Global Warming's Terrifying New Math

eh never mind I get how biomass energy production works I was more curious about ways to actually remove CO2 from the atmosphere, which this is only partly related to

just an aside am i only the only person who hears the work "fracking" and thinks it some kind of sex act and/or lewd dance move?

battlestar galactica has taken over that word for many us i'd bet

lol otm

who are these fucking people
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/16/skeptical-scientists-debunk-white-house-global-warming-report/

probably on the koch payroll?

"...and the Antarctic cooled slightly." Is that true? What about the western ice shelf of Antarctica collapsing?

I'm gonna go ahead and guess that every single "fact" those guys cite is some kind of distortion but idk

like what part of the Antarctic are they referring to? the land mass? the ocean? the ice shelf?

gotta step away, such infuriating bullshit

they've really got a point there that every square foot of the earth doesn't warm equally

who are these fucking people

Several people who signed the NCA rebuttal are also members of the Cornwall Alliance - a group which famously issued "An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming" in 2009:

"We believe Earth and its ecosystems – created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth’s climate system is no exception. Recent global warming is one of many natural cycles of warming and cooling in geologic history."

The money trail crosses paths with dominionists, etc.

I don't believe in hell, so I'm annoyed that most of them will be dead by the time the planet is an acrid desiccated wasteland.

we will all have migrated to jupiter by then, anyway.

beyond that, i hear the triangulum and andromeda galaxies have some nice planets.

the sushi in those places is awful though

I wish the title scientist was something that could be removed by some form of professional body, possibly by reclassifying them as village idiots.

you snob!

;-)

http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/05/oklahoma-legislators-block-new-science-standards-over-climate-change/

URL says it all

'Global Warming' or 'Climate Change': Does it make a difference?

Today, we are releasing a special report (based on a nationally representative experimental study) that finds the terms global warming and climate change often mean different things to Americans—and activate different sets of beliefs, feelings, and behaviors, as well as different degrees of urgency about the need to respond.

We found that the term global warming is associated with greater public understanding, emotional engagement, and support for personal and national action than the term climate change.

For example, the term global warming is associated with:

Greater certainty that the phenomenon is happening, especially among men, Generation X (31-48), and liberals;
Greater understanding that human activities are the primary cause among Independents;
Greater understanding that there is a scientific consensus about the reality of the phenomenon among Independents and liberals;
More intense worry about the issue, especially among men, Generation Y (18-30), Generation X, Democrats, liberals and moderates;
A greater sense of personal threat, especially among women, the Greatest Generation (68+), African-Americans, Hispanics, Democrats, Independents, Republicans, liberals and moderates;
Higher issue priority ratings for action by the president and Congress, especially among women, Democrats, liberals and moderates;
Greater willingness to join a campaign to convince elected officials to take action, especially among men, Generation X, liberals and moderates.

That why I personally favor the term Global Roasting.

Planet Porking

xp That sounds aromatic and delicious, though.

"Planet Porking" not so much.

not really -- I was on Planet Porking last month on my OKCupid shuttle.

the Greatest Generation (68+)

That can't be right. Greatest Generation is Depression-era kids.

uh baby boomers are totally the greatest generation didn't u get the memo

Maybe they have it mixed up with people who bought The Greatest Generation in hopes of feeling bad about themselves/basking in the reflected glow. I also sold a lot of copies to Gen Y types, confused about the historical timeline and apparently planning to bestow it honorifically on their boomer parents. So who knows.

lol

Sadly, me:

http://assets.amuniversal.com/fdcd6530c7fd01315e28005056a9545d

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jun/03/china-pledges-limit-carbon-emissions

cartoon otm

top right corner has been an interesting transition over the past 5-10 years. all the people now saying "sure, the climate's changing, but not b/c of humans" were the same people who only a few years ago were denying anything was changing.

sorry, top LEFT corner

http://www.climatecentral.org/images/sized/images/sized/remote/assets-climatecentral-org-images-uploads-news-6_3_14_Brian_SummerTemperatureTrends-720x405.jpg

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/us-summer-temperatures-climate-change-17510

Nationwide, the summer warming trend averages out to a little more than 0.4°F per decade since 1970. The places warming the fastest also happen to be some of the hottest places in the country, with a large chunk of the Southwest and all of Texas warming more than 1°F per decade.

The notable blue spot in a sea of red is the Upper Midwest, where substantial parts of Iowa and the Dakotas have seen a slight cooling trend since 1970. Interestingly, that region is actually home to some of the fastest-warming states when you look at the change in annual average temperatures. Winters in particular have warmed dramatically there over the past 40 years.

Of the 344 climate divisions, which are set by the National Climatic Data Center and divide the country into climatically-similar zones, less than 10 percent have seen a summer cooling trend. In general, every state in the lower 48 has warmed since 1970 and the most recent decade was the warmest on record for the country. Those trends are consistent with the overall warming that has been observed for the planet as greenhouse gases emitted by humans build up in the atmosphere.

California's Central Valley sees big drop in wintertime fog needed for fruit and nut crops

California’s winter tule fog — hated by drivers, but needed by fruit and nut trees — has declined dramatically over the past three decades, raising a red flag for the state’s multibillion dollar agricultural industry, according to new research.

Crops such as almonds, pistachios, cherries, apricots and peaches go through a necessary winter dormant period brought on and maintained by colder temperatures. Tule fog, a thick ground fog that descends upon the state’s Central Valley between late fall and early spring, helps contribute to this winter chill.

“The trees need this dormant time to rest so that they can later develop buds, flowers and fruit during the growing season,” said University of California, Berkeley biometeorologist and study lead author Dennis Baldocchi, whose father grew almonds and walnuts in Antioch and Oakley. “An insufficient rest period impairs the ability of farmers to achieve high quality fruit yields.”

The study, published May 15 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, has implications for the entire country since many of these California crops account for 95 percent of U.S. production, the authors noted.

Spt 20-21 NYC

http://peoplesclimatemarch.org/

http://cmu-energy.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/how-much-public-support-is-needed-for.html

xkcd isn't real popular around here, but this is pretty great: http://xkcd.com/1379/

Toobin blames Citizens U. for herding the GOP towards denialism (deep pocketed petromoguls becoming GOP gatekeepers).

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/6/12/1402540696416/updatedcartoon.jpg

so I guess I'll ask in this thread but so what is Clinton's climate voting history and where does she stand and does she have any post '08 statements on climate change? Assuming there's even a serious primary challenger I'd like to think this is the biggest issue in the Democratic Party. I'm probably being a naive idiot.

TEMPE, Ariz. (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton says young people understand the significant threat of climate change and that she hopes there will be a mass movement that demands political change.

The potential 2016 presidential candidate says at a Clinton Global Initiative University panel that young people are much more committed to doing something to address climate change. Clinton says it isn't "just some ancillary issue" but will determine the quality of life for many people.

The former secretary of state cited global warming as a major issue that students could face in the future.

She made the comments Saturday during an interview with late-night TV host Jimmy Kimmel at Arizona State University. The weekend gathering also features former President Bill Clinton and their daughter, Chelsea.

from that finger in the wind to her mouth

never knowing who to cling to when the acid rain set in

http://climatedesk.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/DaysOver95-MJ.jpg

http://climatedesk.org/2014/06/these-maps-show-how-many-brutally-hot-days-you-will-suffer-when-youre-old/

haha, yeah, i've seen that going around...the age categories are a little weird! take the first years of each four:

Birth: 1981
College: 2020 (age 39 for someone born in 1981?)
Adulthood: 2040 (age 59 for someone born in 1981?)
Retirement: 2080 (age 89 for someone born in 1981?)

lol

cool visual though

all those 59 year olds like "yes we can finally see rated r movies without our parents buying us tickets *buys tickets to blind side 2 anyway*

at any rate, the curious age categories provide even more proof that global warming is a hoax

admire Appalachia for keepin cool there