2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

The subtitle of this thread is looking bitterly ironic now.

31g, Thursday, 6 March 2008 02:06 (eighteen years ago)

what it do hubie? you're def doing work right now on this suns-nuggs game right now

J0rdan S., Thursday, 6 March 2008 02:12 (eighteen years ago)

Wait, so caucus != primary? Obama won the Texas Caucus and lost the Texas Primary, apparently, so I guess they're not the same thing :-/ (I R 1 stupid european thought he knew what was going on but is now totally stumped again)

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:11 (eighteen years ago)

well tx does it all fucked, you had it right to begin with but we went and confused everyone.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:14 (eighteen years ago)

Bugger me, I am going to the RNC in september.

Ed, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:20 (eighteen years ago)

uh, why??

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:21 (eighteen years ago)

Install and support the prompting system.

Ed, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:31 (eighteen years ago)

MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:36 (eighteen years ago)

/ drums fingers together sinisterly

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:36 (eighteen years ago)

Ah well, at least you'll know where to go when you're not working. STATE FAIR.

suzy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:39 (eighteen years ago)

Clinton gameplan

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 13:33 (eighteen years ago)

HRC'S GAMEPLAN IS FOOLPROOF.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 13:58 (eighteen years ago)

Actually, it's pretty damn rational. Win most of what's left, close the pledged delegate gap to a small margin, win the "big states," take the shine off Obama, and charge into the convention with a message for the super-delegates about perseverance and loyalty and toughness.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:00 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah but there's no way for her to win w/o using superdelegates to undermine a popular vote / delegate count Obama lead. That's a reprehensible 'victory' in my view... and probably the GE voters who, you know, have a deep appreciation for the most basic definition of 'democracy'.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:16 (eighteen years ago)

lol i was with you til the last part

and what, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:21 (eighteen years ago)

haha fair enough. I think the Clinton camp is underestimating the amount of blowback that these backroom deals will generate in the modern media landscape.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:25 (eighteen years ago)

Is there anyway to spin that other than Obama voters were cheated?

petey_carnum, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:27 (eighteen years ago)

If she can get a majority of the popular vote it's not that hard to spin.

31g, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:39 (eighteen years ago)

yeah plus if shes close enough and something happens and obama bombs in some way, shes there to pick up the pieces

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:40 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2308/2314168404_b0d9e2cdb9_o.jpg

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

lol

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:58 (eighteen years ago)

yeah plus if shes close enough and something happens and obama bombs in some way, shes there to pick up the pieces

I don't think her strategy is to hope for Obama to bomb and then to pick up the pieces. I think her strategy is to bomb Obama to pieces.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

Obama doesn't have to have some spectacular crash for Clinton to get the nomination. She has keep beating him, but the margins don't have to be great. If she can front up to the convention saying the momentum is definitively with her, and has been for months, then I don't think Obama's slim lead in pledged delegates will make a difference as to which way the superdelegates swing. I mean, what is even the point of superdelegates if their voting criteria is solely the popular vote?

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 6 March 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

Margins do have to be great.

I've asked several prominent uncommitted superdelegates if there's any chance they would reverse the will of Democratic voters. They all say no. It would shatter young people and destroy the party.

I wouldn't lol much at the idea that the Democratic party wouldn't want a nominee who wins through superdelegates. As with so much with HRC's campaign, just because Bush got away with it doesn't mean she can too.

Eazy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

but once its popular vote vs. pledged delegates 'the will of the people' is up in the air

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:19 (eighteen years ago)

another denial about obama's rumored bank of 50 superdelegates:

obama spokesperson Bill Burton: This is just a rumor. There is no secret stash of superdelegates that we are sitting on waiting to roll out.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

:(

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:22 (eighteen years ago)

well it wouldnt be a secret...

jhøshea, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:24 (eighteen years ago)

hey can we knock it off with this idea that the press is easy on obama? considering the nafta flap was cooked up by canadian right wingers and was initially floated about hillary, but that didn't stick well enough apparently (you can fault obama for not defusing the former well enough, but it was manufactured from the outset.) oh and the farrakhan business, for which we can thank one tim russert -- in the context of giving mccain a complete pass on his nutcase racist pastor.

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:26 (eighteen years ago)

er some odd syntax due to editing there: "you can fault obama for not defusing IT well enough"

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

Clinton Camp: Obama Attacks Suggest Campaign is “Unable to Make the Positive Case”

Getty

Senior adviser Ann Lewis scolds Obama on media conference call for stepping up attacks against Clinton after Tuesday’s votes, says instead he should talk about his “positive ideas” on the issues.

“I did not realize that their version of new politics is to recycle some of the same old Republican attacks on Hillary that have failed for years.”

Howard Wolfson says he doesn’t “believe imitating Ken Starr” is a way to run a nomination campaign. Permalink

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

WHO ARE THE PEOPLE WHO BUY THIS SHIT

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

something happened in NYC today that will only help McCain in the GE:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/06/times.square/index.html

Beatrix Kiddo, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:30 (eighteen years ago)

hey can we knock it off with this idea that the press is easy on obama?

yea. i think whatever "free pass" or favoritism the press presumably gave obama before no longer stands.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:31 (eighteen years ago)

WHO ARE THE PEOPLE WHO BUY THIS SHIT

EVERYWHERE. They are the kind of people who elected GWB twice.

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

its just such a transparent attempt to reframe an apple as an orange

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

and thats not even touching on the hypocrisy of it

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

Again, she's using Rove's strategies -- audaciously blame the other guy for doing what you're doing.

Eazy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

right but calling her campaign shameless is just a cheap media narrative amirite

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:43 (eighteen years ago)

But they're using Rove's tactics in a way that resembles a star MBA grad trying to get his footing in the real business world.

Eazy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

gff OTM. obama's just doing the same thing maaaaaaaan!

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:48 (eighteen years ago)

did you guys hear her radio ad that presented itself as a news story about Obama's NAFTA 'lie' - only to say 'paid for by hillary clinton' at the end? Like, it was a fake news radio ad

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:49 (eighteen years ago)

what "rovian" things is the obama camp supposed to have said?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:52 (eighteen years ago)

deej did you hear the jimmy carter radio ad that presented itself as a johnny cash "song"?? what a bait and switch

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

wtf are you talking about now?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:54 (eighteen years ago)

i mean when carter starts using great musicians with personal integrity to further his own political ends it's like, who buys this shit

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:54 (eighteen years ago)

tracer srsly wtf dude. you are relishing in just being reactionary against people who care. so not you!

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

are you dumb? xpost

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

there is a vast strategic and moral difference between presenting your political ad as a news story and presenting it as a song

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:57 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.