A successful filibuster was once the sign that a very substantial minority had extreme reservations about a bill, extreme enough to merit bringing the Senate's business to a complete halt for the rest of the session if need be.
I laugh when I think of how serious these jackasses take themselves. I wonder if Byrd is spinning in his grave.
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:09 (twelve years ago)
the real reason probably that making each other stand and talk amounts to pissant trolling of each other, might as well just get rid of it. we're talking about a bunch of old people here.
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:09 (twelve years ago)
it's just too bad democrats didn't come around last time that happened (and too bad ted kennedy died) otherwise we'd have a much better healthcare law right now and cap and trade and prob all sorts other cool laws
opium is wonderful, huh
Teddy was losin' it twd the end, about the best he could do after 2000 was crap like No Child Left Behind.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:10 (twelve years ago)
most honorable classic example i can think of would be la follette leading filibuster against US entrance into WW1. struggling to think of a more recent example where it's been used well.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:10 (twelve years ago)
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:10 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
you realize the house passed cap and trade right, once again see the problem w using the everything is fucked heuristic in place of actual knowledge, opium is meh imho fwiw
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:17 (twelve years ago)
what are you talking about, cruz filibuster (well, long speech, technically) made him a huge hero and laid the groundwork for whipping the house into the shutdown
Yeah, how'd that work out for them? If it wasn't for the ACA's unforced error they'd still be in the ropes. To mix sports metaphors.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:18 (twelve years ago)
struggling to think of a more recent example where it's been used well.
http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/mr_smith_goes_to_washington_61073-1920x1200-600x300.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:19 (twelve years ago)
yeah. cruz and rand paul doing their one-man filibusters was a deliberate echo of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and had no other purpose than to generate publicity. as legislative tactics, they were pointless nonsense. if we went through a period where this happened with any regularity, that aura would soon vanish and people would start to see it more clearly as vapid posturing. the spectacle of a talking filibuster is only compelling for its current novelty, not any inherent drama.
― Aimless, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:20 (twelve years ago)
crazy that one event didn't totally turn the tide, mustve not worked at all then
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:20 (twelve years ago)
josh, your statement was "If the fallout from Cruz's theatrical buffoonery showed anything, it's that many legislators might think twice about making such a public ass of themselves over silly stuff, and save it for the big battles."
the fallout from cruz's theatrical buffoonery was that he got even more popular and powerful, so
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:21 (twelve years ago)
advocating for the talking filibuster is pretty hilarious it's like if there's one thing that clearly demonstrates what an absurd nonsensical practice it is
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:22 (twelve years ago)
we shd make them talk a lot be cut then theyll have to talk a lot and um um
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:23 (twelve years ago)
yeah, like, why would "ability to stand up bullshitting non-stop for 8+ hours at a stretch" be a characteristic you'd seek out in a legislator
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:24 (twelve years ago)
becuz politics are entertainment duh
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:24 (twelve years ago)
xpost Did he? I was under the impression Cruz's position and power has been weakened. I mean, he'll keep his seat, but that was a given.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:25 (twelve years ago)
lets not only continue the filibuster but make it take up more time and produce easy bs media ops yay
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:25 (twelve years ago)
filibuster motherfucker!http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_29_shKT4Elw/S2HlIkDMVgI/AAAAAAAAJXk/ZlX5qgy-eX8/s400/camachobbb.jpg
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:26 (twelve years ago)
I'd advocate for it because it is absurd and I don't think many people would do it. If you told me I could shovel shit by pressing delete on my computer all day, I'd do it. If you told me I had to actually grab a shovel, I'd think twice about volunteering.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:26 (twelve years ago)
his fellow senators think he's a blowhard asshole but the primary voter base and RW mediasphere love him. the first is not insignificant but the latter is huge.
xp
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:26 (twelve years ago)
Do you all think that if you had to do a stand til you drop filibuster every time you wanted to stop something, there'd be just as much stuff getting blocked? You think the Republicans would be doing OK if they were visibly holding things up, loudly and stupidly, all day every day, for months, rather than doing it from some back room? I think they'd get laughed out of office.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:28 (twelve years ago)
are we really making the case that Cruz has long term staying power because of that stunt? I'm not convinced.
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:29 (twelve years ago)
republicans are doing okay despite visibly holding things up loudly and stupidly for decades
― iatee, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:29 (twelve years ago)
he might stay, but he's not gonna get anything accomplished legislatively
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:29 (twelve years ago)
xpost No, man, I mean actually doing shit like reading Green Eggs and Ham for hours.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:31 (twelve years ago)
(Which for all I know is how most of them spend their time, anyway, brushing up on the ol' phonics)
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:32 (twelve years ago)
they spend most of their time fundraising.
I think they'd get laughed out of office.
i think you're a little naive frankly
besides, sen. reid chose to skip right past this delightful compromise position so idk why we're gaming it out
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:33 (twelve years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:28 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
thing youre not considering is the quorum of democrats has to be there the whole time to vote when you give up, it sounds all nice and cinematic but when you really think abt it its deeply silly and untenable, senators are busy raising money and jerking each other off they dont have time for this sort of thing
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:34 (twelve years ago)
yes exactly, they all know the job is 100 old people on the phone all day
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:36 (twelve years ago)
nah, all it needs is one bored senator in the chair to send out the quorum call when the lad or lass drops.
― Aimless, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:36 (twelve years ago)
Nobody hangs out in the Senate anymore; that's why Cruz can read Dr. Seuss for hours.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:36 (twelve years ago)
they still have to be nearby
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:37 (twelve years ago)
they send out the quorum call and another senator starts their own filibuster it's dum who cares the filibuster is in its last days it doesnt require hairbrained never gonna happen schemes
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:39 (twelve years ago)
btw for everyone itt who doubted my predictions over the years that the end of the filibuster was near bow down and suck my nuts
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:40 (twelve years ago)
filibuster deez
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:41 (twelve years ago)
Lets get those DC Circuit vacancies filled
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/11/21/another-reason-for-filibuster-reform-it-will-help-dems-crack-down-on-wall-street/
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:42 (twelve years ago)
"crack down" on Wall Street is comically absurd
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:42 (twelve years ago)
Do we need to list all the high level officials on Team Obama both present and past who worked there?
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:43 (twelve years ago)
I guess since we're on the subject of political theater, we might as well pretend that Dems WILL GET SER-EE-US ABOUT WALL STREET.
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:44 (twelve years ago)
fwiw wall st already p mad re current levels of cracking down, which says more abt their extreme entitlement than anything but still
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:54 (twelve years ago)
but still, there is no cracking down
j0e u don't make any fucking sense when you pick at my "heuristics"
bye, no nuts for me
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:55 (twelve years ago)
I make ALL the sense
― lag∞n, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:56 (twelve years ago)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/11/21/nuclear_option_obama_was_for_filibusters_before_he_was_for_it.html
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:03 (twelve years ago)
he;ll be back to suck nuts
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:03 (twelve years ago)
It's going to be great when someone asks Jay Carney about that at a presser.
Well, not really. Who gives a shit anyway.
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:15 (twelve years ago)
there's nothing scandalous about changing your views on the filibuster after republicans decided to filibuster literally everything
― iatee, Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:17 (twelve years ago)
totally
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:22 (twelve years ago)
hey conservatives, talk about miguel estrada some more, it's really turning me around on this *makes jerky offy motion*
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:22 (twelve years ago)
That's pretty much exactly what I meant? It's so silly and untenable, and not nice and cinematic, that if it were the norm, it would not happen much, because everyone - inc. the filibuster-er - has better things to do with their time. I suspect one reason things got out of control is that senators were allowed to multi-task while folks dithered around with cloture rather than stand there and talk.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:34 (twelve years ago)
opium is meh imho fwiw
never trust a guy who doesn't love opium tbh
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:47 (twelve years ago)
http://fimgs.net/images/perfume/nd.93.jpg
aero otm, shit gets me AMPED
― goole, Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:52 (twelve years ago)