Amazon Kindle (ebook thingy)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2885 of them)

so it does - rip kindle

ice cr?m, Monday, 16 February 2009 16:31 (seventeen years ago)

ya, too bad

s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 16:34 (seventeen years ago)

hope they're flammable

eman, Monday, 16 February 2009 16:53 (seventeen years ago)

http://thekindle.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/oprahkindle.jpg

eman, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:02 (seventeen years ago)

What do books smell like?

i'm shy (Abbott), Monday, 16 February 2009 18:26 (seventeen years ago)

Victory.

EZ Snappin, Monday, 16 February 2009 18:27 (seventeen years ago)

Oh my gosh!

i'm shy (Abbott), Monday, 16 February 2009 18:28 (seventeen years ago)

http://eshop.webindia123.com/images/prodimg/large/COM0225_1lg.jpg

EZ Snappin, Monday, 16 February 2009 18:30 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.schools.pinellas.k12.fl.us/gallery/variety/bookworm.gif

eman, Monday, 16 February 2009 18:40 (seventeen years ago)

For what it's worth, I just bought a Sony PRS-505 and am madly in love with it. For the most part, I download classics from Gutenberg. Reading them on my laptop was no fun, though. The e-ink displays are well worth the investment.

brightscreamer, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 04:21 (seventeen years ago)

i can't fuck with this until it can fit in my pocket.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 04:28 (seventeen years ago)

But then the display would be too small. :(

brightscreamer, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 04:31 (seventeen years ago)

not if the text was nice and big

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 04:35 (seventeen years ago)

i mean, like a 33 1/3 book fits v. nicely in my pocket. if you could make it that size, i'd buy one in a sec

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 04:35 (seventeen years ago)

Consider it done!

brightscreamer, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 04:46 (seventeen years ago)

haha

s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 05:48 (seventeen years ago)

eventually this might be made of some high-tech plastic fabric (pencil-thick is fine) so you can just roll it up and put it in your pocket.

brains, hand-rolled (gnarly sceptre), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 10:42 (seventeen years ago)

fold out screen iphone attachment

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 14:02 (seventeen years ago)

xpost, like a fruit rollup you can read!

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 14:38 (seventeen years ago)

they already have those

to inspire myself, i turn to myself (sunny successor), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:06 (seventeen years ago)

I'd love to have a Kindle that stored music instead of books...

henry s, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:19 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

TBH I wish it wasn't so expensive and it was available in Belgium. It seems awesome. I love to knit'n' read and this seems great as a replacement (for books). I can sort of read books but it's hard doing paperbacks (while knitting). Kindle seems great cause you can voice activate it (?), no?

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 26 March 2009 20:33 (seventeen years ago)

No... :( It will read to you, but you can't control it with your voice. Although some people turn on the reading feature, but turn down the volume, and use it as an automatic page-turner. It is nice to be able to use it for reading with one hand, too.

schwantz, Thursday, 26 March 2009 21:37 (seventeen years ago)

three weeks pass...

Do they finally have a backlight on these things?

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 17:51 (seventeen years ago)

I reckon most book purchasers are too attached to the book as object for iPhone apps to ever really dent sales.

― Ronmael de Canarias (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 17:49 (9 minutes ago)

Not to continue this derailment, but I'm sure there were a lot of record store owners saying the exact same thing about 9 or 10 years ago.

(xpost)

― homage is parody gone sour (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 17:51 (5 minutes ago)

Apples and oranges. Reading anything at length is significantly less pleasant on an electronic screen than a printed page. Varying technologies have been around for ages without making much of a dint in book sales. Most music listeners other than hifi guys didn't care much what format they consume their music in,

Ronmael de Canarias (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:02 (seventeen years ago)

i couldn't agree more

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:02 (seventeen years ago)

Personally, I agree. But I don't think we can speak for everyone. I know of two friends of mine, both voracious readers, who hate the Kindle but would love something digital to take its place to allow them to haul multiple books around at all times and to reduce the amount of shelf space books take up. I think, as more people spend more time staring at screens, this might change. Do I want it to? Hell no.

homage is parody gone sour (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:06 (seventeen years ago)

I haven't seen the kindle but my dad has a handheld reader (sony maybe?) and it's pretty awesome. never wanted one until I saw it tbh.

the problem historically has been that the resolution of paper is much better than the resolution of mobile devices but that gap is closing and will continue to close.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:09 (seventeen years ago)

i wouldn't trust anyone who would decide to do all their reading on one of these things

macarooni (omar little), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

Exactly, these things are going to continue to get easier and easier on the eyes, so I think one would have to be willfully difficult to just shut down and stick to the mantra that books will always be safe.

homage is parody gone sour (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

this shit just seems a little dystopian and boring

macarooni (omar little), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:11 (seventeen years ago)

the problem historically has been that the resolution of paper is much better than the resolution of mobile devices but that gap is closing and will continue to close.

Exactly, these things are going to continue to get easier and easier on the eyes

i really have a hard time believing this

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:12 (seventeen years ago)

rip ballard

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

xp

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

Am I right in thinking these kinds of thing are pretty big in Japan tho so maybe I'm being Westerncentric?

Ronmael de Canarias (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:14 (seventeen years ago)

i really have a hard time believing this

yeah, so did I until I saw one. it looked like a printed page.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

it's just kinda funny because i think the people who are hardcore pushing this particular technology have no real grasp about how the little random ephermal shit like books makes life often kinda great (or they don't really care.)

macarooni (omar little), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

hmm. i've seen and played with a kindle, it doesn't look like a printed page at all.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:19 (seventeen years ago)

Omar OTM, but don't some people say the same about records? The little random shit like pulling a record out of the sleeve, scanning the liner notes, etc?

homage is parody gone sour (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:20 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i guess i don't understand the need to do shit like this, i guess the thought is: "we have the technology to replicate the printed page on a computer screen," like who the fuck cares? books work pretty well.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:21 (seventeen years ago)

The inconvenience of records (lack of portability for example) is much greater than the inconvenience of PB books (they get crinkly in my bag.)

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:21 (seventeen years ago)

yeah but music as something to listen to "on the go" changed that decades ago and records were never the ideal way in which to listen to music in that way, obviously. but books are essentially perfect as is, it's not like you're stuck only reading them in a single room.

macarooni (omar little), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:22 (seventeen years ago)

I admit I am totally the last person to care about this though. I buy most of my books used or remaindered for like $2-5. Kindle or whatever is going to have get awfully cheap to make me even thing about picking it up.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:23 (seventeen years ago)

I wasn't talking about the kindle but some other ebook reader

xp

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:23 (seventeen years ago)

I'm not disagreeing with you at all, I'm just trying to point out that not everyone holds the physical book as sacred as we do.

homage is parody gone sour (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:24 (seventeen years ago)

I mean can Kindle replicate the Boris Vallejo cover and musty smell of this Frederick Pohl novel I got for $1.50. I think not.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:24 (seventeen years ago)

i think a lot more people hold the book sacred than ever held (or hold) a record sacred, though

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

which is kind of scary imo xxpost

macarooni (omar little), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

I wasn't talking about the kindle but some other ebook reader

yeah, the sony reader, right? i mean, i'd like to look at it too and check it out but i just don't see it happening. who knows, maybe this thread will get revived in five years and we'll all have a good laugh when we read it on our personal portable reading devices instead of a computer etc etc

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:26 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i mean i went to a bookstore, inspired by the recent graphic design thread, and bought about 15 old penguin paperbacks for $25, all with these amazing mid-century designs on the covers. that sort of thing can't be replicated at all. and also, regarding the record comparison, records i think are going to outlast CDs and it won't even be close.

macarooni (omar little), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:27 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.