lol carry on then
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 03:30 (twelve years ago)
so many of the Slate writers/editors have between 3-5 kids. It's like they're breeding the next generation of link-bait generators.
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 10:40 (twelve years ago)
I guess this a continuation of Slate's war on dogs:
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/a_fine_whine/2013/05/i_hate_dogs_they_re_lounging_in_our_offices_and_licking_us_at_our_cafes.html
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 10:50 (twelve years ago)
manjoo is a sociopath for real
My first thought upon on reading that article was definitely not "this woman is right about dogs" and more "hahaha she has three kids, whatta dumbass, poor dog having to deal with this narcissistic asshole."
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 12:45 (twelve years ago)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/business_insider/2013/08/15/canned_beer_is_better_than_bottled_beer.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/drink/2012/03/don_t_believe_coors_and_budweiser_colder_isn_t_better_.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/drink/2013/05/hoppy_beer_is_awful_or_at_least_its_bitterness_is_ruining_craft_beer_s_reputation.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/scocca/2010/08/02/mosquitoes_prefer_people_with_beer_in_them.html
this is some jilted lover shit
― President Keyes, Friday, 16 August 2013 01:24 (twelve years ago)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/08/27/new_york_times_noise_essay_man_needs_quiet_in_order_to_think_great_thoughts.html
in which slate presumably accidentally publishes onion parody of slate
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 27 August 2013 20:37 (twelve years ago)
That one almost had me applauding. There had to be a bet involved, like lunch for whoever could turn the most innocuous article into a think piece on male privilege and female oppression. Katy Waldman is a very versatile writer and she ate free that day.
― All kinds of heinous things, Wednesday, 28 August 2013 08:39 (twelve years ago)
this is a reprint from business insider but slate's editors obv realized its rightful place was with them:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/business_insider/2013/08/31/new_york_city_s_next_mayor_shouldn_t_be_afraid_to_say_no.html
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Sunday, 1 September 2013 19:19 (twelve years ago)
slate's headlines have gotten SEO'd to death in the last year. e.g.
The Only Air Travel Tip That MattersThe Clearest Graphs You Will Ever See Refuting the Idea That Women Are Bad at MathI’ve Read 500 Cover Letters for Entry-Level Media Jobs: Here are 12 tips your career counselor hasn’t told you.
― wombspace (abanana), Sunday, 1 September 2013 19:45 (twelve years ago)
If you've written 500 cover letters seeking entry-level media jobs, would that not mean you've read the same number? By the logic of that headline, wouldn't this experience then qualify one to give advice?
― Aimless, Sunday, 1 September 2013 19:48 (twelve years ago)
Oy, that cover letter article, totally screams "dysfunctional office DO NOT APPLY HERE"
― Chuck_Tatum, Sunday, 1 September 2013 21:51 (twelve years ago)
i dunno that i'd call that SEO'd per se, seems more huffpostified with the ~information gap~ thing happening
― HOOS it because...of steen???? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 3 September 2013 17:47 (twelve years ago)
its not SEO'd at all its social'd
― max, Wednesday, 4 September 2013 01:22 (twelve years ago)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/09/03/the_onion_not_funny_a_slatepitches_special_report.html
The Onion is no longer funny because not as afraid as Slate of charges of liberal bias says local Dave Weigel
― President Keyes, Wednesday, 4 September 2013 02:11 (twelve years ago)
i love that it ends with a "c'mon guys" about the SEO op-ed
― da croupier, Wednesday, 4 September 2013 02:16 (twelve years ago)
"your coverage of syria is fucked up, oh and what was the joke in your description of our economic model"
― da croupier, Wednesday, 4 September 2013 02:18 (twelve years ago)
tbf the onion on Syria has been p fucking dark
― HOOS it because...of steen???? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 4 September 2013 12:23 (twelve years ago)
hes not wrong exactly, feels like theres been a preponderance of wish-fulfillment borowitz-style "Like If Your Liberal!" stuff. (all much higher quality than borowitz or the currant it goes w/o saying). my sense tho is that theyre as good and diverse as ever and i (& maybe wiegel) just *see* more of it b/c thats the stuff that blows up facebook/twitter
― max, Wednesday, 4 September 2013 12:42 (twelve years ago)
imagine how much of a jerk u had to be to arrange pro-war demonstrations in college in 2003
Last week, a group of students at Northwestern University in Illinois showed up at an anti-war protest to make a point that there is more than one viewpoint on this issue and that the media hasn't covered both sides.Northwestern University junior David Weigel — also editor-in-chief of the campus' weekly Northwestern Chronicle — organized a group of about 25 people over e-mail to counter an anti-war protest on campus last week.Weigel said students who want to oppose the anti-war — what he calls an "anti-American" movement — should invite speakers to campus and should take part in rallies to get the message out to the media that there is another corner of the debate."Being there at an anti-war protest, it may seem silly," he said, "but that has the effect of not letting the media treat it like a burgeoning anti-war movement …if there is no pro-America presence whatsoever, it's very easy for American reporters to just toe the anti-American line."
Northwestern University junior David Weigel — also editor-in-chief of the campus' weekly Northwestern Chronicle — organized a group of about 25 people over e-mail to counter an anti-war protest on campus last week.
Weigel said students who want to oppose the anti-war — what he calls an "anti-American" movement — should invite speakers to campus and should take part in rallies to get the message out to the media that there is another corner of the debate.
"Being there at an anti-war protest, it may seem silly," he said, "but that has the effect of not letting the media treat it like a burgeoning anti-war movement …if there is no pro-America presence whatsoever, it's very easy for American reporters to just toe the anti-American line."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,79954,00.html
related: thread needs maureen tkacik's classic http://thebaffler.com/past/omniscient_gentlemen_of_the_atlantic
― zvookster, Wednesday, 4 September 2013 19:04 (twelve years ago)
this slate redesign is terrible
― President Keyes, Monday, 23 September 2013 10:01 (twelve years ago)
Ha, I came here to post those words verbatim.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 23 September 2013 19:12 (twelve years ago)
cover story in two days: "everyone hates the new slate redesign. here's why they're all wrong."
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 23 September 2013 19:14 (twelve years ago)
haha assumed the hate above was just standard complaints anything gets after a redesign but wow this really is a mess
― balls, Monday, 23 September 2013 19:31 (twelve years ago)
Slate's mechanic "you're wrong/you're doing it wrong" contrarian tic of a stance as of late is so clearly a dictum from up high it's embarrassing.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 23 September 2013 22:28 (twelve years ago)
The homepage is fucked, but it's always been bad. The one article page I read (on an iPad) seemed fine though.
I'm not sure why people keep wanting responsive design to happen! Don't think I've seen it done well for a magazine site yet.
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 23 September 2013 22:30 (twelve years ago)
it looks better on ipad than a computer screen
― President Keyes, Monday, 23 September 2013 22:40 (twelve years ago)
well i guess i can stop visiting slate. they've been pretty bad for a few years now, and this pretty much cements their worthlessness.
― idembanana (abanana), Tuesday, 24 September 2013 03:04 (twelve years ago)
Has the writing for Salon.com always been this bad? Never been a heavy reader but I recall being impressed and feeling smart for reading their stuff 10-12 years ago and now I find most of it awful. Has it degraded or have I gained/lost taste?
― All kinds of heinous things, Tuesday, 24 September 2013 08:37 (twelve years ago)
balls otm. Buzzfeed meets tetris.
― Marvel's Agents of S.O.U.T.H.S.H.I.E.L.D.S (sktsh), Tuesday, 24 September 2013 09:56 (twelve years ago)
Why Low Winter Sun has already surpassed Breaking Bad
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 24 September 2013 10:04 (twelve years ago)
Yeah, I'm a Hipster. You Should Thank Me For It.
thanks chump
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 24 September 2013 10:43 (twelve years ago)
Breaking Bad: You're Watching It Wrong.
Calcium: Why You Don't Need It
Forget Mars: Why We Need a Base on the Sun
Killed By Chemical Weapons: Not as Bad as It Sounds
Does Thanksgiving Dinner Really Need Turkey?
Why Jimmy Falon is a Genius
The Eagles: America's Greatest Band
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 24 September 2013 11:59 (twelve years ago)
Slate has resisted any kind of sane layout for more than ten years now, why change.
― Call me Shitmael (CompuPost), Tuesday, 24 September 2013 12:36 (twelve years ago)
But I don't think this Tetris.0 design is any worse than the others. Kinda wish all of these sites had a little Wayback Design button that would just turn everything into a reverse-chron text list of articles. Although now I guess you'd have to wade through way more bs to find what you're looking for.
Oh well, I don't really go to Slate anymore, so the fuck do I care. As long as Hang Up And Listen comes out on Monday afternoons and Political Gabfest on friday morning, Slate can continue not figuring out how to design theirs own website.
― Call me Shitmael (CompuPost), Tuesday, 24 September 2013 12:43 (twelve years ago)
It's not Tetris, they've tumblr-ized their homepage.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 24 September 2013 13:59 (twelve years ago)
the worst thing about the redesign is how prominently it sticks those "from around the web" links that fool you into clicking them... such a sleazy practice and every news site does it these days it seems
― socki (s1ocki), Tuesday, 24 September 2013 14:17 (twelve years ago)
Dunno, just went over there on my laptop, got the urge to let the two middle boxes at the top fall down the whitespace underneath and watch the Hipster article, Yglesias piece, and sponsored content go *poof* at the bottom.
New Slate page should pivot and add Korobeiniki.mid as background browsing music.
― Call me Shitmael (CompuPost), Tuesday, 24 September 2013 14:22 (twelve years ago)
content aside I would say the manner in which Salon runs their Twitter feed is by far the most irritating out of these three
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 24 September 2013 17:46 (twelve years ago)
Classic Salon-in-2013 pitch
http://www.salon.com/2013/10/27/the_dangerous_transphobia_of_roald_dahls_matilda/
― Deafening silence (DL), Thursday, 7 November 2013 20:35 (twelve years ago)
actually laughed out loud at the last line of that.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 7 November 2013 21:10 (twelve years ago)
well with this
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/11/the-mcrib-enjoy-your-symptom/281413/
starting here
“Pork” is a generous term, since the McRib has traditionally been fashioned from otherwise unmarketable pig parts like tripe, heart, and stomach, material that is not only cheap but also easier to mold and bind into a coherent, predetermined shape. McDonald’s accurately lists the patty’s primary ingredient as “boneless pork,” although even that’s a fairly strong euphemism. Presumably few of the restaurant’s patrons would line up for a Pressed McTripe.Despite its abhorrence, the McRib bears remarkable similarity to another, more widely accepted McDonald’s product, the Chicken McNugget.
Despite its abhorrence, the McRib bears remarkable similarity to another, more widely accepted McDonald’s product, the Chicken McNugget.
but end up here
Sometimes the things we believe aren’t out there in plain view, but hidden away inside. The French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan gives the name objet a to the thing that elicits desire. In French the phrase means “object other” (the a stands for autre). For Lacan, our behaviors themselves may be knowable, but the causes of those behaviors aren’t always so. Objet a is not the object of desire (the thing we desire), but the thing that causes the desire to come into being (the cause of a desire for that thing). The philosopher Slavoj Žižek sometimes calls objet a the stain or defect in the world that motivates a belief or action.
― j., Thursday, 14 November 2013 00:58 (twelve years ago)
… i didn't expect it to…
― j., Thursday, 14 November 2013 00:59 (twelve years ago)
oh, that's why, it's ian bogost
― j., Thursday, 14 November 2013 01:37 (twelve years ago)
lol i enjoyed it. good read.
― Mordy , Thursday, 14 November 2013 01:55 (twelve years ago)
what do you think of ib j.?
― lollercoaster of rove (s.clover), Thursday, 14 November 2013 02:46 (twelve years ago)
i think he hasn't had any very good molecular gastronomy or he wouldn't confuse it for a cheeto.
on the other hand the article has a great punchline.
― lollercoaster of rove (s.clover), Thursday, 14 November 2013 02:50 (twelve years ago)
i don't know, he seems like yet another huckster/hustler, but i do recall glancing through one of his things and not being turned off
― j., Thursday, 14 November 2013 03:29 (twelve years ago)
i like him. he seems like he's into cool things.
― Mordy , Thursday, 14 November 2013 03:39 (twelve years ago)
That was good, the kind of thing I miss since I started wasting too much time on forums and not enough reading essays.
Paged through most of his author archive too. This hit home -- http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/11/hyperemployment-or-the-exhausting-work-of-the-technology-user/281149/
― Plasmon, Thursday, 14 November 2013 04:29 (twelve years ago)