The Wolf of Wall Street (new Scorsese)

"Before long, he, too, has cocaine and hookers — at one point sucking the former from the ass of the latter. "

p. sure Leo was blowing the former into the ass of the latter, not sucking it from.

Shouldn't you be endorsing financial rape?

― Alfre, Lord Woodard (Eric H.)

where'd i do this? i mean i get yr just a dumber goofier morbs, the drake to his kanye, but really make an effort scamp

Bye.

Solid zing, tho, and that I prefer Drake to Kanye probably proves it true at every level.

Is Hustle the Drake to Wolf's Kanye too?

it's the jay z

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/all-the-songs-in-the-wolf-of-wall-street-including-devo-cypress-hill-foo-fighters-more-20131227

http://www.hitfix.com/in-contention/leonardo-dicaprio-says-wolf-of-wall-street-critics-missed-the-boat-entirely

it was weird hearing "Never Say Never" at a late eighties/early nineties pool party.

itt "FUN SHIRTS"

well I never thought there'd be a Scorsese film where Bo Dietl gave the best performance, but here we are...

A sprightly opening 30-40 minutes (his best work in 16 years) that makes all the obvious points fairly well, followed by numbing repetition -- call it a David O Russell hommage.

Nah, Fran Lebowitz killed.

If he'd gotten deeper inside ratholes and juking the Steve Madden IPO and stuff, or Leo's friendship with Jonah Hill, it would have been closer to worth the extra time.

i can get down w/ this

good thing ya didn't hafta sanitize "the N-word" in Taxi Driver & Raging Bull, eh Marty

Brad Pitt is nowhere NEAR 5'11"

balls stfu, Eric is not goofier than me

even the choices of sndtrk needledrops sucked in this film

hi im doctor morbius i hate all movies ever

no, mostly protracted pointless 3-hour comedies by a filmmaker who can't do comedy

(nb: The King of Comedy is satire)

tell us more about comedy gabbneb

http://urbanrethink.com/sites/default/files/sdm.jpg

even the choices of sndtrk needledrops sucked in this film

Jimmy Castor Bunch!!!

actually my definition of comedy this minute rests upon whether clemenza meant to type "racial epitaph"

(I don't think that was a joke in the film...?)

Ouch...I've been mixing up those two words for years, and spell-check didn't save me.

People who are complaining about the length don't get that the point of the film was to hit you on the head with its excess?

Oh well

A sprightly opening 30-40 minutes (his best work in 16 years) that makes all the obvious points fairly well, followed by numbing repetition

even the choices of sndtrk needledrops sucked in this film

Hearty co-sign on these.

I get that point... it just wasn't a good choice. There's a point of diminishing returns on "this guy does sooooooo many quaaludes" and that point came ~90 minutes in, except for Leo doing the worm to get to his Lambo. At that point it wasn't revealing anything about his character or the Stratton world, it was just watching a guy with pancake makeup on do lots of blow off perfect boobs.

in addition to above, it was kind of weird how divorced it seemed from any outside world and never sought to comment on Wall Street or brokers or penny stocks, etc. - the closest was Leo mentioning CDOs and Internet stocks, but the timeline would have put him circa 1993 for the latter.

Most disappointing: shot where the camera seems to freeze frame panning over the Stratton trading floor and an intro drops in like we're going to get some awesome hard soul but then the song itself was completely forgettable.

Probably the only thing worse than thinking this movie was misguided in being repetitive & intemperate is thinking that this movie was gonna reveal some hard truth about how con artists sleazeball really made their money when all you really needed to know is that these were fast talking guys from Queens calling up people in Alabama to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge

yeah I get that "point" too and I don't pay $8 (matinee) for cock and ball torture.

(Leo's DIRTY BIRDIE line as the hot wax is dripping on him was prob the last time I laughed at anything, mostly McConaughey before that)

I definitely got the point of the film's excessive excessiveness (both as it applied to the story, and at the second level of Scorsese trying to outdo himself), but that didn't make it any less numbing to sit through.

fast talking guys from Queens calling up people in Alabama to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge is not worth 180 minutes, QED.

Jonah Hill was basically a squashed Adam Sandler

I didn't ask for hard truths - the inside part of what was going on and how it related to the outside world can be funny! Definitely funnier than the 400th shot of Leo popping a 'lude.

I've thought about this film a lot today and i think i need to add that myself and balls and hungry4ass and gr80 are generally otm here. latebloomer too. a couple others who agree with me also.

Probably the only thing worse than thinking this movie was misguided in being repetitive & intemperate is thinking that this movie was gonna reveal some hard truth about how con artists sleazeball really made their money when all you really needed to know is that these were fast talking guys from Queens calling up people in Alabama to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge

― 乒乓, Tuesday, December 31, 2013 9:03 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

point is if the people making the movie actually had any insight into the people environment or culture they were depicting then you would learn something how they made their money even if it wasnt explicitly taught, the fact that the filmmakers thought "fast talking guy from queens" was a sufficient identity for a character is why even though it has many masterful aspects it is overall not really that great

There isn't any insight to be had. It really was that easy to make money in the early 90s

if that was true than many more people wouldve done just that, the world is not lacking in sociopaths

its a movie that villainizes its characters for ignoring the humanity of others while ignoring the humanity of its characters, i know this is just a huge opening for someone to be all dont you see thats the whole point meta commentary etc but no its just bad writing

I've thought about this film a lot today

ie compounding your original error

bye, off to naked gay butler party!

it such incredible loathing for its subjects that i really think it clouded its vision and obscured all the detail

you got to have some love, you have to at least be intersted

i mean i liked it it was funny it had some sick ass shit in it but it was very insubstantial

I agree that the movie is like being inside of a giant egg. There's nowhere to gain a foothold

That's why I loves the movie. I love eggs

i eat eggs almost every day, make of it what you will

The Egg of Wall Street

You could make the same criticism of taxi driver. Wow what a despicable character. Who could love or identify with such a guy

But that movie revealed that nearly all movie critics and movie watchers are actually lonely psychopathic murderous ragemen. They love that movie

In time movie watchers will realize they are also quaalude popping sleazy caligulan sexmen. Just give it a few years

obviously my criticism was not that its impossible to portray monstrous psychos on film

morbs come back, that party's just going to end with you getting dangled off a building anyway.

its a movie that villainizes its characters for ignoring the humanity of others while ignoring the humanity of its characters, i know this is just a huge opening for someone to be all dont you see thats the whole point meta commentary etc but no its just bad writing

― lag∞n, Tuesday, December 31, 2013 9:22 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

so u wanted a jason reitman movie, got it

eggs taste better than this movie, and are out of your system faster.

u fuckers who can't tell the diff btwn this and Taxi Driver deserve cable

it is the Year Zero

also Marty go play fucking bingo