Well, it (and Gremlins) started the PG-13 rating.
― The Butthurt Locker (cryptosicko), Saturday, 3 August 2013 20:18 (ten years ago) link
Yeah, there was total fuss.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 3 August 2013 20:44 (ten years ago) link
Welp.
http://variety.com/2013/film/news/disney-acquires-indiana-jones-rights-from-paramount-1200927216/
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 December 2013 23:34 (ten years ago) link
How long til this gets handed over to J.J. Abrams?
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Saturday, 7 December 2013 00:15 (ten years ago) link
This is much worst news than Star Wars IMO.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Saturday, 7 December 2013 00:24 (ten years ago) link
agreed, either they keep making them w/ harrison ford which plz no or they start making them w/o harrison ford which god fucking no.
― balls, Saturday, 7 December 2013 02:24 (ten years ago) link
Oh, come on, isn't the answer obvious? http://img2-2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/080521/shia_l.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 7 December 2013 02:34 (ten years ago) link
― balls, Saturday, December 7, 2013 2:24 AM (1 hour ago)
Well if they were to come up with a really really good screenplay for one more film then obviously I wouldn't be complaining, but how likely is that to happen. Indiana Jones without Ford and Spielberg would not be Indiana Jones.
If they do spin-off films with his kid that wouldn't really bother me.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Saturday, 7 December 2013 03:45 (ten years ago) link
Me neither, cause then I'd have absolutely zero reason to see them.
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Saturday, 7 December 2013 04:18 (ten years ago) link
christ this reminds me i saw Temple.. at a festival in summer with a VERY loud sound system and fuck me some bits of it are as good as terrifying.
― piscesx, Saturday, 7 December 2013 05:36 (ten years ago) link