"The Senator's proboscis did not twitch at all."
― cops on horse (WilliamC), Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:22 (twelve years ago)
Standard Obama day after talk:
Obama called on Congress to resist “pressure from the extremes” and “understand that how business is done in this town has to change.” He urged lawmakers to pursue a “balanced” long-term budget and pass comprehensive immigration reform and a new farm bill.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/government-reopens-thursday-after-congress-passes-budget-deal-raises-debt-limit/2013/10/17/dbe7889a-371b-11e3-80c6-7e6dd8d22d8f_story.html?hpid=z1
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 17 October 2013 17:26 (twelve years ago)
yeah i happened to catch a lil piece of that as i was flipping around and i was just like aw dude still
― lag∞n, Thursday, 17 October 2013 17:27 (twelve years ago)
I'm not a big fan of focus groups but...
"FOX is about the middle. (Evangelical man, Roanoke)[Fox News is] about the only one that gives you both sides. (Evangelical man, Roa- noke)I don’t think they’re trying to make the news. I think they’re trying to report the news. It seems like everybody else is trying to make the news. (Evangelical man, Roanoke)"
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 17 October 2013 17:39 (twelve years ago)
both sides: right and wrong!
― ryan, Thursday, 17 October 2013 17:40 (twelve years ago)
lying and wrong
― lag∞n, Thursday, 17 October 2013 17:41 (twelve years ago)
Same 'ol, same 'ol
The most likely path to replacing part of the sequester is to make cuts to mandatory spending — such as health-care programs. On a practical level, Republicans and Democrats agree that mandatory spending is better to cut because it’s the long-term driver of U.S. debt.
But any discussion of significant changes to mandatory spending usually leads Democrats to insist on new taxes, which has been a deal breaker for the GOP.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/shutdown-deal-averts-catastrophe-but-leaves-the-economy-in-peril/2013/10/16/9734ba18-367d-11e3-80c6-7e6dd8d22d8f_story_1.html
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:21 (twelve years ago)
interesting that there has been zero chatter about Boehner losing his Speakership. Not sure how he does it, it's kind of remarkable.
TPM makes it sound like we'll be back in this same situation in January.
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:26 (twelve years ago)
these people are so fucking stupid I cant handle it
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) threw verbal punches at each other Wednesday night and Thursday morning, respectively, in an ongoing tiff between the two lawmakers.
On Wednesday, McCain said Gohmert had "no intelligence" in response to Gohmert's charge that McCain is an al-Qaeda supporter.
"Sometimes comments like that are made out of malice, but if someone has no intelligence I don't feel it as being a malicious statement," McCain said on NBC News. "But yes, there's polarization here, and there's a lack of civility."
Gohmert responded Thursday, saying that McCain "would be better off with 'no intelligence.'"
"Obviously, Senator McCain would be better off with ‘no intelligence’ since he does not know the Syrian opposition he met with is infested with al-Qaeda and terrorist kidnappers," Gohmert said in a statement to the Daily Beast. "His 'intelligence' even caused him to support the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt that burned churches and killed Christians, as the senator stood against the will of the massive majority of Egyptians including moderate Muslims, Christians, and secularists who demanded the Muslim Brotherhood extremist persecutions must end."
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:26 (twelve years ago)
rawr hiss hiss
― lag∞n, Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:28 (twelve years ago)
it seems like the TP reps blame the moderate reps (and not, say, Boehner himself) for capitulating? I guess Boehner has made them feel secure enough that he's just reflecting the will of the majority of his caucus, allowing him to stay in place.
xp
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:28 (twelve years ago)
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2013/10/17/Four-Lessons-GOP-Shutdown-Wars
pretty good rundown
― goole, Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:44 (twelve years ago)
gohmert kinda otm about mccain fraternizing w/ terrorists
― Mordy , Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:50 (twelve years ago)
the correct term is "palling around with" i believe
― goole, Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:51 (twelve years ago)
http://media.salon.com/2011/03/Picture_8.png
― pplains, Thursday, 17 October 2013 18:58 (twelve years ago)
Obama & Netanyahu to thread
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 October 2013 19:00 (twelve years ago)
I'm sure McCain knows many wealthy ranch owners in Arizona who'd feel right at home with Qadhafi's basic worldview.
― Aimless, Thursday, 17 October 2013 19:06 (twelve years ago)
It's awesome how we can return to cutting Medicare and Social Security benefits after a 14-day furlough.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 October 2013 19:31 (twelve years ago)
xxp I think I understand your point but surely you can't expect Bibi to snub the President of the United States
― Mordy , Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:04 (twelve years ago)
i hope we repeal the obama partial repeal of the bush tax cuts soon, too. the job creators must be feeling really uncertain after all this
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:08 (twelve years ago)
peal everything then repeal everything
― lag∞n, Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:11 (twelve years ago)
repeel obamacare
mmmmmm
― reckless woo (Z S), Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:16 (twelve years ago)
peel obamacare, blanche, dry, bread, deep fry
― lag∞n, Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:18 (twelve years ago)
we’re not going to be disrespected. we have to get something out of this. and I don’t know what that even is
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:20 (twelve years ago)
#bananapeel
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:22 (twelve years ago)
Yeah, that "not going to be disrespected" quote. How else do you expect to be treated when you throw a tantrum?
― Aimless, Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:30 (twelve years ago)
greeted as liberators?
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:37 (twelve years ago)
if Boehner's job wasn't in jeopardy, what was the point of the last two weeks?
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:50 (twelve years ago)
Someone deport this guy back to England.
One way out of this would be for Obama to go big, to propose in these new talks a Bowles-Simpson-style deal in which major tax reform and entitlement cuts are exchanged for much higher revenues. If the GOP were a genuinely conservative party, actually interested in long-term government solvency and reform within our current system of government, they would jump at this. They could claim to have reduced tax rates, even if the net result were higher taxes. And the brutal fact is that, given simply our demographics, higher taxes are going to be necessary if we are to avoid gutting our commitments to the seniors of tomorrow. They could concede that and climb down from this impossibly long limb they have constructed for themselves.
I’ve long favored a Grand Bargain, but recognize its huge political liabilities without the leadership of both parties genuinely wanting to get there. But for Obama, it seems to me, re-stating such a possibility and embracing it more than he has ever done, is a win-win.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 October 2013 21:09 (twelve years ago)
The most irritating thing to me is how systemic, ruthless, single-minded warfare on the poor and meek consistently gets portrayed as somehow embodying the ideals of Jesus Christ.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 17 October 2013 21:18 (twelve years ago)
Mcconnell's shorthand phrase for cutting Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security: "mandatory spending reductions"
“There is an openness on our side for trading mandatory spending reductions for sequester spending relief. So far, the Democrats’ view is no mandatory changes without taxes,” McConnell said.
Inside the Beltway and in mainstream and right-wing media everywhere one is not allowed to suggest that there are alternatives to cuts for addressing federal government expenditures for Medicare, Medicaid and Socila Security. Also, if cut supporters were asked how cutting government spending on these programs will address the problem of rising US healthcare costs what would they say? Just the standard cliche that promoting competition between private insurers across state lines and tort & malpractice law changes will somehow improve things (or that people just have to work harder and pay the higher bills)?
― curmudgeon, Friday, 18 October 2013 14:02 (twelve years ago)
tax hikes pay for themselves. say it majority leader reid
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 18 October 2013 14:09 (twelve years ago)
Pobrecitos
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/18/us/from-the-right-despair-anger-and-disillusion.html
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 October 2013 15:25 (twelve years ago)
Give'em hell, Harry!
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 October 2013 15:29 (twelve years ago)
I liked that NYT piece, showing how out of touch the conservative rantosphere is even with many hardcore Republicans. The sheer lunacy of still thinking this could ever have been a winning strategy.
― Deafening silence (DL), Friday, 18 October 2013 15:35 (twelve years ago)
I try to be sympathetic for them somehow and you know, no.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 October 2013 15:41 (twelve years ago)
Meantime, this'll be entertaining
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/senate-conservatives-fund-endorses-mcconnell-primary-challenger
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 October 2013 15:53 (twelve years ago)
All of this helps Alison Lundergan Grimes, right?
I also just saw a headline that said Palin was going to involve herself in the KY race, in support of Bevin I'd imagine.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 18 October 2013 16:09 (twelve years ago)
Pretty sure she won the KY race in "Who's Nailin' Palin."
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 October 2013 16:30 (twelve years ago)
"Ted Cruz is smart," Reid said. "He has always been able to talk down to people. He is now in the Senate. People are as smart as he is. He can't talk down to anyone anymore. But he has still not accepted that in his own head. He still thinks he's smarter than everybody else. He might be able to work a calculus problem better than I can. But he can't legislate better than I can."
reid gettin salty
― lag∞n, Friday, 18 October 2013 16:48 (twelve years ago)
What's up with all these smug Republicans with some mysterious reputation as super geniuses? Cruz, Ryan, Gingrich ... it's like the party is one part chumps like them and several parts chumps like Issa or Vitter, who are outright morons but don't give a fuck.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 October 2013 17:20 (twelve years ago)
well, "brilliant" is the Beltway's favorite adjective
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 October 2013 17:23 (twelve years ago)
well, 'brilliance' can imply either genius or a shining glory, or a combination of the two.
― Aimless, Friday, 18 October 2013 17:29 (twelve years ago)
fluency with received ideas
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 October 2013 17:29 (twelve years ago)
cruz s universally described as super intelligent by everyone whos ever met him starting way before he became a politician, he was the youngest person to ever argue before the supreme court and hes been generally just immensely successful even tho pretty much everyone whos ever met him hates him too
i imagine hes got an incredibly quick and logical mind, the sort that makes a super impressive debater, even if hes nowheresville on the self awareness scale, theres all sort different intelligences out there
if you look at the failure of the shutdown in legislative terms he doesnt seem too bright, but if you look at it as an attempt to brand himself as the last true conservative and seize political power based on that he was wildly successful, not to mention that his meal ticket is punched from here to infinity on the conservative think tank speaking fox news etc circut if he ever feels like retiring into a life of luxury and adulation
― lag∞n, Friday, 18 October 2013 17:32 (twelve years ago)
But really, aren't there like a hundred different ways to get on the nutty circuit. Surely, this was not one of the smartest ways...
― Frederik B, Friday, 18 October 2013 17:48 (twelve years ago)
...OR WAS IT?
― Nhex, Friday, 18 October 2013 17:49 (twelve years ago)
i'd say it was a pretty good calculation on his part. we've all seen so much heinous shit go down that has destroyed peoples lives and hurt our entire society, and people got rich from it, and absolutely nothing happened to them... except that person getting to live a life of luxury. and, that's probably what's going to happen with him. fame and luxury after nearly wrecking the world economy ... not a bad deal all around.
― Spectrum, Friday, 18 October 2013 17:53 (twelve years ago)
But he's a us senator, fame and luxury is hardly scarce commodities? Just seems dumb to me to wreck the economy to get something he could have easily gotten without making such a fuzz.
― Frederik B, Friday, 18 October 2013 17:58 (twelve years ago)
A PARLIAMENT OF WHORES AND TRAITORS
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/10/did-the-gop-establishment-just-curb-stomp-liberty/280680/
― goole, Friday, 18 October 2013 18:03 (twelve years ago)