I don't know the nature of the financial arrangement between the BFI, Warner Bros (who have the DVD/Blu-Ray rights to 2001) and the Kubrick estate with regard to this new print of 2001.
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 18:44 (eleven years ago)
Saw this last night on a massive screen, with a pleasingly big and attentive audience. A modern - loud - cinema sound system brought it home to me just how much of a space opera this actually is; it's amazing that the music choices were all made after the fact, and after a score had been commissioned.
There was one weird jump cut in the middle of the scene with Leonard Rossiter, which felt like the most obvious place where Kubrick had taken out footage after his initial cut.
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Friday, 5 December 2014 08:57 (eleven years ago)
I thought the music was what was already being used as the scratch track, before any soundtrack work was considered.
― MaresNest, Friday, 5 December 2014 09:11 (eleven years ago)
Oh right - I know there was an Alex North score that Kubrick didn't use - but was the classical music in place at the time of filming (which would make sense given the choreography between music and image)?
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Friday, 5 December 2014 09:40 (eleven years ago)
From Wiki:
In the early stages of production, Kubrick had actually commissioned a score for 2001 from noted Hollywood composer Alex North, who had written the score for Spartacus and also worked on Dr. Strangelove.[11] However, during post-production, Kubrick chose to abandon North's music in favor of the now-familiar classical music pieces he had earlier chosen as "guide pieces" for the soundtrack. North did not know of the abandonment of the score until he saw the film's premiere screening.
In March 1966, MGM became concerned about 2001's progress and Kubrick put together a show reel of footage to the ad hoc soundtrack of classical recordings. The studio bosses were delighted with the results and Kubrick decided to use these "guide pieces" as the final musical soundtrack, and he abandoned North's score.
― MaresNest, Friday, 5 December 2014 10:04 (eleven years ago)
Kubrick chose to abandon North's music in favor of the now-familiar classical music pieces he had earlier chosen as "guide pieces" for the soundtrack.
Thanks - it's not entirely clear, but I take that to mean that the classical music choices were first applied to the film after filming had completed, but before North's score was ready. So it's not like Leone's Once Upon a Time in America, where the Morricone score was played to the actors during filming.
It's interesting to me how often 'master planner' Kubrick made decisive creative decisions like this, well after filming had completed (ie his tinkering with edits, or abandoning narration on 2001).
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Friday, 5 December 2014 10:20 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, I guess he commissioned the score at some point in production then went with the temp tracks during editing.
― MaresNest, Friday, 5 December 2014 11:14 (eleven years ago)
So watching this today has confirmed to me that Kubrick films are so much more enjoyable the second time round, and should always be viewed on a big screen. Same as the Shining screening I attended a couple of years ago. I was blown away.
― dive inside water and you will know (dog latin), Monday, 8 December 2014 01:10 (eleven years ago)
A friend who saw it in Croydon said they played generic R n'B during the intermission, is this standard or just a Croydon thing?
― めんどくさかった (Matt #2), Monday, 8 December 2014 03:27 (eleven years ago)
It's a Croydon thing (we got Ligeti)
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Monday, 8 December 2014 06:44 (eleven years ago)
we got 3 minutes of A$AP Rocky during the blank screen at the beginning. The docking bay part was 'Sugar' by System of a Down. The psychedelic trip to Jupiter section was 'Jesus He Knows Me' by Genesis.
― dive inside water and you will know (dog latin), Monday, 8 December 2014 09:30 (eleven years ago)
they were obv going for the 'zane lowe rescores' vibe.
― StillAdvance, Monday, 8 December 2014 19:58 (eleven years ago)
don't go all pinkfloydplanetarium on us
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 December 2014 20:06 (eleven years ago)
more films should have intermissions. how much better would winter sleep or boyhood have been with a gap after the 1.5 hour mark?
― StillAdvance, Monday, 8 December 2014 20:34 (eleven years ago)
people wd go to the lobby, start texting, never come back.
i like uninterrupted long films for as long as i can stand em. pretty sure the 2001 intermission is there cuz the film premiered ~20 minutes longer.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 December 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
I thought it was there cos it was a pretty common feature of cinerama 'roadshow' movies, back in the day?
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Monday, 8 December 2014 22:21 (eleven years ago)
Intermissions are also probably poopooed know as offering viewers a chance to theatre hop in the multiplex.
Serious Question: What was the last major release to feature one?
― Don A Henley And Get Over It (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 8 December 2014 22:25 (eleven years ago)