Mia Farrow's son -- Ronan Seamus Farrow -- really creeps me out!

did Lot's daughters ever win best supporting actress

The Crying of Lot, 49 (Dir. J. Reitman, star. G. Clooney)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/Lot_daughters_Jan_Muller.jpg

it's good to read about other ppl's stories in relation to this coz it goes some way to stopping the case becoming an exemplar in ppl's thinking&arguing about child abuse, w/ is a huge responsibility & extra burden

no sane parent in history has ever mistakenly thought that sexually molesting their children was good for them

mordy i wld have thought you have done enough comparative ethics to have heard counter-examples e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etoro_people

apparently i'm using 'w/' to mean 'which' now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQmmM_qwG4k

xp yr right i definitely should have qualified my statement. in our culture, at least, etc...

I'm aware it's not the most useful thing to point out here

Ugh that People article definitely makes me understand "these people are all crazy" impulse.

Dan, I read your linked article but my brain is refusing to deal with that information right now. Maybe later?

welp http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/times-may-publish-response-from-woody-allen-on-dylan-farrows-accusations

well i suspect awards season has something to do with it. but i'm not sure what awards Lot is up for. also maybe Job is getting his own show soon.

― eric banana (s.clover), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:30 (48 minutes ago) Permalink

Can you elaborate this theory a little further please? Because I keep seeing it just kinda floated out there, just sayin style, and yet I haven't actually heard anyone articulate what the theory really is supposed to be.

cf. "The Untouchables": "They put one about you in a blog, you put one about them in the paper."

well i suspect awards season has something to do with it. but i'm not sure what awards Lot is up for. also maybe Job is getting his own show soon.

― eric banana (s.clover), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:30 (48 minutes ago) Permalink

Can you elaborate this theory a little further please? Because I keep seeing it just kinda floated out there, just sayin style, and yet I haven't actually heard anyone articulate what the theory really is supposed to be.

― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:20 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

terrorism

No I mean really, fill in the blanks. Is it "The Farrows conspired to resuscitate a 20-year-old concocted molestation charge because they were just sooooo mad that Woody Allen was gonna win a lifetime achievement Golden Globe"? Because when you actually say that instead of just throwing around words like "suspicious" it sounds batshit.

hurting are you reading every other word of s. clover's posts?

look at the nouns.

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNbrBQ6oj8L39xGjWJni-4cnVEuqDzlJMHJtTOOt239Bs8JDjA_Q

I read "Lot" out of the first post and thought the subsequent references were sarcastic

^ sir mixedupalot

ha i thought u were playing a lot

along lol

IRL LOT

LTIPOS! (literally turning into a pillar of salt)

look at the nouns.

― da croupier, Wednesday, February 5, 2014 7:09 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is an amazing post

This is probably the least awful "let's be balanced" piece on the whole thing that I've read so far: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/02/woody_allen_v_dylan_farrow_the_court_of_public_opinion_is_now_in_session.html

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AauCarFOO_Y/TGXVeJ0qK-I/AAAAAAAAA6k/uMp5EcmPn_g/s1600/Costner-13%2BDays.jpg

closer to the truth

Also, please be aware that in the Court of Public Opinion, choosing silence or doubt is itself a prosecutable offense.

awful enough that i'm not going further

accurate enough - ppl on this thread who have expressed doubt have been prosecuted (lol such drama)

try silence, see if we prosecute

it's a loud kind of silence

THE SCHOOL OF HARD KNOCKS IS NOT A REAL SCHOOL ITS JUST AN EXPRESSION

YOU WON'T GET A DIPLOMA FROM THERE

B.Sc. (schHK) (unawarded on tech.) 2007

http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-blog-piece-on-woody-allen-to-settle-everything,35197/

The thing I don't get is why some people think that those who are discussing this are trying to "settle" or "solve" the issue, as opposed to any other hot-button current event. No one was trying to "solve" Miley Cyrus, right?

Fuck off with the high-road condescension.

No one was trying to "solve" Miley Cyrus, right?

oh yes they were

you got a problem yo I'll solve it

check out my minstrel show while white media absolves it

solve for miley in the following equations. show your twerk.

lol nice

Been a pleasure to watch the journalist acquaintance I alluded to get blasted by a female coworker.

tmi

statistically probable coworker blaster

I mean, in a way that anyone expected a definite resolution.

No adult expects resolution to come from discussion of these things. It's fucking stupid that the Onion/that stupid Flavorwire piece presumes that we do.

That was to Tracer Hand, obv.

resolution = certainty. apparently achieved by many.

I think the Onion piece was also making fun of the way blogposts and counterblogposts on stuff like this tend to unfold.

eh it was cynical in a pretty shitty way imo, trying to be cleverly above-the-fray with something like this is nagl

Dog Unaware It Is Not Starving, however, is pretty hilarious