DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived post-Murdoch era

This may yet be of genuine public interest depending on how badly they played Cameron.

Woah

Have they the real cameron trussed up somewhere? For how long?

oh hey i just arrived in the us for my hols, has this story broken open in the uk yet?

I'm just an American citizen with no real interest or knowledge of UK politics, but I hope it turns out to be SamCam and the redhead.

SamCam doesn't shag oiks, silly.

That's why David was allegedly so shocked, obvs.

heard from a diff source the ac stands for a certain someone's older brother. are we 100% sure it's the two red-top hatemongers?

Heard that alternative rumour too. Would make a lot more sense in 'big shocking secret' terms.

I had not heard that! But it's interesting who her lawyer is...

We would put a limit on how long anyone who can work, can stay unemployed, without getting and taking a job.

Some people say the jobs just aren't there, Miliband says. He disagrees.

I say with a national mission, led from the top of government, we can get thousands of businesses, tens of thousands, in the country behind the idea.

Not sure getting business onside is the major barrier to workfare, tbh.

Currently, after two years of work, someone is entitled to “Contributory Jobseeker’s Allowance” without a means test for six months.

They get £72 per week.

Whether they’ve worked for two years or forty years.
Two years of work is a short period to gain entitlement to extra help.

And £72 is in no sense a proper recognition of how much somebody who has worked for many decades has paid into the system.

As so many people have told me: “I have worked all my life, I have never had a day on benefits, and no real help is there when I needed it.”

So I have asked our Policy Review to look at whether, without spending extra money, we can change the system.

Asking people to work longer – say 5 years instead of 2 - before they qualify for extra support.

Glad we're finally narrowing down that definition of "the deserving poor".

nice to see the party making a play for all those disaffected voters oh never mind

£72 is in no sense a proper recognition of how much somebody who has worked for many decades has paid into the system.

Indeed, let's double it then

hang on, that's not going to cut it, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THESE CUNTS THERE ARE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO WON'T VOTE BECAUSE THEY DON'T FEEL REPRESENTED BY THE MAJOR PARTIES AND THIS PUBLIC SCHOOL FUCKWIT IS STILL CHASING THE DEAD-EYED TORY UNDECIDED SCUMFUCK VOTE???

TBF he's being a comprehensive school fuckwit here.

Also these millions don't live in the right constituencies

i wasn't sure whether he want to a comp or not, i was just making outraged classist assumptions as one does when the corpse of the only party that's ever had any connect to the working class gets skull-fucked by Tory apologists like this

i mean i honestly do believe that most of us are proletarians now but sometimes the knife twist is too sharp

There are many, many working class people who agree whole-heartedly with this though.

that isn't the point, at all

I know, fuck them where they breathe too

Well, it sort of is, if the Labour party is going to represent the working class

a party's job should be to represent and form the aspirations of its political support, education is a part of that, taking a stance is part of that

it's okay to tell people they're wrong and attempt to show them why

Fair enough, it takes courage/conviction to do that I guess and Ed Miliband, well, yeah I see what you're saying

also, it's quite possible to belong to a class and have no class consciousness. historically, it's probably the norm rather than the exception.

Some of the points he's making, that you can't really get 'welfare' spending down without tackling low wages, lack of social housing and unemployment, are OTM and sensible and I'd hope he actually ends up doing something about all that. But it's tied up in this dog-whistling nonsense which helps to fuel right-wing myths as much as anything else.

That's what's so frustrating. He outlines why the current situation is unfair to workers, why it's wrong to demonise the unemployed and why getting more people into work is going to do more for the benefits budget than anything else, and then comes up with a load of half-baked Thatcherite solutions.

OTM x2

He's so inept it makes me weep.

http://www.rsablogs.org.uk/2013/enterprise/labour-puts-gun-head-welfare/

The point about welfare being effectively privatised is perceptive here.

"My sense is that welfare is now effectively privatised for many if not most - people fund themselves through credit cards, subsidisation from their partners, and small pots of savings and mortgage insurance."

These people are not the same people I think of when I think of welfare. The people I think of do not have credit cards or partners with money or savings or mortgages or insurance. They have dole money that is being cut if they have spare rooms. They have food banks. They have loan sharks.

yr partner doesn't need to have money if you live w/ them. this is the source of a lot of grief amongst ppl I know.

I dunno, the whole point of the welfare state is that it's intended to support everyone, not just the very poorest (although it's very rhetorically useful to Thatcherites of all colours to have people think the opposite).

The Tories were probably high-fiving each other throughout Miliband's speech.

i just heard the interview on the radio, i think they cut the bit where he explains how he's gonna get the private sector to come up with millions of living wage jobs

Or get landlords to reduce rents

Also it's just idiotic to believe that they are ever going to be able to out-hardman the Tories on benefits.

tough on benefits, tough on the causes of benefits

it must be really disappointing when you give a lengthy explanation of why benefits recipients aren't 100 per cent to blame for their worthless leech-like existence and then the news just runs with "Labour to cap benefits" as a headline. they'll be cross about that.

The benefit cap and the removal of universal child benefit etc are all part of a shitty recent phenomenon of opposition parties pledging to stick to the spending plans of the current government* for x years and refusing to see any policy or law as being reversible.

*I blame Tony Blair, even though he was lying when he said it.

Think you mean Gordon Brown, even though he was lying when he said it.

I think it was Tony's idea as part of the whole Becoming Electable thing.

Possibly, becoming unelectable was more Gordon's speciality

£73 a week for anyone who isnt a 19 yr old or whatever is pretty shitty

£73 a week for NOT DOING THE RIGHT THING. I'm suprised they don't cull them and have done with it.

The Tories SNP were probably high-fiving each other throughout Miliband's speech.

£72 a week, but if you get sanctioned for the most minor thing, you get £42 as a hardship payment and that can be over 3 months.

£72 seemed quite high to me at first, cos 10 years ago I was on the dole for a year and got £53 a week, but turns out according to an inflation calculator it's actually less in real terms (not by very much, but still, I wasn't expecting inflation to have made that much difference).

(when I say quite high, I mean relative to how much I got, not that it's a lot to live on or anything like that, but I wonder if there's a psychological effect there that makes people think benefit claimants are better off than they actually are)

I wonder if there's a psychological effect there that makes people think benefit claimants are better off than they actually are

Other than stupidity and malice?

There's def. something irrational that kicks in when times are hard, it's how you end up with Nazis et al.

Would maybe say ignorance rather than stupidity, but that's a minor quibble