― timmy tannin (pompous), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:11 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:14 (twenty years ago)
As does Osama.
― ((((((DOPplur)))n)))u))))tttt (donut), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:16 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:17 (twenty years ago)
As do the pancakes.
ihttp://www.petsinuniform.com/images/pancakes.jpg
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:23 (twenty years ago)
http://seattlecentral.org/faculty/jhubert/mallard.jpgwidth="500" height="250">
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:42 (twenty years ago)
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:44 (twenty years ago)
Of course, all the guys I like aren't in control of things.
Howard Dean the talker is iffy; Howard Dean the planner is better.
― kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 19 May 2006 03:56 (twenty years ago)
He's famous, sort of smart, well spoken and hot. All Reagan had was famous.
― Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Friday, 19 May 2006 23:28 (twenty years ago)
"More or less money will do nothing to make Defense Department programs and mangers accountable through rudimentary financial management. Managers in the private sector who fail on this measure are fired; some go to jail. In the Defense Department, none are held accountable; many are promoted. When that changes, competent program and financial management can begin...
The Democrats want us to ignore how they helped to create the mess and their current intention to do nothing about it. In fact, they are not even thinking about solutions--and the Republicans appreciate that."
http://www.forward.com/articles/7819
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 May 2006 20:16 (twenty years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 01:36 (twenty years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:36 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:42 (twenty years ago)
― and what (ooo), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:52 (twenty years ago)
I found the assertion that raising the minimum wage or giving college tuition credits would be rallying policy points for the Democratic Party laughable (not that they're bad ideas - I support both - just that they are not BIG MORAL ISSUES that Dems can use to build a new identity)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:56 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:59 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 16:08 (twenty years ago)
I believe that there are some substantive differences between self-identified liberals and self-identified moderates and conservatives- there's more going on here than the changing image of a word. There's a school of thought that says that Dems don't need to change any of their positions - they just need to change how they talk about them (ie., the Lakoff school). However, I think that there's a limit to how far you can go with this, unless you are going to come out and lie. People want to hear you talk the right talk, but they are also interested in what you say you are going to do, and they have a high aversion to any perceived phoniness. I think the successful candidate will have to combine the right language with some substantive policy proposals that show it's more than a matter of language.
― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 16:36 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 16:48 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 16:54 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)
once again, show me the secret cadre of liberals who are our key to electoral success.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:19 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:28 (twenty years ago)
the Dems don't offer a set menu of policy options. Its all garbled. Just look at Kerry's campaign, it was a mess of contradictions and half-steps. More importantly, the Dems don't back up the policies they do occasionally trumpet with anything like a coherent philosophy or framework.
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:30 (twenty years ago)
UH
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:32 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:35 (twenty years ago)
Republicans don't believe in nuance and coalitions?
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:44 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:48 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:49 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:51 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:53 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 17:53 (twenty years ago)
the Dems could find a Tony Blair, and they may well have in Hillary Clinton, or in an age where workers fear for their jobs and an aging population fears the cost of healthcare they could wave the banner of FDR and talk about socialised medicine, globalised employement rights, lowering domestic fuel costs through energy efficiency.
You never know, Hillary may, with a democratic congress, be able to fix medical care in the US but she seems to be too polarising a figure to get that congress, even if she is a bankable centrist.
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:08 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:13 (twenty years ago)
The distillation is the important bit here, taking the central core that all the various factions on the left grow out of(green folks, union folks, health care folks, sustainable energy folks, public-agencies-should-actually-be-competent folks, etc).
― kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:15 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:16 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:21 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:24 (twenty years ago)
maybe what it has stood for in the past 20 years simply isn't popular. Or, in a more palatable format for liberals to accept, maybe what the left stood for was too easily spun as failure by the right. Since, you know, voters are simply willfully ignorant of reality and all.
― don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:24 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:26 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:29 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:30 (twenty years ago)
We have to change that idea at the level of intutition. I don't care about liberalism and centrism. The Democrats have to capture people's imagination and dominate the national consciousness. Learning how to speak people's language carries more political currency than policy.
I mean, universal health care (not necessarily single payer, but possibly so) could become just as centrist as Social Security.
If Democrats can't find a way to make people feel differently about Democrats, it doesn't matter how radically centrist they become or how well-calculated their policy proposals are.
We already are a centrist party. How do you change that feeling?
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 18:32 (twenty years ago)