Ken vs. Boris: It's So On

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1874 of them)

Look here, a quick STV example for you stupid Englishers!

Say you vote like this:

1. Fit Greens Bird
2. That Gay Lib Dem Dude
3. (A Message To You) Ken
4. That Idiot Boris

Now let's say after the results come in that the Greens candidate has the least amount of votes. Well, all his votes get sent to the next preferred candidate on the voting slips. In that case it goes to the Lib Dem. Now it looks like this:

1. Lib Dem
2. (A Message To You) Ken
3. That Idiot Boris

Now with the final three, the Lib Dems have the least amount of votes. That means his votes including those second preferences from those originally voted Green will go to your NEXT preference on the voting slip...

1. (A Message To You) Ken
2. That Idiot Boris

Therefore, Ken gets your vote in the end yet a message has been sent to him. Ken stays Mayor with his lesson learnt whilst Boris goes on a profitable tour of Universities across the country with his LOLcat Powerpoint Slide Show.

YES, IT'S THAT SIMPLE

King Boy Pato, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:22 (eighteen years ago)

this background image amuses me too
http://www.backboris.com/images/header_blue.jpg

"hmmm, fillet mignon or the sea bass?"

blueski, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

Livingstone's result as an Independent in 2000 looks stunning to me.

Thanks, King Boy, for your help, but I'm still not sure I have got the hang of this, so I had better stay safe and simple as possible.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:25 (eighteen years ago)

However, if you feel like just voting Green or Lib Dem, just give them the No. 1 and your preferences will be directed automatically according to their wishes. Which should mean it'll go to Ken instead of Boris (well, I hope for their sake).

King Boy Pato, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:26 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, ken winning against a tory nonentity who was dropped in after jeffrey archer got done for perjury was a real shock.

xpost

banriquit, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:28 (eighteen years ago)

He won against a Labour nonentity as well! If by 'nonentity' you mean 'former cabinet minister'. Actually this goes for Norris as well.

Matt DC, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:36 (eighteen years ago)

no the shock was more his ability to undermine Labour (candidate) at the same time, as well as he did - crap tho Dobson also came across as. xp

blueski, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:39 (eighteen years ago)

did anyone here NOT vote Ken in BOTH of the previous elections?

blueski, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:41 (eighteen years ago)

Me - I didn't vote.

Mind you I wasn't eligible to vote in 2001 as I moved to London in June.

Colonel Poo, Monday, 28 April 2008 14:58 (eighteen years ago)

look at all you tourists

DG, Monday, 28 April 2008 15:01 (eighteen years ago)

Terrible innit? Especially as the first Mayoral election was in 2000.

I was living in Oxford at the time, however, so couldn't vote.

Dingbod Kesterson, Monday, 28 April 2008 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

Was it 2000? In that case I was even less eligible to vote.

Colonel Poo, Monday, 28 April 2008 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

Ah yes it was the General Election in 2001. Didn't vote in that either come to think of it. That's apathy for you.

Colonel Poo, Monday, 28 April 2008 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

"Donut mayor": good political meme/bad political meme?

Dom Passantino, Monday, 28 April 2008 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

I have been looking through a Mayoral Manifesto leaflet.

First up are the BNP. They begin: "Remember London the way it used to be? Clean, friendly and safe". I find this implausible. Does anyone remember such a London? It was doubtless cleaner re. pollution etc, but is possibly less polluted now than say 30 years ago? Not sure about this - but the river for instance. It's true that there is a lot of terrible behaviour in London, but I don't think that means it used to be friendly, or safe. I don't really remember it that way, having lived here most of my life.

They also quote a woman who says she is voting BNP because she's Irish and they care about 'the indigenous peoples of these islands'. I'm not sure this a coherent position. If they're the *British* National Party, then surely to stick up for Irish people in Britain is just opportunism on their part?

The BNP's logo looks ugly to me; maybe this just chimes with the sense that they are ugly in some deeper way too.

Lindsey German of left list looks old, though some of her policies sound decent.

The Tory manifesto features a load of BS language - 'Beef up the police presence' and 'Stretch the taxpayer pound'.

Sian Berry does look lovely! and she is younger than me, for heaven's sake. I would love her to be Mayor of London, I suppose.

Brian Paddick's yellow / purple colourscheme is odd. I do feel, though, that a veteran senior cop, who also considers himself a liberal, ought on the face of it to be a good candidate for running London.

Alan Craig stands for Christian Choice. He wants to champion people including the unborn. I was amused by his promise to 'End the (alleged) corruption at City Hall'. The legalistic (alleged) utterly undermines the force of the promise.

The English Democrats seem anti-Scottish - this seems obnoxious to me. I like Scotland.

Ken Livingstone comes last. The whole left page with just a picture of his weary old smiling face and not many words; the right page listing achievements and what needs to be done. I was struck by the authority of this presentation, against all the others. It stands out, visually, from them all. It confirms my affection for Ken Livingstone and my desire to see him elected.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

but you could leave your door open and they loved their mums

onimo, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:46 (eighteen years ago)

I had exactly the same feeling about Ken's page in that pamphlet (although I thought he looked well cheesy in the photo). Just soooo much more pro than the others. V effective.

Zoe Espera, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:48 (eighteen years ago)

(Maybe he was going for the new austerity aesthetic.)

Zoe Espera, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:48 (eighteen years ago)

Goodness, that shot of a bombing plane is just remarkable.

That is nice to know, Zoe (austerity or no). I suppose my feeling about photos of him is different - I look at him and see a man in his 60s, his face sagging, bags under his eyes, most of his hair gone, no claim at all on glamour - just a sort of droopy-eyed smile, and a lot of wry knowledge and experience in his gaze. I like something about this - the way he can be an attractive candidate without being physically attractive? (Don't know where his 5 children etc fits with this.)

In what I've seen of debates, he's been calm and 'statesmanlike', perhaps deliberately against the table-thumping bombast he knew BJ would bring; I like this too. He impresses me; I realize that others don't share that response.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:52 (eighteen years ago)

I got the booklet today! I guess I'll vote for the Green lady, not sure about the 20mph speed limit though.

jel --, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

Jel, I hope you will vote Ken 2nd. Though of course you may not want to listen to what anybody else hopes.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

Lindsey German is "old", I guess. I wonder why she doesn't receive the same sympathetic words that Ken's wrinkled face provokes? I heard her speak once and I liked what she said.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 28 April 2008 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

You're right, Hand - I apologize for the inconsistency. I just don't feel like I am 'supporting' her in this election, so I am not turned on to sympathizing with her. And something puts me off her historically, re. SWP / Respect / whatever. I had never seen a picture of her before an hour or so ago, so it was a surprise to me, how old she looks. Like I said, maybe the policies are good. I don't think people should be disqualified because they're old, unless they really are too old.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 17:01 (eighteen years ago)

Fantastic clip of Paxman owning Boris 'LOL U LEGERND!' Johnson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EujXtSlOwA

James Mitchell, Monday, 28 April 2008 17:18 (eighteen years ago)

but is possibly less polluted now than say 30 years ago

I keep forgetting that 30 years ago was only the 70s. London (and every city in Britain) is cleaner than it was it the 1970s, don't let anyone tell you any different. Of course, the BNP is probably talking about the 50s, before all them dirty foreigners arrived with their smells and garlic breath.

The Great Smog of 1952-53 killed 12,000 people.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 28 April 2008 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

Also dog shit. And I know there is still a lot of dog shit but believe me it was worse in the 70s.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 28 April 2008 18:55 (eighteen years ago)

Ah but at least in the 70s it was white dog shit.

Ed, Monday, 28 April 2008 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

So the Standard is all "OMG BORIS SURGES INTO THE LEAD WE ARE SO CLOSE WE CAN TASTE THE PRECIOUSSSSSS" and Thelondonpaper says Ken has edged into the lead.

So basically, no one has a fucking clue who's going to win?

Matt DC, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:35 (eighteen years ago)

Also, that Paxman clip is astonishing, especially when he starts walking towards him.

Matt DC, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:40 (eighteen years ago)

Paxman in "fuck you, pay me" mode is still the funniest zingster on TV.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

Incidentally, did anyone start a thread on Nigel Lawson's last Newsnight appearance/climate change denial/possible Alzheimer's? Paxman's opening salvo that night was spectacular.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

i read the oddest review of his book by uber-leftist alex (or patrick) cockburn, saying lawson was a pussy for allowing the theory that co2 causes global warming. had no idea cockburn was that way inclined.

banriquit, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:47 (eighteen years ago)

I think his scientific expertise is on a par with Lawson's.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:49 (eighteen years ago)

The night of the Stern report, was that?

You're right, Paxman is heroic in scenarios like that BJ encounter - in a way he shouldn't have let him get away with it. Perhaps he didn't.

I think Ned T Rifle is right about London's dirty past.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:57 (eighteen years ago)

i will be glad when it's over, whatever cunt wins.

banriquit, Monday, 28 April 2008 19:59 (eighteen years ago)

I won't. I will be happy if KL wins, and unhappy if BK wins.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

that is, BJ.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

Think it was later than the actual release of the report, but Lawson was certainly very critical of it, without being able to articulate why. A lot of comparisons to the David Kelly affair tossed about.

Anyway, it's here on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74E2D6oNSHc

Noodle Vague, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

What makes me laugh the most is that Viz regularly run stories about authors with controversial theories who are clearly pathetic fantasists who've written their book after a heavy night in the pub. Lawson is v. reminiscent of this, especially his ray-gun idea.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

Mathew d'Ancona, class traitor and defender of the downtrodden, backs Ken for Mayor.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

Not really.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

i clicked on it anyway because i like the song

banriquit, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

No rickrolls from me I'm afraid - it's all too serious attempt to make Boris sound heavyweight...

Imagine Giuliani’s ‘zero tolerance’ of crime woven into Disraelian Toryism: Robocop with a sense of compassion.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:46 (eighteen years ago)

I was interested in this 'fact' - that there are now nearly twice as many robberies with violence a year in London than in the larger city of New York - anyone know where this comes from?

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

Robocop had a sense of compassion. I'll assume the rest of his puff piece is that badly researched. Amateur.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

I think it comes from the NYPD shooting random people sitting quietly in their car.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

Imagine London as a Tory stronghold against the Gordon Empire, with Boris as our clean-shaven Asterix. And — unlike the PM — he would have an electoral mandate

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:53 (eighteen years ago)

I'm no big fan of Brown but this "he doesn't have a mandate" stuff just makes me want to shout 'FUCK OFF' repeatedly.

Matt DC, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

he doesn't have a mandate

DG, Monday, 28 April 2008 20:59 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.