Let's talk about Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman, and how unbelievably fucked up this all is

go troll elsewhere

clover i'm really struggling to see what point you're making that you think other people itt don't get

best bond film: a) goldracist b) the spy who hated black teens c) moon-why-isn't-there-a-white-history-month

itt: people who aren't ian flemming fans

oh man. checkmate. (hangs head in shame)

I sort of get that the whole legal specifics conversation is also a way to process what happened--like I dunno, the different ways people process grief after a break-up or death of a loved one. Rationalizing, trying to understand. It may even be valid in large part, and I think the conversation about how courts cannot legislate social change is key, and our dream that they will mete out moral justice is misplaced and bound to end badly.

But I also think it's a mistake to be lawyering people whose anger is just. That while it may not be difficult to get people to say, I'm angry with the jury, or I'm angry because the acquittal was unjust, or similar things that aren't really factually applicable, what they're really angry about is that black bodies are not welcome in public spaces and will be acted against and that is a righteous reason to be furious and I am not going to try to blunt anyone's fury about that.

otm

clover i'm really struggling to see what point you're making that you think other people itt don't get

― BIG HOOS aka the denigrated boogeyman (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, July 15, 2013 4:02 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i am in the zing phase of the grief process.

no apparently you're still in the denial stage

also has become "fact" that GZ was getting beaten to a pulp, getting the living shit beaten out of him, his head was being slammed against the concrete repeatedly, he had no other option. So...just a few cuts from that? no concussion? refused a hospital visit? was aware enough to draw and fire his weapon? really?

http://images.christianpost.com/full/56944/george-zimmerman-broken-nose.jpg?w=262

He took a beating of some kind.

he looks a long way from dead

someone in IM with me just said "but why was he wearing a hoodie, it's not cold in Florida". I just...wtf

xpost yeah, the description of the beating George gave doesn't match the very real but also unimpressive photos. one of the medical examiners said his injuries were minor (though I presume they meant the head wounds).

Feel like many of the pro-Zimmerman faction focus on the 'wound' videos as evidence without asking themselves why George was creepily stalking a dude who had every right to be where he is, or identifying himself as a Neighborhood Watch captain.

Obviously Zimmerman's story was wildly exaggerated, but it wasn't just "a few cuts" either. If he'd just had a couple scrapes this would be a much more outrageous verdict imo.

this is why concealed carry laws are dangerous and not conducive to a peaceful society. gun rights people would tell you "see look! GZ's gun saved his life. unfortunate that his attacker had to lose his own life, but so be it. kill or be killed." and even if you believe that horseshit wouldn't you ever think hmm maybe if GZ didn't have the courage his gun gave him, he would've never approached TM and the only encounter that would've happened would be with the police? (not that the possibility of getting shot by them instead of GZ is non-existent but it'd have to be far less)

xp have you ever seen someone get their head pounded it to pavement? cause I have actually. they are knocked out almost immediately. just seems fishy that he was getting his head pounded in repeatedly on concrete and had no concussion, refused medical care.

think we all agree he had injuries, but that for whatever reason, Zimm's supporters kept using these pics as a 'gotcha' moment when it clearly wasn't one.

I think part of the disconnect from reality is that most of the Zimmerman fans are pretty contemptuous of reasonable doubt or lawyerly arguments in general, so this only makes sense for them as pure innocence.

that's fairly otm for people in these parts, at least. I got in an argument with an old HS friend who I recently ran into again, who, while he didn't explicitly support Zimmerman, implied that even if Zimmerman did initiate the squabble, he should have been allowed to defend himself with lethal force without consequence if he was indeed being 'beaten' by Trayvon.

This turn of conversation makes me want to tell SOMETIMES YOU JUST GET BEATEN UP, HOW IS THIS NEWS, IT'S BAD BUT IT'S NOT MURDER. NB I have never been beaten up though.

if black people cared about gun violence they'd stop making that violent hippity hop music DO YOU SEE

my only encounter with this shit was someone on facebook linking to an article about how Trayvon Martin may have done lean. Teenagers doing drugs!

Ive been beaten up, id have happily pulled a gun on them tbfh

nb i didnt chase them first and pick a fight with them

I haven't followed the details of Zimmerman's testimony. Did he admit to following Martin and telling him to stop?

he didn't testify iirc

*statements to police, that is

one of the most heart-wrenching things i saw on twitter saturday night was an alternate timeline where the whole incident ended with zimmerman saying, "ok" to the dispatcher telling him that they didn't need him to follow martin. if only it could've been that simple.

No pleading the fifth in civil court. If there is a civil case brought, he will be compelled to testify.

that is not correct

I think in his statements he didn't admit to following him at any time. One of the several lies in his version of things.

I think dispatches should now be trained to be more direct and assertive in that type of direction to a caller. "Do not follow this person. Return to you vehicle and remain there until police arrive. Do you understand, sir? I repeat...", rather than mmmyeahh ok we're not gonna need you to go ahead and come in on Saturday.

however I think the difference may be that the plaintiffs in a civil proceeding are entitled to point to the fact that a person refuses to testify and to draw inferences from it, whereas in a criminal case you can't be like "If Zimmerman is so innocent, why does he refuse to take the stand and tell us what REALLY happened?!" xp

I still don't understand how it has become so clear to many people that TM attacked GM. "These assholes always get away ------>>>> I'm going to make sure this one doesn't. "Why are you following me??...Get off me!" ---->>>>GZ attempted to detain TM so he wouldn't be another one that got away.

xpost
Yeah, I guess that's what I meant, he doesn't have to testify, but not testifying can be held against him in the decision. He is metaphorically compelled to testify, because if he doesn't it could harm him even more.

Oh fun, I just saw that "Trayvoning" is a thing now.

Is that a euphemism for "murdering?"

trayvoning = planking in a hoodie holding an iced tea and skittles

please be joking

http://gawker.com/george-zimmerman-juror-b37-hates-media-called-trayvon-787873533

Juries, ladies and gentlemen. The American way.

Trayvonning started right after the shooting fyi. Not new

I would not joke about something like that because it's not funny. it's a thing.

if I saw someone trayvonning I would stomp on some extremely painful part of his/her body, but I get the feeling nobody would do that in public around here

holy shit. :( if there were ever a scenario that needed a shitty offensive meme any less, it's this one.

I think "jury of your peers" is a nice idea in theory, but the one time I served on a jury I was angered and disgusted by how cavalierly the other jurors took their duty. They were more concerned about getting home in time for dinner than deliberating and coming to a just verdict. It was "this guy is obviously an asshole, let's say he's guilty" rather than ok what are the facts, what has been proven, what was he actually charged with, etc. Ugh I get mad and depressed thinking about it.

I've been called for duty three times, and I've never made it to a trial. Dismissed after voir dire when a plea was agreed to once, dismissed without even getting to voir dire the other two.

Welcome to my America. I've been living here for forty years.

It's been interesting and infuriating to read the reactions on this thread after mostly following the aftermath of the verdict through black twitter. The way most of you are processing this feels utterly alien to me.

Care to expand?

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6duwsi3gP1rnpq4go1_400.gif

http://black.twitter.com ?

srsly get depressed and furious every time i read about this. what a fucked-up country.

I think "jury of your peers" is a nice idea in theory, but the one time I served on a jury I was angered and disgusted by how cavalierly the other jurors took their duty.

i do wonder how anyone could consider an all-white jury a fair and impartial group of "peers" in a case where race is so obviously a factor.