or disprove
lol, sorry gr8080 didn't meant to imply that u r not funny :)
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 5 November 2013 02:43 (twelve years ago)
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ailbhemalone/16-bitstrips-that-will-restore-your-faith-in-bitstrips
(Spoiler Alert: Your faith in bitstrips will not be restored.)
― pplains, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 02:45 (twelve years ago)
i dont think ive seen one of these but ive seen a lot of complaining abt them
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 02:48 (twelve years ago)
i see more buzzfeed links in my fb feed than bitstrips
― sarahell, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 02:52 (twelve years ago)
everything itt and what i see on my wife's FB make me 10000 times more grateful i axed this shit from my lyfe
― shiny trippy people holding bandz (m bison), Tuesday, 5 November 2013 03:00 (twelve years ago)
jesus mary and joseph
― snoop dogey doge (seandalai), Tuesday, 5 November 2013 03:03 (twelve years ago)
A friend made several bitstrips not of him but of me, posted them on my wall, they were fucked up and wierd, eyes going in different directions, etc.
That was about a month and a half ago: now, there are sincere bit-strippers popping up everywhere in my feed
― cardamon, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 03:35 (twelve years ago)
Was just thinking of the ethical ramifications of making bit strips out of ilxors.
― pplains, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 03:57 (twelve years ago)
yes that's where i was headed
― ᶓ͠סּᴥ͠סּᶔ ᶓͼ᷆ₓͼ᷇ᶔ (gr8080), Tuesday, 5 November 2013 11:41 (twelve years ago)
my faith in bitstrips was not restored by that buzzfeed thing, no. but i did first come across it via some friends who actually made good, funny use of it, so when it picked up in ever-increasingly banal ways it was tough to take.
― Merdeyeux, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 11:55 (twelve years ago)
Annoyed at that damned e-mail; why the dumb-down to call it 'info' rather than 'information'?
― hatcat marnell (suzy), Tuesday, 5 November 2013 12:52 (twelve years ago)
https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/q71/s720x720/1391968_416242978498053_1417226875_n.jpg
― pplains, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 14:22 (twelve years ago)
If I'm getting the context of these bitstrips correct, I think my facebook friend is getting a divorce.
Or is into glory holes
― cardamon, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 14:45 (twelve years ago)
bitstrips, christ.
I use Facebook for pics of my kid 80% of the time, which probably annoys everyone I know that doesn't have kids. I also just assume that eventually Facebook is just going to be people posting into a void because everyone will have hidden everyone else's news feed.
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 5 November 2013 14:51 (twelve years ago)
i dont have kids and i enjoy pictures of kids and stories abt kids, especailly when its abt kids saying hilarious weird shit, i think this is prob a p commonly held opinion, its when it gets into mommy wars parenting culture type stuff thats super tedious
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 16:53 (twelve years ago)
for instance a friend of mines post yesterday
I feel like I'm homeless because you won't let me watch any TV ~[childs name redacted]
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 16:54 (twelve years ago)
― kinder, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 19:04 (twelve years ago)
as in, I only got annoyed with ppl moaning about them - filling my feed with shit about what they can see in THEIR feed.Now I've seen the bitstrips for myself. I am not impressed.
― kinder, Tuesday, 5 November 2013 19:05 (twelve years ago)
These are a bit too Comic Sans User for my liking.
― hatcat marnell (suzy), Tuesday, 5 November 2013 19:17 (twelve years ago)
xposts to al leong: if Facebook was ONLY pictures of yr babby, that would be a fine thing :)
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 6 November 2013 03:34 (twelve years ago)
So some kind of new look this morning.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Thursday, 7 November 2013 05:26 (twelve years ago)
oh hang on, it's this graph search thing.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Thursday, 7 November 2013 05:42 (twelve years ago)
90% of my facebook posts are kid pix, its just the most convenient place to put them where relatives will see
graph is lol but ~useful~
― buzza, Thursday, 7 November 2013 05:46 (twelve years ago)
who hacked your account?
― markers, Thursday, 7 November 2013 08:42 (twelve years ago)
Check out what you've shared in the past—and who can see that info—by going to your activity log.
This was helpful information in that it made me go back and realize that all sorts of things were set to "public" that I had repeatedly set to "friends" but had obviously been changed during one or another update that I ignored.
The whole weird cat-and-mouse privacy game with Facebook seems like a new experience on the consumer landscape, but I guess is just a natural evolutionary step along the chain toward eventually encoding advertising in your DNA.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Friday, 8 November 2013 03:46 (twelve years ago)
i just assume its all public, much easier
― lag∞n, Friday, 8 November 2013 04:13 (twelve years ago)
Ive never had my privacy settings changed by a FB update.
― taxi tomato or bag tomato (Trayce), Friday, 8 November 2013 04:18 (twelve years ago)
Sure, and also it's not like it even matters because who's going to bother to look? It's more the unease of finding a window unlocked that you're sure you locked than the fear that anything's actually been stolen.
I didn't think I had either. I think a lot of this is just an inexorable push toward making everything public all the time -- which I don't mind so much as the persistent sense of duplicity around the whole enterprise.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Friday, 8 November 2013 04:27 (twelve years ago)
fb is def horrible and shady dont get me wrong
― lag∞n, Friday, 8 November 2013 04:37 (twelve years ago)
I want to promote a study (for teens with autism) to the parents of potential participants. I asked a work study student to look for appropriate local/national listservs, websites, etc. She just emailed me to ask about Facebook and kijiji and craigslist. I'm down with kijiji and craigslist, but... this is embarrassing... how would this be done on Facebook? Just post stuff to the timelines of relevant local orgs? That feels like spamming. Am I just old?
― ljubljana, Friday, 29 November 2013 02:45 (twelve years ago)
I think it would be okay to post a relevant study to autism orgs on fb.
― Mordy , Friday, 29 November 2013 03:16 (twelve years ago)
I guess orgs that don't want us to do that would have their timelines locked down so that only their friends can post?
― ljubljana, Friday, 29 November 2013 03:30 (twelve years ago)
Yeah, and if they don't like the link they can always remove it later.
― Mordy , Friday, 29 November 2013 03:38 (twelve years ago)
*prepares the annoyingly chirpy-voiced study announcement*
― ljubljana, Friday, 29 November 2013 03:39 (twelve years ago)
I've always had a policy of not adding colleagues on FB. Can you still add people on a 'limited profile' or similar now? Settings have changed 89089 times since I last thought about it. I guess you have to just specify for everything you post if you want it viewable by all friends or specific groups? (Don't care much about existing stuff, just don't want to have to second-guess anything I post or comments from friends etc)
― kinder, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:54 (twelve years ago)
you can do all sorts of grouping iirc but since facebook is just gonna change it a million times its best imo to assume that everyone will see everything
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:55 (twelve years ago)
yeah that's kind of my thinking
― kinder, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:57 (twelve years ago)
When I add someone I don't know so well, I stick them straight into "Acquaintances". This means they don't see any of the more personal posts, that are published to "Friends except acquaintances."
― mike t-diva, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:57 (twelve years ago)
i just let everyone see my incredible posts
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:01 (twelve years ago)
even friends of friends
I just stopped posting to Facebook because I don't know who I'm talking to any more.
― cristalnacht (lukas), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:13 (twelve years ago)
I post my dumb babble and assume that whoever sees it and is tired of me will just block/unfriend me so w/e
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 21:03 (twelve years ago)
thanks mike, that's an optionmy reasoning for no colleages: most ppl don't have the same sense of humour as me and I never want to have to work out whether any work-related stuff could be down to something I've said on FB. Plus my mates can be obscene on my posts. TBH the main reason is once you add one colleague they all pile on and I don't like having ppl I don't really like on FB. So far everyone who's actually requested is a good work friend anyway.
― kinder, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 21:28 (twelve years ago)
thread cd do with more Kristie tbh
― UK Cop Humour (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 9 January 2014 10:48 (twelve years ago)
i'm with Serena SInclair.
― ronnie jotten (color definition point of "beyond "color, eg a transient that), Thursday, 9 January 2014 11:23 (twelve years ago)
Does anyone else have the "trending" feature?
― ^ enlightening post (sarahell), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 00:06 (twelve years ago)
yes
― markers, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 00:07 (twelve years ago)
is the point to just get users to spend more time on facebook and use it as a resource for "all internet things"?
― ^ enlightening post (sarahell), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 00:09 (twelve years ago)
for the past couple of days or so, every time i want to open a new message or send one it does it in a crappy little chat window which sucks if you write a message longer than two sentences. my chat is turned off for a reason fb, it's because it sucks. anyone have this and/or knows how to deactivate that so that it works like before?
― Jibe, Thursday, 23 January 2014 16:16 (twelve years ago)