oh also prophet of kruphix is awesome and should be worth something eventually even if it doesn't stick in a standard deck
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 14:14 (twelve years ago)
i would rather play reynad's naya deck if i'm going to play a red control deck, i think it looks better than this one
idk he has approximately 34 planeswalker cards in there for some reason none of which seem to compliment each other and the mana looks pretty terrible. fwiw i am completely willing to be wrong abt this and loxodon smiter seems like kind of a sweet card to be playing but i prefer the boros lists. there have been a couple of cleaner 4-0 lists in the last couple of days that added elspeth and i think its a deck to watch
i bought swan songs on mtgo on the chance that its an important sideboard card in eternal match-ups and its like ten cents or something. thats my speculation
― Lamp, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 14:22 (twelve years ago)
yeah thinking about it more i think its probably right to just play RW buti still don't like ash zealot unless you're running purphoros and/or nykthos
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 14:54 (twelve years ago)
i also wish there was 1 more way to go deeper into your deck other than chandra + magma jet
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 15:19 (twelve years ago)
haha me too. wish there was something of value to do w/wild guess other than run the not very good rn pyromancer
― Lamp, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 15:25 (twelve years ago)
purphomancer decks w/assemble just fold to like, everything though rn but man that feels sweet
― Lamp, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 15:26 (twelve years ago)
do any of you MTG nerds play on OCTGN?
― Mordy , Wednesday, 23 October 2013 18:24 (twelve years ago)
nope
cockatrice is the current standard for free MTG-ing, as far as i know. dont know anyone who still uses OCTGN
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 19:07 (twelve years ago)
whoa
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/other/10212013/vintagemasters
essentially power 9 cards are coming, but they're basically as rare as foil mythics, and the set itself is gonna be double MSRP. dunno how this is going to be much different than Masters Edition
― frogbs, Thursday, 24 October 2013 01:28 (twelve years ago)
here's what i'm working on for standard now:
4 elvish mystic4 experiment one4 burning-tree emissary4 kalonian tusker2 scavenging ooze4 boon satyr4 reverent hunter4 ghor-clan rampager3 nylea, god of the hunt1 polukranos, world eater
3 domri rade
4 stomping ground4 temple of abandon2 mountain12 forest1 nykthos, shrine to nyx
sideboard:4 mistcutter hydra3 nylea's disciple1 polukranos, world eater2 flesh//blood2 time to feed2 garruk, caller of beasts1 bow of nylea
basically trying to build the best ghor-clan rampager deck since that card is way underplayed right now. blood is also awesome and should maybe just be maindeck, it's only bad vs supreme verdict decks.
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 15:56 (twelve years ago)
looks like it would be fun to play. is there no room for savageborn hydra?
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 16:56 (twelve years ago)
i like arbor colossus a lot in those r/g lists
― Lamp, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:43 (twelve years ago)
this deck's too aggro for either of those, its not the ramp deck where you're generating a ton of mana
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:47 (twelve years ago)
idk if you cant play a 6/6 for 5 in yr elvish mystic deck than
― Lamp, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:49 (twelve years ago)
also if if you're playing 3 nyleas it seems good? i am terrible w/ r/g decks though, i could not find any success w/domri decks last season
― Lamp, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:50 (twelve years ago)
yeah i might try it but i want to be more compact i think. mana efficiency seems to be the key to beating the sea of mono-black attrition decks
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:59 (twelve years ago)
yeah monoblack is everywhere online despite it not being that good in the meta. i dont really like that deck and have been playing both u/w control decks w/prognostic sphinx and variations on r/w control to some success. i really, really like the u/w list but its not a deck that i enjoy playing esp because of the uptick in control mirrors over the last week. the r/w list is more fun but kinda loose.
― Lamp, Wednesday, 30 October 2013 18:13 (twelve years ago)
http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/silvestri-says-stats/
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 14:43 (twelve years ago)
yeah i saw that - biggest takeaway i can find so far is that sea god's revenge is incredibly overvalued, several 'bad' commons are outperforming it in this sample
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 14:57 (twelve years ago)
or maybe not, i misinterpreted how the scoring works here, but it still seems like its worse than the good commons and good cheaper uncommons
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:02 (twelve years ago)
it really depends on your deck. a fast uw deck doesn't really want it more than another heroic trigger, but for other decks it's regularly a blowout.
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:03 (twelve years ago)
also although the ordeals have a high win % they also have a high 'this is why you lost' factor when you get lightning striked
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:06 (twelve years ago)
I keep complaining to lamp about them, I think they are the biggest mistake in the format
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:07 (twelve years ago)
yeah ordeals are some of the most swingy high risk/high reward cards we've gotten in a while
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:08 (twelve years ago)
also i am reasonably certain now that nimbus naiad is the best common, stats be damned
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:09 (twelve years ago)
I wouldn't take it over voyage's end or lightning strike but yeah...it's really good...
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:10 (twelve years ago)
I'd take it over Voyage's End at least!
Sea God - yes it definitely seems a little overrated. My first thought was that it was almost an Uncommon Cyclonic Rift but THS is faster than RTR and doesn't have a token strategy, plus the sorcery speed really does hamper it. As good as it can be I think it fits into that category of "expensive + situational" which does not make for great limited cards.
― frogbs, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:15 (twelve years ago)
I seem to get murdered by the Ordeals over and over - turn 2 play on a Hoplite is nearly unbeatable unless you have the Voyage's End right then and there. I'm surprised that anyone would diss the Hoplite, it's a 1-drop that's revelant late game and is really hard to block.
― frogbs, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:16 (twelve years ago)
ehh come draft w/ me and give me all the voyage's ends and sea god's revenges
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:16 (twelve years ago)
yeah stupid ordeal wins are (among) the reasons why lightning strike and end are even better than normal
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:17 (twelve years ago)
I'm fully aware of the strength of Voyage's End, just that my evaluation of the 3 strongest commons are Lightning Strike/Nimbus Naiad/Voyage's End. The Naiad just does so much in this set, I think just in general I tend to value proactive cards over reactive ones. Maybe to a fault.
― frogbs, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:39 (twelve years ago)
the numbers actually push god's willing ahead of all of those
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:39 (twelve years ago)
i don't like the rescaling by CMC for cards with 1-4 CMC since its rare to be able to win a game where you don't hit 4 regardless of how many cheap spells you have
i think gods willing is the 2nd best white common but there's no way it's better than wingsteed rider.
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 15:42 (twelve years ago)
i think satyr hedonist is the burning-tree emissary of this set. way stronger card than it looks on the surface, lots of big red mana costs that are devastating when used a couple turns earlier than you're supposed to― ciderpress, Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:40 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― ciderpress, Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:40 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 16:56 (twelve years ago)
yeah i agree, the reweighting by cmc is superflawed. also agree that rider is better than gods willing. i also take eidolon over willing. in the comments to that article someone suggests a better way of weighting the win % and he and his friend rejig their formula a bit. i think those results are probably better although its still annoying to be basically guessing at these likelihoods.
― Lamp, Friday, 1 November 2013 16:57 (twelve years ago)
haha fwiw i have used hedonist that way exactly once
my friend tried to convince me it was great and so I tried it exactly once and ramped into a 5 and got voyage's ended immediately and now I will never do it again
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:00 (twelve years ago)
well i was talking about constructed there
but i completely missed on nykthos doing the same thing without having to play or throw away a 2/1
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:03 (twelve years ago)
in limited its basically there to threaten monstrous early so you can attack your ill-tempered cyclops into a 4/4 on turn 5 or whatever. pretty circumstantial for it to matter
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:05 (twelve years ago)
what is this...constructed...you speak of
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:05 (twelve years ago)
constructed is an awful timesink, please continue to ignore it. don't end up like me, devoting actual brainpower towards single-set block constructed and the like
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:14 (twelve years ago)
I'm slowly trading towards a modern deck
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:16 (twelve years ago)
which one? modern is actually pretty sweet, probably my favorite format though i'm finally getting tired of birthing pod and shopping around for a new deck to learn now
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:17 (twelve years ago)
uwr
which I know isn't very t1 atm but it's just how I like to play magic
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:17 (twelve years ago)
cool, uwr not my style but like jund it's always a safe bet to be playable
the zendikar fetchlands are probably the worst part of modern now, i'm feeling pretty dumb for trading some away before they rotated from standard. had to buy them back later at like 25 bucks each instead of 10 and they're even higher now
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:21 (twelve years ago)
yeah I have a friend in my edh group that has full sets of them and he's cool w/ sharing so I think I might just build the deck minus those and borrow for an event
― iatee, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:23 (twelve years ago)
cause spending $50 on a scalding tarn seems like a bad investment
yeah it seems very likely to get a reprint within the next few years, either in a modern masters 2, or a zendikar 2 since zendikar seems like the most likely set to get a sequel other than the inevitable ravnica 3.
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:31 (twelve years ago)
its pretty weird in retrospect how zendikar was the set that saved magic commercially despite being a mediocre-to-bad limited format. i guess quality of limited play is just not that correlated with overall sales though.
― ciderpress, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:39 (twelve years ago)
iatee and i have talked about this - i would bet actual money on a reprint of zendikar and onslaught in the fall 2015 block. i'm not sure if they'll do zen II set but 2015 would be the same gap btw zen and zen II as they had btw rav and rtr. and it gives people enough of a break from shocks and 'good mana' in standard. and fetches are the biggest barrier to wider adoption of the modern format imo. mm 2 also showed that reprints of high-value utility cards don't hurt the price of original printings that much so people that have sunk money into onslaught fetches won't lose too much, they will still command a premium.
― Lamp, Friday, 1 November 2013 17:46 (twelve years ago)