seemed weighty in the sense that no one can imagine a way of life that involves moderation. the expectant faces at the end were kind of crushing.― ryan, Tuesday, January 7, 2014 7:51 AM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark
― ryan, Tuesday, January 7, 2014 7:51 AM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark
Yeah this is why I draw the parallel to the ending of Casino upthread, although now that I RC more, I think De Niro was out of the casino game by then and was a full time sports bookie. Think the framing was, that he had been in Vegas when it was fucking awesome, and now it's full of seniors
Like I'm trying to think if there's any more in the way Scorsese uses these shots of the hoi polloi other than to signal the huge gulf when compared to the hedonistic highs in both movies
IDK I was thinking earlier that Jordan probably sees absolutely nothing wrong with making NZ people sell pens, he's taken the advice of Rob and framed even his defeats as marks of true success, like a good salesman does... You can end the movie thinking he's pretty lucky that he lives in such a self-constructed bubble, or alternately feel extreme pity that he lives in such a self-constructed bubble
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:32 (twelve years ago)
i feel like there are five hundred posts here & i just probably stepped on richard brody's toes regurgitating
- what about the weird back & forth crane shot across the floor
- also i think something else that was strange, seeing this, & again maybe relates to how closely i assume it hews to its source text, was the kinda sometimes strange, specific elasticity of its tension. there are scenes like leo, like-ryan-says-very-preacherishly, stepping up to the stage to retire, & then obviously reneging on it, & it does this in such a strangely arhythmic fashion; you clearly know this is one of the possibilities, so expect it, but it's circuitous, & at one point shorts its momentum to include that terrific interlude w/the single mom in the armani suit, or circles back to just indulge in the kinda jazzy leo performance for a minute longer. like so much of it seems so deliberately, strategically languorous, all while pretty much structuring itself vaguely like the clippy two hour film it could have been. i think this film is on the cover of the new film comment, i'd really love to read something good with scorsese talking about it because i feel like i need a way to just inject him into my understanding of this film. it has the dna of a kinda ray liotta narrated vice-logue we're familiar with but i guess cf ryan's late twist thing there's some deliberate logic to it i can't trace
― mustread guy (schlump), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:32 (twelve years ago)
This also kinda feels like Flaubert's A Sentimental Education too. Making the connection because it happens to be the only book I've read in the past 5 years xp
You can end the movie thinking he's pretty lucky that he lives in such a self-constructed bubble, or alternately feel extreme pity that he lives in such a self-constructed bubble― 龜, Tuesday, January 7, 2014 8:32 AM (39 seconds ago) Bookmark
― 龜, Tuesday, January 7, 2014 8:32 AM (39 seconds ago) Bookmark
I mean the real Jordan Belfort probably thinks it's fucking awesome that this is the second movie that's been made about him & I bet he absolutely misses completely all the hints & ways that Scorsese maybe, might a little bit be skeptical of the enterprise... He just mentally puts himself in all the orgy scenes
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:34 (twelve years ago)
lack of moral compass complaints are mystifying. it's closer to being puritanical than not!
ha hm idk - i sorta feel like it's the breaking bad criticism of why don't we see how bad meth is, but it just has other concerns; it obviously doesn't get into penny shares, &c. i don't know that i think it is or isn't puritanical, so much as it just isn't concerned with spoonfeeding you what you can deduce, better attempts to just situate you in the milieu you don't have access to, &c
― 龜, Monday, January 6, 2014 8:32 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol
― mustread guy (schlump), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:36 (twelve years ago)
Like even acknowledging that he wrecked his Zonda was conveyed in a "Holy shit The_Hangover_Part_3" type tone & without any sort of moral reckoning
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:36 (twelve years ago)
that interlude with the single mom was amazing.
maybe im way out of left field but i thought there was real compassion in the final shot
i don't know that i think it is or isn't puritanical, so much as it just isn't concerned with spoonfeeding you what you can deduce, better attempts to just situate you in the milieu you don't have access to, &c
yes there's a blessed lack of finger wagging.
― ryan, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:38 (twelve years ago)
if only there was a blessed lack of dick waving right fellas haha j/k
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:41 (twelve years ago)
this movie takes a very much cake and eat it too approach to morality and im okay with that and consider people who arent to be my mortal enemies
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:42 (twelve years ago)
Yo man you want some cake
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:43 (twelve years ago)
film is just made of those kinda digressions, i think. i remember being frustrated with the master, which was admirably panoramic but then sorta hemmed itself in by occasionally bending back to give a shit about joaquin phoenix's ex-girlfriend or whatever, & this was a more satisfying ratio of like ... core & fringe, to me, like every yacht interlude or joanna lumley scene or whatever was just pretty satisfying to be in, & a perverse part of me would prefer a non-narrative compendium of just this without explanatory context.
& yeah re: final shot, i think that's true, & probably under pressure adds some weight to our read of jordan, right? like those scenes - the headshaving scene included, the retirement scene, him & his pals at the diner - seem to rotate around that kinda connection hunger.
nb a short line i really liked in this was the part in which staff are being interviewed & a guy is asked about his name & he says it's my name
― mustread guy (schlump), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:43 (twelve years ago)
― 龜, Monday, January 6, 2014 7:43 PM (40 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i always want cake why do some people hate cake so much doesnt make any sense
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:44 (twelve years ago)
the scene where he backs out of the deal with the feds cracks me up because it's framed as this vision quest epic fight against all odds but clearly we're meant to think "christ this dude is a fucking idiot"
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:45 (twelve years ago)
Yeah the way he psychs himself up to have it on his yacht + have two models + lobster on deck
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:45 (twelve years ago)
naw i'm talking about the speech near the end but that scene too. the yacht scene is top 3 in the film for sure.
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:46 (twelve years ago)
will take a crumb of key lime pie over a whole cake of anything
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:46 (twelve years ago)
O yeah. The part of the movie where he sells himself to himself xp
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:47 (twelve years ago)
his life was meaningless w/o his awesome party corporation and they were all so sad to see him go
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:47 (twelve years ago)
Man once the feds see my yacht they're gonna let me go. It's got a helicopter on the top
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:48 (twelve years ago)
what's weird about reneging on the deal it is that it's a totally uncynical move! like "no you can't stop me from swindling people because I truly believe in the gospel of prosperity." it IS his religion!
― ryan, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:48 (twelve years ago)
he loves it
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:49 (twelve years ago)
Also <35mm nerd> read that they were gonna shoot this in digital but ended up using mostly film. The scenes in the ocean + some others with CGI felt too fake interweaved with the lushness of real film </35mm nerd>
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:49 (twelve years ago)
its funny cause walking away w a slap on the wrist wouldve been the ultimate victory instead he goes to jail just to spend another year or w/e with his beloved scam
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:50 (twelve years ago)
~75% film, 23% hd digital, 2% weird shitty .rm clip of '90s shoe advert
― mustread guy (schlump), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:51 (twelve years ago)
― lag∞n, Tuesday, January 7, 2014 8:50 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
Yeah he scams himself basically
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:53 (twelve years ago)
re: schlump's otm comments about the odd structure and rhythm of this, i do recall the editor saying it was difficult to pare it down from 4 hours. would be very curious about that cut (though i fear it may coalesce into a more standard feeling movie).
― ryan, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 00:54 (twelve years ago)
also just make all movies just jonah hill & leo buddy comedies now.
yes
also all elbows-out male performances now are just shades of unavoidably-evident-hair-thinning-'80s-nicholson -ism, now, aren't they.
otm
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 01:01 (twelve years ago)
I'LL BE FRESH AS HELL IF THE FEDS WATCHIN
― Beatrix Kiddo (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 01:42 (twelve years ago)
P Labuza on L'boxd is the first person I've read who makes a retrospectively obvious point that the quaaludes sequence is both verbally and physically an hommage to Jerry Lewis.
also Richard Brody wrote today that Chaplin's talkies surpassed his silents, so feel free to ignore, he's raving.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 01:46 (twelve years ago)
― Beatrix Kiddo (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, January 7, 2014 9:42 AM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark
This is actually the most otm comment about this movie
― 龜, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 02:03 (twelve years ago)
this was a more satisfying ratio of like ... core & fringe, to me, like every yacht interlude or joanna lumley scene or whatever was just pretty satisfying to be in, & a perverse part of me would prefer a non-narrative compendium of just this without explanatory context.
The Wolf of Wall Street starring James Franco, dir. Harmony Korine.
― tbd (Eazy), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 02:05 (twelve years ago)
Armond less lacerating than usual, mocks Leo's pubescent voice
http://cityarts.info/2013/12/21/secret-lives-of-walter-marty/
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 02:06 (twelve years ago)
this is badly proofread!
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 02:16 (twelve years ago)
(Imagine the swagger Paul Walker could have brought to playing Belfort)
he wouldn't have been terrible
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 02:17 (twelve years ago)
he has this weird obsession with the supposed lack of masculinity in actors' voices
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 03:17 (twelve years ago)
certain actors that is
paul wa... what
― Hungry4Ass, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 03:46 (twelve years ago)
― mustread guy (schlump), Monday, January 6, 2014 7:43 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
i liked "i would fuck her if she was my sister"
Leo's crew: Guy Who Eats Everything, Guy With Bad Hairpiece etc, it's just like Robin Hood
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 08:22 (twelve years ago)
I liked "I would let her give me AIDS" because it didn't feel like he was even making a joke there
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 16:03 (twelve years ago)
Was reading somewhere a critique that basically amounted to "Scorcese doesn't know when to stop." Doesn't he though? That's one of the most impressive things about this movie. Trim each scene by a minute or two and you'd have very different movie. Like, yeah we see what the point is and where things are going but the obsessive compulsive repetition, always going back for one more, strikes me as very pointed and controlled here. It's amazing to behold.
― ryan, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 23:48 (twelve years ago)
it's exhausting to behold
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 January 2014 23:50 (twelve years ago)
it's obviously a tight rope walk of sorts--but I got off on the aesthetic thrill and daring of it.
― ryan, Tuesday, 7 January 2014 23:52 (twelve years ago)
keep meaning to hash something out about the 'real' 'respectable' wall street & the old establishment being the kind of distant unloving father of this movie, it's not shown much at all but is constantly on everyone's mind. i suppose it's a very basic gatsby new-old money polarity. some critics have said WoWS doesn't show the REAL financial criminals which sort of gets at this
"real finance" is where JB starts until black monday knocks him out, where he's trying to get back to. he talks about the fake-wasp name of his firm in those terms ("carved on plymouth rock"), and at one point excuses his firm's bad reputation by saying he has to make noise because he's the new guy, and the legit world is around the corner (shades of michael corleone wanting to take the family straight? only not really...), the shift to ipos which have the look of legitimacy but they do as crookedly as they can (i looked up steve madden and irl he went down for crimes related to that deal, haha.) the speech about the single mom who now wears armani has that doubleness, of wanting so badly to be inside the castle but also to be proud of your busted ass bridge and tunnel self for crashing it.
interesting too that class issues underlie the major plot turn, but not belfort's: it's donnie azoff who can't stand having to deal with a drug dealer as a money mule, that he hasn't gotten out of that world, which leads to the fight in the parking lot that keeps belfort in the fbi's sights. if he hadn't had that chip on his shoulder and been able to just to the deal with the guy, well...
in a way it's a mirror of belfort's scene on the boat with the fbi agents: he really just can't clock that they'd be disgusted by his excess rather than impressed.
― goole, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 00:27 (twelve years ago)
Loved the way the "Stratton Oakmont" title that opens the movie looks at first like it's another production company logo
― latebloomer, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 04:40 (twelve years ago)
intersting http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/01/the_wolf_of_wall_street_and_the_stratton_oakmont_ruling_that_helped_write.html
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:20 (twelve years ago)
I'LL BE FRESH AS HELL IF THE FEDS WATCHIN― Beatrix Kiddo (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, January 7, 2014 9:42 AM (21 minutes ago) BookmarkThis is actually the most otm comment about this movie― 龜, Monday, January 6, 2014 8:03 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― 龜, Monday, January 6, 2014 8:03 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol & otm
― |$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:54 (twelve years ago)
no memory of such a line
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:01 (twelve years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NttlPwNKd_M
― |$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:10 (twelve years ago)