http://media.wizards.com/images/magic/tcg/products/cns/asdfsc3wfas234/QybjB0lKv5_EN.jpg
this is confusingly worded
― iatee, Monday, 2 June 2014 14:22 (twelve years ago)
the tl;dr is you get everyone's last pick from the current pack and any future packs
― ciderpress, Monday, 2 June 2014 14:30 (twelve years ago)
okay my initial read was 'last card' in the sense that every hands over the card at the bottom of the pack that they are holding right now
― iatee, Monday, 2 June 2014 14:36 (twelve years ago)
which is clearly wrong, but they could have worded that more clearly
― iatee, Monday, 2 June 2014 14:37 (twelve years ago)
The fact that they need to account for multiples of these draft-action cards really makes the wordings get obtuse. I think a lot of these cards are pretty simple once you get what they do.
re: Spiritmonger - no idea if it would see play now (about as much as Reaper of the Wilds, maybe?) and yeah it didn't destroy Standard the way a lot of people had predicted but I recall a lot of people playing it, IIRC Standard was was slow then. I just remember that being one of the three times where a card looked so obviously overpowered that my first impression was that it must be a misprint. The other two were Baneslayer Angel and Jace, the Mind Scupltor.
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Monday, 2 June 2014 15:05 (twelve years ago)
vintage masters limited actually looks pretty fun, i'm excited to play it. hopefully they'll add phantoms eventually like with modern masters since the price point is a bit high
― ciderpress, Friday, 13 June 2014 17:28 (eleven years ago)
kinda just looks like cube
― iatee, Friday, 13 June 2014 17:35 (eleven years ago)
looks more like 'modern masters but with older cards from my most fondly remembered era of magic' to me
― ciderpress, Friday, 13 June 2014 18:08 (eleven years ago)
vintage masters seems pretty amazing so far
― dude (Lamp), Friday, 13 June 2014 18:39 (eleven years ago)
but the real test will be when i start drafting i guess
I am way too insulted at the idea of $40 online drafts where you can open a lotus w/ dumb art
― iatee, Friday, 13 June 2014 18:40 (eleven years ago)
they're only 25, still a lot but maybe decent if you can win prize packs and open decent cards. anyone know the EV of a pack here or is it way too early to tell?
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Friday, 13 June 2014 18:48 (eleven years ago)
no idea
i am guessing they'll run phantoms eventually like they did for modern masters, once the release hype/sales die down.
― ciderpress, Friday, 13 June 2014 19:26 (eleven years ago)
Had friends over for a Conspiracy draft this weekend - lots of fun. I ended up in black because it was underdrafted and I ended up getting 4 Liliana's Specters before the last pack. I opened and took Secrets of Paradise in pack 3, and realized two picks later that all of a sudden with that Secrets pick I could splash any cards I wanted to, thanks to having so many Specters. I didn't make that much use of it though, only taking a Dack's Duplicate and a Selvala's Charge. The Conspiracy cards are really fun but also pretty interesting for gameplay. I wouldn't be opposed to them showing up in regular Magic.
I <3 Grudge Keeper. My friend to my right played a Custodi Squire, voted to get back some bomb and I voted for him to get it too. My other three friends were priced into voting for some other card to prevent the bomb from getting returned, and taking 2 damage for it. Needless to say, I was killed quickly that game, but it was worth it
― Vinnie, Monday, 16 June 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
Another highlight was killing a 13/13 Custodi Soulbinders with a Morbid Tragic Slip
― Vinnie, Monday, 16 June 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
has anyone else been drafting vintage masters? i've drafted a bunch over the last few days and while its fun both to play the crack a lotus lottery and to continually draft battle screech and/or goblins its starting to feel a lot more narrow than modern masters draft.
― dude (Lamp), Monday, 16 June 2014 23:55 (eleven years ago)
i've done a couple drafts so far and i like it a lot. i didn't draft MMA enough to get a good sense of how deep it was so i can't really compare them in that regard, but this set pulls from my favorite era of magic so i'm probably naturally inclined to like it more.
― ciderpress, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 13:46 (eleven years ago)
M15 looking kinda exciting and weird for a core set. i'm excited to get a new non-theros draft format irl, at the least.
― ciderpress, Monday, 23 June 2014 15:09 (eleven years ago)
yeah it def seems more promising than m14
― iatee, Monday, 23 June 2014 15:22 (eleven years ago)
pretty much every single one of the guest designed cards look awesome. gonna have to see the commons and uncommons to figure out how it's going to play in Limited but what we've seen is very interesting. I'm guessing the rest is reprints??
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Monday, 23 June 2014 15:24 (eleven years ago)
The guest designed cards are all really out-of-the-box. Maybe they should do those more often.
― Vinnie, Monday, 23 June 2014 16:44 (eleven years ago)
yeah a lot of them are actually pretty cool, only a few cringeworthy ones
― ciderpress, Monday, 23 June 2014 16:55 (eleven years ago)
the 'designed by' tag makes them all a little bit cringeworthy
― iatee, Monday, 23 June 2014 16:58 (eleven years ago)
Eh I don't mind that. OTOH I'm really not digging the "movie trailer for 300" look of the new dailymtg.com
― Vinnie, Monday, 23 June 2014 17:08 (eleven years ago)
yeah they were so dedicated to making a site that looks good on an ipad that they sacrificed a site that people actually go to
― iatee, Monday, 23 June 2014 17:12 (eleven years ago)
where can i go to see the guest designed cards?
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:08 (eleven years ago)
This is where I always go for spoilers: http://www.mtgsalvation.com/spoilers/141-magic-2015
The guest-designed cards are mixed in but have the "Designed by" tag
― Vinnie, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:20 (eleven years ago)
cool, ty
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:22 (eleven years ago)
Aggressive Mining looks pretty excellent
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Monday, 23 June 2014 19:56 (eleven years ago)
finally figured I'd try Vintage Masters - it's a ton of fun. don't go into the chatroom though, it's pretty much nonstop griping about how they're not pulling Power 9 cards. it's an excellent format...Goblins feel really pushed but there are some safety valves (the Buzzard that gives all creatures -1/-1 when it dies is nice). really wish they could print this in paper, would be tons of fun.
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 02:33 (eleven years ago)
I feel like these draft-only formats get to be more wild than normal sets because they don't have to worry about constructed implications, can allow busted things, you get to open cool cards etc.
but they also seem like they have super streamlined fun archetypes, like vintage masters might be more fun than theros right now but I don't think it could hold its own for half a year of limited
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 02:40 (eleven years ago)
yeah i very much agree with that - the 'real' set most similar to these formats in structure is probably ROE which was a 3-month format and does in fact wear itself thin with repeated play due to having heavily delineated archetypes
― ciderpress, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 13:44 (eleven years ago)
VM does seem to allow for a lot of different archetypes - White Weenie, Goblins, Stompy, and Skies all seem possible, along with more syngery-based decks like Cycling, Madness, and Reanimation, plus there's a possibility of Storm (which would be a blast to play, but really could use something like Cloud of Faeries - that said, Brainstorms/Dark Ritual/Frantic Search seem to not get drafted often)
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 13:52 (eleven years ago)
cloud of faeries is in the set (?)
storm is definitely draftable but not that good unless you get it perfect
― ciderpress, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 13:57 (eleven years ago)
cloud of faeries is in vma i do think that vma is even more narrow than mma was although iatee is right, neither of them have the depth of replayability of even triple theros, never mind a really good limited format. that said i've found vma a really interesting format to play even as its become kinda boring to draft. i also like how the more 'constructed' nature of these limited-only formats allows them to create a rock/paper/scissors style meta - like storm loses to goblins loses to g/w - and as one archetype becomes overdrafted you can start to look for that archetypes natural weakness. idk, i havent gotten bored of the format yet despite playing it p heavily
― dude (Lamp), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:01 (eleven years ago)
my bad about Cloud of Faeries - I never saw one in the drafts I did. I actually never looked at the spoiler. so Storm is stronger than I thought.
I tried to draft Storm a lot in power Cube, mainly because it's the most fun archetype to build (for me at least) and you can wheel a lot of the cards you really need. VM seems mostly the same, nobody's going to pick a Brain Freeze for example. Obviously you're not getting as many crazy artifacts as you would in Cube but you probably die a turn or two slower so I think it's worth trying. I agree that it's not a very good archetype but the cards are there...
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:04 (eleven years ago)
though Reanimation may be more fun and possibly a lot more doable. the mixed up rarities have really thrown me off though a lot of them are Rares -> Uncommon which is nice
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:06 (eleven years ago)
the key storm cards are uncommon which means that a good storm deck won't be in every draft. cube storm is also way wilder because it allows / requires a lot of weird interactions and a multicolor deck. vma storm is just a bad legacy high tide deck.
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:12 (eleven years ago)
i havent really found 'not gettting enough pieces' to be storms big problem - i think it just has a bad match-up against some of the better archetypes in vma
― dude (Lamp), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:21 (eleven years ago)
yeah I think the good Goblin or White Weenie decks can get out of hand very quickly if you don't have a way to keep them in check.
― Maggie killed Quagmire (collest baby ever) (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:44 (eleven years ago)
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/magic-2015-week-one-previews-2014-06-25
really liked these things in m13
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 15:18 (eleven years ago)
nightfire giant is borderline limited bomb I think
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
Nissa is sweet. Very reminiscent of Koth's abilities, who I also liked a lot. Love the art too, it's an unusual style for a PW
― Vinnie, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 17:09 (eleven years ago)
I hope they spoil a jace that doesn't ruin drafts
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 17:19 (eleven years ago)
crucible of fire reprint seems like an obvious plant for the next block, not that it's ever going to be a constructed card
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 17:23 (eleven years ago)
also the card that the minecraft guy designed is super sweet
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)
I really hope we get one or two more cheap Dragons in M15 to go along with Dragon Egg, Dragon Hatchling, and Mutavault so that people will foolishly try to make the deck work
― Vinnie, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
http://mythicspoiler.com/m15/cards/chiefengineer.jpg
this seems like a card with a bright future
― iatee, Saturday, 28 June 2014 02:28 (eleven years ago)
Agree! Though I don't think the people calling it an affinity card are quite right - I feel like its home is some bonkers Intruder Alarm / Beck-Call / Genesis Chamber thing?
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Monday, 30 June 2014 12:43 (eleven years ago)
yeah it doesn't really bring you much when your curve tops out at 2
― iatee, Monday, 30 June 2014 13:11 (eleven years ago)