EZRA KLEIN v MATT YGLESIAS

@mattyglesias: My final Slate column will deal with the relationship between fast casual burritos and neoliberalism.

@mattyglesias: Help! I have nowhere to blog.

the line that follows the quote above:

Think about it.

illuminations follow

He is so annoying

Retweeted by Jonah Peretti
Ezra Klein ‏@ezraklein 3h
I don't think Buzzfeed gets enough credit for how good it is at video

so who's in this new venture with ezra klein? matt yglesias is, i gather.

"project x"

Matt Yglesias ‏@mattyglesias 15m
Last time I went this long without blogging, I was 20 and hand-coding HTML files.

man loves to blog

everyone, back-up and give matthew yglesias room to blog

no vox thread so here we are

http://vox.com

haven't had a chance to read this yet: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/business/media/voxcom-takes-melding-of-journalism-and-technology-to-next-level.html

it's too bad there's no general vox media thread either, because ppl on the verge's forums have been going nuts and stuff has been happening over there

not that most people on ilx give a shit

journalists in my fb feed are really annoyed at the unanimous positive coverage vox has been getting

it is a v pretty website

i think the front page is kinda ugly

u shndt have to "launch cards" why cant u just scroll through them on the bottom of the page, and then when you do launch it overlays the page except that not really clear except a lil exit button

swear I've seen a site with a similar graphical layout, but it was a few years back
the name vox irritates me

i actually like those launch-cards, but yeah, you should have the option to scroll thru them if that's yr preference.

Ezra Klein’s first big piece for his new venture (heretofore known as Project X) at Vox is on a topic that quite naturally worries the former Wonkblogger: the limits of evidence-based reasoning when it conflicts with political allegiances increasingly based on polarized ideologies.

Klein will almost certainly get some blowback from progressives for projecting a false equivalency of Left and Right in exhibiting “identity protection” in the face of inconvenient evidence,

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_04/party_ideology_and_evidence049794.php

it's just too much it's all jumping out at me, i just want words

hamlet would be appalled

max, good looking out

http://www.vox.com/cards/the-internet/what-is-the-internet#E5357695

what the unholy fuck

The short guide to Capital in the 21st Century
Matthew Yglesias April 8, 2014, 10:30 a.m. ET

retch

oh thank god its a book review

they r writing wikipedia?

artisanalpedia

they r writing internet

artisanalpedia

― j., Tuesday, April 8, 2014 10:19 PM (56 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

artisanalpedia

― j., Tuesday, April 8, 2014 5:19 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

http://i.imgur.com/FZezeWM.png

why is it a + k its not ashton plus kutcher makes no sense u dillweed

vox is a nice website. but how does it make money? it isn't a subscription service, and i don't see any ads on the pages.

http://i.imgur.com/Zznnt3u.png

spending all that ad money on jobs is no way to run a business

i don't see any ads on the pages

wasn't ge or gm their "launch sponsor"?

look at the right side of the site, above where it says "#pressing"

also in the middle of the page

one ad on this page

http://i.imgur.com/3VlpXUh.png

right. i spotted an ad on second-look, but there aren't many (maybe just the one i remember). normally i expect to see almost all the available "real-estate" occupied by ads. this site seems different, in that regard.

prob just easing their way into it

guess you didn't see that article where they said the internet was invented by GE and you should buy GE products to best use internet

i only read graphs

http://www.vox.com/2014/4/22/5636156/basic-a-beginners-guide-to-everyones-favorite-new-insult

on the verge of unfollowing everyone associated with this site

might as well put this here

http://www.nytimes.com/upshot/

*farts*

I think there's something potentially insidious about "just explaining complicated stuff in an objective way" journalism, since it tends to obscure agendas and ideology. I'm reminded of that widely-cited Daily Beast piece about the Allen/Farrow molestation charges that took that "Whoa whoa, let's look at ALL the facts" approach to mask an obvious pro-Allen bias.

None of this has anything to do with "basic."

next they'll explain because

the internet really is the worst

surprised how frivolous theyve gone w a lot of their stuff