You Want Superman Revamp? [Also the Man of Steel (2013) thread]

Jor-El has this robot called Kelex [voiced by Carla Gugino]

whoa

yeah, i kept wondering who the voice was as I was watching the movie. nice cameo

We have already had a cinematic armed polar bear throw down in a terrible movie (golden compass)

anti-human cinema feels like a pop thing right now...?

― i didn't even give much of a fuck that you were mod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 14:51 (6 days ago) Permalink

Good.

huzzah!

looking forward to superman/daftpunk team-up to fight braniac.

I finally watched this tonight, and I'll stan for pretty much any superhero film - I even found things to like in Green Lantern, believe it or not - but this was a gigantic ball of suck from start to finish. I think I might even have walked out of the cinema if I'd paid to see it.

Villain woman saved it for me ;)

i made it through 75% maybe? p boring movie

Waiting for rifftrax

http://i.minus.com/ibxiQCxiv9P991.gif

cockships best part of movie imo

Russell Crowe dying was the best, but that's not exclusive to this film so

http://www.radiognome.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/fleshgordon1.jpg

i liked the first 15 minutes and its weird hysterical scifi stuff

*krshhst* send in reinforcements, over
http://i1354.photobucket.com/albums/q686/tinyservants/penishelicopter_zps991b9f2f.gif

Finally saw this, not much I can say that hasn't already been said, movie is eminently forgettable. Krypton stuff was OK, best scene of Clark was him getting overwhelmed by his powers in school. Noticed this way upthread:

What HfA said about the ending. It's not Reeve, but it's quiet humor that works. I actually really liked the fact that they make Lois Not An Idiot because she doesn't fall for the glasses thing for a second.

― Ned Raggett, Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:30 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Lois knew he was Clark Kent from about the hour mark on!

yeah, definitely one of the better choices they made that she discovers his secret ID off the bat

Exact same thing happens in Green Lantern. I'd have enjoyed it more in Man of Steel if it wasn't one of many indications that Snyder, Goyer and Nolan were basically ashamed to be making a Superman movie and fighting against the character every step of the way.

i figure a real superman would have as much chance of being overcome with bitterness as being totally righteous. unlike, say, batman, who's really just a good samaritan in costume, superman has real powers. and there's always terrible things happening. if he's really trying to save everyone, he'd never get any sleep or time for himself; someone is always endangered. he'd probably either go mad from the inability to save everyone, everywhere, or he'd say "f--k it," or he'd become totally bitter at everyone's constant demands of him. now that's the superman story worth telling.

p.s., my wife and i just saw most of the 2013 man of steel movie. it's kind of boring, cuz superman is kind of boring.

Feel like anything can be boring, in the hands of the wrong filmmakers.

it's kind of boring, cuz superman is kind of boring.

you think All-Star and For The Man and Siegel and Weisinger covers are boring?

This was a decent movie, nothing special but I don't really get the "worst movie ever produced" reaction on this thread, particularly in a world where the Affleck Daredevil movie exists.

fuck that, Superman's awesome and Superman II is one of my fav flicks ever.

this movie blew because it was just Superman Pathos for the first half and video game action for the second half. I do think it's kinda LOL that it takes presumably hundreds of thousands of civilians dying before Supes thinks it's a good idea to break his 'not killing people' rule.

(xpost)

it wasn't off the rails terrible, no. It was well made in parts and I liked the opening. I think part of my annoyance was that I had many friends that crapped on Iron Man 3 over really nitpicky shit and stanned for this and it was like...really?

Well that's dumb, IM3 was way more fun/enjoyable than this

I liked the opening but otherwise Man Of Steel is one of the worst films I've ever sat through

totally. idk, I'm generally one that hates mining people's thought processes when they like something I don't cuz it feels a bit condescending, but fuck it i'm doing it anyway....

obv it wasn't a critical success, but in regards to the audience-drooling, part of me wonders if some of their love for this film was propped up by how middling Superman Returns was. Superman flicks were events in the 80s, even the shitty ones (I remember seeing Superman IV in the theatre as a 7 year old and being excited about it). The franchise was resurrected in the mid-2000s for this slight, kinda-emo Superman film that has only tentative connections to the rest of the film series and now is relegated to the 5.99 or less bin at MovieStop, and summarily forgotten.

I think it made a lot of people hungry for a more substantive Supes film and this one dared to redo the origin story and had a long-lasting action climax that had more heft than Brandon Routh's final boss battle with a chunk of kryptonite.

(x-post)

Will say that The logic holds up in that the initial esteem for Superman Returns Owing Child Support was somewhat in response to The Quest For Peace

MAN OF SHIT

though the logic of "Superman flicks were events in the 80s, even the shitty ones" being "(I remember seeing Superman IV in the theatre as a 7 year old and being excited about it)" shows that we're all a little skewed on the subject, imo

who can forget when the simpsons had kids excited about seeing the event film barton fink

just fyi

Superman box office: $134m
Superman II b.o.: 108m
Superman III b.o.: 60m
Superman IV b.o.: 15.5m

ouch! knew it was a turkey but didn't know Supes IV did THAT bad!

adjusted for inflation i & ii are still the biggest superman movies ever, but III & IV are well below the reboots

the wikipedia page for peace is awesome

In 1983, following the mixed-to-negative reaction to Superman III, Reeve and the producers, Alexander Salkind and his son Ilya, assumed that the Superman films had run their course.[9] Reeve was slated to make a cameo in 1984's Supergirl but was unavailable; the film was a box-office failure. Two years later, Ilya Salkind sold the Superman franchise to Golan & Globus of Cannon Films.[10]

According to Jon Cryer, who played Lex Luthor's nephew Lenny, Reeve had taken him aside just before the release and told him it was going to be "terrible". Although Cryer enjoyed working with Reeve and Gene Hackman, Cryer claimed that Cannon ran out of money ahead of time and ultimately released an unfinished movie.[11]

In Reeve's autobiography Still Me, he described filming Superman IV:

We were also hampered by budget constraints and cutbacks in all departments. Cannon Films had nearly thirty projects in the works at the time, and Superman IV received no special consideration. For example, Konner and Rosenthal wrote a scene in which Superman lands on 42nd Street and walks down the double yellow lines to the United Nations, where he gives a speech. If that had been a scene in Superman I, we would actually have shot it on 42nd Street. Dick Donner would have choreographed hundreds of pedestrians and vehicles and cut to people gawking out of office windows at the sight of Superman walking down the street like the Pied Piper. Instead, we had to shoot at an industrial park in England in the rain with about a hundred extras, not a car in sight, and a dozen pigeons thrown in for atmosphere. Even if the story had been brilliant, I don't think that we could ever have lived up to the audience's expectations with this approach.

this movie blew because it was just Superman Pathos for the first half and video game action for the second half.

― getting strange ass all around the globe (Neanderthal), Sunday, April 27, 2014

this is a lot of it, but the other primary objection for me goes deeper: the superman character is, fundamentally, boring. like i said, there are ways to make it interesting (to me, obv.; YMMV), but you just can't take the character that way.

squandering that franchise is pretty sad but they didn't know what to do with superhero films in the 80's.

to think if they'd sold to Golan Globus a few years earlier we coulda had a Supes-Delta Force crossover

i honestly don't think they blew it with Man Of Steel, in that now that his character is established, the sequel could restore his "saves everyone, even the puppy" boy scout qualities, introduce an interesting bete noire in Luthor, and be The Dark Knight to Steel's Batman Begins. Unfortunately they've decided they have to introduce not only a new batman but an entire justice league in the same movie they try to make people like Superman again. Good luck, guys!

why is superman's character interesting? he's basically all-powerful, and a complete do-gooder.

it's an immigrant story - he's a literal alien who's bought the american dream more than most born in american. put him up against luthor - a corruptor of that dream who doesn't think superman has any right to it, and uses techniques that superman can't shoot a heat ray at - and you can get some drama there.

not that zack snyder can conceive of any of this beyond the level of a levi's ad

it's an immigrant story with an all-powerful immigrant who is quickly loved and relied-upon by the entire country he repeatedly saves. there's a fascinating immigrant-story to tell involving a fictitious superhero, but this doesn't sound like it.

they really need to get away from Superman as Jesus IMO

U mad superman is the ultimate immigrant story