Bitcoins

fwiw like half the corporations in the US have a "Delaware address" with "no real connection" to them

fwiw like half the corporations in the US have a "Delaware address" with "no real connection" to them

Yeah, I didn’t understand that either. He’s been through the incorporation and investment processes so I’m sure he knows that too. I think he was saying, “If they’ve registered, it isn’t under the incorporated entity they conduct business under.” But I have no idea.

yeah could be

Shit /r/Bitcoin says ‏@shit_rbtc_says 14h

The owner of Silk Road should be given Obama's Nobel peace prize.

i have to admit that i would love to see bitcoin be a tremendous success in 2014 and all these seemingly deluded nerds walk away with massive payouts and all the internet intelligentsia forced to admit how wrong and cynical they were
"it was a gold rush and we missed it... why couldn't i just BELIEVE"

it would be so fun

visionary stuff right there

and i'll c+p that quote for you to chew on like the bitter tea leaves of your heart when that bright bitcoin day comes

visionary metaphor mixing

that's why i'm on ripplin

Interesting article suggesting that so far we've only scratched the surface of innovations that could be built on top of Bitcoin:

http://theumlaut.com/2014/01/08/bitcoin-internet-of-money/

here are some other interesting articles from that author

http://theumlaut.com/2013/01/30/why-americas-fiscal-reality-will-make-euthanasia-inevitable/

http://theumlaut.com/2013/03/13/paul-krugman-is-brilliant-but-is-he-meta-rational

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/3020148783/8fe0568213d240a2ca1b447493a70bde.jpeg

interesting guy thinking baout things

i didn't know sarge wrote abt bitcoin

Shit /r/Bitcoin says ‏@shit_rbtc_says 8 Jan
If only there would be mass non-compliance against laws in the US. Then we might have some semblance of freedom in the "land of the free."

just read this on a jobs board:

Presenter for New Show (Must Have Understanding of Bitcoin)

just found out that apparently if any one group can control 51% of all mining power at any time they can do what is known as a "doublespend attack" which essentially could bring down the whole ship, and it looks like one group is getting close, what a shock

i think charmander has a doublespend attack mirit

yeah its surprising someone w a sick ass botnet hasnt just declared that they have all the bitcoins

Bitcoin is just a long story of how libertarians discover what financial regulation is for, piece by piece, as lack of it begins to affect them negatively.

haha

!

damn, whose?

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/20/jamaican-bobsled-team-raises-dogecoin-winter-olympics

so chi

Marc Andreessen's case for Bitcoin:

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/01/21/why-bitcoin-matters

Editor’s note: Marc Andreessen’s gigantic pointed skull is full of bitcoins

a tumblr of things that people claimed were the next personal computer/internet

A random spectator at a televised sports event held up a placard with a QR code and the text “Send me Bitcoin!” He received $25,000 in Bitcoin in the first 24 hours, all from people he had never met.

except that it was all from himself

No doubt Andreessen's quite biased, but he makes some good points. I don't buy his argument that Bitcoin's first-mover advantage will guarantee dominance in the crypto-currency sphere though. If you can accept and process one form of crypto-currency, it's a negligible additional effort to accept and process a different form, so I don't think the network effects are as strong as he claims. I still think Tyler Cowen nailed this - eventually as crypto-currencies proliferate the value of any particular currency in circulation has to fall to equal the marginal cost of launching a new one.

its funny he touts all these benefits to business and then the benefit to consumers is you wont get hacked which of course is actually a benefit to business, the benefit to consumers is what no fraud/dispute protection

I've come to think that bitcoin probably is some of the things that its supporters claim, and is not others. E.g. it makes sense to me that it's a very useful way to transfer money or make payments globally without friction/fees. However, I don't think it's going to be a successful tax avoidance strategy, or money laundering device, or drug-purchasing tool forever, and I certainly don't think it's going to become some kind of universal currency that will upend currency and the banking system as we know it.

i have yet to see anyone make a good argument why any person would want to use these over a debit/credit card, buying drugs excepted

the friction/fees are all incurred by the business

If you're paranoid about ID theft would be one. Or if you don't have a credit card.

The better argument I've heard is that people could use it for international remittances instead of services that charge high fees.

not to mention that the security overhead is ridiculous to ask non technical people to handle, someone gets yr wallet infos and all yr bitcoins are gone

if the US government fails I would think Bitcoin would be pretty useful

xp right -- I mean the fees incurred by the business drive up your cost in the end too, but you're not going to make a decision based on that. However, it's possible there could be smaller merchants who would rather just not take credit cards at all -- etsy-type sellers, who could accept bitcoin.

The bigger problems to me are security and stability in the price. If you're just going to transfer quickly in/out of bitcoin for payment purposes only, the stability is less of a problem, as an article here or in the other thread pointed out.

Or if you don't have a credit card.

The better argument I've heard is that people could use it for international remittances instead of services that charge high fees.

― signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:33 AM (37 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

how are you getting the bitcoins w/o the credit card what are the fees associated with that, what abou the fee when you have to transfer bitcoin back into local currency after remittance, and this is all ignoring the obvious market realities that existing systems like money wiring or w/e can just lower their fees to compete w bitcoin

not to mention that the security overhead is ridiculous to ask non technical people to handle, someone gets yr wallet infos and all yr bitcoins are gone

― lag∞n, Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:34 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah this is a big barrier, although there might be a tech solution to it. Fingerprint sensor activated wallet or such.

If you're just going to transfer quickly in/out of bitcoin for payment purposes only, the stability is less of a problem, as an article here or in the other thread pointed out.

― signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:37 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there would be fees for this, bitcoin only becomes feeless if its the default currency which is never gonna happen this is all so stupid

yeah this is a big barrier, although there might be a tech solution to it. Fingerprint sensor activated wallet or such.

― signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:38 AM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

everything is breakable, if there were thousands of dollars just lying around on peoples phones it would start to disappear very fast

smh at dealbook what a piece of shit thats some techcrunch level letting people sell their own book in yr pages

I don't think Western Union would be able to lower fees enough to compete with something that is literally zero cost. Factor in the in and out exchange fees and I still don't think so.

I agree that there are like a million possible ways for bitcoin to not turn into what its boosters think it can turn into, and that the odds are against it, but I still think it has some interesting possibilities.

its not zero cost my god how many times do you have to have this pointed out to you

Well, to be fair to Dealbook, they also recently published a post-mortem on Bitcoin, arguing that Bitcoin was as good as toast and analyzing the misconceptions of its backers.

xxp

they couldve gotten the pro bitcoin line maybe from someone who wasnt the most heavily invested in it of anyone in the world

its not zero cost my god how many times do you have to have this pointed out to you

This is a fair point. If you don't want to be exposed to Bitcoin currency fluctuations, you can't keep your money in Bitcoins, so the cost of any one transaction is the sum of (1) fees to convert your currency to Bitcoin plus bid-ask spread, (2) transaction fee associated with the Bitcoin transaction itself, and (3) fees + spread to convert back to currency on the other end. This is probably not negligible, but still could end up being less than an international wire (I have no idea how much those cost) and possibly more convenient too. I do think this will probably just motivate international wire services to improve their service and cut fees, but if so that's a win-win for everyone (except I guess people who have their life savings in Bitcoin).

yeah thatd be cool but it does nothing for the viability of bitcoin

im quite sure theres a shitload of other costly infrastructure that would have to be worked into that equation too, real life will intrude upon the beautiful logarithm