i mean you guys can pretend the tea party is an ineffective joke that will be the downfall of the gop just you wait and that ows was an effective movement that made good points and stated their demands clearly and managed to get a broad cross section of american to stroke their chins and think 'hmm, these guys might be on to something' but i predict that winning races and continuing to win races and nearly and possibly eventually seizing control of one of two major political parties will count for more in the long run than a jeff mangum sighting.
― balls, Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:31 (twelve years ago)
at some point a presidential candidate is going to take advantage of the fact that the whole country feels ripped off by the rich, it would be cool if it was a democrat, if you want to compare that wildly popular position to a con man pandering to tea party wingnuts you are certainly welcome
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:31 (twelve years ago)
you could go ahead and look at polling on these issues if you want, or just pretend that only stinky hippies care that their moneys getting tooken my people who dont need it
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:33 (twelve years ago)
if you want to keep greeting every cortes that washes ashore hoping that maybe this time it's quetzalcoatl feel free. warren's no more the lib messiah than obama was and she's also not half the politician.
― balls, Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:35 (twelve years ago)
lol @ ameritocracy
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:35 (twelve years ago)
also might want to look into how the tea party has already affected the gops electoral results
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:35 (twelve years ago)
lagoon i could also show you polling supporting single payer national health care for over fifty years now. prediction: nobody will run and win on this issue in 2016 either.
― balls, Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:36 (twelve years ago)
cf gun control
― balls, Sunday, September 29, 2013 3:35 PM (24 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
im just daydreaming back to these threads in 07 when everyone was telling me hillary was a lock and obama had no chance
lol at liberal messiah tho, youre v smart and tough and realistic minded congratualtions
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:38 (twelve years ago)
― balls, Sunday, September 29, 2013 3:36 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yea please go right ahead
this is all the tea party's fault. buncha rubes! this has nothing to do with academia / the media / music / etc fucking up. maybe we should start a kickstarter?
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:39 (twelve years ago)
were you asleep the past two months?
"optics" don't fool me and I'm fucking off to baseball now
― Miss Arlington twirls for the Coal Heavers (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:43 (twelve years ago)
(does balls work for the Dem Party just like ethan?)
― Miss Arlington twirls for the Coal Heavers (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:44 (twelve years ago)
lol does ethan work for the dem party? yeesh we are fucked.
― balls, Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:46 (twelve years ago)
media critics of the world, unite
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 19:52 (twelve years ago)
you guys can pretend the tea party is an ineffective joke that will be the downfall of the gop just you wait
The tea party is not ineffective, nor a joke. Where the tea party has proved quite effective is capturing state legislatures and congressional districts, largely due to their control of legislatures. It has created electoral problems for the GOP at the level of the Senate and presidency, because these elections cannot be conducted purely outside of major metro areas.
and that ows was an effective movement that made good points and stated their demands clearly
OWS had very little impact on electoral politics, but it did do some good on issue-oriented politics, by temporarily disentangling populist economic issues of who wins and loses under the present regime from other, less broad-based, social justice issues. Then it got bogged back down in those other social justice issues and lost its edge.
― Aimless, Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:01 (twelve years ago)
obama spending $0 explaining the ACA is biting america's uninsured in the ass
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:04 (twelve years ago)
or not! i'm sure it's all planned. go media strategies
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:05 (twelve years ago)
there are tv ads running all over the country explaining the aca rn fwiw
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:05 (twelve years ago)
ACA passed how long ago?
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:06 (twelve years ago)
well its just being implemented now
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:07 (twelve years ago)
which was def a mistake!
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:08 (twelve years ago)
maybe there's a song about obamacare on the new arcade fire album
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:09 (twelve years ago)
general praktitioner
yeah the snl cold open was attacking obama for not explaining aca well enough and attacking aca in general for being a handout to lazy ppl who are just gonna get deliberately sick so they can get some free healthcare now you watch. it was pretty abysmal, shades of snl blaming the financial meltdown in 08 on pelosi and frank and lazy poor ppl buying mansions cuz the govt let them.
― balls, Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:14 (twelve years ago)
single payer
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:15 (twelve years ago)
i wonder what the numbers are on people who'd want single payer instead of R0mneycare. go team blue
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 29 September 2013 20:34 (twelve years ago)
Sure is a lotta Dem cup-rattling filling up my Junk folder.
ballsy, I did not sleep thru the '90s, my brain cells are dying quite naturally in the 2010s; you will forget your talking points when you're around 50, I promise.
― Miss Arlington twirls for the Coal Heavers (Dr Morbius), Monday, 30 September 2013 00:49 (twelve years ago)
somehow scanned "cup-rattling" as related to "ball-cupping"
― i too went to college (silby), Monday, 30 September 2013 00:50 (twelve years ago)
what are you on about now, Mobs?
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 30 September 2013 00:52 (twelve years ago)
Sure is a lotta dem ball-cuppings fiddling all up in my Junk folder.
― uriah heepster runoff (fake penthouse letters mcgee), Monday, 30 September 2013 00:56 (twelve years ago)
this Alfred: OMG the GOP is about to destroy us all, give us campaign funds for next year!!!!
― Miss Arlington twirls for the Coal Heavers (Dr Morbius), Monday, 30 September 2013 02:57 (twelve years ago)
why do get these emails who did you give money to
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, 30 September 2013 03:40 (twelve years ago)
if warren is a credible national candidate then watch out cuz ted cruz is a juggernaut then.
― balls, Sunday, September 29, 2013 3:23 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol terrible comparison
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Sunday, September 29, 2013 7:25 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
sleepy NPR host vs. weird scrunchy faced lawyer douchebag, seems pretty otm to me
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 30 September 2013 03:40 (twelve years ago)
you guys have weird ideas about what warren is like, almost like youre just making it up
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, 30 September 2013 03:46 (twelve years ago)
no I've totally seen the "Elizabeth Warren OWNS FOX NEWS" clips and shit and she's boring as fuck sorry bro
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 30 September 2013 03:49 (twelve years ago)
all evidence disagrees w you!
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, 30 September 2013 03:50 (twelve years ago)
Harry Reid gets elected over and over and he's the most boring person in the universe, being a Senator isn't so bad
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 30 September 2013 03:52 (twelve years ago)
tbf uncharismatic liberals from massachusetts have had a ton of success at the national level
― balls, Monday, 30 September 2013 03:55 (twelve years ago)
"all evidence" points to Ted Cruz being a guy who fires up the base, which was most of balls' point of comparison I imagine
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 30 September 2013 03:55 (twelve years ago)
harry reid isnt an internet celebrity who raised tons money from all over the country, I mean fine if you think shes just some sort of unelectable liberal phenom but calling her boring sounds suspiciously uniformed and deductive
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, 30 September 2013 03:57 (twelve years ago)
lol Cruz isn't boring either
29 years ago libs were fired up by Gerry Ferraro
― Miss Arlington twirls for the Coal Heavers (Dr Morbius), Monday, 30 September 2013 03:58 (twelve years ago)
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, September 30, 2013 3:57 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
no one said he was boring, he has a whole different set of electability issues
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 30 September 2013 03:59 (twelve years ago)
and like I said the comparison is poor cause warrens positions are popular and cruzes are not, the democrats also have a structural advantage with the presidential election which makes nominating someone a lil more partisan more viable than it would be if republicans did the same
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, 30 September 2013 04:00 (twelve years ago)
professor lady from mass must be like npr right fellas, bet she drives a VOLVO lol omg siiick, so insight such political
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, 30 September 2013 04:02 (twelve years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVNUFikwZDk
truly the next Huey Long right here, I was riveted
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 30 September 2013 04:04 (twelve years ago)
omg she didnt jump right out the tv on on cnbc like all the exciting politicians do
― ภค๓ครՇє (lag∞n), Monday, 30 September 2013 04:06 (twelve years ago)
i'd vote for elizabeth warren fwiw if that helps u guys out
― Clay, Monday, 30 September 2013 04:06 (twelve years ago)
now is the time for gentle argumentation that is barely louder than ambient noise and Elizabeth Warren is the vanguard
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 30 September 2013 04:09 (twelve years ago)