1) No, I concede whatever might have been at stake here.2) "Finally"?
― nate p. (natepatrin), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:23 (nineteen years ago)
No, that was pretty hilarious
― deej.. (deej..), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Chesty Joe Morgan (Chesty Joe Morgan), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)
― dommy p is alright WHICH IS A LOT MORE THAN I CAN SAY ABOUT A LOT OF PEOPLE (Dom, Friday, 10 November 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)
― dommy p is alright WHICH IS A LOT MORE THAN I CAN SAY ABOUT A LOT OF PEOPLE (Dom, Friday, 10 November 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)
xp The first Jackass movie had plenty of those in the TV trailers.
― nate p. (natepatrin), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)
Half of America makes my jaw-drop then with its awfulness.
-- Alex in SF (clobberthesauru...), November 10th, 2006.
fair enough!
just, where i live, i'm surrounded by this kind of thinking, so it's not shocking at all to me, just depressing...
― latebloomer and his 'Cyborg Companion', Hacker (latebloomer), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)
― nate p. (natepatrin), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― nate p. (natepatrin), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Chesty Joe Morgan (Chesty Joe Morgan), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 10 November 2006 22:57 (nineteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Saturday, 11 November 2006 02:08 (nineteen years ago)
wow. that was like stroszek meets the jerk.
― diane airbus (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 11 November 2006 02:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 November 2006 02:25 (nineteen years ago)
― c('°c) (Leee), Saturday, 11 November 2006 02:43 (nineteen years ago)
― something less threatening (heywood), Saturday, 11 November 2006 04:53 (nineteen years ago)
― c('°c) (Leee), Saturday, 11 November 2006 05:16 (nineteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Saturday, 11 November 2006 07:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 11 November 2006 13:16 (nineteen years ago)
everything else seemed real enough to me.
― HUNTA-V (vahid), Saturday, 11 November 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.onpointnews.com/
I did think the scene seemed a little over-the-top, not like they weren't real, but like they'd been kind of encouraged to say certain sorts of things before the camera started rolling - the way the one dude asks him right off "SO WHAT ABOUT THE BABES MAN!"
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 13 November 2006 01:00 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 13 November 2006 01:05 (nineteen years ago)
― aesthetically pleasing, in other words 'fly' (kenan), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:25 (nineteen years ago)
I think it's equally likely that they were just drunk and there was suddenly a camera in the room.
― aesthetically pleasing, in other words 'fly' (kenan), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:27 (nineteen years ago)
― J (Jay), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:33 (nineteen years ago)
― aesthetically pleasing, in other words 'fly' (kenan), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)
1) If you've already seen lots of Ali G episodes, some of the schtick felt too well-worn. Jagshemash, eetsa nice, etc. - it was like an SNL movie
2) Too much Jackass-level grossout humor (although Jackass is ok when that's what you're in the mood for)
3) Too much straight-up meanness
4) Most of the better scenes, i.e. the rodeo, were spoiled in advance by reviews (not the movie's fault, of course)
5) All of the good parts would have been just fine as bits in the show. The attempts to hold this together as a movie (the 'plot', the producer character, all scenes involing only actors) fell flat.
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:44 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:45 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:47 (nineteen years ago)
― aesthetically pleasing, in other words 'fly' (kenan), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:48 (nineteen years ago)
― aesthetically pleasing, in other words 'fly' (kenan), Monday, 13 November 2006 03:56 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 13 November 2006 05:12 (nineteen years ago)
Yawn.
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 13 November 2006 09:29 (nineteen years ago)
WAHT? THE HORSE WAS NOT UPSET BY HIS DESECRATION OF THE NATIONAL ANTHEM?
― ledge (ledge), Monday, 13 November 2006 09:54 (nineteen years ago)
Robert Downey Sr's Putney Swope?
The per-screen average falling by 2/3 essentially shows that ppl who thought the studio goofed by opening it in "only" 800 theaters are likely fulla shit.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 13 November 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 13 November 2006 14:33 (nineteen years ago)
but no, i saw an interview later - she was in some other movie.
fooled again.
― beeble (beeble), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:16 (nineteen years ago)
Even more intriguing are hints that scripted elements were used, along with professional camerawork, all in an effort to make sure the scene went off perfectly.
PROFESSIONAL camerwork, you say?!
jeez, we can add these guys to teh douchebags list.
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth S. (Ex Leon), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)
The plot itself is obviously 'not real' - its merely a framework on which to hang the improvised scenes. The prostitute's involvement in the plot wasn't "real" but there was some question as to whether her initial appearance was. As it turned out, she was an actress but I don't think anyone was confused as to her falling in love with Borat being fictional.
Nonetheless the scenes of them 'out on the town' appeared as if they were filmed 'in reality'
― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)
You've clearly never known any frat boys.
― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 13 November 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)