Richard Dawkins - Anti -Christ or Great Thinker?

“Brash. Uncompromising. Brilliant. Hilarious. Pat Condell has found a simple formula for success: stating the obvious without restraining himself with the conventions of unwarranted piety. Pat flenses sacred cows, and after slicing away the fat and gristle of tired apologetics and mindless tradition, he exposes the hollow carcass of a culture’s hypocrisy…and we laugh.” – PZ Myers, ScienceBlogs.com/Pharyngula

NTSC All Region
1 DVD
Run Time: 180 minutes

Subtitles: none

Episodes:
01 – Introduction
02 – Hello America – 18 February 07
03 – What have I got against religion? – 04 March 07
04 – The trouble with Islam – 16 March 07
05 – What do I believe? – 28 March 07
06 – Happy Easter – 05 April 07
07 – Absolute certainty – 13 April 07
08 – Religion in the UK – 17 April 07
09 – In Jesus’ name – 25 April 07
10 – United States of Jesus – 03 May 07
11 – Why are we friends with Saudi Arabia? – 14 May 07
12 – Am I a racist? – 20 May 07
13 – Miracles and morals – 29 May 07
14 – Catholic morality – 04 June 07
15 – Origin of the species – 13 June 07
16 – The myth of Islamophobia – 21 June 07
17 – What about the Jews? – 29 June 07
18 – Politics and religion – 10 July 07
19 – Why does faith deserve respect? – 19 July 07
20 – God bless atheism – 03 August 07
21 – Islam in Europe – 17 August 07
22 – Unholy scripture – 31 August 07
23 – Video response to Osama – 11 September 07
24 – Hello angry Christians – 25 September 07
25 – More demands from Islam – 09 October 07
26 – What’s good about religion? – 23 October 07
27 – Was Jesus gay? – 02 November 07
28 – A word to Islamofascists – 14 November 07
29 – Why debate dogma? – 27 November 07
30 – Laugh at Sudan – 03 December 07
31 – Pimping for Jesus – 18 December 07
32 – Partying with Baby Jesus – 24 December 07
33 – Hook, line and rapure – 08 January 08
34 – O dhimmi Canada – 19 January 08
35 – God the psycho – 02 February 08

oh good something for everyone

a simple formula for success: stating the obvious

TRUTH BOMB

12 – Am I a racist? – 20 May 07

wait, i know this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz4PjxSmtoI

17 – What about the Jews? – 29 June 07

finally someone answers the Jewish question

That video. Good grief. All you can do with someone like that is try to stay far away from them.

pat condell was put on this earth by god to reveal the true, full & awful character of richard dawkins

If he weren't allowed to make those videos, he'd probably chew his own arm off out of the sheer need to chew on something.

jfc the strawmanning

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bin-laden-has-won-they-confiscated-my-honey-outspoken-academic-richard-dawkins-in-airline-security-twitter-row-over-jar-of-honey-8919618.html

Thankfully, Twitter is full of people pointing out how easily he could have got round the problem. Which he did know about, being such a frequent flier and considering how long the rules have been in place.

he used the phrase "Bin Laden has won" not once but twice. Predicting that he'll be in a straight jacket saying that over and over by the end of the day.

blaming bin laden won't bring back his precious honey

"Dawkins thought the honey just appeared from nowhere. Imagine his surprise when he found out it was created by Bees."

I would have once said that criticism of his style was just 'ad hominem' and not addressing his arguments, but now I think that the way you choose to express yourself is in itself an actual part of your message and if you come across as a twat that is definitely a real problem.

about 75% of my twitter feed right now consists of people trolling dawkins on the topic of honey. i approve.

cool friends

http://oi42.tinypic.com/35bfgp4.jpg

criticised what he called ‘dundridges’ - his word for petty jobsworths

not helping, man

Dawkins has spoken in support of Pat Condell hasn't he? I want to be sure of this though, may be confusing with Myers

I would have once said that criticism of his style was just 'ad hominem' and not addressing his arguments, but now I think that the way you choose to express yourself is in itself an actual part of your message and if you come across as a twat that is definitely a real problem.

Well, his choice of strong adjectives when describing religion – a lot of 'barbaric', 'backward' and so on – is both a matter of style and message, in that 'barbaric' implies there is something called barbarism and 'backward' implies there is something called progress.

Pretty sure that The Dawk and Pat Condell are bffs - the Dawkins Foundation site plugs Condell's bullshit. Also they - a foundation for "Reason & Science" gave Bill Maher (vaccine denier and fellow shithead) an award of some sort.

Aha, so it really is like that.

I wonder what conversation is like between those two. Does Condell sit there rubbing his hands at having convinced a useful rube, or is he like a true believer himself

thick ignorant cunts probly enjoy each others back-up i wd guess

the whole honey matter is second rate compared to this tweet: https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/389432783304548352

"his sign said not" wtf Dorks??

http://static1.fjcdn.com/comments/4755254+_a8a82276dbeb5898a47157d54c7b88d9.jpg

LOL

brilliant trolling by someone

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkens

http://www.scotsman.com/news/celebrity/mosque-attack-conviction-mad-richard-dawkins-1-3455037

Dawkins sides with the SDL on religious hate crimes against Muslims.

I like the ambiguity of the URL.

jesus this guy.

if i ever became a top oxford don with strings of postnominals, the first thing i'd do was try as quickly as possible to become a banal sub-clarkson/littlejohn type figure.

i'd have a sticker on my car that said 'my other professor's a nick ferrari'

I hate the neologism "owned" for "scored a victory over". I have no intention of owning anyone, and nobody will ever own me.

oh Richardpaws

if Dick doesn't do the important scientific work of drawing up a scale for degrees of sexual assault, who will?

he's done this before anyway i think, clearly wants to take away some of the hysteria from sexual abuse carried out in a loving environment

lol then Mr Religion Is For Morons complains about the internet being full of absolutists

"I'm just creating a really creepy hierarchy, what's wrong with you people?"

he's the vociferous but not very bright punter at a night-school philosophy class

He's a fucking prick.

dick dorkins

i think he's just lonely and craving attention tbh, i can't think of any other explanation for his bizarre addiction to making these kinds of statements on Twitter. he surely knows that they're offensive and hurtful, and presumably doesn't care about "the kind of people" he's seeking to hurt. but why he thinks Twitter is the ideal format for his bluff pronouncements on "logic" - WHICH FAIL AT BASIC LOGIC FOR THE MOST PART - god only knows. i get that some people crave publicity but his lack of self-awareness, his sheer foolishness (irrespective of whether you agree with his fundamental arguments he frequently makes them in the weakest, stupidest ways possible) - it's baffling. and hilarious, obv.

this guy is an embarrassment to his profession

Maybe his profession is to be an ignorant arsehole? He doesn't seem to have done anything else for decades.

I think he has zero emotional intelligence and really thinks he's being daring through challenging opinions

ffs can we at least get a link for lols

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10998498/Richard-Dawkins-in-storm-over-mild-date-rape-tweets.html