^^^^^
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:43 (twelve years ago)
shakey yr display name is doing amazing things in that context lol
― balls, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:46 (twelve years ago)
as for the Golden Globes stuff - awards shows have always been nauseous horse shit (an opinion Allen apparently holds as well, ironically), and in that sense the Keaton thing was not really all that unusual, similar to Chris Brown doing Man in the Mirror on BET or any number of other instances where they've valorized horrible assholes. For my part I don't watch awards shows and I'm not even aware of them, beyond what thread titles pop up on new answers. get rid of awards = problem solved.
xp
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:47 (twelve years ago)
re my comments about people pretending they're on a jury being directed at you, the'yre not JUST directed at you, but you did just tell us that it's ok to dismiss someone you don't know as crazy but not as a potential rapist because rape is a crime.
you're also the one asking what possible outcome people could want from farrow's letter, so forgive us for telling you
― da croupier, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:49 (twelve years ago)
x-post As far as I know, Ms. Keaton is not a participant on this thread.
― Three Word Username, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:51 (twelve years ago)
reading the comments on Nathaniel's posts from people aghast that Farrow doesn't have the good breeding and stiff upper lip to keep things private and in the family...and N insists on wondering why on earth Farrow attacks poor Alex Baldwin and Cate Blanchett
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:53 (twelve years ago)
you did just tell us that it's ok to dismiss someone you don't know as crazy but not as a potential rapist because rape is a crime
one's a bit more serious than the other is all. so it would make sense that a different level of judgment is involved.
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:54 (twelve years ago)
"crazy" (apologies to mental health advocates itt btw) is a bit easier to toss around than "rapist", it does not contain the same degree of moral opprobrium, nor does it imply that someone should be arrested and put in jail.
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:56 (twelve years ago)
it's like the difference between calling someone a jerk and calling them a murderer
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:57 (twelve years ago)
this was a genuine question and I appreciated your answer fwiw
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:58 (twelve years ago)
i know everyone has already torn apart that terrible blogpost morbs posted but this paragraph requires special attention i think
I was publicly attacked on twitter recently by someone I was once online-friendly-with for merely suggesting that people ought to know facts before they passed judgment. I was concerned that people were forgetting that "innocent until proven guilty" is the backbone of our whole judicial system and as much as I may feel for Dylan Farrow, I have to admit that the health of our entire nation's legal system is more important to me than her personal journey.
― socki (s1ocki), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:16 (twelve years ago)
(because if we take a woman's claim that she was sexually assaulted even halfway seriously, THE HEALTH OF OUR ENTIRE NATION'S LEGAL SYSTEM IS AT STAKE)
― socki (s1ocki), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:17 (twelve years ago)
He's probably gonna post that New Republic piece soon about how it's not very journalistic and ethical to not consider both sides
― Murgatroid, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:20 (twelve years ago)
i hope the trauma from that public attack on twitter will eventually dissipate, i'm sorry his personal journey through life had to include such an event.
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:20 (twelve years ago)
like, should you wait until woody's suffered more than having to write a "mia's crazy, i'm innocent" press release before saying OMG IS THIS A KANGAROO COURT
― da croupier, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:21 (twelve years ago)
i've seen such heinous stuff on facebook about this (mostly friends-of-friends). one gem was "it's not blaming the victim if she's not a victim."
― socki (s1ocki), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:22 (twelve years ago)
when the wolves descend on the Magic In The Moonlight premiere and the bag is put over Woody's head, then maybe it's time to wonder what became of jurisprudence
― da croupier, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:22 (twelve years ago)
my eye skipped right over "personal journey". what a jackass.
― goole, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:24 (twelve years ago)
hey folks who read film people, let us know when one of them does a rembert-browne-on-kelly will you? or if it's already been done.
― goole, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:26 (twelve years ago)
he pulled a Hannah Horvath though!
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:35 (twelve years ago)
I can't even
I think you're right Nathaniel that the lashing out at the end of Dylan's letter is a cause of confusion for many of us. What exactly is she saying Diane Keaton and Cate Blanchett and everybody else should do? Refuse to participate in Woody's films based solely on her accusations? When she says she's not going to be silent as he's rewarded, is she implying that by speaking up she expects to change the public's interactions with Woody? Is she passing moral judgment on those of us who will continue to watch his films?
It's one thing for Mia, Dylan, et al. to cut Woody out of their lives, and even urge mutual friends to do the same thing. But it seems to me like a bridge too far to ask the general public, who have no first-hand knowledge, to take sides and judge his art by his personal life. That's a rabbit hole I'm unwilling to go down.
I imagine it's common for crime victims to get a "the whole world's against me" feeling, and that's why a lot of people, who may see themselves in Dylan, are upset at people who are trying to be agnostic on the issue.
February 4, 2014 | Marsha Mason
I thought Marsha Mason was busy with bath and body products.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:38 (twelve years ago)
if we take a woman's claim that she was sexually assaulted even halfway seriously
I believe he is taking it seriously. The cynicism on display in this thread is sickmaking.
I don't have any doubt of D.F. being a victim, but I'm not going to assign percentages of likelihood to each parent because this isn't a game.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:43 (twelve years ago)
I haven't been posting here because I don't have 2 brain cells to rub together anymore and was waiting for someone to sum up my thinking so all I had to do was type "otm." Shakey got there -- thanks, man.
― 330,003 Luftballons (WilliamC), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:47 (twelve years ago)
The worst bits I've read in the last few days have been by reporters, actually. An acquaintance a few hours ago said that "most victims of sexual abuse never would speak out against the perpetrator this way in a public forum. It's just not what happens. They might speak out against abuse in general, but they rarely voluntarily talk out in public of what happened to them. If so, the victims of Sandusky would be screaming in the headlines. Real victims of abuse don't do that." And it's infuriating because he can't understand why Woody Allen is different, and infuriating because HE knows how real victims of abuse because as reporter he hasn't met or read anyone like Dylan Farrow.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:57 (twelve years ago)
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/culturebox/2014/02/woody_allen_s_biggest_defender_robert_weide_s_attack_on_mia_farrow_and_her.html
― Murgatroid, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:05 (twelve years ago)
You have to allow people their emotions on this one, morbs. One of Solon's more interesting laws in ancient Athens was to make it an offense for anyone to refuse to pick a side in a civil war. Withholding judgment because the facts are not recoverable is an intellectually valid position to take in a case like this, but for a lot of people that position is not emotionally valid. Taking a position of emotional disengagement in this kind of issue gets read as monstrous inhumanity by those who are fully emotionally engaged. You can't alter that, so don't fight it.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:07 (twelve years ago)
Xpost alfred did this reporter say this in a public forum bc if so I want the fkin idiot's name...
― grape is the flavor of my true love's hair (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:15 (twelve years ago)
― Aimless, Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:07 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
who the FUCK do you think you are?
― Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:17 (twelve years ago)
take that smug fucking tone and shove it up your asshole till it bleeds you worthless piece of shit
Matt, I sense your outrage.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:19 (twelve years ago)
i seriously wish rape on both you and morbs before you die your miserable deaths so maybe just once you can feel what it's like, the world would be a better place because of it
― Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:21 (twelve years ago)
― grape is the flavor of my true love's hair (Jon Lewis)
FB.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:21 (twelve years ago)
this is one of those things that makes me glad I'm not on fb
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:22 (twelve years ago)
Matt P stfu, seriously
― groovemaaan, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:45 (twelve years ago)
who the fuck are you?
― Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:47 (twelve years ago)
I am very sorry to hear you were raped, Matt.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:47 (twelve years ago)
groovemaaan wrote this on thread Stanley Kubrick: Classic or Dud? on board I Love Everything on Sep 7, 2010
barry lyndon is probably his best film
the killing is my favorite
groovemaaan wrote this on thread The Stock Market on board I Love Everything on Jun 2, 2011
long position on silver
i would wait a few weeks (or months) before trading stocks though, until the greece situation is sorted out
intraday trading is more predictable
fuck no, just look at today's dow chart
i guess it's probably easier to predict the next 4 weeks than the next 4 hours
yeah 700$ for stocks isn't much, especially for intraday trading. options have a much higher volatility
yeah, but if you're on your toes you'll know that the dow is starting to tank. and if you're really good you can forsee that it will tank..... it's about being up on the news
yeah but how do you explain that the dow has risen again after the release of the unemployment numbers?
just an example btw, but i would say that following the news isn't enough to predict the trend
xp what he said
Yesterday I predicted that Sprint stock would do well today. I was definitely right on that one;
it has risen 2% so you would've made a 14$ profit, congratulations
Search Again... Next...
Hurting??
― Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:49 (twelve years ago)
― Aimless, Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:47 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
1. i wasn't raped. 2. other people being raped isn't about you.
― Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:50 (twelve years ago)
i mean really, who the fuck do you think you are.
― Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:51 (twelve years ago)
what the hell is going on here and why is my name at the end of that strange post
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:52 (twelve years ago)
i wasn't raped.
My apologies. I must have misunderstood.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:52 (twelve years ago)
o rly
― Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:53 (twelve years ago)
might want to take a look every other post you've made while you're at it.
All 14,974?
― Aimless, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:55 (twelve years ago)
i didn't think this thread could get more poisonous
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:58 (twelve years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/KBNcZ.gif
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:59 (twelve years ago)
impressive face heel turn by aimless after (imo mostly ungrounded) outburst from balls
― ad music for ad people (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 21:02 (twelve years ago)
Telling another poster "I wish you would get raped" isn't acceptable, Matt.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 February 2014 21:02 (twelve years ago)
nope.
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 21:02 (twelve years ago)
well this is gasoline on an open flame
― Fight the Powers that Be with this Powerful Les Paul! (DJP), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 21:06 (twelve years ago)