ILE Weight Watchaz

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (411 of them)
Ho hum, only 40 pounds underweight.

N., Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Not to worry! I am still a great FAT FUCKING BASTARD!

DG, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I note the body weight site gives you the choice of 'US' or 'Metric' weights.

So imperialism is dead, then?

Tim, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

If you dont have to be air lifted out of the house through the roof you are a sissy... :)

Menelaus Darcy, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I weighed myself at the Natural History Museum, and have put on over half a stone in three months. Oh dear. I did lose a bit of weight earlier this year, and will go back on a diet after the holidays. Well, by diet, I mean stop eating five servings of chocolote a day, yikes.

rosemary, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

six years pass...

I have to boast about this somewhere.

Since July I've lost 10cm off hips and waist, and my body fat's down from 14.7% to 9.5%. My blood pressure's dropped to just-below-healthy-range (which apparently is excellent), and to fulfil thread requirements I've lost half a stone.

\m/ \m/ \m/ &c.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 4 February 2008 00:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Pretty damn good.

kingfish, Monday, 4 February 2008 00:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I just learned today, from a trivia card, that Weight Watchers in Brazil is called "Vigilantes do Peso"

Hurting 2, Monday, 4 February 2008 00:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I had my 2nd weight watchers meeting yesterday morning, and turns out i lost 3 lbs and change in my first week. Not bad.

kingfish, Monday, 4 February 2008 00:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Brilliant!

You need to expect that the weight will fluctuate, so some weeks you might actually go up a little bit. All normal. (I've never done it but I know several people who have)

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 4 February 2008 00:52 (sixteen years ago) link

my main prob is how to work the beer in. Today being the super bowl doesn't help, but if it doesn't rain(ha ha), i'll go biking tonight.

kingfish, Monday, 4 February 2008 00:54 (sixteen years ago) link

AA & KF that's excellent news. we should use this thread to track our progress. in 13 days of sticking to approx 1200 cals per day (with two days going up to 2000 because of pesky lager) and around 1 hrs worth of exercise (40 mins aerobic, 15 mins anaerobic) 3 times per week i have dropped 3 pounds (from 177 to 174lbs), which i am quite pleased with but godddd i wish i could just have it all zapped out and be eating this way for normality, rather than waiting til JUNE for it all to be done.

im a bit concerned about hitting a weightloss plateau in a few weeks.

s.rose, Monday, 4 February 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, that's excellent. What happens in June?

Don't worry about the plateau; if anything, celebrate it. Plateaus are a good way of measuring chunks of weight loss.

Just so I don't appear callous or insensitive, I should point out that I've never been technically overweight (78kg is my highest ever, I think, back when I was unfit), and that my current efforts are all about building physique through heavy weights training. Even though I had aimed to drop some fat, this loss (and the scale of it) took me completely by surprise.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 4 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i just have a silly limit set for june whereby i aim to be slim enough to wear a particular shirt. and once im at the lower end of the healthy bmi range i'll stop being quite as strict on the NO TAKEAWAY, NO OIL, etc rules.

will the plateau just disappear naturally and weightloss continue, or do i need to ramp up the exercise or lessen calories to kick it aside? how long do they generally last?

i think im the typical chubster in that i was nice and slim just 3 years ago, but then moved in with a partner and food became a big focus, eating rich fatty food - suddenly realised that i wasn't looking how i used to and made a firm decision to reverse it. (i see it as a kindof parallel with the world economy haha - boom years guzzling chinese and sugarry drinks, now the bubble has burst and its time for cutbacks)

i do hope my exericse + calorie-cutting will work in the longterm (over a 6 month period) but im worried im doing things wrong, like eating too much salt or not eating enough overall and my body is entering starvation mode. i think i will be ok though. i have found it difficult to find good detailed articles about all this, though the ny times has some very interesting pieces.

the one thing i am most pleased with is that by learning about the calorie content of most foodstuffs (oil and butter and soft drinks are just insane!) means that i will be much more careful about this for the rest of my life, which in the very very longterm can only be good. also good as im quite the control freak and i feel im taking back control of my life and the food that goes into it. comes as a great relief after those awful pangs of blinkered guilt after gorging myself on curries, etc.

i am quite lucky in that my partner enjoys cooking and is also keen to lose weight and eat healthier. if i lived on my own again i doubt i could do quite so well. this new diet has given me more energy and i feel more chipper and less slobby in my day-to-day life too. im at danger of prattling on about the benefits to my friends too much though!

at the moment i would most like some advice on what kind of weight lifting is best for my situation, could you recommend some good websites/articles which go into this?

s.rose, Monday, 4 February 2008 03:26 (sixteen years ago) link

i just have a silly limit set for june whereby i aim to be slim enough to wear a particular shirt.

Not silly. This is precisely the kind of goal you need to keep you motivated.

will the plateau just disappear naturally and weightloss continue, or do i need to ramp up the exercise or lessen calories to kick it aside? how long do they generally last?

Plateaus can potentially last weeks. It's the way the body reconfigures. One week you can be eating perfectly and plateau; another week you can be eating cakes and lose weight. It's your overall diet and long-term loss that count.

i do hope my exericse + calorie-cutting will work in the longterm (over a 6 month period) but im worried im doing things wrong, like eating too much salt or not eating enough overall and my body is entering starvation mode.

If you're eating enough, you'll be fine. The trick is to get enough of all the major food groups and not overindulge (or underindulge) in any areas.

A lot of people think starvation = weight loss. It's bullshit. Carbs in measure are essential, for example.

What do you do with salt that has you worried?

the one thing i am most pleased with is that by learning about the calorie content of most foodstuffs (oil and butter and soft drinks are just insane!) means that i will be much more careful about this for the rest of my life, which in the very very longterm can only be good.

Definitely. Kids should be taught this stuff in school.

this new diet has given me more energy and i feel more chipper and less slobby in my day-to-day life too.

As long as you don't think about it as 'a diet,' you could be doing it forever.

Many people think of a diet as something temporary to do in order to lose weight. RONG.

at the moment i would most like some advice on what kind of weight lifting is best for my situation, could you recommend some good websites/articles which go into this?

I really can't help you with this (my trainer does all this for me!) but bodybuilding.com is a decent resource that covers just about every aspect of weight training you can think of.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 4 February 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Someone start an ILE Biggest Loser thread?

wanko ergo sum, Monday, 4 February 2008 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

We've already got the statscock.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 4 February 2008 04:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh s.rose, before I forget: Eating less will not necessarily cause you to lose weight faster. If what you're doing now is working, stick to it.

If you feel the need to reduce what you eat, do it gradually. Slice around 5% off your daily intake -- no more -- and stay with that for 2-3 months.

We tend to think our bodies are like a giant balloon, and if we put in more stuff it'll get bigger. It's more about cultivating an efficient metabolism.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 4 February 2008 04:46 (sixteen years ago) link

One of the things I like about Weight Watchers the program is that's a well-thought-out systematic approach to losing weight and changing what one eats. With the weekly meetings, there's even more of an external reinforcing structure that I need, since i'm bad at changing long-term habits.

Also, i rode my bike to the supermarket about 20-25 minutes away, up & down the hills of NE Portland. That was overdoing it just a little, as i had a backpack full of groceries on the way home. Still, this should take care of at some of the beer I drank today.

kingfish, Monday, 4 February 2008 05:33 (sixteen years ago) link

What happens if, during a healthy period, we have a massive (one-meal) blowout that involves having seconds of three different kinds of pies until we're so full we're in pain :(

Mark C, Monday, 4 February 2008 12:24 (sixteen years ago) link

What happens? You feel guilty for a while, nothing serious happens and you don't do it again.

Also, calling it a 'healthy period' implies you'll stop eating healthily.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 4 February 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

I need to figure out how to eat less or something.

Abbott, Monday, 4 February 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

What do you do with salt that has you worried?

oh nothing particular with salt, i just plucked that out as a random example. im slowly getting a grip on the different elements of nutrition, but am i right in thinking i only REALLY need to think about calories intake? (providing im eating plenty of fruit, veg, etc and not just 1200 cals worth of sweets). the only thing i am slightly concerned about is sugar, as i do drink a lot of cordial and tea (albeit low sugar fruit juice and half cal sugar + honey in tea).

Kids should be taught this stuff in school.

absolutely. it should be made compulsory for all high street food chains to make their calorie/fat information available, if not on the menu then at least on the website. in a perfect world this should apply to all places, even small independent cafes & restaurants (if i can work out the calories for a meal i make on my own then it certainly isn't beyond a moneymaking business to do this as well).

As long as you don't think about it as 'a diet,' you could be doing it forever. Many people think of a diet as something temporary to do in order to lose weight. RONG.

damn right, when i made the decision to sort this out (in great part to the stream of post-xmas pro-healthy eating docs hosted by jamie oliver & co) i was certain not to refer to it as a 'diet' in a temporary sense. i am doing it to an extreme for the next 6 months in order to get to my ideal weight, and after that will allow more treats and meal outs, but the basic way im eating is completely changed forever.

another question about exercise, is it better to use exercise bikes or the treadmill, or they both equal? i much prefer the bikes, to be able to read and listen to music at leisure but i don't want to compromise the work im doing.

s.rose, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Now that I have to share a kitchen with roommates I usually don't cook anymore, thus I don't eat as much. After my separation in October I've lost probably 30-40 lbs by not eating so much and smoking 2 packs a day. Was at like 315, own to like 265 or 270 now. Also, whiskey instead of beer every night.

Helltime Redux, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

i seriously considered the cigarette diet as well.

s.rose, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

s.rose: Alternate between the two, on say a monthly cycle (hur cycle geddit).

Autumn Almanac, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh my GOD smoking would be the worst health decision you could possibly make! Don't ever start!

Abbott, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

hehe i wasnt 100% about smoking, but it did cross my mind - when i was a 10 per day smoker i was a rake!

AA, is the switch to treadmill necessary? i truly hate running and much much prefer cycling - but am i missing out on exercising certain parts of my body if i stick solely to cycling?

and perhaps related, the main problem with my body are my love handles and flabby belly, if i continue with the aerobic + anaerobic exercise + low cal eating will these problems disappear in enough time? are there any particular exercises i can do to focus on these pesky bits?

s.rose, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Most important fact first: You can't spot reduce. Fat goes where it wants to go.

If you don't like the treadmill, don't use it. At all. You'll only keep it up if you like doing it.

You seem to do plenty on the bike, so your legs will be getting a decent pounding. Have you looked at the rowing machine?

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 23:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh and yes, they will disappear if you're doing everything properly.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

that's good to hear about the belly flab! i had visions of a tight lean frame with a rubber ring of flab round the middle

is it really important to switch machines after a time? i might try out the cross trainer but i can't see myself sticking at it so long or enjoying it as much as the bikes. but if im getting the same results on a bike as on a different cardio machine then is it really vital to switch?

that bodybuilding site is great btw, thanks very much for that link

s.rose, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I only started to like running when I weighed little enough that it wasn't extremely uncomfortable - like maybe when I was only about 10 pounds overweight instead of 20 or 30.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

is it really important to switch machines after a time?

Yeah. Your body gets used to a certain way of working and begins to adapt to it. It's change that has the most impact.

My weights routine changes every four weeks for this reason. You need to shake things up in order to maintain progress.

Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

ahh damn, i didn't know this. looks like i'll have to try out the cross trainer every so often. would something like 3 wks of cycling, 1 wk of crosstrainer be enough of a change? as hurting says, it should get easier as i get lighter.

in what way do you change your weights routine, AA? i have a basic routine of 3 sets of 20 reps on about 5 or 6 machines, not too sure how i could vary them.

s.rose, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Try it, see if it works.

My current routine is a five-day split, meaning I go in five days a week and do a ~50 minute routine. It's all low reps/heavy weights, so I can manage four reps but no more than six. Next week I'm on two weeks of hypertrophy, doing lighter weights but ~12 reps at a time. Then it's back to low reps/heavy weights for a few weeks, but different exercises to what I'm doing now.

Also, I don't use machines unless it's absolutely necessary because generally they're sort of useless.

You should see a trainer and get a programme. Does your gym do programmes?

Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 7 February 2008 03:11 (sixteen years ago) link

<i>I don't use machines unless it's absolutely necessary because generally they're sort of useless.</i>

woah, how come?

s.rose, Thursday, 7 February 2008 03:46 (sixteen years ago) link

You don't get the right kind of training, stability for example. Bench pressing a barbell is 293847293749234 times more effective than using some machine that does the same thing, because you're having to hold, balance and stabilise the entire bar, rather than have a machine do all that for you.

You can't avoid machines for some exercises, like calf raises and cable rows/pulls, because there's really no other way to do those.

Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 7 February 2008 04:20 (sixteen years ago) link

By contrast my trainer wants me eating five meals a day ffs. I've just spent $80 on some magical bulking powder. This had better work.

Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:59 (sixteen years ago) link

blew out any semblence of tracking my eating on tuesday night with a burrito and a 6er of Rainier's tallboys. Got good & drunk whilst watching primary election returns.

Woke up today with a mild hangover and a chest cold, making my morning all the more blah. No exercise or brisk walks for me for the last coupla days.

In other news, i found out that six pints of beer is only like 20-21 weight watchers points. Funny how that works out.

kingfish, Thursday, 7 February 2008 07:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Attempting to loose the 8-ish lbs I put on during the stress fest that was the end of 2007 and then over Christmas. I've always eaten in a reasonably healthy fashion (nice fatty things in small amounts, excepting cheese and wine - I will not strip all wicked joy from my life, however much I actually enjoy raspberries, grilled fish etc.) So I've started going swiming three times a week again. I was doing this about a year and a half ago and it worked very nicely. I had a flatter stomach, noticably more toned upper arms and thighs and the bit of cellulite I did have went (I am aware I'm quite genetically lucky WRT cellulite, and I thank my grandmother's genes on a regular basis.)
So, swimming it is. Four pounds gone. Whoo hoo! Just the difficult four to go now. (I always struggle with those four-five, that's the cheese weight.)

Anna, Thursday, 7 February 2008 11:11 (sixteen years ago) link

AA, is the switch to treadmill necessary? i truly hate running and much much prefer cycling - but am i missing out on exercising certain parts of my body if i stick solely to cycling?

and perhaps related, the main problem with my body are my love handles and flabby belly, if i continue with the aerobic + anaerobic exercise + low cal eating will these problems disappear in enough time? are there any particular exercises i can do to focus on these pesky bits?

pretty sure that aerobic exercise is aerobic exercise is aerobic exercise - the point of it isn't to work certain parts of your body, the point of it is to get your heart beating faster and your lungs working harder for an extended period of time - so whatever you choose that does this is fine

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 February 2008 11:34 (sixteen years ago) link

kingfish, what is the logic behind lager having low points? i dont quite understand the WW system, is it not based on calories?

AA, that's annoying (for me) about the machines. im not planning to use the weights in my gym as that area is always populated by a real nasty bunch of alpha cocks, complete with roidstare. when i move to a new flat the aim is to have a spare bedroom to put an exercise bike, weights and bench in there, but that'll be at least 6 months off. i'll stick with the machines for now though.

are you a full-on bodybuilder, in that you enter competitions or is just a hobby, a personal thing to look muscular? just out of interest id like to see a photo of your shape. im taking monthly photos of my progress so i'll put them up once im at a stage im happy with.

that bodybuilding site has got me very keen on learning the full facts behind it all, and how best to use weights, though im reading a lot of contradictory points about carbs, proteins, aerobic vs anaerobic, etc. things like eating 8 small meals per day aren't an option for me, but i dont think im doing *that* much damage to my metabolism by eating 3 meals per day.

s.rose, Thursday, 7 February 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

kingfish, what is the logic behind lager having low points? i dont quite understand the WW system, is it not based on calories?

It's based on calories/kilojoules and saturated fat, as far as I'm aware.

are you a full-on bodybuilder, in that you enter competitions or is just a hobby, a personal thing to look muscular? just out of interest id like to see a photo of your shape.

Full-on? Nah, just a pride/confidence thing. I've been at it for about four years, but never really had proper direction (or sufficient time) until just recently, so the results have only ever been basic. I can take photos, but I don't know if posting them in this thread, and therefore rubbing 9% body fat in the noses of people who read this and are struggling, is terribly fair. The gym thread, perhaps?

Everyone contradicts everyone else in health and training. It's really really bloody annoying. Most of the time whatever you do is okay, as long as it makes sense and is backed up. The bodybuilding site is also aimed at a wide range of people, and it can be difficult to know who's writing some of it; not to mention the fact that everyone's different, and so some techniques and supplements that work for one person may not work for another.

Stick to three meals if that's what suits you. Again, everyone's different.

Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 7 February 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

s.rose, as per your request:

http://www.4bitterguys.com/adam/before.jpg

^ 2003-ish(~80kg)

http://www.4bitterguys.com/adam/after.jpg

^ 2005-ish (roughly where I am now, but perhaps 1-2% less body fat)

Autumn Almanac, Friday, 8 February 2008 23:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Had my meeting today. Have lost a total of 5 lbs since starting 2 weeks ago, so i'm down to 248 and change. I haven't weighed less than 250 lbs in several years.

(for body type analysis, i'm a shade over 6'1" with a decent back & legs from years of the rowing machine and bike; biceps & upper chest need much work, tho)

kingfish, Sunday, 10 February 2008 00:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, i've dropped 20 lbs from last spring/summer, which is astonishing, since i think i drank MORE after changing jobs.

kingfish, Sunday, 10 February 2008 00:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Brilliant! If you keep doing what you're doing, there's no reason that it shouldn't continue to drop.

Autumn Almanac, Sunday, 10 February 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

What's the best way to do sit-ups? I wanna start them but I'm worried that I'll do them wrong and they'll be ineffective, or give me a hernia or something. Any diagrams or videos online to show the best way?

Bodrick III, Sunday, 10 February 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago) link

They're more effective if you keep your feet up against your bum and pull your chin toward your hips, rolling into it.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 11 February 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I read/was told once that only a small movement was needed for a sit-up to be effective, but I'm not sure if that's just an excuse to do relatively lazy/easy versions, rather than fully pulling myself up to meet my knees, which I'm not convinced I could even do one of.

krakow, Monday, 11 February 2008 08:26 (sixteen years ago) link

hmmm there might be something to the "carers" quote there

Simon H., Friday, 26 April 2019 14:28 (five years ago) link

ok maybe not a gender specific thread just a thread where ppl are allowed to quit sugar without the yknow

deemsthelarker (darraghmac), Friday, 26 April 2019 14:36 (five years ago) link

Good god that carers definition in relation to binging: so me. :-( I am better at it but even at work I have been told I erase myself and comply too much. :-(

nathom, Friday, 26 April 2019 15:45 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.